Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 4x − 4 = 20 — Method: subtract 2x from both sides of the equation, and simplify each side separately. Working: left side: 6x − 4 − 2x = 4x − 4. Right side: 2x + 20 − 2x = 20. Answer: 4x − 4 = 20. 4x = 20 drops the −4 from the left side, as though subtracting 2x also removes the constant term. 8x − 4 = 20 comes from moving the 2x across to the left without changing its sign: it is taken off the right side correctly, leaving 20, but added to the left side instead of subtracted, giving 6x + 2x = 8x. 4x − 4 = 2x + 20 comes from subtracting 2x from the left-hand side only and leaving the right-hand side unchanged; whatever is done to one side must be done to the other.
- (a) Overestimates — trapezium edges lie above the curve. — For a concave-up curve, each chord connecting two points on the curve lies ABOVE the curve between those points, because the curve bends away from the chord underneath it. The trapezium rule uses these chords as the top edges of each trapezium, so the trapeziums cover a larger region than the true area under the curve — the estimate is an overestimate. Saying it underestimates because the edges lie below the curve gets the direction backwards: for a concave-up curve the edges lie above, not below. Saying it overestimates 'because more strips always increase it' gives the right verdict for the wrong reason — using MORE, narrower strips makes a trapezium estimate more accurate and brings it closer to the true area, it does not simply increase the total. Saying the estimate is exact ignores that straight edges cannot follow a curved line perfectly; there is always a gap between the chord and the curve on a bend, which is exactly what makes the rule an estimate rather than an exact calculation.
- (a) It gets closer to zero but never actually reaches it. — y = 60 × (0.5)ˣ is always positive, however large x is, because a positive number raised to any power stays positive. As x increases, (0.5)ˣ gets smaller and smaller but never equals zero, so y approaches zero without ever reaching it. Believing the curve reaches zero when x = 60, because 60 is the starting value, mixes up the y-intercept with a stopping point — an exponential decay curve like this one never actually reaches the x-axis, so this is wrong. Believing the curve goes negative for large x is wrong because multiplying a positive number by (0.5) any number of times can never produce a negative result. Believing the curve levels off at y = 0.5, confusing the base of the exponential with its eventual level, is wrong: the base only controls how fast the curve falls, not where it settles — this curve settles at y = 0, not y = 0.5. Whenever you sketch an exponential decay curve, draw it approaching the x-axis but never touching it.
- (c) x = 8 — The turning point lies exactly halfway between the two roots. If the other root is r, the midpoint of −2 and r must be 3, so (−2 + r) ÷ 2 = 3, giving r = 8. Choosing x = 5 comes from adding 2 and 3 rather than using the midpoint relationship correctly. Choosing x = 1 comes from subtracting 2 from 3 instead of reflecting −2 across the turning point. Choosing x = −8 finds the right distance but then reflects in the y-axis instead of in the line of symmetry x = 3, so the sign of the answer is flipped.
- (d) y = −f(x + 2) has a maximum turning point at (1, 5). — y = f(x + 2) translates the graph 2 units in the negative x-direction, so the turning point's x-coordinate moves from 3 to 1; reflecting in the x-axis then negates the y-coordinate, turning −5 into 5, and also turns a minimum into a maximum — giving a true maximum turning point at (1, 5). Translating the root at x = 1 in the wrong direction, adding 2 instead of subtracting it, gives x = 3, but the true image root is at 1 − 2 = −1, so that statement is false. Keeping the coordinates (1, 5) correct but forgetting that reflecting in the x-axis turns a minimum into a maximum gives a false "minimum turning point" statement. Getting the reflection's effect on the turning-point type right (a maximum) but translating the x-coordinate in the wrong direction, using 3 + 2 = 5 instead of 3 − 2 = 1, gives a false statement at (5, 5).
- (b) 6 — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis turns the minimum point (2, −3) into a maximum point at (2, 3), since −f(x) negates every y-value: −(−3) = 3. Adding a then gives 3 + a = 9, so a = 9 − 3 = 6. Forgetting the reflection and using the original y-value of −3 gives −3 + a = 9, so a = 12 — this ignores that −f(x) changes the sign of the y-coordinate before a is added. Writing a = −12 comes from subtracting in the wrong order, working out 9 − (−3) as −3 − 9 instead. Writing a = −6 comes from taking the negative of the correct answer, as if the final value of a needed to be reflected too, on top of the turning point.
- (c) x = (y + 24)/4 — Method: expand the bracket first, then undo the operations done to x in reverse order. Working: y = 4(x − 6) = 4x − 24, so y + 24 = 4x, so x = (y + 24)/4. Answer: x = (y + 24)/4. x = (y + 6)/4 comes from expanding the bracket incorrectly, treating 4(x − 6) as 4x − 6 instead of 4x − 24. x = 4y + 96 comes from multiplying by 4 instead of dividing by 4 to undo the multiplication, giving 4(y + 24) = 4y + 96. x = y/4 − 6 comes from dividing by 4 first without expanding the bracket, then subtracting 6 as if the bracket's operation still applied afterwards.
- (d) 37.0 — C = 5(98.6 − 32) ÷ 9 = 5 × 66.6 ÷ 9 = 333 ÷ 9 = 37.0. A candidate who forgets to subtract 32 first gets 5 × 98.6 ÷ 9 = 54.8 (1 d.p.). A candidate who forgets the 5 ÷ 9 factor entirely and just works out F − 32 gets 66.6. A candidate who multiplies by 9 ÷ 5 instead of 5 ÷ 9 gets 66.6 × 9 ÷ 5 = 119.9 (1 d.p.).
- (c) t = 1 second and t = 5 seconds — The ball is at ground level when h = 0, which happens when either bracket is zero. t − 1 = 0 gives t = 1, and 5 − t = 0 gives t = 5. The option with t = −1 makes a sign error solving the first bracket. The option with t = −5 makes a sign error solving the second bracket, treating 5 − t = 0 as if it gave a negative solution. The option with t = 4 seconds is an arithmetic slip in solving 5 − t = 0.
- (b) 12 — Method: substitute the total cost into the formula, then subtract the fixed cost and divide by the cost per person. Working: 92 = 6p + 20, so 6p = 92 − 20 = 72, p = 72 ÷ 6 = 12. Answer: 12 people. 15.33 comes from dividing the whole £92 by £6 without first subtracting the £20 fixed cost: 92 ÷ 6 ≈ 15.33. 4.3 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £6 and dividing by £20: (92 − 6) ÷ 20 = 4.3. 18.67 comes from adding the fixed cost instead of subtracting it: (92 + 20) ÷ 6 ≈ 18.67.
- (a) (−6, −3) — Reflecting in the y-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate and keeps the y-coordinate the same: (−6, −3). (6, 3) comes from reflecting in the x-axis instead, which changes the sign of the y-coordinate. (−6, 3) comes from reflecting in both axes. (6, −3) comes from not applying the reflection at all.
- (a) 12 km/h — Method: convert 15 minutes to hours: 15 ÷ 60 = 0.25 h. Speed = distance ÷ time = 3 ÷ 0.25 = 12 km/h. Distractor origins: 9 km/h is the speed for the second section (3 km in 20 minutes) instead of the first; 8 km/h is the average speed for the whole journey (6 km in 45 minutes) instead of just the first section; 0.2 km/h divides 3 km by 15 without converting the minutes into hours.
- (b) (2, 4) and (−2, −4) — Substitute y = 2x into x² + y² = 20: x² + (2x)² = 20, which gives x² + 4x² = 20, so 5x² = 20, x² = 4, and x = 2 or x = −2. Using y = 2x for each x-value: x = 2 gives y = 4; x = −2 gives y = −4. The path meets the pond's edge at (2, 4) and (−2, −4). Distractor routes: (2, −4) and (−2, 4) swaps the sign pairing, matching each x-value with the wrong sign of y instead of keeping each x with its own correctly-signed y. (2, 1) and (−2, −1) comes from using y = x/2 instead of y = 2x when finding the y-coordinates. (2, 4) alone stops after the positive square root of x² = 4 and never finds the second point from x = −2.
- (a) x = 3.5 — Method: clear the fractions by multiplying both sides by 15, expand both brackets, then collect the x terms on one side and the numbers on the other. Working: multiplying both sides by 15 gives 3(3x + 2) = 5(x + 4), which expands to 9x + 6 = 5x + 20; subtracting 5x and 6 from both sides gives 4x = 14, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x = 3.5. Answer: x = 3.5. The distractors: x = 1 comes from collecting the x terms by adding the 5x instead of subtracting it, giving 9x + 5x = 20 − 6 and so 14x = 14; x = 4.5 comes from expanding 3(3x + 2) as 9x + 2, multiplying only the x term by the 3, which leads to 4x = 18; x = 10 comes from reaching 4x = 14 correctly and then subtracting 4 instead of dividing by 4.
- (d) 4x + 5 — A minus sign directly before a bracket changes the sign of both terms inside it: 6x − (2x − 5) = 6x − 2x + 5 = 4x + 5. The option 4x − 5 comes from only changing the sign of the 2x term and not the −5, giving 6x − 2x − 5. The option 8x − 5 comes from adding 2x instead of subtracting it, as if the minus sign did not apply to the bracket, giving 6x + 2x − 5. The option 8x + 5 repeats that same addition mistake and also changes the sign of the −5 term.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.