Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) An identity, true for every value of x — Expanding the bracket on the left gives 3x + 12, which matches the right-hand side exactly, so the statement is true for every value of x — this makes it an identity. A candidate who reasons that any statement with an equals sign must be an equation picks that option, missing that an equation is only true for particular value(s) of x, not all of them. A candidate who confuses an identity with a formula, because both relate two expressions, picks the formula option — but a formula connects two different quantities, such as area and side length, not two equivalent forms of the same expression. A candidate who assumes it can be solved for a single value of x, as with a normal equation, picks that option, not realising there is no single solution here.
- (a) x ≈ 6.70 — Since the two roots sum to 7, the other root is 7 − 0.30 = 6.70. The option 7.30 comes from adding the given root to 7 instead of subtracting it. The option 6.30 comes from subtracting 0.70 (one minus the given root) rather than the given root itself. The option 0.70 confuses the required root with the amount by which the given root falls short of 1.
- (c) Week 16, £37,000 — y = f(x − 6) − 8000 combines a horizontal translation of 6 units RIGHT (subtracting 6 inside the brackets) with a vertical translation of £8000 DOWN (subtracting 8000 outside). Applying both to the maximum (10, 45000): 10 + 6 = 16, so the new maximum is in week 16. And 45000 − 8000 = 37000, so the maximum weekly profit is £37,000.
- (c) No — that moment has already passed — Method: call the number of years from now x, add x to both ages, form the equation from the comparison and then interpret the value of x that comes out. Working: in x years Harry will be 14 + x and Mia will be 8 + x, so 14 + x = 2(8 + x); expanding gives 14 + x = 16 + 2x, and subtracting x and 16 from both sides gives x = −2. A negative value of x places the moment two years in the past, when Harry was 12 and Mia was 6 and 12 = 2 × 6, so it is not something still to come. Answer: no — that moment has already passed. The distractors: the claim that it has never happened and never will comes from reaching x = −2 and reading a negative number of years as no solution at all, when x = −2 does not say that no such moment exists but says where it is — two years before now; the claim that it happens when Harry is 16 comes from doubling Mia's present age, 2 × 8 = 16, and reading that as the age Harry has to reach; the claim that it happens when Harry is 20 comes from expanding 2(8 + x) as 8 + 2x, doubling only the x, which gives x = 6.
- (a) 842.0 — The radius to (20, 21) has gradient 21/20, so the tangent's gradient is −20/21. The tangent line is y − 21 = −20/21(x − 20), i.e. y = −20/21x + 841/21. Setting y = 0 gives the x-intercept x = 841/20 = 42.05; setting x = 0 gives the y-intercept y = 841/21 ≈ 40.048. The area of triangle OPQ is 1/2 × 42.05 × 40.048 ≈ 842.0. 1684.0 comes from multiplying the two intercepts without the 1/2 that a triangle's area needs — twice the correct area. 580.7 comes from using the circle's radius, 29, as a side of the triangle instead of the x-intercept, 42.05: 1/2 × 29 × 40.048 ≈ 580.7. 2.0 comes from a sign error in the tangent's gradient — using 20/21 instead of −20/21 — which gives a different line, with intercepts x ≈ −2.05 and y ≈ 1.952, and area 1/2 × 2.05 × 1.952 ≈ 2.0.
- (d) 30° and 150° — The first solution is x = 30°, since sin 30° = 0.5. The graph of y = sin x is symmetrical about x = 90° between 0° and 180°, so the second solution is 180° − 30° = 150°. Adding 180° to the first solution instead of subtracting it from 180° gives 30° and 210°, but sin 210° = −0.5, not 0.5. Reflecting the first solution about x = 90° by adding 30° to 90° instead of subtracting from 180° gives 30° and 120°, but sin 120° = √3/2, not 0.5. Misremembering the standard value and using sin 45° = 0.5 instead of sin 30° = 0.5 gives 45° and 135°, but sin 45° = √2/2, not 0.5.
- (a) Positive x-direction, 90°; image is y = sin x. — Writing cos(x − 90°) as cos(x − a) with a = 90 shows this is a horizontal translation, y = f(x − a), which moves the graph 90° in the positive x-direction; the identity cos(x − 90°) = sin x confirms the image is y = sin x. Choosing the negative x-direction reverses the sign inside the bracket — subtracting inside the bracket always translates in the positive x-direction, not the negative one, so that statement is wrong on direction. Getting the direction right but conflating the subtraction inside the bracket with an extra reflection of the output flips the sign of the resulting graph, wrongly giving y = −sin x. Treating the subtraction as if it changed the output directly, rather than the input, wrongly calls this a vertical translation even while still correctly recalling that the image simplifies to y = sin x.
- (d) 7n − 2 — Method: find how much the total cost rises each month, then find the constant that fits the cost for one month. Working: the cost rises by £7 for each extra month (12 − 5 = 7, 19 − 12 = 7, 26 − 19 = 7), so the cost has the form 7n + c. Substituting n = 1: 7(1) + c = 5, so c = −2. Answer: the total cost in pounds is 7n − 2. The value 7n comes from leaving out the constant. The value 7n + 5 comes from using the cost of one month as the constant directly, without subtracting the monthly rise first. The value 5n + 7 comes from swapping the roles of the cost of one month, £5, and the monthly rise, £7 — using the cost of one month as the coefficient of n and the rise as the constant.
- (c) 3.153 — x₁ = √(4 × 1 + 1) = √5 = 2.236067977. x₂ = √(4 × 2.236067977 + 1) = √9.944271908 = 3.153453965, which rounds to 3.153. Reporting x₁ instead of x₂ gives 2.236067977, which rounds to 2.236. A sign error inside the root, using xₙ₊₁ = √(4xₙ − 1) instead of √(4xₙ + 1), gives x₁ = √3 = 1.732050808 and x₂ = √(4 × 1.732050808 − 1) = √5.928203232 = 2.434790182, which rounds to 2.435. Applying the formula in the wrong order, working out √(4xₙ) + 1 at every step instead of √(4xₙ + 1), gives x₁ = √4 + 1 = 3 and x₂ = √(4 × 3) + 1 = 4.464101615, which rounds to 4.464.
- (c) Statement (ii) — Statement (ii) opens with 'Since n(n + 1) is even', treating the very fact the proof is meant to establish as if it were already known — that is circular reasoning, assuming the conclusion to help derive itself. Statement (i) only names the two consecutive integers as n and n + 1; it makes no claim about whether their product is even, so it introduces nothing circular. Statement (iii) states the conclusion, and would be a valid final step if statement (ii) had reached 'one of n and n + 1 is even' by a genuine argument, such as considering the cases where n is even or odd separately. Saying the proof assumes nothing circular is wrong, because statement (ii)'s opening clause is exactly that assumption.
- (d) 28 cm — Method: rate = 12 cm ÷ 3 min = 4 cm per minute. Depth after 7 minutes = 4 × 7 = 28 cm. Distractor origins: 84 cm multiplies the given depth by 7 directly, without first finding the rate per minute (12 × 7 = 84); 24 cm simply doubles the given depth instead of scaling correctly by the ratio of times; 16 cm combines the numbers with subtraction and addition (12 − 3 + 7 = 16) instead of finding a rate.
- (a) x = 3.5 — Method: clear the fractions by multiplying both sides by 15, expand both brackets, then collect the x terms on one side and the numbers on the other. Working: multiplying both sides by 15 gives 3(3x + 2) = 5(x + 4), which expands to 9x + 6 = 5x + 20; subtracting 5x and 6 from both sides gives 4x = 14, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x = 3.5. Answer: x = 3.5. The distractors: x = 1 comes from collecting the x terms by adding the 5x instead of subtracting it, giving 9x + 5x = 20 − 6 and so 14x = 14; x = 4.5 comes from expanding 3(3x + 2) as 9x + 2, multiplying only the x term by the 3, which leads to 4x = 18; x = 10 comes from reaching 4x = 14 correctly and then subtracting 4 instead of dividing by 4.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
- (b) 10 — Check n = 9: a₉ = 3 × 2⁸ = 3 × 256 = 768, below 1,000. Check n = 10: a₁₀ = 3 × 2⁹ = 3 × 512 = 1,536, above 1,000. So the first term greater than 1,000 is at position n = 10. Answering 9 comes from forgetting the −1 shift and using the formula as 3 × 2ⁿ instead of 3 × 2ⁿ⁻¹: checking 3 × 2⁹ = 1,536 (which exceeds 1,000) but then reporting the position as n = 9, the exponent used, instead of n = 10 — wrong, because the exponent in the real formula is n − 1, not n. Answering 11 comes from going one term too far: correctly finding that a₁₀ already exceeds 1,000, but then checking one position further and reporting n = 11 instead of stopping at the first position that already works — wrong, because n = 11 is not the FIRST term greater than 1,000. Answering 1,536 gives the VALUE of the term (a₁₀ itself) rather than its position — wrong, because the question asks which term it is (the value of n), not what that term is worth.
- (c) x ≥ 3 — Method: collect the number terms first; the x term is negative, so the final step multiplies both sides by −1, and that is the one step that turns the inequality sign round. Working: subtracting 5 from both sides of 5 − x ≤ 2 gives −x ≤ −3; multiplying both sides by −1 turns −x into x and −3 into 3, and because the multiplier is negative the ≤ becomes ≥, so x ≥ 3. Answer: x ≥ 3. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from multiplying by −1 without turning the sign round, the commonest slip on this type; x ≤ −3 comes from reading −x ≤ −3 as though the minus sign could simply be rubbed off the left-hand side; x ≥ −3 comes from turning the sign round correctly but leaving the right-hand side at −3 instead of multiplying it by −1 as well.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.