Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) Overestimate — the curve bends upward (convex). — The first differences of the speeds are 3, 5, 7 and 9, so the second differences are 2, 2 and 2 — constant and positive, which means the speed-time graph curves upwards (is convex). On a convex curve, each straight chord used by the trapezium rule lies above the curve, so the trapezium rule overestimates the true distance. 'Underestimate — the curve bends upward' states the same correct geometry but gets the conclusion backwards — a chord above the curve means too much area is counted, not too little. 'Overestimate — the speed values are increasing' uses the wrong evidence: increasing speed alone doesn't tell you whether the curve bends up or down, only the second differences do. 'Underestimate — second differences are constant' confuses a constant second difference with a steady rate of change in speed, which isn't what the second difference of a speed-time table measures.
- (d) −11/60 — The radius from the origin to (11, 60) has gradient 60/11. The tangent is perpendicular to this radius, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal: −1 ÷ (60/11) = −11/60. Choosing 60/11 uses the radius's gradient unchanged, without applying perpendicularity. Choosing −60/11 negates the radius's gradient but forgets to take its reciprocal. Choosing 11/60 takes the reciprocal correctly but keeps the gradient positive instead of negative.
- (a) 2 — The candle's height falls from 30 cm to 20 cm, a drop of 10 cm, over 5 minutes, so m = 10 ÷ 5 = 2. 10 comes from using the drop in height but forgetting to divide by the time. 0.5 comes from dividing the time by the drop instead of the drop by the time (5 ÷ 10). 4 comes from dividing the final height by the time, 20 ÷ 5, instead of using the drop in height.
- (d) 66 — 6 and (4x + 3) are correct factors of 24x + 18. — Substituting x=2 into 24x+18: 24×2+18=48+18=66. Checking the factorisation: 6×4x=24x and 6×3=18, so 6(4x+3)=24x+18, matching the original expression — 6 and (4x+3) are correctly identified as factors. A candidate who substitutes x=2 into (4x+3) but forgets to multiply by the factor 6 afterwards would compute just 4×2+3=11. A candidate who adds 24 and 18 together before multiplying by x, instead of multiplying 24 by x first, would compute (24+18)×2=84. A candidate who distributes the 6 over only the first term inside the brackets, forgetting the second, would check the factorisation as 6×4x=24x but leave the 3 unmultiplied, getting 24x+3 instead of 24x+18 — and would wrongly conclude that 6 and (4x+3) are not correct factors.
- (b) h = 2A/b — The height has been multiplied by the base and the result then divided by 2, so undo the division first. Multiplying both sides by 2 gives 2A = bh. Undoing the multiplication by the base comes next: dividing both sides by b gives 2A/b = h, so h = 2A/b. Dividing by 2 instead of multiplying gives A/(2b), a quarter of the correct height; multiplying by the base instead of dividing gives 2Ab; writing b/(2A) turns the final fraction upside down.
- (c) 2.61 — The limit L satisfies L = 12 ÷ (L + 2), so L(L + 2) = 12, giving L² + 2L − 12 = 0 and L = (−2 + √52) ÷ 2 = 2.6056, which is 2.61 to 2 decimal places (the early iterates 4, 2, 3, 2.4, 2.73, ... oscillate around this value before settling). Choosing 3.00 reads off x₃, one of the early oscillating values, before the sequence has settled close to the limit. Choosing 4.00 reads off x₁, the very first iterate, not the value the sequence approaches. Choosing 6.00 comes from writing the limit equation as L = 12 ÷ 2, leaving L itself out of the denominator.
- (d) n/2 + 5 — Half of n is n ÷ 2, which is written as the fraction n/2. 'More than' means add, and the addition happens after the halving, so the expression is n/2 + 5. Writing (n + 5)/2 halves the 5 as well, because everything inside a bracket is divided; writing 2n + 5 doubles n instead of halving it; writing 5n/2 multiplies half of n by 5 instead of adding 5 to it.
- (c) P — Sequence P has a common ratio of 2 (4 × 2 = 8, 8 × 2 = 16, 16 × 2 = 32), so it is geometric. Sequence Q has a common difference of 4, which is arithmetic, not geometric — a candidate who confuses a constant difference with a constant ratio picks Q. Sequence R has increasing differences of 3, 5, 7, a quadratic sequence, not geometric — a candidate who assumes any fast-growing sequence must be geometric picks R. Sequence S is the square numbers from 2² onwards (2², 3², 4², 5²), which is also quadratic, not geometric — a candidate who thinks squaring always means geometric growth picks S.
- (a) 3x/2 — Factorise top and bottom first: 6x³ − 15x² = 3x²(2x − 5), and 4x² − 10x = 2x(2x − 5). The bracket (2x − 5) is common to both, so it cancels, leaving 3x²/(2x); dividing the power of x, 3x² ÷ x = 3x, gives 3x/2. Writing 3x²/2 cancels the (2x − 5) correctly and removes the denominator's x, but never reduces the power of x left in the numerator — 3x² ÷ x should give 3x, not stay as 3x². Writing 3/2 cancels the (2x − 5) correctly but then drops the x from the numerator altogether, treating 3x² over x as if it cancelled completely to 3 instead of reducing to 3x. Writing −3x/2 comes from factorising the denominator with the wrong sign, as 2x(5 − 2x) instead of 2x(2x − 5); cancelling (5 − 2x) against the numerator's (2x − 5) then needs an extra minus sign, which flips the answer to −3x/2.
- (d) The cost increases by about £10 per extra item — Gradient = change in cost ÷ change in items = (800 − 400) ÷ (70 − 30) = 400 ÷ 40 = 10. The units of the gradient are £ per item, so the cost is increasing by about £10 for every extra item produced, near x = 50. Subtracting in the wrong order, (400 − 800) ÷ (70 − 30) = −10, gives the right size but the wrong sign — check which point comes first each time. Leaving out the division by 40 gives £400 per item; dividing the wrong way round, 40 ÷ 400 = 0.1, gives £0.10 per item.
- (b) x ≤ −2 — Method: take the number term off both sides, then divide by the coefficient of x; the sign turns round only when you divide BY a negative number, and here you divide by 3. Working: subtracting 6 from both sides of 3x + 6 ≤ 0 gives 3x ≤ −6; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ −2. Answer: x ≤ −2. The distractors: x ≥ −2 comes from turning the sign round because the right-hand side has become negative, which is not the rule; it is the sign of the divisor that matters; x ≤ 2 comes from moving the 6 across without changing its sign, giving 3x ≤ 6; x ≤ −18 comes from multiplying both sides by 3 instead of dividing by it.
- (d) x = 5y + 4 — To make x the subject of y = (x − 4)/5, first multiply both sides by 5 to clear the fraction: 5y = x − 4, then add 4 to both sides: x = 5y + 4. Writing x = 5y − 4 multiplies correctly but keeps the minus sign on the 4 instead of changing it to a plus when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 + 4 divides by 5 instead of multiplying, the wrong inverse of the fraction. Writing x = 5(y + 4) adds 4 before multiplying by 5, reversing the correct order of the two steps. The correct rearrangement is x = 5y + 4.
- (a) 12 — Method: write both ages as they were six years ago, call Leo's present age x, and form an equation from the comparison at that time. Working: six years ago Harry was 24 − 6 = 18 and Leo was x − 6, so 18 = 3(x − 6); expanding gives 18 = 3x − 18, adding 18 to both sides gives 36 = 3x, and dividing by 3 gives x = 12. Checking: six years ago Harry was 18 and Leo was 6, and 18 = 3 × 6. Answer: 12. The distractors: 6 comes from solving 18 = 3(x − 6) as far as Leo's age six years ago, 18 ÷ 3 = 6, and giving that as his age now; 8 comes from dividing Harry's present age by 3, 24 ÷ 3 = 8, using the multiple at the wrong moment in time; 36 comes from stopping at 3x = 36 and giving 36 as Leo's age.
- (c) (3, 9) — Reflecting in the horizontal line y = 2 keeps the x-coordinate the same and maps y to 2 × 2 − y = 4 − (−5) = 9, so S = (3, 9). A candidate who uses k − y instead of 2k − y gets 2 − (−5) = 7, giving (3, 7). A candidate who reflects in the x-axis instead of the line y = 2, simply changing the sign of y, gets (3, 5). A candidate who also changes the sign of the x-coordinate, as if reflecting in both axes, gets (−3, 9).
- (b) 8 kg — The cost above the flat £5 charge is 17 − 5 = £12. At £2 per kg, this covers 12 ÷ 2 = 6 kg above the first 2 kg, so the total weight is 2 + 6 = 8 kg. Dividing the full £17 by £2 per kg without first taking off the £5 flat charge gives 17 ÷ 2 = 8.5 kg. Taking off the £5 flat charge and dividing by £2 per kg, but forgetting to add back the 2 kg that the flat charge covers, gives 12 ÷ 2 = 6 kg. Taking off £2 instead of £5 as the flat charge, (17 − 2) ÷ 2 = 7.5 kg, swaps which number is the fixed fee.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.