Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Circle theorems worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions on "circle theorems" — DfE statement G10. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.
Higher only
Answer key: Circle theorems worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
- (a) 71° — Method: first use the straight line through T to find the tangent-chord angle RTC, then apply the alternate segment theorem, which states that this angle equals the angle subtended by the chord in the alternate segment. Working: the two rails form a straight line through T, so angle RTC = 180 − 109 = 71 degrees. D lies in the alternate segment of the chord TC, so angle TDC = angle RTC = 71°. Answer: 71°. Find angle RTC FIRST from the straight line before applying the theorem: using the given 109° directly, doubling the tangent-chord angle, or taking its complement from 90° all give the wrong angle at D.
- (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
- (a) 67° — PA and PB are tangents from the same point, so OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem. The kite's angles sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 46° = 134°. C is on the major arc AB, so by the angle at the centre theorem, angle ACB = 134° ÷ 2 = 67°. Doubling angle APB instead of first finding angle AOB from the kite gives 46° + 46° = 92°. Using angle APB directly as if it were the centre angle, then halving it, gives 46° ÷ 2 = 23°. Finding angle AOB = 134° correctly but forgetting to halve it for the angle at the circumference gives 134°. Halve angle AOB, once you've found it properly, and you get 67°.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (b) (2x + 10)° — By the angle at the centre theorem, angle ABC is half of angle AOC, because both stand on the same arc AC: angle ABC = (4x + 20)° ÷ 2 = (2x + 10)°. Writing down the centre angle itself, without halving at all, gives (4x + 20)°. Halving only the constant term and leaving the x-term unchanged gives (4x + 10)°. Doubling the centre angle instead of halving it gives (8x + 40)°. Halve every term in the expression, and (2x + 10)° is what you get.
- (c) Tangent-chord angle = angle in the alternate segment. — This diagram has a diameter AC, a centre O, and a cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, but no tangent anywhere in it. 'Angle in a semicircle = 90°' applies directly, because AC is a diameter. 'Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°' applies directly, because ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral. 'Angle at the centre = twice angle at circumference' applies directly, because O is given as the centre of the circle. The tangent-chord fact relates the angle between a tangent and a chord to an angle elsewhere in the circle, and since this diagram has no tangent, there is nothing in it for that fact to describe — so it is the one theorem that does not apply here.
- (d) Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180° — ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, and angle ABC and angle ADC are a pair of opposite angles in it — they don't sit next to each other around the quadrilateral. The theorem that fixes the sum of a cyclic quadrilateral's opposite angles at 180° is exactly the one needed here. The other three theorems don't apply to this figure at all: the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem gives a 90° angle only when one side is a diameter, and no diameter is mentioned; the angle-at-the-centre theorem needs a centre point and an inscribed angle on the same arc, and no centre is given here; the tangent–radius theorem gives a 90° angle only where a tangent line touches the circle, and there is no tangent in this figure. Only the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem fits what is actually drawn.
- (b) 128° — Angle AOC and angle ABC stand on the same arc AC (the minor arc, which does not contain B), so by the angle at the centre theorem angle ABC = 104° ÷ 2 = 52°. ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, so its opposite angles ABC and ADC sum to 180°: angle ADC = 180° − 52° = 128°. A candidate who finds angle ABC = 52° correctly but then treats opposite angles as equal, as in a parallelogram, instead of supplementary, writes down 52° and stops there. Skipping the halving step and using 104° as angle ABC gives 180° − 104° = 76°. Reading off the given centre angle itself as the final answer, without applying either theorem, gives 104°. Work through both theorems in order and you land on 128°.
- (b) 2x + 2y = 180° — Method: use the fact that OA, OB and OC are all radii, so triangles OAC and OBC are each isosceles, and set up the angle sum of triangle ABC as a whole. Working: since OA = OC, triangle OAC is isosceles, so angle OAC = angle OCA = x. Since OB = OC, triangle OBC is isosceles, so angle OBC = angle OCB = y. The angle at A in triangle ABC is x, the angle at B is y, and the angle at C is angle OCA plus angle OCB, which is x + y. The three angles of triangle ABC sum to 180°, giving x + y + (x + y) = 180°, which is 2x + 2y = 180°. Answer: 2x + 2y = 180°. Dividing this by 2 gives x + y = 90°, and since angle ACB = x + y, this proves angle ACB = 90°: the point C was never restricted to any particular position on the circle, so the proof holds for every choice of C. Include ALL THREE angles of the triangle in the sum, do not use a quadrilateral's 360° total, and remember angle ACB is the SUM x + y, not x alone.
- (d) 49° — Method: first combine the two given angles at the centre to find the whole central angle FOM, then apply the angle-at-the-centre theorem, which halves the central angle to give the angle at the circumference on the major arc. Working: angle FOM = angle FOP + angle POM = 55 + 43 = 98 degrees. Since S is on the major arc FM, angle FSM = 98 ÷ 2 = 49 degrees. Answer: 49°. Add BOTH given angles to find the whole angle FOM before you halve anything: halving only one of them, doubling the total instead of halving it, or subtracting from 180° all give the wrong angle for the programme.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (b) 30 cm — The perpendicular from the centre of a circle to a chord bisects the chord, so this line, half the chord and the radius form a right-angled triangle. Using Pythagoras' theorem, half the chord = √(17² − 8²) = √(289 − 64) = √225 = 15 cm. The full chord AB is twice this length: AB = 2 × 15 = 30 cm. Stopping after finding the half-chord, without doubling it for the whole chord, gives 15 cm. Adding the radius and the perpendicular distance directly, 17 + 8 = 25 cm, ignores that these two lengths are the two shorter sides of a right-angled triangle, not parts of a straight line. Subtracting instead, 17 − 8 = 9 cm, makes the same mistake in the other direction.
- (c) 72° — Method: opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral always sum to 180°. Working: angle DAB and angle BCD are opposite angles of the cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, so angle BCD = 180 − 108 = 72 degrees. Answer: 72°. Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral are SUPPLEMENTARY, not equal, so do not simply copy the given angle; and do not subtract from 360°, which is the rule for angles round a point, or confuse this with the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem, which gives a fixed 90° that has nothing to do with this quadrilateral.
- (a) 24 cm — The line from the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to the chord, so triangle OMA has a right angle at M. By Pythagoras' theorem, AM² = OA² − OM² = 169 − 25 = 144, so AM = 12 cm. AB is twice AM, since M is the midpoint: AB = 2 × 12 = 24 cm. Finding AM = 12 cm correctly but forgetting to double it for the full chord gives 12 cm. Working out 169 − 25 = 144 and forgetting to take the square root gives 144 cm. Subtracting first and then doubling the wrong way, (13 − 5) × 2, gives 16 cm. Doubling AM after finding it correctly is the step that's missing from all three — do it, and you get 24 cm.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.