Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) y = (1/4)x + 3 — The given line has gradient −4, so the perpendicular gradient is the negative reciprocal, 1/4. Since (0, 3) is the y-intercept, the perpendicular line is y = (1/4)x + 3. Distractor routes: y = −4x + 3 uses the original line's own gradient instead of the perpendicular gradient, only changing the intercept for the new point. y = (−1/4)x + 3 takes the reciprocal of −4 but forgets to change its sign, so it is not the true negative reciprocal. y = 4x + 3 negates the gradient −4 but does not take its reciprocal, giving 4 instead of 1/4.
- (b) 8 kg — The cost above the flat £5 charge is 17 − 5 = £12. At £2 per kg, this covers 12 ÷ 2 = 6 kg above the first 2 kg, so the total weight is 2 + 6 = 8 kg. Dividing the full £17 by £2 per kg without first taking off the £5 flat charge gives 17 ÷ 2 = 8.5 kg. Taking off the £5 flat charge and dividing by £2 per kg, but forgetting to add back the 2 kg that the flat charge covers, gives 12 ÷ 2 = 6 kg. Taking off £2 instead of £5 as the flat charge, (17 − 2) ÷ 2 = 7.5 kg, swaps which number is the fixed fee.
- (a) 12 + 4√2 — a₁ = 4, a₂ = 4√2, and a₃ = a₁ × r² = 4 × (√2)² = 4 × 2 = 8. The sum of the first three terms is 4 + 4√2 + 8 = 12 + 4√2. 8 + 4√2 comes from leaving out a₁ and adding only a₂ + a₃ = 4√2 + 8. 36 + 4√2 comes from squaring the whole second term instead of applying the ratio to the first term: (4√2)² = 32 used as a₃, giving 4 + 4√2 + 32 = 36 + 4√2. 4 + 12√2 comes from using r³ instead of r² for the third term: 4 × (√2)³ = 4 × 2√2 = 8√2, giving 4 + 4√2 + 8√2 = 4 + 12√2.
- (a) Positive x-direction, 90°; image is y = sin x. — Writing cos(x − 90°) as cos(x − a) with a = 90 shows this is a horizontal translation, y = f(x − a), which moves the graph 90° in the positive x-direction; the identity cos(x − 90°) = sin x confirms the image is y = sin x. Choosing the negative x-direction reverses the sign inside the bracket — subtracting inside the bracket always translates in the positive x-direction, not the negative one, so that statement is wrong on direction. Getting the direction right but conflating the subtraction inside the bracket with an extra reflection of the output flips the sign of the resulting graph, wrongly giving y = −sin x. Treating the subtraction as if it changed the output directly, rather than the input, wrongly calls this a vertical translation even while still correctly recalling that the image simplifies to y = sin x.
- (b) £115, and C = 40 + 25h is a formula — Substitute h = 3 into the rule, multiplying before adding. The hours cost 25 × 3 = 75, and adding the call-out fee gives 40 + 75 = 115, so the charge is £115. The rule itself links two different quantities, C and h, and lets one be worked out from the other, so it is a formula; an expression would have no equals sign in it. Adding the fee before multiplying gives 65 × 3 = 195, which charges the call-out fee three times over, and stopping at 40 + 25 leaves £65, the charge for a single hour.
- (a) 7 — Method: multiply both sides by 3 to clear the fraction, then solve the resulting equation. Working: 2x + 1 = 5 × 3 = 15. Subtract 1: 2x = 14. Divide by 2: x = 7. Answer: 7. 2 comes from ignoring the denominator altogether, treating the equation as 2x + 1 = 5 without multiplying by 3 first. 8 comes from a sign error, adding 1 to 15 instead of subtracting it, giving 2x = 16. 14 comes from correctly reaching 2x = 14 but stopping there, without dividing by 2 to find x.
- (a) Yes — the gradients multiply to −2 × 1/2 = −1. — Rearrange Q into the form y = mx + c: 2y = x + 6 gives y = (1/2)x + 3, so Q has gradient 1/2. P has gradient −2. Two lines are perpendicular exactly when the product of their gradients is −1: −2 × 1/2 = −1. Since this holds, P and Q are perpendicular. Distractor routes: "the product is −1, but perpendicular needs 1" works out the product correctly but misremembers the condition — the perpendicular test is a product of exactly −1, and parallel lines are spotted by their gradients being equal, not by a product of 1. "Q's gradient is 2, and −2 × 2 = −4" comes from reading the 2 in front of y in 2y = x + 6 as the gradient, instead of dividing the whole equation by 2 first to reach y = (1/2)x + 3, where the gradient is 1/2. "Both equations have a negative x-term" is not a valid test at all — P's equation does have a negative x-term, but Q's, once rearranged, does not, and matching signs say nothing about the actual gradients.
- (c) 6x(2x + 3) — The highest common factor of 12x² and 18x is 6x. Dividing each term by 6x gives 12x² ÷ 6x = 2x and 18x ÷ 6x = 3, so 12x² + 18x = 6x(2x + 3). A candidate who only takes out the number 6 (missing the x) gets 6(2x² + 3x), which is not fully factorised. A candidate who only takes out 2x (missing the extra factor of 3 in 6) gets 2x(6x + 9), also not fully factorised — the bracket still shares a common factor. A candidate who takes out 3x instead of the full 6x gets 3x(4x + 6), which again is not fully factorised since 4x + 6 shares a common factor of 2.
- (d) It has a solution between x = 2.2 and x = 2.3 — Since f(2.2) is negative and f(2.3) is positive, the graph of f crosses the x-axis somewhere between x = 2.2 and x = 2.3, so the equation has a solution in that interval. Choosing 'between x = −2.2 and x = −2.3' confuses the negative f-VALUE at 2.2 with a negative x-value. Choosing 'no solution' misreads a change of sign as meaning the opposite of what it shows. Choosing 'exactly two solutions' assumes a single change of sign must give two roots, which is not what the rule guarantees.
- (c) 1 — At x = 0, f(0) = 4. Applying the transformations in order — reflect in the x-axis first, then translate up by 5 — gives −f(0) + 5 = −4 + 5 = 1. Applying the translation but forgetting the reflection gives f(0) + 5 = 9. Applying the reflection to the whole expression, including the +5, gives −f(0) − 5 = −9. Applying the reflection but forgetting the translation gives −f(0) = −4.
- (c) 4 years — The yearly multiplier is 1 − 0.12 = 0.88. After 1 year: 2400 × 0.88 = 2112. After 2 years: 2112 × 0.88 = 1858.56. After 3 years: 1858.56 × 0.88 = 1635.5328. After 4 years: 1635.5328 × 0.88 = 1439.27 (2 d.p.), which is the first value below £1,500 — so it takes 4 complete years. Stopping after 3 years, where the value is still £1,635.53, above £1,500, gives 3 years — wrong, because the threshold has not been crossed yet at that point. Continuing for one year longer than needed gives 5 years — wrong, because the value has already fallen below £1,500 by year 4, so year 5 overcounts. Multiplying by the percentage itself instead of by the multiplier — using 0.12 in place of 0.88 — gives 2400 × 0.12 = £288 after a single year, apparently below £1,500 straight away, so 1 year — wrong, because 12% is the part lost each year, and the part left is 88%, so the multiplier is 0.88.
- (c) y = 3x + 7 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both taken in the same order, and a point whose x-coordinate is 0 gives the constant straight away because it lies on the y-axis. Working: m = (7 − 1) ÷ (0 − (−2)) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3; the point (0, 7) lies on the y-axis, so c = 7 and the line is y = 3x + 7. Answer: y = 3x + 7. The distractors: y = −3x + 7 comes from taking the y-difference as 1 − 7 while taking the x-difference as 0 − (−2), so the two subtractions run in opposite orders; y = 3x + 1 comes from using the y-coordinate of (−2, 1) as the constant instead of the point that actually lies on the y-axis; y = (1/3)x + 7 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 2 ÷ 6.
- (a) The equation has one solution; the inequality has many. — Method: solve each statement. From 2x + 3 = 11, 2x = 8, so x = 4 — a single value. From 2x + 3 > 11, 2x > 8, so x > 4 — every number greater than 4 makes the inequality true, so there are many solutions. So the equation has one solution and the inequality has many. Distractor origins: swapping the two round gives the range to the equation and the single value to the inequality; saying both have exactly one solution treats the > sign as if it were an = sign; saying both have many solutions treats the equation as if it were an inequality.
- (d) −2 — Method: a gradient can only be read off an equation that is written in the form y = mx + c, so y has to be made the subject first. Working: subtracting 2x from both sides of 2x + y = 8 gives y = −2x + 8, and comparing that with y = mx + c gives m = −2. Answer: −2. The distractors: 2 comes from reading the coefficient of x straight off the equation as it is printed, without rearranging, so the change of sign is missed; 8 comes from reading the constant as the gradient, confusing m with c; −1/2 comes from rearranging correctly and then writing the gradient upside down, as the change in x over the change in y.
- (b) 5 and −6 — Method: turn the sentence into an equation in one letter, collect every term on one side so it reads as a quadratic equal to zero, then factorise. Working: if the number is x then x² + x = 30, which rearranges to x² + x − 30 = 0; two numbers that multiply to −30 and add to 1 are 6 and −5, so (x + 6)(x − 5) = 0 and x = −6 or x = 5. Both values work: 5 + 25 = 30 and −6 + 36 = 30. Answer: 5 and −6. The distractors: 6 and −5 comes from reading the numbers inside the brackets as the solutions without changing their signs; 5 only comes from discarding the negative solution, although nothing in the question rules out a negative number; 5 and 6 comes from hunting for a factor pair of 30 instead of forming and solving the quadratic.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.