Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) (6, 8) — Method: a point lies on the circle x² + y² = 100 exactly when the squares of its two coordinates add to 100, so square both coordinates of each point and add them. Working: for (6, 8), 6² + 8² = 36 + 64 = 100, which matches the right-hand side of the equation. Answer: (6, 8) lies on the circle. The distractors: (3, 4) is the 3, 4, 5 right-angled triangle recalled but never scaled up to a radius of 10, and 3² + 4² = 25, so it lies on the far smaller circle x² + y² = 25; (5, 5) has coordinates adding to 10, which compares the sum of the coordinates with the radius instead of the sum of their squares with r², and 5² + 5² = 50; (10, 10) takes each coordinate separately to equal the radius, and 10² + 10² = 200, which is twice too big.
- (d) (4, 3) — The sides are parallel to the axes: the missing vertex must share the y-coordinate 3 with (−2, 3) and the x-coordinate 4 with (4, −3), giving (4, 3). (−4, 3) comes from a sign error on the x-coordinate. (4, −9) comes from continuing the pattern of the given points by subtracting 6 from the y-coordinate again instead of matching it to (−2, 3). (3, 4) comes from swapping the x- and y-coordinates.
- (b) x ≤ 4 — Method: undo the number subtracted from 3x first, then divide by 3; the direction of the sign changes only for division by a negative number. Working: adding 1 to both sides of 3x − 1 ≤ 11 gives 3x ≤ 12; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ 4. Answer: x ≤ 4. The distractors: x ≥ 4 comes from turning the sign round while dividing by 3; x ≤ 10/3 comes from subtracting 1 from both sides instead of adding it, giving 3x ≤ 10; x ≤ 12 comes from stopping at 3x ≤ 12 and reading off the 12 without dividing by 3.
- (c) 5 — Method: let a be the number of adult tickets, so the number of child tickets is 9 − a. Form the equation 10a + 6(9 − a) = 74. Working: expand the bracket: 10a + 54 − 6a = 74, so 4a = 20, giving a = 5. Answer: 5 adult tickets. 4 comes from correctly finding the number of child tickets but reporting it instead of the number of adult tickets asked for. 1.25 comes from a sign error expanding the bracket, writing 10a + 54 + 6a = 74 instead of subtracting, which gives 16a = 20. 7.4 comes from dividing the total takings by the adult ticket price only, ignoring the children entirely, 74 ÷ 10.
- (b) 4.39 — x₁ = ∛(150 − 3 × 4²) = ∛(150 − 48) = ∛102 = 4.672 (unrounded). x₂ = ∛(150 − 3 × 4.672²) = ∛(150 − 65.49) = ∛84.51 = 4.39 (2 d.p.). Choosing 4.67 stops after only one iteration, giving x₁ instead of x₂. Choosing 84.51 finds the value inside the cube root for x₂ but never takes the cube root. Choosing 6.32 comes from adding 3xₙ² instead of subtracting it inside the root, which does not match the given formula.
- (b) h = 2A/b — The height has been multiplied by the base and the result then divided by 2, so undo the division first. Multiplying both sides by 2 gives 2A = bh. Undoing the multiplication by the base comes next: dividing both sides by b gives 2A/b = h, so h = 2A/b. Dividing by 2 instead of multiplying gives A/(2b), a quarter of the correct height; multiplying by the base instead of dividing gives 2Ab; writing b/(2A) turns the final fraction upside down.
- (c) Wrong — the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. — Rearranging x − 2 = x² − 4x + 2 by moving every term across: 0 = x² − 4x + 2 − x + 2 = x² − 5x + 4. The candidate's x-term is wrong: combining −4x with the moved −x gives −4x − x = −5x, not −3x. So the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. Distractor routes: "x² − 3x + 4 = 0 is correct" simply agrees with the candidate's sign error without checking it. "It should be x² − 5x − 4 = 0" correctly spots that something is wrong but blames the wrong term — the constant, 2 + 2 = 4, is correct; the error is in the x-term. "Subtracting is the same as adding" states something false: subtracting a term and adding it give different signs.
- (d) x² − 6x + 9 — Method: squaring a bracket means multiplying that bracket by itself, so expand (x − 3)(x − 3) term by term and then collect like terms. Working: x × x = x², x × (−3) = −3x, (−3) × x = −3x and (−3) × (−3) = 9, giving x² − 3x − 3x + 9, and the two middle terms collect to −6x. Answer: x² − 6x + 9. The distractors: x² − 3x + 9 comes from writing down only one of the two middle products instead of both; x² + 6x + 9 comes from treating (−3) × x as +3x, so the middle terms are added rather than subtracted; x² − 9 comes from treating the square as the difference of two squares (x − 3)(x + 3).
- (d) 3 — 2x² − 12x + 7 rewrites as 2(x² − 6x) + 7, then as 2[(x − 3)² − 9] + 7, which simplifies to 2(x − 3)² − 11, since −2 × 9 + 7 = −11. The bracket (x − 3)² is zero when x = 3, so the minimum occurs at x = 3. Treating the shift as b/a instead of b/(2a) — using 6 instead of 3 — gives x = 6, which is wrong. Reading the bracket's sign directly without negating it gives x = −3, wrong, because (x − 3)² is zero at x = 3, not x = −3. Reading off the coefficient of x itself, −12, and calling that the answer skips the completing-the-square process entirely and gives x = −12, which is wrong because b is not the turning point's x-coordinate under any circumstance. Always check: substituting your value of x should make the bracketed term equal to zero, and nothing else.
- (c) 3 and 2n + 5 are both factors of 6n + 15 — Factors are the parts multiplied together to make an expression; terms are the parts added together. In 3(2n + 5) the 3 and the bracket 2n + 5 are multiplied, so both of them are factors of 6n + 15. The parts added together are 6n and 15, and those are its two terms, not its factors. A factor need not be a number: a bracket containing letters is a factor in exactly the same way.
- (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
- (b) 3 — At the limit, L = √(2L + 3). Squaring both sides: L² = 2L + 3, so L² − 2L − 3 = 0, which factorises as (L − 3)(L + 1) = 0, giving L = 3 or L = −1. Since the sequence of iterates stays positive throughout, the limit is L = 3. Taking the other, negative root without rejecting it gives −1. Treating the equation L = 2L + 3 as already linear, forgetting to square both sides first, gives −L = 3, so L = −3. A sign error when factorising, writing (L + 3)(L − 1) = 0 instead of (L − 3)(L + 1) = 0, gives L = 1.
- (c) 7n − 1 — Method: find the common difference, then find the constant that fits the first term. Working: 13 − 6 = 7, 20 − 13 = 7, 27 − 20 = 7, so the terms increase by 7 each time and the nth term has the form 7n + c. Substituting n = 1: 7(1) + c = 6, so c = −1. Answer: the nth term is 7n − 1. The value 7n comes from leaving out the constant altogether. The value 7n + 6 comes from using the first term as the constant directly, without subtracting the common difference first. The value 6n + 1 comes from using the first term, 6, as the coefficient of n instead of the common difference, and then attaching +1 with the sign of the constant flipped.
- (d) 4.521 — x₁ = √(3 × 4 + 7) = √19 = 4.358898944. x₂ = √(3 × 4.358898944 + 7) = √20.076696833 = 4.480702716. x₃ = √(3 × 4.480702716 + 7) = √20.442108148 = 4.521294964, which rounds to 4.521. Mislabelling the starting value x₀ as x₁, so that the working stops one iteration too early, reports the true x₂ = 4.480702716, which rounds to 4.481. Working out one iteration too many reports the true x₄ = √(3 × 4.521294964 + 7) = 4.534741987, which rounds to 4.535. Applying the formula in the wrong order, calculating √(3xₙ) + 7 at every step instead of √(3xₙ + 7), gives, from x₀ = 4: √12 + 7 = 10.464101615, then √(3 × 10.464101615) + 7 = 12.602883619, then √(3 × 12.602883619) + 7 = 13.148873950, which rounds to 13.149.
- (a) 271 m — The reading at t = 12 isn't in the table, so it must be interpolated between t = 10 (35 m/s) and t = 14 (27 m/s): the velocity falls by 8 m/s over the 4-second gap, so over 2 seconds it falls by 4 m/s, giving 35 − 4 = 31 m/s. The trapezium rule then uses three strips of unequal width, 4, 6 and 2 seconds, with areas of 40, 165 and 66: 40 + 165 + 66 = 271 m. Writing 267 m comes from skipping the interpolation and using the table's t = 14 reading, 27, directly as the height at t = 12. Writing 282 m comes from treating all three strips as though they were 4 seconds wide, instead of using the true gaps of 4, 6 and 2 seconds between the readings. Writing 275 m comes from using the t = 10 reading, 35, at both ends of the final strip, instead of interpolating a new value at t = 12.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.