Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 8 s — Rearranging v = u + at for t: subtract u from both sides to get v − u = at, then divide by a: t = (v − u)/a. Substituting u = 4, a = 2, v = 20: t = (20 − 4)/2 = 16/2 = 8 s. Answering 12 s comes from adding u instead of subtracting it: (20 + 4)/2 = 12. Answering 32 s comes from multiplying (v − u) by a instead of dividing by it: 16 × 2 = 32. Answering 6 s divides v by a first and then subtracts u, in the wrong order: 20/2 − 4 = 10 − 4 = 6. The time taken is 8 s.
- (a) Overestimates — trapezium edges lie above the curve. — For a concave-up curve, each chord connecting two points on the curve lies ABOVE the curve between those points, because the curve bends away from the chord underneath it. The trapezium rule uses these chords as the top edges of each trapezium, so the trapeziums cover a larger region than the true area under the curve — the estimate is an overestimate. Saying it underestimates because the edges lie below the curve gets the direction backwards: for a concave-up curve the edges lie above, not below. Saying it overestimates 'because more strips always increase it' gives the right verdict for the wrong reason — using MORE, narrower strips makes a trapezium estimate more accurate and brings it closer to the true area, it does not simply increase the total. Saying the estimate is exact ignores that straight edges cannot follow a curved line perfectly; there is always a gap between the chord and the curve on a bend, which is exactly what makes the rule an estimate rather than an exact calculation.
- (a) Tuesday, by 2 km/h — Monday's speed is 15 ÷ 2.5 = 6 km/h and Tuesday's speed is 12 ÷ 1.5 = 8 km/h, so Tuesday was faster, by 8 − 6 = 2 km/h. A candidate who works out the correct speeds but mislabels which day is faster gets Monday, by 2 km/h. A candidate who divides 15 ÷ 2.5 incorrectly as 5 instead of 6 gets a difference of 8 − 5 = 3 km/h, still crediting Tuesday. A candidate who forgets to find Monday's speed and gives Tuesday's speed itself as the difference states Tuesday, by 8 km/h.
- (c) 1, 7, 13, 19 — Method: substitute n = 1, 2, 3, 4 into the rule 6n − 5 in turn. Working: n = 1: 6 − 5 = 1. n = 2: 12 − 5 = 7. n = 3: 18 − 5 = 13. n = 4: 24 − 5 = 19. Answer: 1, 7, 13, 19. 6, 12, 18, 24 comes from using 6n on its own, forgetting to subtract 5. 5, 11, 17, 23 comes from using the rule 6n − 1 instead of 6n − 5, a slip in the constant. 0, 6, 12, 18 comes from using 6(n − 1) instead of 6n − 5, effectively shifting every term one position along.
- (b) x = 5 — Area = length × width, so x(x + 3) = 40, which rearranges to x² + 3x − 40 = 0. This factorises as (x + 8)(x − 5) = 0: the two numbers in the brackets must multiply to −40 and add to +3, and the pair 8 and −5 does both. This gives x = −8 or x = 5. Since x is a length, it cannot be negative, so x = 5. A candidate who gives both solutions without rejecting the negative one, which cannot be a length, answers x = 5 or x = −8. A candidate who picks the wrong factor pair of 40, such as 10 and −4 instead of 8 and −5, gets (x + 10)(x − 4) = 0 and answers x = 4. A candidate who rejects the wrong root, keeping the negative solution instead of the positive one, answers x = −8.
- (c) n = 4 — Testing n = 4: 4² = 16, and 16 + 4 + 1 = 21, and 21 = 3 × 7 is not a prime number, so this value disproves the claim. Testing n = 1: 1² = 1, and 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, which is prime, so it does not disprove the claim. Testing n = 2: 2² = 4, and 4 + 2 + 1 = 7, which is prime. Testing n = 3: 3² = 9, and 9 + 3 + 1 = 13, which is also prime — a counterexample has to give a result that isn't prime, and only n = 4 does that.
- (a) x = 4 or x = −3 — Method: find two numbers that multiply to give −12 and add to give −1 — these are −4 and 3. So x² − x − 12 = (x − 4)(x + 3) = 0, giving x = 4 or x = −3. Distractor origins: x = −4 or x = 3 has the signs the wrong way round; x = 4 or x = 3 makes both roots positive, ignoring the sign of −12; x = 12 or x = −1 comes from reading off the coefficient and the constant directly instead of factorising.
- (a) 3x = 12 — Adding the two equations: the y-terms, +y and −y, have opposite signs, so they cancel; the x-terms combine to 2x + x = 3x; and the right-hand sides add to 11 + 1 = 12. This gives 3x = 12. A candidate who forgets that the y-terms cancel, and instead adds them as if they had the same sign, would write 3x + 2y = 12. A candidate who subtracts the right-hand sides instead of adding them would get 3x = 10. A candidate who correctly reaches 3x = 12 but then treats 12 itself as the value of x, skipping the final division, would write x = 12.
- (a) y = 2ˣ — An exponential graph y = 2ˣ passes through (0, 1) since 2⁰ = 1, rises more and more steeply for positive x, and has the x-axis as an asymptote as x becomes very negative, since 2ˣ gets closer to 0 without ever reaching it. y = x² + 1 also passes through (0, 1) and also rises steeply for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it rises to infinity too, rather than settling towards the x-axis — mistaking any curve that gets steeper for an exponential misses this. y = x³ + 1 passes through (0, 1) and rises for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it falls towards negative infinity rather than approaching the x-axis from above. y = 1 − x² also passes through (0, 1), but it falls for large positive x rather than rising — a candidate who checks only the y-intercept, without reading the described shape of the curve, could pick this.
- (d) x = (y + 3)/4 — Two operations have been applied to x: it has been multiplied by 4 and then 3 has been subtracted. Undo them in the opposite order. Adding 3 to both sides gives y + 3 = 4x. Dividing both sides by 4 then gives (y + 3)/4 = x, so x = (y + 3)/4. The bracket matters: writing y/4 + 3 divides only the y by 4 and leaves the 3 untouched. Writing (y − 3)/4 subtracts the 3 instead of adding it, and writing 4(y + 3) multiplies by 4 rather than dividing.
- (d) x = 6 — Method: with an unknown on both sides, first collect the x terms on one side by subtracting the smaller x term from both sides, then deal with the numbers. Working: subtracting x from both sides gives x + 7 = 13, and subtracting 7 from both sides gives x = 6. Answer: x = 6. The distractors: x = 20 comes from adding 7 to 13 instead of subtracting it once the x terms have been collected; x = 2 comes from collecting the x terms by adding them, giving 3x + 7 = 13 and then 3x = 6; x = −6 comes from subtracting 2x from both sides to get 7 = −x + 13, reaching −6 = −x and then copying the sign straight across instead of dividing by −1.
- (a) Subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. — Method: try to solve the equation as normal and see what happens. Working: subtract 4x from both sides: 4x + 3 − 4x = 4x + 10 − 4x, giving 3 = 10. This statement is false for every value of x, so the equation has no solution. Answer: subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. "x would have to be negative" invents a constraint on x that the equation never states. "It's true for every x" confuses this equation with an identity, where both sides would simplify to the same expression. "x = 7" misreads the false statement 3 = 10 as something to solve for x, rather than recognising it means no solution exists.
- (d) (5x − 1)/(x² − x − 2) — The common denominator is (x + 1)(x − 2) = x² − x − 2. The numerator becomes 2(x − 2) + 3(x + 1) = (2x − 4) + (3x + 3) = 5x − 1, so the sum is (5x − 1)/(x² − x − 2). Choosing 5/(2x − 1) adds the numerators (2 + 3 = 5) and the denominators ((x + 1) + (x − 2) = 2x − 1) directly, which is not how fractions add. Choosing (5x + 1)/(x² − x − 2) comes from expanding 2(x − 2) as 2x − 2 instead of 2x − 4, losing part of the constant term. Choosing (5x − 1)/(x² + x − 2) has the correct numerator but the wrong sign on the x-term when (x + 1)(x − 2) is expanded.
- (d) 2.7 — The height after 3 years of 10% compound growth is 2 × 1.1³ = 2.662 m, which rounds to 2.7 m. A candidate who adds 10% of the original height (0.2 m) in each of the 3 years, instead of compounding on the new height each time, would reach 2 + 3×0.2 = 2.6 m. A candidate who compounds for only 2 years would reach 2 × 1.1² = 2.42 m, rounding to 2.4 m. A candidate who compounds for 4 years instead of 3 would reach 2 × 1.1⁴ = 2.928 m, rounding to 2.9 m.
- (a) 4 — a₅ = a₄ + a₃, so a₄ = a₅ − a₃ = 29 − 11 = 18. a₄ = a₃ + a₂, so a₂ = a₄ − a₃ = 18 − 11 = 7. a₃ = a₂ + a₁, so a₁ = a₃ − a₂ = 11 − 7 = 4. Checking forwards: 4, 7, 11, 18, 29. Answering 7 stops one step early, reporting a₂ = 7 instead of continuing back one more step to a₁ — wrong, because the question asks for a₁, not a₂. Answering 18 reports a₄ = 18, an intermediate value found along the way, instead of a₁ — wrong, because a₄ is a term used to reach the answer, not the term the question asks for. Answering 3 takes one backward step too many, working out a further term a₀ = a₂ − a₁ = 7 − 4 = 3 — wrong, because the sequence starts at a₁, so a₁ = 4 is as far back as the question goes.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.