Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 40 — The differences between consecutive terms are 3, 5, 7, 9, increasing by 2 each time, so the next difference is 11, giving 29 + 11 = 40. A candidate who reuses the last difference of 9 without increasing it gets 29 + 9 = 38. A candidate who increases the difference by only 1 instead of 2 gets 29 + 10 = 39. A candidate who reuses the first difference of 3 instead of the pattern gets 29 + 3 = 32.
- (a) Overestimates — trapezium edges lie above the curve. — For a concave-up curve, each chord connecting two points on the curve lies ABOVE the curve between those points, because the curve bends away from the chord underneath it. The trapezium rule uses these chords as the top edges of each trapezium, so the trapeziums cover a larger region than the true area under the curve — the estimate is an overestimate. Saying it underestimates because the edges lie below the curve gets the direction backwards: for a concave-up curve the edges lie above, not below. Saying it overestimates 'because more strips always increase it' gives the right verdict for the wrong reason — using MORE, narrower strips makes a trapezium estimate more accurate and brings it closer to the true area, it does not simply increase the total. Saying the estimate is exact ignores that straight edges cannot follow a curved line perfectly; there is always a gap between the chord and the curve on a bend, which is exactly what makes the rule an estimate rather than an exact calculation.
- (d) 40 m — Each trapezium has width 2. Its area is width × the average of its two heights. Strip 1: average of 0 and 5 is 2.5, so area = 2 × 2.5 = 5. Strip 2: average of 5 and 9 is 7, so area = 2 × 7 = 14. Strip 3: average of 9 and 12 is 10.5, so area = 2 × 10.5 = 21. Total distance = 5 + 14 + 21 = 40 m. Leaving out the division by 2 in the averaging step doubles every strip, giving 80 m instead of 40 m. Using only the LEFT height of each strip as a rectangle, 0 × 2 + 5 × 2 + 9 × 2 = 28, or only the RIGHT height, 5 × 2 + 9 × 2 + 12 × 2 = 52, both ignore that the graph curves between the two ends of each strip — always average the two heights of a trapezium, never use just one of them.
- (a) 7.9 m — Method: the iteration converges on the width of the plot, so run the formula three times from the starting value and then add 4 m, because the length is 4 m greater than the width. Working: x₁ = √(30 − 4 × 3) = √18 = 4.24264…; x₂ = √(30 − 4 × 4.24264…) = √13.02943… = 3.60963…; x₃ = √(30 − 4 × 3.60963…) = √15.56147… = 3.94480…. The estimate for the length is 3.94480… + 4 = 7.94480…, which is 7.9 m correct to 1 decimal place. Answer: 7.9 m. The iteration is still oscillating at x₃, so this is the estimate that three uses of the formula give, not a settled value. The distractors: 3.9 m is x₃ itself, the width, given by a candidate who runs the iteration correctly and then stops before the step the question actually asks for; 7.6 m uses x₂ in place of x₃, one use of the formula short, and then adds the 4 m correctly; 15.8 m multiplies the width by 4 instead of adding 4 m to it, reading greater than as a multiplier.
- (c) The sequence diverges, moving away from x = 3 — Starting from x₀ = 2.9: x₁ = 2.9² − 6 = 2.41, x₂ = 2.41² − 6 = −0.19, x₃ = (−0.19)² − 6 = −5.96, x₄ = (−5.96)² − 6 = 29.56 — the values swing away from 3 and grow rapidly, so the sequence diverges rather than settling anywhere. Choosing 'settles towards x = 3' assumes that starting close to a root is enough for a rearrangement to converge to it, which is not always true — this rearrangement changes values too steeply near x = 3 to stay there. Choosing 'settles towards x = −2' assumes a diverging sequence must eventually land on the other root; instead it runs away to increasingly large values. Choosing 'stays constant at 2.9' ignores that applying the formula changes the value at every step.
- (b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
- (b) (2, 6) — y = f(x − 3) translates y = f(x) horizontally by 3 units to the RIGHT — inside the brackets, subtracting moves the graph in the positive x-direction. Turning point (−1, 6) → (−1 + 3, 6) = (2, 6). The common slip is to move LEFT instead, since the sign inside the bracket is negative — that gives (−4, 6). Changing the y-coordinate instead of the x-coordinate, as in (−1, 3) or (−1, 9), treats this as a vertical shift, which y = f(x − 3) is not.
- (c) Line D — Method: the steeper of two lines is the one whose gradient is greater, and the gradient of a line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x. Working: line C rises 2 for a run of 4, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 4 = 1/2; the other line rises 2 for a run of 2, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 2 = 1; since 1 is greater than 1/2, it is line D that is the steeper. Answer: Line D. The distractors: Line C is chosen by comparing the x-coordinates and calling the line that reaches further along the x-axis the steeper one; They are equally steep comes from comparing only the y-coordinates, which are both 2, without dividing by the two different runs; There is not enough information comes from believing that a gradient can only be measured off a drawn graph, when two points on a line are enough to work it out.
- (d) x² − 7x − 3 = 0 — Method: an iteration settles where the next value equals the one before it, so both can be written as the same letter x; replace every xₙ by x, square both sides to clear the square root, and collect all the terms on one side. Working: x = √(7x + 3) gives x² = 7x + 3 on squaring both sides; subtracting 7x and 3 from both sides gives x² − 7x − 3 = 0. Answer: x² − 7x − 3 = 0. The distractors: x² + 7x − 3 = 0 moves the 7x across the equals sign without changing its sign; x² − 7x + 3 = 0 makes that same slip on the constant instead, leaving the 3 positive as it crosses; x² − 7x − 9 = 0 squares the expression term by term, squaring the 3 to give 9 as though squaring √(7x + 3) gave 7x + 9, which is the (a + b)² = a² + b² mistake dressed as a square root.
- (b) 8 — The perimeter is 2(x + (x + 3)) = 4x + 6, so 4x + 6 = 38, which gives 4x = 32 and x = 8. A candidate who forgets the '+3' and treats the rectangle as a square, solving 2(2x) = 38, gets x = 9.5. A candidate who forgets to double the sum of the sides, solving 2x + 3 = 38, gets x = 17.5. A candidate who uses 3x instead of x + 3 for the length, solving 2(x + 3x) = 38, gets x = 4.75.
- (c) y = (5/12)x − 169/12 — The gradient of the radius to (5, −12) is (−12 − 0) ÷ (5 − 0) = −12/5. A tangent is perpendicular to the radius at that point, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal, 5/12. Using y − y₁ = m(x − x₁) with (5, −12): y + 12 = (5/12)(x − 5), which gives y = (5/12)x − 169/12. y = −(12/5)x comes from using the radius's own gradient, −12/5, instead of turning it into the perpendicular gradient, and building the line through the origin (as the radius itself does). y = −(5/12)x − 119/12 comes from taking the reciprocal of −12/5 correctly as a size but keeping the wrong sign, using −5/12 instead of 5/12. y = (5/12)x − 25/12 comes from using the correct gradient 5/12 but building the line through (5, 0) instead of (5, −12) — dropping the point's y-coordinate.
- (a) x = 4, y = −3 — Method: both equations contain +y with the same coefficient, so subtracting one equation from the other removes y. Working: (2x + y) − (x + y) = 5 − 1 gives x = 4; substituting x = 4 into x + y = 1 gives 4 + y = 1, so y = −3. Answer: x = 4, y = −3, which also satisfies 8 − 3 = 5. The distractors: x = 4, y = 5 comes from rearranging x + y = 1 as y = 1 + x; x = −2, y = 3 comes from eliminating x by doubling the first equation and then reading −y = 3 as y = 3; x = 6, y = −5 comes from adding the constants instead of subtracting them while eliminating y, taking x as 5 + 1.
- (c) 3.153 — x₁ = √(4 × 1 + 1) = √5 = 2.236067977. x₂ = √(4 × 2.236067977 + 1) = √9.944271908 = 3.153453965, which rounds to 3.153. Reporting x₁ instead of x₂ gives 2.236067977, which rounds to 2.236. A sign error inside the root, using xₙ₊₁ = √(4xₙ − 1) instead of √(4xₙ + 1), gives x₁ = √3 = 1.732050808 and x₂ = √(4 × 1.732050808 − 1) = √5.928203232 = 2.434790182, which rounds to 2.435. Applying the formula in the wrong order, working out √(4xₙ) + 1 at every step instead of √(4xₙ + 1), gives x₁ = √4 + 1 = 3 and x₂ = √(4 × 3) + 1 = 4.464101615, which rounds to 4.464.
- (a) 23 — The number of logs increases by 4 for each layer down, starting from 3 in the top layer, so the nth layer has 3+(n−1)×4 logs. For the 6th layer: 3+5×4=3+20=23. A candidate who adds the difference of 4 six times instead of five, treating the top layer as needing an addition too, would compute 3+6×4=27. A candidate who uses 4n instead of 4n−1, omitting the adjustment for the first layer, would compute 4×6=24. A candidate who subtracts the common difference, 4, instead of 1 when adjusting the multiplier would compute 4×6−4=20.
- (c) 32 — The terms are 60, 53, 46, 39, 32 — each found by subtracting 7 from the term before, so the 5th term is 32. Subtracting 7 five times from the first term instead of four times, 60 − 7 × 5 = 25, treats the first term as if it came before the sequence starts. Adding 7 four times instead of subtracting, 60 + 7 × 4 = 88, uses the wrong operation. Stopping one term early gives the 4th term, 39.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.