Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) x = (y + 8) / 3 — Method: add 8 to both sides, then divide the whole side by 3. Working: y = 3x − 8, so adding 8 to both sides gives y + 8 = 3x, then dividing both sides by 3 gives x = (y + 8) / 3. The value x = y + 8 / 3 is Priya's version, which comes from dividing only the 8 by 3 instead of dividing the whole expression y + 8 by 3. The value x = (y − 8) / 3 comes from a sign error, keeping −8 instead of moving it to +8. The value x = 3(y + 8) comes from multiplying by 3 instead of dividing.
- (c) 26.6 — h² = 1.6² = 2.56, so B = 68 ÷ 2.56 = 26.5625, which rounds to 26.6 (1 d.p.). A candidate who forgets to square the height gets 68 ÷ 1.6 = 42.5. A candidate who squares the mass instead of the height gets 68² ÷ 1.6 = 2890.0. A candidate who truncates 26.5625 instead of rounding it gets 26.5.
- (c) (3, 9) — Reflecting in the horizontal line y = 2 keeps the x-coordinate the same and maps y to 2 × 2 − y = 4 − (−5) = 9, so S = (3, 9). A candidate who uses k − y instead of 2k − y gets 2 − (−5) = 7, giving (3, 7). A candidate who reflects in the x-axis instead of the line y = 2, simply changing the sign of y, gets (3, 5). A candidate who also changes the sign of the x-coordinate, as if reflecting in both axes, gets (−3, 9).
- (c) 32 — Using the rule 3n + 4: the 3rd term is 3 × 3 + 4 = 13, and the 5th term is 3 × 5 + 4 = 19, so their sum is 13 + 19 = 32. Forgetting to add the 4 for the 3rd term, 3 × 3 = 9, and adding the correct 5th term, gives 9 + 19 = 28. Rounding the 19 up to 20 to make the addition easier and then forgetting to take the extra 1 back off, 13 + 20 = 33, gives 33. Using the rule 4n + 3 instead of 3n + 4 gives 4 × 3 + 3 = 15 and 4 × 5 + 3 = 23, summing to 38.
- (a) y = −3x − 5 — Gradient = (−8 − 4) ÷ (1 − (−3)) = −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Using the point (1, −8): −8 = −3(1) + c, so c = −5, giving y = −3x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient, using m = 3 instead, would then solve −8 = 3(1) + c to get c = −11, writing y = 3x − 11. A candidate who makes a sign error isolating c, writing c = 5 instead of −5, would write y = −3x + 5. A candidate who mixes up both mistakes — keeping the correct gradient but the wrong, positive value of c from the flipped-gradient calculation — would write y = −3x + 11.
- (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
- (b) 235 litres — The flow rate at t = 10 is the gradient of the tangent: change in volume ÷ change in time = (190 − 130) ÷ (12 − 8) = 60 ÷ 4 = 15 litres per minute. Treating this rate as roughly constant for a short interval, the volume 5 minutes after t = 10 is estimated as 160 + 5 × 15 = 235 litres. Using the tangent's own point spacing — 2 minutes, from t = 10 to t = 12 — instead of the 5 minutes actually asked for gives 160 + 2 × 15 = 190, which is just the volume already given at one of the tangent's own points, not an answer to the question asked. Multiplying the gradient by the time WITHOUT adding the starting volume, 5 × 15 = 75, forgets that a rate estimates a CHANGE, which must be added to the starting volume, not given as the answer on its own. Subtracting instead of adding, 160 − 5 × 15 = 85, extrapolates backward in time rather than forward.
- (d) y = (x + 3)(x − 5) — A root at x = −3 means the matching bracket must be zero when x = −3, so the bracket is (x − (−3)) = (x + 3). A root at x = 5 means the other bracket is (x − 5). So the equation is y = (x + 3)(x − 5); checking the y-intercept, (0 + 3)(0 − 5) = 3 × (−5) = −15, which matches the given value. The option (x − 3)(x + 5) swaps the signs of both roots. The option (x + 3)(x + 5) keeps the correct sign for the first root but gets the second wrong. The option (x − 3)(x − 5) gets the first root's sign wrong.
- (a) Outside: OQ² = 221 > r² = 169 — OQ² = 10² + 11² = 100 + 121 = 221. Comparing this with r² = 169: since 221 > 169, OQ > r, so Q lies outside the circle — this is the correct verdict AND the correct working. 'Outside: OQ = 21 (10 + 11) > r = 13' reaches the same Outside verdict, but by invalid working: it adds the coordinates instead of squaring them (10 + 11 = 21, rather than 10² + 11² = 221), so the stated 'OQ' of 21 is not a distance at all — the verdict happens to match, but the method is wrong. 'Inside: OQ ≈ 14.87 < r² = 169' correctly finds the distance OQ = √221 ≈ 14.87, but then compares that DISTANCE with r² = 169 instead of with r = 13 — comparing two different kinds of quantity gives a meaningless, and here wrong, verdict. 'Inside: OQ² = 221 < (2r)² = 676' confuses the radius with the diameter: it compares OQ² with the diameter squared, (2 × 13)² = 676, instead of with r² = 169.
- (a) (6, 8) — Method: a point lies on the circle x² + y² = 100 exactly when the squares of its two coordinates add to 100, so square both coordinates of each point and add them. Working: for (6, 8), 6² + 8² = 36 + 64 = 100, which matches the right-hand side of the equation. Answer: (6, 8) lies on the circle. The distractors: (3, 4) is the 3, 4, 5 right-angled triangle recalled but never scaled up to a radius of 10, and 3² + 4² = 25, so it lies on the far smaller circle x² + y² = 25; (5, 5) has coordinates adding to 10, which compares the sum of the coordinates with the radius instead of the sum of their squares with r², and 5² + 5² = 50; (10, 10) takes each coordinate separately to equal the radius, and 10² + 10² = 200, which is twice too big.
- (d) It crosses the x-axis at x = 3 and x = −3. — y = x² − 9 factorises as (x − 3)(x + 3), since 9 = 3², so the curve crosses the x-axis at x = 3 and x = −3. Saying it crosses once at x = 9 mistakes the constant term for a root directly, without taking its square root. Saying it crosses at x = 9 and x = −9 makes the same mistake but adds a sign either way. Saying it does not cross the x-axis confuses the y-intercept, which is negative at (0, −9), with the number of times the curve meets the x-axis — a negative y-intercept combined with an upward-opening curve guarantees it crosses the x-axis twice.
- (a) x ≈ 6.70 — Since the two roots sum to 7, the other root is 7 − 0.30 = 6.70. The option 7.30 comes from adding the given root to 7 instead of subtracting it. The option 6.30 comes from subtracting 0.70 (one minus the given root) rather than the given root itself. The option 0.70 confuses the required root with the amount by which the given root falls short of 1.
- (c) 27 days — The campaign starts at d = 3 and ends at d = 30, so it runs for 30 − 3 = 27 days. Getting 33 days comes from adding the two values, 3 + 30 = 33, instead of subtracting them. Getting 30 days uses only the end day and ignores that the campaign did not start at day 0. Getting 24 days comes from subtracting the start day twice, 30 − 3 − 3 = 24, instead of once.
- (b) −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 — Factorise x² − 2x − 8 = (x − 4)(x + 2), giving roots x = 4 and x = −2. Since the coefficient of x² is positive and the inequality is ≤ 0, the solution is the closed interval between the roots, −2 ≤ x ≤ 4, with the roots included because the inequality is not strict. The integers in this interval are −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Distractor routes: −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 drops both endpoints, treating ≤ as if it were the strict inequality <. −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 5)(x + 2), giving an upper root of 5 instead of 4. −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 4)(x + 3), giving a lower root of −3 instead of −2.
- (b) y = 2x and y = −(1/2)x + 1 — Method: two lines are perpendicular when the product of their gradients is −1, so the gradient of each line is read from the number multiplying x and the two are multiplied together. Working: for y = 2x and y = −(1/2)x + 1 the gradients are 2 and −1/2, and 2 × (−1/2) = −1, so that pair is perpendicular. Answer: y = 2x and y = −(1/2)x + 1. The distractors: the pair y = 2x and y = 2x + 1 has equal gradients, whose product is 4, so those two lines are parallel and never meet, and they are chosen by a candidate applying the parallel condition; the pair y = 2x and y = −2x + 1 comes from changing the sign of the gradient without turning it upside down, and its product is −4; the pair y = 2x and y = (1/2)x + 1 comes from turning the gradient upside down without changing its sign, and its product is 1.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.