Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) They always charge the same, since 3(2n + 4) = 6n + 12. — Expand Advert A's formula by multiplying both terms inside the bracket by 3: 3 × 2n = 6n, and 3 × 4 = 12, giving 3(2n + 4) = 6n + 12, which is identical to Advert B's formula — so the two adverts always charge the same amount, whatever n is. Getting 6n + 4 comes from multiplying the 2n by 3 but leaving the 4 unmultiplied. Getting 2n + 7 comes from adding 3 to the bracket instead of multiplying by it. Saying it depends on n avoids expanding the bracket at all — once expanded, both formulas are identical for every value of n, so the cost can be compared directly.
- (b) 8 kg — The cost above the flat £5 charge is 17 − 5 = £12. At £2 per kg, this covers 12 ÷ 2 = 6 kg above the first 2 kg, so the total weight is 2 + 6 = 8 kg. Dividing the full £17 by £2 per kg without first taking off the £5 flat charge gives 17 ÷ 2 = 8.5 kg. Taking off the £5 flat charge and dividing by £2 per kg, but forgetting to add back the 2 kg that the flat charge covers, gives 12 ÷ 2 = 6 kg. Taking off £2 instead of £5 as the flat charge, (17 − 2) ÷ 2 = 7.5 kg, swaps which number is the fixed fee.
- (d) w ≤ 630 — 'No more than 630 kg' means the weight can be exactly 630 kg or anything less, so the correct inequality is w ≤ 630, using 'less than or equal to' to include the limit itself. Writing w < 630 excludes 630 kg itself, as though the limit could not be reached exactly. Writing w ≥ 630 reverses the direction, describing a minimum weight rather than a maximum. Writing w > 630 both reverses the direction and excludes the boundary value. The inequality describing the lift's weight limit is w ≤ 630.
- (b) x ≤ 5 — Method: divide out the bracket first, then undo the number term; the inequality sign turns round only if both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Working: dividing both sides of 2(x − 1) ≤ 8 by 2 gives x − 1 ≤ 4, and 2 is positive so the ≤ is unchanged; adding 1 to both sides gives x ≤ 5. Answer: x ≤ 5. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from subtracting 1 from 4 instead of adding 1 to both sides; x ≤ 4 comes from stopping at 8 ÷ 2 = 4 and never undoing the −1 inside the bracket; x < 5 comes from reading ≤ as a strict inequality, which wrongly leaves the boundary value out of the solution set.
- (d) x₂ closer: f(x₂) = 0.0225, nearer to 0 — f(2.6) = 2.6² − 7 = 6.76 − 7 = −0.24, and f(2.65) = 2.65² − 7 = 7.0225 − 7 = 0.0225. The closer a value of x is to the root, the closer f(x) is to zero — regardless of sign. Since |0.0225| = 0.0225 is much smaller than |−0.24| = 0.24, x₂ = 2.65 is closer to the root. 'x₁ closer: −0.24 is the smaller value' comes from comparing the SIGNED values of f(x) rather than their distances from zero — −0.24 is indeed less than 0.0225 as a number, but that does not mean x₁ is closer to the root. 'x₁ closer: f(x₁) negative ⇒ nearer root' invents a rule that a negative f(x) means x is closer to the root; the sign of f(x) only tells you which side of the root x is on, not how close it is. 'x₂ is the exact root, since f(x₂) ≈ 0' misreads f(x₂) = 0.0225 as zero; the true root is √7 ≈ 2.6458, so f(2.65) is close to zero but not equal to it, and x₂ is an approximation, not the exact root.
- (b) 2n + 3 — Method: multiply the cost per mile by the number of miles to get an expression, then add the fixed fee as a separate term. Working: n miles at £2 each is 2n; add the £3 fixed fee: 2n + 3. Answer: 2n + 3. 3n + 2 comes from swapping the fee and the rate round, treating £3 as the rate per mile and £2 as the fixed fee. 5n comes from adding the fee and the rate together first (3 + 2 = 5) and multiplying the result by n, instead of keeping the fixed fee as its own term. 2n − 3 comes from subtracting the fixed fee instead of adding it.
- (a) 52 — Test successive terms: n=6 gives 6²+3=39, which is not greater than 50. n=7 gives 7²+3=52, which is greater than 50, so the first term greater than 50 is 52. A candidate who stops at n=6, before checking whether 39 actually exceeds 50, would give 39. A candidate who solves n²>50 instead of n²+3>50, ignoring the +3 in the search, would find n=8 is the first value with n²>50 (since 7²=49) and compute 8²+3=67. A candidate who computes n² by doubling n instead of squaring it would compute 2×7+3=17.
- (a) x = −1.8 and x = 2.8 — Method: the solutions of x² − x − 2 = 3 are the x-coordinates of the points where the curve y = x² − x − 2 meets the line y = 3, read off the grid to 1 decimal place. Working: the curve meets the line y = 3 at approximately x = −1.8 and at x = 2.8. Answer: x ≈ −1.8 and x ≈ 2.8. Distractor refutation: x = −1.0 and x = 2.0 comes from reading where the curve crosses the x-axis (y = 0), solving x² − x − 2 = 0, instead of where it meets the line y = 3. x = −3.0 and x = 4.0 comes from taking the two ends of the drawn curve as the intersection points, instead of finding where it actually crosses the line y = 3. x = 1.8 and x = 2.8 comes from a sign slip on the left-hand intersection, reading it as positive instead of negative.
- (d) x² − 6x + 9 — Method: squaring a bracket means multiplying that bracket by itself, so expand (x − 3)(x − 3) term by term and then collect like terms. Working: x × x = x², x × (−3) = −3x, (−3) × x = −3x and (−3) × (−3) = 9, giving x² − 3x − 3x + 9, and the two middle terms collect to −6x. Answer: x² − 6x + 9. The distractors: x² − 3x + 9 comes from writing down only one of the two middle products instead of both; x² + 6x + 9 comes from treating (−3) × x as +3x, so the middle terms are added rather than subtracted; x² − 9 comes from treating the square as the difference of two squares (x − 3)(x + 3).
- (a) 23 — The number of logs increases by 4 for each layer down, starting from 3 in the top layer, so the nth layer has 3+(n−1)×4 logs. For the 6th layer: 3+5×4=3+20=23. A candidate who adds the difference of 4 six times instead of five, treating the top layer as needing an addition too, would compute 3+6×4=27. A candidate who uses 4n instead of 4n−1, omitting the adjustment for the first layer, would compute 4×6=24. A candidate who subtracts the common difference, 4, instead of 1 when adjusting the multiplier would compute 4×6−4=20.
- (b) 4 — Adding the two equations: the y-terms, −2y and +2y, cancel, and the x-terms combine to 5x + 3x = 8x; the right-hand sides add to 16 + 16 = 32. This gives 8x = 32, so x = 4. A candidate who adds only one of the right-hand sides, instead of both, would get 8x = 16, so x = 2. A candidate who divides 32 by 4 instead of 8 would get x = 8. A candidate who subtracts the equations instead of adding them, getting 2x − 4y = 0, and then wrongly assumes y = 0, would get x = 0.
- (b) 5.00 — Continuing the iteration: x₁ = √(2 × 1 + 15) = √17 = 4.1231, x₂ = √(2 × 4.1231 + 15) = √23.2462 = 4.8214, x₃ = √(2 × 4.8214 + 15) = √24.6428 = 4.9642, x₄ = √(2 × 4.9642 + 15) = √24.9284 = 4.9928, and the values keep climbing towards 5.00 as n increases (the limit L satisfies L² = 2L + 15, so L² − 2L − 15 = 0, giving L = 5). Choosing 4.99 stops after x₄, one iteration before the value has settled fully to 5.00. Choosing 17.00 uses the value under the very first square root (2 × 1 + 15 = 17) as if that number itself were the limit. Choosing 1.00 assumes the sequence never moves from the starting value x₀.
- (d) y = (x + 3)(x − 5) — A root at x = −3 means the matching bracket must be zero when x = −3, so the bracket is (x − (−3)) = (x + 3). A root at x = 5 means the other bracket is (x − 5). So the equation is y = (x + 3)(x − 5); checking the y-intercept, (0 + 3)(0 − 5) = 3 × (−5) = −15, which matches the given value. The option (x − 3)(x + 5) swaps the signs of both roots. The option (x + 3)(x + 5) keeps the correct sign for the first root but gets the second wrong. The option (x − 3)(x − 5) gets the first root's sign wrong.
- (c) 307.1 g — The multiplier for one hour is 1 − 0.15 = 0.85. After 3 hours the mass is 500 × 0.85³. Since 0.85 × 0.85 = 0.7225 and 0.85 × 0.7225 = 0.614125, the mass is 500 × 0.614125 = 307.0625 g, which rounds to 307.1 g. Stopping after only 2 hours instead of 3 gives 500 × 0.7225 = 361.25 g, which rounds to 361.3 g — wrong, because the question asks for 3 hours, not 2. Treating the decay as simple (15% × 3 = 45% lost in total, applied once) gives 500 × 0.55 = 275.0 g, which is wrong because the decay compounds hour by hour rather than adding up. Working out the AMOUNT LOST instead of the mass remaining gives 500 − 307.0625 = 192.9375 g, which rounds to 192.9 g — wrong, because the question asks what remains, not what has decayed away. Whenever a percentage decreases repeatedly, multiply by the same factor each period rather than adding the percentages together.
- (a) 4.897 — Method: substitute the starting value into the right-hand side of the formula to get x₁, then feed each new value back in, keeping the whole calculator display every time and rounding only at the very end. Working: x₁ = √(5 × 2 + 2) = √12 = 3.46410…; x₂ = √(5 × 3.46410… + 2) = √19.32050… = 4.39551…; x₃ = √(5 × 4.39551… + 2) = √23.97755… = 4.89668…, which is 4.897 correct to 3 decimal places. Answer: 4.897. The distractors: 4.396 is x₂, written down by a candidate who counts the starting value x₀ as the first iterate and so stops one use of the formula early; 3.464 is x₁, the value after using the formula only once; 5.146 is x₄, one use of the formula too many — the mirror image of the first slip, made by a candidate who labels the first value worked out as x₀ rather than as x₁ and so runs the count a step long.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.