Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) x ≈ 6.70 — Since the two roots sum to 7, the other root is 7 − 0.30 = 6.70. The option 7.30 comes from adding the given root to 7 instead of subtracting it. The option 6.30 comes from subtracting 0.70 (one minus the given root) rather than the given root itself. The option 0.70 confuses the required root with the amount by which the given root falls short of 1.
- (c) x = (y + 24)/4 — Method: expand the bracket first, then undo the operations done to x in reverse order. Working: y = 4(x − 6) = 4x − 24, so y + 24 = 4x, so x = (y + 24)/4. Answer: x = (y + 24)/4. x = (y + 6)/4 comes from expanding the bracket incorrectly, treating 4(x − 6) as 4x − 6 instead of 4x − 24. x = 4y + 96 comes from multiplying by 4 instead of dividing by 4 to undo the multiplication, giving 4(y + 24) = 4y + 96. x = y/4 − 6 comes from dividing by 4 first without expanding the bracket, then subtracting 6 as if the bracket's operation still applied afterwards.
- (b) Student B's — narrower strips fit the curve more closely. — The trapezium rule replaces the curve with straight-line segments; the narrower each strip, the more closely its straight edge follows the curve, so Student B's estimate with 8 narrower strips is more likely to be closer to the true area. Reasoning from the number of arithmetic steps rather than from how well the straight lines fit the curve gives the wrong claim that Student A makes fewer rounding errors. Believing the trapezium rule is exact, rather than an estimate that improves with narrower strips, gives the wrong claim that the two are always the same. Believing wider strips smooth out the curve better, rather than following it less closely, gives the wrong claim in favour of Student A's wider strips.
- (a) It gets closer to zero but never actually reaches it. — y = 60 × (0.5)ˣ is always positive, however large x is, because a positive number raised to any power stays positive. As x increases, (0.5)ˣ gets smaller and smaller but never equals zero, so y approaches zero without ever reaching it. Believing the curve reaches zero when x = 60, because 60 is the starting value, mixes up the y-intercept with a stopping point — an exponential decay curve like this one never actually reaches the x-axis, so this is wrong. Believing the curve goes negative for large x is wrong because multiplying a positive number by (0.5) any number of times can never produce a negative result. Believing the curve levels off at y = 0.5, confusing the base of the exponential with its eventual level, is wrong: the base only controls how fast the curve falls, not where it settles — this curve settles at y = 0, not y = 0.5. Whenever you sketch an exponential decay curve, draw it approaching the x-axis but never touching it.
- (d) Yes: the 8th term is 50 − 8 × 7 = −6, which is negative. — Method: find the 8th term by subtracting 8 a total of 7 times from the first term, since the 1st term itself needs 0 subtractions. Working: 8th term = 50 − 8 × 7 = 50 − 56 = −6, which is negative, so Priya is correct. Answer: Yes, the 8th term is 50 − 8 × 7 = −6, which is negative. The "50 − 8 × 6 = 2" option subtracts 8 only six times instead of seven, an off-by-one error in counting the steps. The "50 − 8 × 8 = −14" option subtracts 8 eight times instead of seven, the opposite off-by-one error. The claim that repeated subtraction "can never go negative" ignores that subtracting enough times from any starting value eventually gives a negative result.
- (b) xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ² + 3) ÷ 5 — Starting from x² = 5x − 3, add 3 to both sides: x² + 3 = 5x. Divide both sides by 5: x = (x² + 3) ÷ 5. Writing this as an iteration gives xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ² + 3) ÷ 5. xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ² − 3) ÷ 5 comes from a sign error when moving the −3 across the equals sign — it should become +3, not stay as −3. xₙ₊₁ = 5(xₙ² + 3) comes from multiplying by 5 instead of dividing by 5 when isolating x. xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ + 3) ÷ 5 comes from dropping the index on x², using xₙ instead of xₙ².
- (a) 842.0 — The radius to (20, 21) has gradient 21/20, so the tangent's gradient is −20/21. The tangent line is y − 21 = −20/21(x − 20), i.e. y = −20/21x + 841/21. Setting y = 0 gives the x-intercept x = 841/20 = 42.05; setting x = 0 gives the y-intercept y = 841/21 ≈ 40.048. The area of triangle OPQ is 1/2 × 42.05 × 40.048 ≈ 842.0. 1684.0 comes from multiplying the two intercepts without the 1/2 that a triangle's area needs — twice the correct area. 580.7 comes from using the circle's radius, 29, as a side of the triangle instead of the x-intercept, 42.05: 1/2 × 29 × 40.048 ≈ 580.7. 2.0 comes from a sign error in the tangent's gradient — using 20/21 instead of −20/21 — which gives a different line, with intercepts x ≈ −2.05 and y ≈ 1.952, and area 1/2 × 2.05 × 1.952 ≈ 2.0.
- (d) 12 — Method: call the younger brother's age x, write the elder brother's age in terms of x, and form an equation from the total. Working: the elder brother is x + 6, so x + (x + 6) = 30; simplifying gives 2x + 6 = 30, subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 24, and dividing by 2 gives x = 12. Checking: 12 and 18 add up to 30 and differ by 6. Answer: 12. The distractors: 18 comes from solving correctly and then giving the elder brother's age, which is not the age asked for; 15 comes from halving 30 and ignoring the 6-year difference altogether; 24 comes from taking 6 off the total, 30 − 6 = 24, and giving that as an age.
- (a) 4.897 — Method: substitute the starting value into the right-hand side of the formula to get x₁, then feed each new value back in, keeping the whole calculator display every time and rounding only at the very end. Working: x₁ = √(5 × 2 + 2) = √12 = 3.46410…; x₂ = √(5 × 3.46410… + 2) = √19.32050… = 4.39551…; x₃ = √(5 × 4.39551… + 2) = √23.97755… = 4.89668…, which is 4.897 correct to 3 decimal places. Answer: 4.897. The distractors: 4.396 is x₂, written down by a candidate who counts the starting value x₀ as the first iterate and so stops one use of the formula early; 3.464 is x₁, the value after using the formula only once; 5.146 is x₄, one use of the formula too many — the mirror image of the first slip, made by a candidate who labels the first value worked out as x₀ rather than as x₁ and so runs the count a step long.
- (b) 19 — A line through (x₁, y₁) with gradient m has equation y − y₁ = m(x − x₁). Substituting (6, 1) and m = −3: y − 1 = −3(x − 6), so y = −3x + 18 + 1, which simplifies to y = −3x + 19; at x = 0 this gives 19. Making a sign error when distributing, writing −3(x − 6) as −3x − 18 instead of −3x + 18, gives the wrong line y = −3x − 17, so −17 at x = 0. Forgetting to add the y₁ = 1 at the end, using y = −3(x − 6) alone, gives 18 at x = 0. Substituting the y-coordinate into the gradient term instead of using x, working out 1 + (−3 × 1), gives −2.
- (a) xₙ₊₁ = ∛(5xₙ + 3) — Starting from x³ − 5x − 3 = 0, add 5x and 3 to both sides to get x³ = 5x + 3, then take the cube root of both sides: x = ∛(5x + 3), giving the iterative formula xₙ₊₁ = ∛(5xₙ + 3). A sign error when moving the constant term across, treating x³ − 5x − 3 = 0 as x³ = 5x − 3, gives xₙ₊₁ = ∛(5xₙ − 3). Swapping the coefficient of x with the constant term gives xₙ₊₁ = ∛(3xₙ + 5), which does not come from x³ = 5x + 3 at all. Treating cubing as meaning multiply by 3 rather than raise to the power 3, and so undoing it by dividing by 3 instead of taking a cube root, gives xₙ₊₁ = (5xₙ + 3) ÷ 3.
- (c) 5n + 7 — Method: find the common difference between the rows, then find the constant by adjusting the first row's total. Working: each row has 5 more seats than the last, so the coefficient of n is 5. The constant is the first row's total minus the common difference: 12 − 5 = 7. Answer: the nth term is 5n + 7. 5n + 12 comes from using row 1's total, 12, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 5n + 2 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (12 − 5 − 5 = 2) instead of once. 7n + 5 comes from swapping the common difference and the constant.
- (c) 3 and 2n + 5 are both factors of 6n + 15 — Factors are the parts multiplied together to make an expression; terms are the parts added together. In 3(2n + 5) the 3 and the bracket 2n + 5 are multiplied, so both of them are factors of 6n + 15. The parts added together are 6n and 15, and those are its two terms, not its factors. A factor need not be a number: a bracket containing letters is a factor in exactly the same way.
- (b) x = −3, y = −7 — x² + 6x + 2 = (x + 3)² − 3² + 2 = (x + 3)² − 7. Substituting x = −3: (−3)² = 9, 6 × (−3) = −18, so 9 − 18 + 2 = −7, confirming the minimum value −7 at x = −3: turning point (−3, −7). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket gives (x + 6)² − 34, turning point (−6, −34) — wrong, because only half the coefficient of x belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (3, −7) — wrong, because (x + 3)² is zero at x = −3, not x = 3. Computing 9 − 2 = 7 instead of 2 − 9 = −7 flips the sign of the constant, giving (−3, 7) — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 2 minus 9, not 9 minus 2. Always check a turning point by substituting its x-value back into the original equation.
- (a) −1/3 — The gradient of L is 3, the coefficient of x in y = mx + c form. The gradient of a line perpendicular to a line of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1/m. So the perpendicular gradient is −1/3. Distractor routes: 3 gives the gradient of L itself, forgetting to change it at all — that is the gradient of a PARALLEL line. 1/3 takes the reciprocal of 3 but keeps the same sign, missing the negative sign a perpendicular gradient requires. −3 negates the gradient of L but does not take its reciprocal, giving the gradient of a line with the opposite slope rather than a perpendicular one.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.