Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 72 m — The first section is a triangle with base 4 s and height 8 m/s, area = 1/2 × 4 × 8 = 16 m. The middle section is a rectangle with base 6 s and height 8 m/s, area = 6 × 8 = 48 m. The final section is a triangle with base 2 s and height 8 m/s, area = 1/2 × 2 × 8 = 8 m. Total distance = 16 + 48 + 8 = 72 m. Treating both sloping sections as full rectangles instead of triangles — forgetting the factor of a half — gives 4 × 8 + 6 × 8 + 2 × 8 = 96 m, which is wrong because a sloping speed-time section is a triangle, not a rectangle. Leaving out the final, decreasing section entirely gives 16 + 48 = 64 m, which is wrong because the cyclist is still moving and covering distance while slowing down. Leaving out the middle, constant-speed section gives 16 + 8 = 24 m, which is wrong because the cyclist covers the most distance of all during the 6 seconds of constant speed.
- (a) 130 — Method: substitute the total bill into the formula, then subtract the fixed charge and divide by the cost per text message. Working: 24.50 = 18 + 0.05t, so 0.05t = 24.50 − 18 = 6.50, t = 6.50 ÷ 0.05 = 130. Answer: 130 extra text messages. 490 comes from dividing the whole bill by 0.05 without first subtracting the £18 fixed charge: 24.50 ÷ 0.05 = 490. 13 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.5 instead of 0.05, moving the decimal point one place too far: 6.50 ÷ 0.5 = 13. 65 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.1 instead of 0.05.
- (d) 400 m — The distance travelled equals the area under the speed-time graph. The first 10 seconds form a triangle with base 10 and height 20, giving an area of 0.5 × 10 × 20 = 100 m. The next 15 seconds form a rectangle with base 15 and height 20, giving an area of 15 × 20 = 300 m. The total distance is 100 + 300 = 400 m. The option 500 m treats the whole 25 seconds as travelled at the constant 20 m/s, ignoring that the speed was building up during the first 10 seconds: 25 × 20 = 500. The option 300 m only counts the constant-speed section and forgets the triangle section entirely. The option 200 m comes from working out the triangle's area without halving it (10 × 20 = 200) and forgetting the rectangle altogether.
- (d) 6th term — The terms are aₙ = 3 × (√3)ⁿ⁻¹: a₁ = 3, a₂ = 3√3 ≈ 5.196, a₃ = 9, a₄ = 9√3 ≈ 15.588, a₅ = 27, a₆ = 27√3 ≈ 46.765. Since a₅ = 27 is still below 30 and a₆ ≈ 46.8 is above 30, the 6th term is the first to exceed 30. 4th term comes from treating the common ratio as 3 instead of √3: 3, 9, 27, 81, … — under that wrong ratio, 81, the 4th term, is the first over 30. 5th term comes from misjudging a₅ = 27 as already greater than 30. 7th term comes from tracking only the whole-number terms (3, 9, 27, 81, …) and reporting the ORIGINAL position of 81 in the full sequence — 81 is indeed a₇, but a₆ ≈ 46.8 already exceeds 30 first.
- (c) x = 2, y = 3 — Method: no letter cancels straight away, so make one letter the subject of one equation and substitute that expression into the other. Working: 2x + y = 7 gives y = 7 − 2x, so x + 2y = 8 becomes x + 2(7 − 2x) = 8, that is x + 14 − 4x = 8, so −3x = −6 and x = 2; substituting back gives y = 7 − 4 = 3. Answer: x = 2, y = 3, which checks in 2 + 6 = 8. The distractors: x = 3, y = 2 comes from adding the equations to x + y = 5 and then subtracting them the wrong way round, writing x − y = 1 instead of x − y = −1; x = 2, y = 5 comes from substituting x = 2 into 2x + y = 7 as 2 + y = 7, dropping the coefficient; x = −2, y = 11 comes from dividing −3x = −6 as though two minus signs gave a negative answer.
- (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
- (d) x² − 6x + 9 — Method: squaring a bracket means multiplying that bracket by itself, so expand (x − 3)(x − 3) term by term and then collect like terms. Working: x × x = x², x × (−3) = −3x, (−3) × x = −3x and (−3) × (−3) = 9, giving x² − 3x − 3x + 9, and the two middle terms collect to −6x. Answer: x² − 6x + 9. The distractors: x² − 3x + 9 comes from writing down only one of the two middle products instead of both; x² + 6x + 9 comes from treating (−3) × x as +3x, so the middle terms are added rather than subtracted; x² − 9 comes from treating the square as the difference of two squares (x − 3)(x + 3).
- (a) x = 6 — Method: a minus sign in front of a bracket changes the sign of every term inside it, so expand the bracket first and then simplify. Working: expanding gives 4x − 2x + 6 = 18, which simplifies to 2x + 6 = 18; subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 12, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 6. Answer: x = 6. The distractors: x = 12 comes from leaving the −6 unchanged when the bracket is removed, giving 4x − 2x − 6 = 18 and so 2x = 24; x = 24 comes from reaching 2x = 12 correctly and then multiplying by 2 instead of dividing by 2; x = 3 comes from dividing by 2 too early, at 2x + 6 = 18, and dividing only the 2x and the 18 while leaving the 6 untouched, which gives x + 6 = 9.
- (d) It diverges, growing rapidly without limit. — x₁ = 2³ − 2 = 8 − 2 = 6. x₂ = 6³ − 2 = 216 − 2 = 214. x₃ = 214³ − 2 = 9800344 − 2 = 9800342. The values 6, 214, 9800342, … grow far larger at every step, so the sequence diverges rather than settling anywhere. Checking whether the sequence converges to a fixed value near 2 fails, since the terms grow enormously instead of levelling off. Checking for a repeating pair of values also fails, since 6, 214 and 9800342 are all different, with no sign of a return to 6. x₀ = 2 is a fixed point only if 2³ − 2 = 2, but 2³ − 2 = 6, not 2, so the sequence does not stay constant.
- (d) 44 m — The trapezium rule between t = 2 and t = 5 uses only the speeds at t = 2, 3, 4 and 5 — 12, 15, 16 and 14 — with three strips of width 1: adding the first and last readings and twice the sum of the middle readings gives 12 + 14 + 2 × (15 + 16) = 88, and half of that is 44 m. Writing 68.5 m comes from applying the trapezium rule to the whole table, from t = 0 to t = 6, instead of restricting it to the interval t = 2 to t = 5 that the question asks for. Writing 28.5 m comes from forgetting to double the two middle readings, 15 and 16, in the trapezium rule formula. Writing 39 m comes from averaging only the first and last speeds in the interval, 12 and 14, and multiplying by the 3-second interval, ignoring the readings at t = 3 and t = 4 in between.
- (d) x = 5y + 4 — To make x the subject of y = (x − 4)/5, first multiply both sides by 5 to clear the fraction: 5y = x − 4, then add 4 to both sides: x = 5y + 4. Writing x = 5y − 4 multiplies correctly but keeps the minus sign on the 4 instead of changing it to a plus when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 + 4 divides by 5 instead of multiplying, the wrong inverse of the fraction. Writing x = 5(y + 4) adds 4 before multiplying by 5, reversing the correct order of the two steps. The correct rearrangement is x = 5y + 4.
- (a) Overestimates — trapezium edges lie above the curve. — For a concave-up curve, each chord connecting two points on the curve lies ABOVE the curve between those points, because the curve bends away from the chord underneath it. The trapezium rule uses these chords as the top edges of each trapezium, so the trapeziums cover a larger region than the true area under the curve — the estimate is an overestimate. Saying it underestimates because the edges lie below the curve gets the direction backwards: for a concave-up curve the edges lie above, not below. Saying it overestimates 'because more strips always increase it' gives the right verdict for the wrong reason — using MORE, narrower strips makes a trapezium estimate more accurate and brings it closer to the true area, it does not simply increase the total. Saying the estimate is exact ignores that straight edges cannot follow a curved line perfectly; there is always a gap between the chord and the curve on a bend, which is exactly what makes the rule an estimate rather than an exact calculation.
- (b) 3 — Method: a term is any part of an expression separated from the rest by a + or − sign, including a number on its own. Working: 8 − 3x + 5x² splits at the + and − signs into 8, −3x and 5x² — that is three separate terms. Answer: 3. Ryan's answer of 2 comes from wrongly excluding the number 8, thinking a term must contain a letter. 5 comes from miscounting by treating the coefficients and powers as separate terms as well as the letters. 1 comes from treating the whole expression as a single term because it is written without brackets.
- (c) x + 18 — Expand −3(2x − 6) by multiplying both terms by −3: −3 × 2x = −6x and −3 × (−6) = 18, giving 7x − 6x + 18 = x + 18. Writing x − 18 comes from not flipping the sign of the −6 inside the bracket, so −3 × (−6) is treated as −18 instead of +18. Writing x + 6 comes from forgetting to multiply the −6 by 3, only carrying its sign. Writing 13x − 18 comes from treating the whole bracket as being added rather than subtracted, so 3(2x − 6) = 6x − 18 is added to 7x.
- (b) Student B's — narrower strips fit the curve more closely. — The trapezium rule replaces the curve with straight-line segments; the narrower each strip, the more closely its straight edge follows the curve, so Student B's estimate with 8 narrower strips is more likely to be closer to the true area. Reasoning from the number of arithmetic steps rather than from how well the straight lines fit the curve gives the wrong claim that Student A makes fewer rounding errors. Believing the trapezium rule is exact, rather than an estimate that improves with narrower strips, gives the wrong claim that the two are always the same. Believing wider strips smooth out the curve better, rather than following it less closely, gives the wrong claim in favour of Student A's wider strips.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.