Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
- (c) x ≤ 4 — Subtract 9 from both sides: −2x ≥ 1 − 9 = −8. Divide both sides by −2, flipping the inequality: x ≤ 4. A candidate who divides by −2 but forgets to flip the inequality gets x ≥ 4. A candidate who divides −8 by −2 but keeps a negative sign gets x ≤ −4. A candidate who miscalculates 1 − 9 as −10 gets x ≤ 5.
- (b) x ≤ 5 — Method: divide out the bracket first, then undo the number term; the inequality sign turns round only if both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Working: dividing both sides of 2(x − 1) ≤ 8 by 2 gives x − 1 ≤ 4, and 2 is positive so the ≤ is unchanged; adding 1 to both sides gives x ≤ 5. Answer: x ≤ 5. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from subtracting 1 from 4 instead of adding 1 to both sides; x ≤ 4 comes from stopping at 8 ÷ 2 = 4 and never undoing the −1 inside the bracket; x < 5 comes from reading ≤ as a strict inequality, which wrongly leaves the boundary value out of the solution set.
- (b) 19 — A line through (x₁, y₁) with gradient m has equation y − y₁ = m(x − x₁). Substituting (6, 1) and m = −3: y − 1 = −3(x − 6), so y = −3x + 18 + 1, which simplifies to y = −3x + 19; at x = 0 this gives 19. Making a sign error when distributing, writing −3(x − 6) as −3x − 18 instead of −3x + 18, gives the wrong line y = −3x − 17, so −17 at x = 0. Forgetting to add the y₁ = 1 at the end, using y = −3(x − 6) alone, gives 18 at x = 0. Substituting the y-coordinate into the gradient term instead of using x, working out 1 + (−3 × 1), gives −2.
- (c) y = 2x + 1 — Method: the gradient of the line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x, and the constant is then found by substituting one of the points into y = mx + c. Working: m = (5 − 3) ÷ (2 − 1) = 2 ÷ 1 = 2, so the line is y = 2x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 3 gives 3 = 2 × 1 + c, so c = 3 − 2 = 1. Answer: y = 2x + 1. The distractors: y = x + 2 comes from taking the gradient as the change in x, 2 − 1 = 1, and then substituting (1, 3) to reach a constant of 2; y = 2x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 2 × 1 − 3 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = 2x + 3 comes from using the y-coordinate of (1, 3) as the constant without substituting at all.
- (c) L/5 − 3 — Each of the 5 equal pieces is L/5 metres long, and removing 3 metres from one piece gives L/5 − 3. Subtracting the 3 metres before dividing by 5, (L − 3)/5, divides the removed length between all 5 pieces instead of taking it from just one. Dividing only the 3 by 5 instead of dividing L by 5, L − 3/5, divides the wrong number. Writing 5/L − 3 inverts the fraction, swapping which number is the numerator.
- (a) It gets closer to zero but never actually reaches it. — y = 60 × (0.5)ˣ is always positive, however large x is, because a positive number raised to any power stays positive. As x increases, (0.5)ˣ gets smaller and smaller but never equals zero, so y approaches zero without ever reaching it. Believing the curve reaches zero when x = 60, because 60 is the starting value, mixes up the y-intercept with a stopping point — an exponential decay curve like this one never actually reaches the x-axis, so this is wrong. Believing the curve goes negative for large x is wrong because multiplying a positive number by (0.5) any number of times can never produce a negative result. Believing the curve levels off at y = 0.5, confusing the base of the exponential with its eventual level, is wrong: the base only controls how fast the curve falls, not where it settles — this curve settles at y = 0, not y = 0.5. Whenever you sketch an exponential decay curve, draw it approaching the x-axis but never touching it.
- (a) 16 — A and B share the same y-coordinate, so the distance between them is the horizontal difference between their x-coordinates: 8 − (−8) = 16, giving a chord of length 16. Choosing 8 gives only the x-coordinate of one point, not the full distance between the two points. Choosing 34 is the diameter of the circle (2 × 17), not the length of this particular chord. Choosing 17 is the radius — the distance from the centre to A or to B, not from A to B.
- (b) 8 kg — The cost above the flat £5 charge is 17 − 5 = £12. At £2 per kg, this covers 12 ÷ 2 = 6 kg above the first 2 kg, so the total weight is 2 + 6 = 8 kg. Dividing the full £17 by £2 per kg without first taking off the £5 flat charge gives 17 ÷ 2 = 8.5 kg. Taking off the £5 flat charge and dividing by £2 per kg, but forgetting to add back the 2 kg that the flat charge covers, gives 12 ÷ 2 = 6 kg. Taking off £2 instead of £5 as the flat charge, (17 − 2) ÷ 2 = 7.5 kg, swaps which number is the fixed fee.
- (c) 32 — The terms are 60, 53, 46, 39, 32 — each found by subtracting 7 from the term before, so the 5th term is 32. Subtracting 7 five times from the first term instead of four times, 60 − 7 × 5 = 25, treats the first term as if it came before the sequence starts. Adding 7 four times instead of subtracting, 60 + 7 × 4 = 88, uses the wrong operation. Stopping one term early gives the 4th term, 39.
- (a) 2 m/s² — Method: acceleration = change in speed ÷ time = (17 − 5) ÷ 6 = 12 ÷ 6 = 2 m/s². Distractor origins: 12 m/s² stops after finding the change in speed and forgets to divide by the time; 22 m/s² adds the two speeds instead of subtracting them, and also forgets to divide by time (5 + 17 = 22); 72 m/s² multiplies the change in speed by the time instead of dividing (12 × 6 = 72).
- (b) 1 at x = 90° — The graph of y = sin x rises from (0°, 0) to its maximum value of 1 at x = 90°, a quarter of the way through the period. Thinking the maximum occurs where the graph crosses the y-axis, at the start of the curve, gives 1 at x = 0°, but sin 0° = 0, not the maximum. Thinking the maximum occurs halfway to x = 360°, rather than a quarter of the way, gives 1 at x = 180°, but sin 180° = 0, not the maximum. Swapping the roles of the maximum value and the x co-ordinate at which it occurs gives 90 at x = 1, but the maximum value of sin x is 1, not 90.
- (c) 32 — Using the rule 3n + 4: the 3rd term is 3 × 3 + 4 = 13, and the 5th term is 3 × 5 + 4 = 19, so their sum is 13 + 19 = 32. Forgetting to add the 4 for the 3rd term, 3 × 3 = 9, and adding the correct 5th term, gives 9 + 19 = 28. Rounding the 19 up to 20 to make the addition easier and then forgetting to take the extra 1 back off, 13 + 20 = 33, gives 33. Using the rule 4n + 3 instead of 3n + 4 gives 4 × 3 + 3 = 15 and 4 × 5 + 3 = 23, summing to 38.
- (a) 6 — Subtracting the second equation from the first: the x-terms, 4x and 4x, cancel; the y-terms combine as 3y − (−y) = 4y; and the right-hand sides give 25 − 1 = 24. This gives 4y = 24, so y = 6. A candidate who subtracts in the wrong order would get 4y = 1 − 25 = −24, so y = −6. A candidate who forgets the sign on the −y term, treating 3y − y as 2y, would get 2y = 24, so y = 12. A candidate who divides 24 by 6 instead of 4 would get y = 4.
- (c) Statement (ii) — Statement (ii) opens with 'Since n(n + 1) is even', treating the very fact the proof is meant to establish as if it were already known — that is circular reasoning, assuming the conclusion to help derive itself. Statement (i) only names the two consecutive integers as n and n + 1; it makes no claim about whether their product is even, so it introduces nothing circular. Statement (iii) states the conclusion, and would be a valid final step if statement (ii) had reached 'one of n and n + 1 is even' by a genuine argument, such as considering the cases where n is even or odd separately. Saying the proof assumes nothing circular is wrong, because statement (ii)'s opening clause is exactly that assumption.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.