Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) t = 5 — The maximum height occurs halfway between the two times when the ball is at ground level: the midpoint of t = 1 and t = 9 is (1 + 9) ÷ 2 = 5, so the ball reaches its maximum height at t = 5 seconds. Getting t = 4 comes from halving the DIFFERENCE between the times, 9 − 1 = 8, then 8 ÷ 2 = 4, instead of finding their midpoint. Getting t = 8 uses that difference, 9 − 1 = 8, as if the gap between the two times were itself the time of the maximum. Getting t = 10 adds the two times, 1 + 9 = 10, but forgets to divide by 2.
- (a) x = 4, y = −3 — Method: both equations contain +y with the same coefficient, so subtracting one equation from the other removes y. Working: (2x + y) − (x + y) = 5 − 1 gives x = 4; substituting x = 4 into x + y = 1 gives 4 + y = 1, so y = −3. Answer: x = 4, y = −3, which also satisfies 8 − 3 = 5. The distractors: x = 4, y = 5 comes from rearranging x + y = 1 as y = 1 + x; x = −2, y = 3 comes from eliminating x by doubling the first equation and then reading −y = 3 as y = 3; x = 6, y = −5 comes from adding the constants instead of subtracting them while eliminating y, taking x as 5 + 1.
- (a) Subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. — Method: try to solve the equation as normal and see what happens. Working: subtract 4x from both sides: 4x + 3 − 4x = 4x + 10 − 4x, giving 3 = 10. This statement is false for every value of x, so the equation has no solution. Answer: subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. "x would have to be negative" invents a constraint on x that the equation never states. "It's true for every x" confuses this equation with an identity, where both sides would simplify to the same expression. "x = 7" misreads the false statement 3 = 10 as something to solve for x, rather than recognising it means no solution exists.
- (c) 7 — To reverse the rule, subtract the constant then divide by the coefficient: 30−2=28, then 28÷4=7, so n=7. A candidate who adds the constant instead of subtracting it, a sign error when rearranging, would compute (30+2)÷4=32÷4=8. A candidate who subtracts the constant correctly but then forgets to divide by the coefficient would stop at 30−2=28. A candidate who treats 4n+2 as a single term 6n, adding the coefficient and constant together, would compute 30÷6=5.
- (d) 12 — Since a₃ = a₂ + a₁, rearranging gives a₂ = a₃ − a₁ = 17 − 5 = 12. 22 comes from adding instead of subtracting: a₃ + a₁ = 17 + 5 = 22. 11 comes from treating the sequence as if it were arithmetic and averaging the two given terms: (5 + 17) ÷ 2 = 11 — but a Fibonacci-type sequence isn't arithmetic, so this doesn't apply. −12 comes from subtracting in the wrong order: a₁ − a₃ = 5 − 17 = −12.
- (b) (2x + 1)/(x − 3) — Factorise both the numerator and the denominator before you cancel anything. The numerator 2x² + 7x + 3 factorises to (2x + 1)(x + 3), and the denominator x² − 9 is a difference of two squares, factorising to (x − 3)(x + 3). The (x + 3) factor is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (2x + 1)/(x − 3). Writing (2x + 1)/(x + 3) comes from factorising x² − 9 as (x + 3)² instead of (x − 3)(x + 3) — a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing (2x + 3)/(x − 3) comes from mis-factorising the numerator as (2x + 3)(x + 1) and then wrongly cancelling the (x + 1) against the denominator's (x + 3) as though they were the same bracket. Writing 2x + 1 comes from cancelling the (x + 3) factor correctly but then dropping the remaining (x − 3) on the denominator altogether.
- (b) x = (y − 3)/5 — To make x the subject of y = 5x + 3, first subtract 3 from both sides to get y − 3 = 5x, then divide both sides by 5: x = (y − 3)/5. Writing x = (y + 3)/5 keeps the division correct but does not change the sign of the 3 when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 − 3 divides only the y term by 5 and leaves the 3 as a separate subtraction, instead of subtracting first and dividing the whole expression. Writing x = 5(y − 3) applies the correct order of subtracting 3 first, but then multiplies by 5 instead of dividing — the inverse of 5x is division, not multiplication. The correct rearrangement is x = (y − 3)/5.
- (d) 2x² − 4x + 3 — fg(x) means f(g(x)): substitute g(x) into f in place of x. g(x) = x − 1, so fg(x) = f(x − 1) = 2(x − 1)² + 1. Expanding (x − 1)² = x² − 2x + 1, so fg(x) = 2(x² − 2x + 1) + 1 = 2x² − 4x + 2 + 1 = 2x² − 4x + 3. Writing 2x² comes from working out gf(x) instead — g(f(x)) = f(x) − 1 = (2x² + 1) − 1 = 2x², which applies the functions in the wrong order. Writing 2x² − 1 comes from expanding (x − 1)² as x² − 1, dropping the middle term, so f(x − 1) becomes 2(x² − 1) + 1 = 2x² − 2 + 1 = 2x² − 1. Writing 2x² − 4x + 2 comes from expanding correctly but forgetting the final + 1 from f, stopping at 2(x² − 2x + 1) = 2x² − 4x + 2.
- (c) Statement (ii) — Statement (ii) opens with 'Since n(n + 1) is even', treating the very fact the proof is meant to establish as if it were already known — that is circular reasoning, assuming the conclusion to help derive itself. Statement (i) only names the two consecutive integers as n and n + 1; it makes no claim about whether their product is even, so it introduces nothing circular. Statement (iii) states the conclusion, and would be a valid final step if statement (ii) had reached 'one of n and n + 1 is even' by a genuine argument, such as considering the cases where n is even or odd separately. Saying the proof assumes nothing circular is wrong, because statement (ii)'s opening clause is exactly that assumption.
- (c) (2n + 1)² + (2n + 3)² = (4n² + 4n + 1) + (4n² + 12n + 9) = 8n² + 16n + 10 = 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2, and n² + 2n + 1 is an integer, so the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. — Expand each square carefully: (2n + 1)² = 4n² + 4n + 1 and (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 12n + 9, since the cross term is 2 × 2n × 3 = 12n. Adding gives 8n² + 16n + 10, and factorising out 8 from every term that can hold one gives 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2; since n² + 2n + 1 is always an integer, the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. The attempt reaching 8(n² + 2n) + 10 has the correct expansion but stops the factorisation one step early — it never pulls a further 8 out of the 10 (10 = 8 + 2), so 'always 10 more than a multiple of 8' should be reduced to 'always 2 more than a multiple of 8'. The attempt reaching 2(4n² + 8n + 5) also has the correct expansion, and the factorisation is true, but 'always even' only shows the sum is a multiple of 2 — being even is necessary but nowhere near sufficient to be a multiple of 8, and the argument never finds the extra factor of 4. The fourth attempt makes an expansion slip, using (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 9 instead of 4n² + 12n + 9 — dropping the 12n cross term entirely — so it works from the wrong expression 8n² + 4n + 10 throughout, and no amount of correct working afterwards can recover the right conclusion.
- (d) (x − 7)² + 1 is at least 1 for every x, so y is never 0 — x² − 14x + 50 = (x − 7)² − 7² + 50 = (x − 7)² + 1. Since a squared term can never be negative, (x − 7)² ≥ 0 for every real x, so y = (x − 7)² + 1 ≥ 1 for every x — y is always at least 1, so it can never equal 0, and the curve never crosses the x-axis. Claiming the discriminant is positive is wrong on the facts: b² − 4ac = (−14)² − 4(1)(50) = 196 − 200 = −4, which is NEGATIVE, not positive — a negative discriminant is in fact the standard reason a quadratic has no real roots, so this option misstates its own sign. Claiming the turning point is at (7, −1) is wrong because completing the square gives (x − 7)² + 1, so the turning point is (7, 1) — the constant is +1, not −1, and a point with a negative y-coordinate would sit BELOW the x-axis, not above it, contradicting the option's own claim. Claiming that 50 being positive is enough is wrong because it ignores the −14x term completely — a positive constant term alone does not guarantee y stays positive for every x (the expression still dips down towards its turning point before growing again, and it is the completed square that shows how far it dips, not the constant on its own).
- (d) 8 — Method: write both present ages in terms of one letter, take four years off each of them, and form an equation from the comparison four years ago. Working: let Amelia be y, so her mother is 3y; four years ago they were y − 4 and 3y − 4, giving 3y − 4 = 5(y − 4); expanding gives 3y − 4 = 5y − 20; adding 20 and subtracting 3y from both sides gives 16 = 2y, and dividing by 2 gives y = 8. Checking: Amelia is 8 and her mother 24; four years ago they were 4 and 20, and 20 = 5 × 4. Answer: 8. The distractors: 4 comes from solving correctly but giving Amelia's age four years ago instead of her age now; 16 comes from stopping at 2y = 16 and giving 16 as her age; 2 comes from collecting the y terms by adding the 5y instead of subtracting it, giving 3y + 5y = 20 − 4 and so 8y = 16.
- (c) x = 0 or x = 3 — Method: take out the common factor 5x: 5x(x − 3) = 0, so 5x = 0 or x − 3 = 0, giving x = 0 or x = 3. Distractor origins: x = 0 or x = 15 comes from forgetting to divide the second term by the common factor 5x correctly, leaving 15 instead of 3; x = 3 loses the solution x = 0 by dividing both sides by x; x = 5 or x = 3 mistakes the coefficient 5 itself for one of the solutions.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
- (c) Only x = 5 satisfies 3x + 5 = 20, not every value of x. — 3x + 5 = 20 is only true when x = 5, since 3 × 5 + 5 = 20; for any other value of x the two sides are not equal, so it is an equation, not an identity. Saying it cannot be simplified confuses simplifying with the equation/identity distinction, which is about how many values of x make it true. Saying it has an = sign is not a valid test, since identities are also written with an = or ≡ sign. A number on the right-hand side does not decide it either — what matters is whether both sides match for every value of x, not the form of the right-hand side.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.