Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 10 m/s — A symmetric chord gradient uses the two points either side of t = 3: (2, 40) and (4, 60). The gradient is the change in height divided by the change in time: (60 − 40) ÷ (4 − 2) = 20 ÷ 2 = 10 m/s. Using only the values either side of one gap, (2, 40) and (3, 54), instead of the full symmetric chord, gives (54 − 40) ÷ (3 − 2) = 14 m/s. Getting the correct number but dropping the time unit, leaving only metres, gives 10 m. Dividing time by height instead of height by time inverts the calculation to (4 − 2) ÷ (60 − 40) = 0.1 s/m.
- (c) 2.61 — The limit L satisfies L = 12 ÷ (L + 2), so L(L + 2) = 12, giving L² + 2L − 12 = 0 and L = (−2 + √52) ÷ 2 = 2.6056, which is 2.61 to 2 decimal places (the early iterates 4, 2, 3, 2.4, 2.73, ... oscillate around this value before settling). Choosing 3.00 reads off x₃, one of the early oscillating values, before the sequence has settled close to the limit. Choosing 4.00 reads off x₁, the very first iterate, not the value the sequence approaches. Choosing 6.00 comes from writing the limit equation as L = 12 ÷ 2, leaving L itself out of the denominator.
- (b) x = (y − 3)/5 — To make x the subject of y = 5x + 3, first subtract 3 from both sides to get y − 3 = 5x, then divide both sides by 5: x = (y − 3)/5. Writing x = (y + 3)/5 keeps the division correct but does not change the sign of the 3 when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 − 3 divides only the y term by 5 and leaves the 3 as a separate subtraction, instead of subtracting first and dividing the whole expression. Writing x = 5(y − 3) applies the correct order of subtracting 3 first, but then multiplies by 5 instead of dividing — the inverse of 5x is division, not multiplication. The correct rearrangement is x = (y − 3)/5.
- (a) −1/3 — The gradient of L is 3, the coefficient of x in y = mx + c form. The gradient of a line perpendicular to a line of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1/m. So the perpendicular gradient is −1/3. Distractor routes: 3 gives the gradient of L itself, forgetting to change it at all — that is the gradient of a PARALLEL line. 1/3 takes the reciprocal of 3 but keeps the same sign, missing the negative sign a perpendicular gradient requires. −3 negates the gradient of L but does not take its reciprocal, giving the gradient of a line with the opposite slope rather than a perpendicular one.
- (b) 2n + 3 — Method: multiply the cost per mile by the number of miles to get an expression, then add the fixed fee as a separate term. Working: n miles at £2 each is 2n; add the £3 fixed fee: 2n + 3. Answer: 2n + 3. 3n + 2 comes from swapping the fee and the rate round, treating £3 as the rate per mile and £2 as the fixed fee. 5n comes from adding the fee and the rate together first (3 + 2 = 5) and multiplying the result by n, instead of keeping the fixed fee as its own term. 2n − 3 comes from subtracting the fixed fee instead of adding it.
- (a) y = −2x + 7 — Using y = −2x + c, and substituting the point (3, 1): 1 = −2(3) + c, so 1 = −6 + c, and c = 7, giving y = −2x + 7. A candidate who uses the y-coordinate of the point directly as the y-intercept, instead of solving for c, would write y = −2x + 1. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient would write y = 2x + 7. A candidate who makes a sign error when isolating c, writing c = 1 − 6 = −5 instead of c = 1 + 6 = 7, would write y = −2x − 5.
- (d) x = (y + 3)/4 — Two operations have been applied to x: it has been multiplied by 4 and then 3 has been subtracted. Undo them in the opposite order. Adding 3 to both sides gives y + 3 = 4x. Dividing both sides by 4 then gives (y + 3)/4 = x, so x = (y + 3)/4. The bracket matters: writing y/4 + 3 divides only the y by 4 and leaves the 3 untouched. Writing (y − 3)/4 subtracts the 3 instead of adding it, and writing 4(y + 3) multiplies by 4 rather than dividing.
- (c) 1, 7, 13, 19 — Method: substitute n = 1, 2, 3, 4 into the rule 6n − 5 in turn. Working: n = 1: 6 − 5 = 1. n = 2: 12 − 5 = 7. n = 3: 18 − 5 = 13. n = 4: 24 − 5 = 19. Answer: 1, 7, 13, 19. 6, 12, 18, 24 comes from using 6n on its own, forgetting to subtract 5. 5, 11, 17, 23 comes from using the rule 6n − 1 instead of 6n − 5, a slip in the constant. 0, 6, 12, 18 comes from using 6(n − 1) instead of 6n − 5, effectively shifting every term one position along.
- (a) 8 — f(x − 1) means every input to f is reduced by 1 before it is looked up. At x = 2, the input to f becomes 2 − 1 = 1, so f(x − 1) at x = 2 is f(1) = 8. Reading f(2) = 4 directly from the table, without applying the shift, gives 4. Shifting in the wrong direction, using x + 1 = 3 instead of x − 1 = 1, gives f(3) = 1. Confusing f(x − 1) with f(x) − 1 — taking f(2) = 4 and then subtracting 1 — gives 3.
- (a) y = 2ˣ + 3 — A translation of 3 units in the positive y-direction shifts the whole graph up, which means adding to the output: y = f(x) + k with k = 3, so the image is y = 2ˣ + 3. Adding the 3 inside the power instead of outside it, which translates the graph horizontally instead of vertically, gives y = 2ˣ⁺³. Using a negative 3, which moves the graph down instead of up, gives y = 2ˣ − 3. Mistaking 2ˣ for the linear expression 2x and adding 3 inside brackets gives y = 2(x + 3).
- (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
- (c) No — that moment has already passed — Method: call the number of years from now x, add x to both ages, form the equation from the comparison and then interpret the value of x that comes out. Working: in x years Harry will be 14 + x and Mia will be 8 + x, so 14 + x = 2(8 + x); expanding gives 14 + x = 16 + 2x, and subtracting x and 16 from both sides gives x = −2. A negative value of x places the moment two years in the past, when Harry was 12 and Mia was 6 and 12 = 2 × 6, so it is not something still to come. Answer: no — that moment has already passed. The distractors: the claim that it has never happened and never will comes from reaching x = −2 and reading a negative number of years as no solution at all, when x = −2 does not say that no such moment exists but says where it is — two years before now; the claim that it happens when Harry is 16 comes from doubling Mia's present age, 2 × 8 = 16, and reading that as the age Harry has to reach; the claim that it happens when Harry is 20 comes from expanding 2(8 + x) as 8 + 2x, doubling only the x, which gives x = 6.
- (b) y = −(1/3)x + 2 — Method: two lines are perpendicular when the product of their gradients is −1, so the gradient of a line perpendicular to one of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1 divided by m. Working: reading m from y = 3x + 1 gives a gradient of 3, so the perpendicular gradient is −1 ÷ 3 = −1/3, and the line carrying that gradient is y = −(1/3)x + 2; the check 3 × (−1/3) = −1 confirms it. Answer: y = −(1/3)x + 2. The distractors: y = 3x − 4 comes from using an equal gradient, which is the test for parallel lines rather than perpendicular ones; y = (1/3)x + 2 comes from turning the gradient upside down but leaving out the change of sign, giving a product of 1 instead of −1; y = −3x + 2 comes from changing the sign of the gradient without turning it upside down, giving a product of −9.
- (a) 3 and 7 — Method: one equation is linear and the other is not, so rearrange the linear equation and substitute it into the other to leave a single quadratic in one letter. Working: x + y = 10 gives y = 10 − x, so xy = 21 becomes x(10 − x) = 21, which rearranges to x² − 10x + 21 = 0; factorising gives (x − 3)(x − 7) = 0, so the two values are 3 and 7, and 3 + 7 = 10 with 3 × 7 = 21. Answer: 3 and 7. The distractors: 1 and 21 comes from using only the product and taking the first factor pair of 21; −3 and −7 comes from factorising as (x + 3)(x + 7), which reverses the sign of both values; 5 and 5 comes from using only the sum and splitting 10 into two equal parts.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.