Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 3c + 2d — Method: 'triple c' is 3c, 'double d' is 2d, and 'add' joins the two separate terms with a plus sign. Working: 3c + 2d. Answer: 3c + 2d. 2c + 3d comes from swapping which letter gets tripled and which gets doubled. 6cd comes from multiplying the two terms together instead of adding them, and also multiplying the coefficients (3 × 2 = 6). 5(c + d) comes from adding the coefficients (3 + 2 = 5) and applying that single number to both letters together, as if c and d always came as a pair.
- (a) Yes — the t² coefficient is negative, giving an n-shape. — The coefficient of t² in h = −5t² + 20t is −5, which is negative, so the graph is n-shaped with a maximum point — this matches the physical story of the rocket rising then falling, but the shape itself is decided by the negative coefficient of t², not by the story alone. Saying the shape comes from the story rather than the coefficient gets the reasoning backwards — the algebra determines the shape, and the story happens to agree with it. Saying it is U-shaped because height starts by increasing confuses the early part of the curve with its overall shape; a U-shaped curve would mean the rocket's height eventually increases again forever, which does not happen here. Saying it is n-shaped only because the rocket lands treats a consequence of the shape as if it were the cause.
- (c) 19 — Method: set up the equation 15 + 9n = 186, then subtract the deposit and divide by the cost per student. Working: 9n = 186 − 15 = 171; n = 171 ÷ 9 = 19. Answer: 19 students. 20.67 comes from dividing the whole £186 by £9 without first subtracting the deposit: 186 ÷ 9 ≈ 20.67. 11.8 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £9 and dividing by £15: (186 − 9) ÷ 15 = 11.8. 22.33 comes from adding the deposit instead of subtracting it: (186 + 15) ÷ 9 ≈ 22.33.
- (c) Wrong — the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. — Rearranging x − 2 = x² − 4x + 2 by moving every term across: 0 = x² − 4x + 2 − x + 2 = x² − 5x + 4. The candidate's x-term is wrong: combining −4x with the moved −x gives −4x − x = −5x, not −3x. So the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. Distractor routes: "x² − 3x + 4 = 0 is correct" simply agrees with the candidate's sign error without checking it. "It should be x² − 5x − 4 = 0" correctly spots that something is wrong but blames the wrong term — the constant, 2 + 2 = 4, is correct; the error is in the x-term. "Subtracting is the same as adding" states something false: subtracting a term and adding it give different signs.
- (d) (0, 4) — Method: in the form y = mx + c the constant c is the y-coordinate of the point where the line crosses the y-axis, and every point on that axis has x-coordinate 0. Working: comparing y = 2x + 4 with y = mx + c gives c = 4, and substituting x = 0 confirms y = 2 × 0 + 4 = 4, so the crossing point is (0, 4). Answer: (0, 4). The distractors: (4, 0) is the same pair of numbers written in the wrong order and is a point on the x-axis; (0, 2) comes from reading the gradient 2 as the intercept, confusing m with c; (−2, 0) is where the line crosses the x-axis, found by solving 0 = 2x + 4 instead.
- (b) 6x + 6 — Perimeter = 2[(2x + 5) + (x − 2)] = 2(3x + 3) = 6x + 6. A candidate who adds the length and width but forgets to double for the perimeter gets 3x + 3. A candidate who makes a sign error and adds 2 instead of subtracting it before doubling gets 2[(2x + 5) + (x + 2)] = 6x + 14. A candidate who multiplies the length and width instead of adding them, confusing the perimeter formula with the area formula, and then doubles that product, gets 2(2x + 5)(x − 2) = 4x² + 2x − 20.
- (b) 3w − 5 ≥ 16 — "Three times w, minus 5" translates to 3w − 5, and "is at least 16" means it must be 16 or more, giving 3w − 5 ≥ 16. A candidate who reads "at least" as a strict inequality writes 3w − 5 > 16. A candidate who misreads the wording and applies the subtraction before the multiplication writes 3(w − 5) ≥ 16. A candidate who reverses the direction of the inequality writes 3w − 5 ≤ 16.
- (c) 6,400 — 9 hours contains 9 ÷ 3 = 3 whole periods of doubling, so the population is 800 × 2³. Since 2³ = 8, the population after 9 hours is 800 × 8 = 6,400. Adding 100% growth three times instead of compounding it — treating the growth as simple, not repeated doubling — gives 800 × 4 = 3,200, which is wrong because each period doubles the CURRENT population, not the original one. Using 9 as the power instead of dividing by the 3-hour period first gives 800 × 2⁹ = 409,600, which is wrong because the exponent counts periods, not hours. Giving the growth factor 2³ = 8 on its own, without multiplying by the starting population 800, leaves the answer as 8, which is wrong because the question asks for the population, not the multiplier. Always check that your final number of periods matches the total time divided by the period length.
- (a) −3/4 — Method: the tangent at a point on a circle is perpendicular to the radius drawn to that point, so find the gradient of the radius and then take its negative reciprocal. Working: the radius joins (0, 0) to (6, 8), so its gradient is 8 ÷ 6, which cancels to 4/3. Turning 4/3 upside down gives 3/4, and changing the sign gives −3/4. Answer: the gradient of the tangent is −3/4. The distractors: 4/3 is the gradient of the radius itself, quoted without taking the perpendicular at all; −4/3 changes the sign but leaves the fraction the same way up, so the two gradients do not multiply to give −1; 3/4 turns the fraction upside down but keeps it positive, which is the other half of the same rule left undone.
- (b) £115, and C = 40 + 25h is a formula — Substitute h = 3 into the rule, multiplying before adding. The hours cost 25 × 3 = 75, and adding the call-out fee gives 40 + 75 = 115, so the charge is £115. The rule itself links two different quantities, C and h, and lets one be worked out from the other, so it is a formula; an expression would have no equals sign in it. Adding the fee before multiplying gives 65 × 3 = 195, which charges the call-out fee three times over, and stopping at 40 + 25 leaves £65, the charge for a single hour.
- (d) Overestimate — the curve bends upward (convex). — The first differences of the speeds are 3, 5, 7 and 9, so the second differences are 2, 2 and 2 — constant and positive, which means the speed-time graph curves upwards (is convex). On a convex curve, each straight chord used by the trapezium rule lies above the curve, so the trapezium rule overestimates the true distance. 'Underestimate — the curve bends upward' states the same correct geometry but gets the conclusion backwards — a chord above the curve means too much area is counted, not too little. 'Overestimate — the speed values are increasing' uses the wrong evidence: increasing speed alone doesn't tell you whether the curve bends up or down, only the second differences do. 'Underestimate — second differences are constant' confuses a constant second difference with a steady rate of change in speed, which isn't what the second difference of a speed-time table measures.
- (d) It has a solution between x = 2.2 and x = 2.3 — Since f(2.2) is negative and f(2.3) is positive, the graph of f crosses the x-axis somewhere between x = 2.2 and x = 2.3, so the equation has a solution in that interval. Choosing 'between x = −2.2 and x = −2.3' confuses the negative f-VALUE at 2.2 with a negative x-value. Choosing 'no solution' misreads a change of sign as meaning the opposite of what it shows. Choosing 'exactly two solutions' assumes a single change of sign must give two roots, which is not what the rule guarantees.
- (a) A translation by vector (0, 3) — y = x² + 3 adds a constant outside the squaring, so it is a vertical translation of y = x² — every point moves the same distance parallel to the y-axis, with no change in x. The vector is (0, 3), matching the +3. A vector of (3, 0) confuses this with a horizontal shift; (0, −3) has the right axis but the wrong sign, since the graph moves up, not down; a stretch changes the shape of the curve, which adding a constant term never does.
- (c) −6 — Method: substitute the value, work out the bracket first, then multiply what the bracket comes to by 2. Working: the bracket gives (−5) + 2 = −3, and multiplying by 2 gives 2 × (−3) = −6. Answer: −6. The distractors: −3 comes from working out the bracket correctly but stopping there and never multiplying by 2; −1 comes from multiplying the 2 inside the bracket by the 2 outside before adding, giving −5 + 4; −8 comes from multiplying only the x by 2 and leaving the 2 inside the bracket unchanged, giving −10 + 2.
- (b) −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 — Factorise x² − 2x − 8 = (x − 4)(x + 2), giving roots x = 4 and x = −2. Since the coefficient of x² is positive and the inequality is ≤ 0, the solution is the closed interval between the roots, −2 ≤ x ≤ 4, with the roots included because the inequality is not strict. The integers in this interval are −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Distractor routes: −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 drops both endpoints, treating ≤ as if it were the strict inequality <. −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 5)(x + 2), giving an upper root of 5 instead of 4. −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 4)(x + 3), giving a lower root of −3 instead of −2.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.