Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) −10 — Method: multiply each bracket out, treating the second bracket as being multiplied by −3 because it is subtracted, then collect like terms. Working: 4(2x − 1) = 8x − 4 and −3(x + 2) = −3x − 6, so the expression becomes 8x − 4 − 3x − 6 − 5x; the x terms give 8x − 3x − 5x = 0, so no term in x survives, and the numbers give −4 − 6 = −10. Answer: −10. The distractors: 2 comes from expanding −3(x + 2) as −3x + 6, leaving the numbers −4 + 6; 5x − 10 comes from forgetting the final −5x, so the x terms give 8x − 3x = 5x; −7 comes from multiplying the 4 over only the first term of its bracket, giving 8x − 1 and so the numbers −1 − 6.
- (a) (40, 0) — Method: a graph crosses the x-axis where y = 0, which in this context is the moment the tank holds no water, so substituting y = 0 and solving gives the time. Working: 0 = −5x + 200 gives 5x = 200, so x = 200 ÷ 5 = 40 and the crossing point is (40, 0); the tank is empty after 40 minutes. Answer: (40, 0). The distractors: (0, 200) is the y-axis crossing, the 200 litres in the tank at the start, found by substituting x = 0 instead of y = 0; (200, 0) comes from reading the constant 200 as the x-coordinate without dividing by the 5 litres lost each minute; (0, 40) has the right number in the wrong place, with the time written as a y-coordinate.
- (a) (3, 7) — y = f(x) + 5 is a vertical translation of y = f(x) by 5 units up — the translation vector is (0, 5) — so only the y-coordinate of any point changes. Turning point (3, 2) → (3, 2 + 5) = (3, 7). Adding the 5 to the x-coordinate, or treating it as a horizontal shift like y = f(x + 5), moves the wrong coordinate — check first whether the number sits inside or outside the brackets.
- (c) h = V / (lw) — Method: undo the multiplication by lw by dividing both sides by lw. Working: V = lwh, so dividing both sides by lw gives h = V / (lw). The value h = V − lw comes from subtracting lw instead of dividing by it. The value h = Vlw comes from multiplying by lw instead of dividing. The value h = lw / V comes from inverting the fraction, dividing lw by V instead of V by lw.
- (d) 2n² − n − 2 — First differences: 5, 9, 13, 17. Second differences: 4, 4, 4, so a = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Subtracting 2n² (2, 8, 18, 32, 50) from the terms (−1, 4, 13, 26, 43) leaves −3, −4, −5, −6, −7, which is the linear expression −n − 2. So the nth term is 2n² − n − 2. Using the second difference itself as a, without halving it, gives 4n² − n − 2. Finding a = 2 correctly but dropping the linear remainder −n − 2 entirely leaves 2n². Treating the first first difference (5) as a common difference and building a + (n − 1)d = −1 + 5(n − 1) gives 5n − 6, which only matches the first two terms.
- (c) £8,000 — The multiplier for one year is 1 − 0.18 = 0.82, so 0.82 × 0.82 = 0.6724. Original value = 5,379.20 ÷ 0.6724 = £8,000. Treating the total drop as simple depreciation (18% × 2 = 36% lost in total, so dividing by 0.64 instead of 0.6724) gives 5,379.20 ÷ 0.64 = £8,405 (nearest pound) — wrong, because the depreciation compounds year by year rather than adding up. Dividing by 0.82 only once, forgetting the second year entirely, gives 5,379.20 ÷ 0.82 = £6,560 — wrong, because two years of depreciation have passed, not one. Multiplying by 0.6724 instead of dividing by it — repeating the depreciation forward instead of reversing it — gives 5,379.20 × 0.6724 = £3,617 (nearest pound) — wrong, because to find the ORIGINAL value you must undo the depreciation, not apply it again.
- (d) (4, 8) — The other endpoint is found from 2 × midpoint − known endpoint: x = 2 × (−1) − (−6) = −2 + 6 = 4, y = 2 × 5 − 2 = 10 − 2 = 8, giving (4, 8). (−3.5, 3.5) comes from averaging the given endpoint and the midpoint as if they were the two endpoints of a segment, instead of working backwards from the midpoint. (5, 3) comes from working out (−1 − (−6), 5 − 2) instead of doubling the midpoint before subtracting. (4, 5) comes from correctly finding the x-coordinate but copying the midpoint's y-coordinate of 5 instead of doubling it.
- (c) (2n + 1)² + (2n + 3)² = (4n² + 4n + 1) + (4n² + 12n + 9) = 8n² + 16n + 10 = 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2, and n² + 2n + 1 is an integer, so the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. — Expand each square carefully: (2n + 1)² = 4n² + 4n + 1 and (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 12n + 9, since the cross term is 2 × 2n × 3 = 12n. Adding gives 8n² + 16n + 10, and factorising out 8 from every term that can hold one gives 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2; since n² + 2n + 1 is always an integer, the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. The attempt reaching 8(n² + 2n) + 10 has the correct expansion but stops the factorisation one step early — it never pulls a further 8 out of the 10 (10 = 8 + 2), so 'always 10 more than a multiple of 8' should be reduced to 'always 2 more than a multiple of 8'. The attempt reaching 2(4n² + 8n + 5) also has the correct expansion, and the factorisation is true, but 'always even' only shows the sum is a multiple of 2 — being even is necessary but nowhere near sufficient to be a multiple of 8, and the argument never finds the extra factor of 4. The fourth attempt makes an expansion slip, using (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 9 instead of 4n² + 12n + 9 — dropping the 12n cross term entirely — so it works from the wrong expression 8n² + 4n + 10 throughout, and no amount of correct working afterwards can recover the right conclusion.
- (c) 496 — d = 0.4v² + 6. First v² = 35 × 35 = 1225. Then 0.4 × 1225 = 490. Add 6: 490 + 6 = 496 m. 490 comes from forgetting to add the 6 at the end. 202 comes from squaring 0.4v together instead of squaring only v, (0.4 × 35)² + 6 = 14² + 6 = 202. 20 comes from using v instead of v², 0.4 × 35 + 6.
- (d) 1 hour 32 minutes — T = 40 × 1.8 + 20 = 72 + 20 = 92 minutes. Since 92 = 60 + 32, the cooking time is 1 hour 32 minutes. A candidate who rounds the mass to 2 kg before substituting gets 40 × 2 + 20 = 100 minutes = 1 hour 40 minutes. A candidate who forgets to add the 20 minutes gets 40 × 1.8 = 72 minutes = 1 hour 12 minutes. A candidate who multiplies the mass by (40 + 20) = 60 instead of substituting into the formula gets 1.8 × 60 = 108 minutes = 1 hour 48 minutes.
- (a) 2.55 — x₁ = 20 ÷ (2 + 5) = 20 ÷ 7 = 2.857142857. x₂ = 20 ÷ (2.857142857 + 5) = 20 ÷ 7.857142857 = 2.545454545, which rounds to 2.55. Reporting x₁ instead of x₂ gives 2.857142857, which rounds to 2.86. Dropping the +5 in the denominator, using xₙ₊₁ = 20 ÷ xₙ, gives x₁ = 20 ÷ 2 = 10 and x₂ = 20 ÷ 10 = 2, which is 2.00. A sign error in the denominator, using xₙ₊₁ = 20 ÷ (xₙ − 5), gives x₁ = 20 ÷ (2 − 5) = −6.666666667 and x₂ = 20 ÷ (−6.666666667 − 5) = −1.714285714, which rounds to −1.71.
- (c) 16 km/h — Method: total distance = 12 + 8 = 20 km. Total time = 30 + 30 + 15 = 75 minutes = 1.25 hours. Average speed = total distance ÷ total time = 20 ÷ 1.25 = 16 km/h. Distractor origins: 20 km/h gives the total distance without ever dividing by the total time; 24 km/h uses only the speed of the first stage (12 km in 30 minutes), ignoring the second stage and the rest; 28 km/h averages the two separate stage speeds, 24 km/h and 32 km/h, instead of using total distance over total time.
- (d) It crosses the x-axis at x = 3 and x = −3. — y = x² − 9 factorises as (x − 3)(x + 3), since 9 = 3², so the curve crosses the x-axis at x = 3 and x = −3. Saying it crosses once at x = 9 mistakes the constant term for a root directly, without taking its square root. Saying it crosses at x = 9 and x = −9 makes the same mistake but adds a sign either way. Saying it does not cross the x-axis confuses the y-intercept, which is negative at (0, −9), with the number of times the curve meets the x-axis — a negative y-intercept combined with an upward-opening curve guarantees it crosses the x-axis twice.
- (c) 32 — Using the rule 3n + 4: the 3rd term is 3 × 3 + 4 = 13, and the 5th term is 3 × 5 + 4 = 19, so their sum is 13 + 19 = 32. Forgetting to add the 4 for the 3rd term, 3 × 3 = 9, and adding the correct 5th term, gives 9 + 19 = 28. Rounding the 19 up to 20 to make the addition easier and then forgetting to take the extra 1 back off, 13 + 20 = 33, gives 33. Using the rule 4n + 3 instead of 3n + 4 gives 4 × 3 + 3 = 15 and 4 × 5 + 3 = 23, summing to 38.
- (b) 5.00 — Continuing the iteration: x₁ = √(2 × 1 + 15) = √17 = 4.1231, x₂ = √(2 × 4.1231 + 15) = √23.2462 = 4.8214, x₃ = √(2 × 4.8214 + 15) = √24.6428 = 4.9642, x₄ = √(2 × 4.9642 + 15) = √24.9284 = 4.9928, and the values keep climbing towards 5.00 as n increases (the limit L satisfies L² = 2L + 15, so L² − 2L − 15 = 0, giving L = 5). Choosing 4.99 stops after x₄, one iteration before the value has settled fully to 5.00. Choosing 17.00 uses the value under the very first square root (2 × 1 + 15 = 17) as if that number itself were the limit. Choosing 1.00 assumes the sequence never moves from the starting value x₀.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.