Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16

Congruence and similarity: lengths, areas and volumes worksheet — GCSE Higher

Fifteen questions on "congruence and similarity: lengths, areas and volumes" — DfE statement G19. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.

part Higher

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

CalculatorMixed Non-calculator (Paper 1)Calculator (Papers 2 and 3)

New sheet

Answer key: Congruence and similarity: lengths, areas and volumes worksheet — GCSE Higher

Maths · GCSE Higher · G19 · Congruence and similarity: lengths, areas and volumes · 15 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(c) 9 : 16 — Method: in similar solids the ratio of the surface areas is the square of the ratio of corresponding lengths. Working: the radii are in the ratio 3 : 4, so the surface areas are in the ratio 3² : 4² = 9 : 16. Answer: 9 : 16. The distractors: 27 : 64 is 3³ : 4³, the ratio of the volumes, which cubes the length ratio instead of squaring it; 3 : 4 leaves the length ratio untouched, as though surface area scaled in the same way as a length; 81 : 256 comes from squaring a second time, applying the rule to the ratio 9 : 16 rather than to the radii.
(d) 1687.5 ml — The length scale factor from the standard bottle to the giant bottle is 1.5, so the volume scale factor is 1.5³ = 3.375. The capacity of the giant bottle is 500 × 3.375 = 1687.5 ml. 750 ml comes from multiplying by the length factor 1.5 directly, without cubing it. 1125 ml comes from using the area scale factor 1.5² = 2.25 instead of the volume scale factor. 2250 ml comes from treating 'cubed' as 'multiplied by 3', giving 1.5 × 3 = 4.5 as the scale factor instead of 1.5³.
(c) 14.7 cm — The scale factor from the smaller tile to the larger tile is 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75, so the larger side is 8.4 × 1.75 = 14.7 cm. '4.8 cm' comes from scaling by 4 ÷ 7 instead, using the ratio the wrong way round. '11.4 cm' comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 4 = 3, onto 8.4, instead of scaling. '58.8 cm' comes from multiplying by 7 on its own, using a ratio number as the scale factor instead of working out 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75 first.
(d) SAS — Method: a congruence condition is named by the parts that are given equal and the order in which they sit round the triangle, so count the sides and the angles first. Working: AB = DE and AC = DF are two pairs of equal sides, and the equal angle at A and D lies between AB and AC, so the given parts read side, included angle, side. Answer: SAS. The distractors: SSS needs three pairs of equal sides, and the third pair, BC and EF, is not given — it follows from the proof rather than being part of it; ASA reads the two equal sides as two equal angles, swapping which facts are which; RHS applies only when the triangles contain a right angle and the equal pair includes the hypotenuse, and nothing here says the angle at A is 90°.
(a) 1 : 8 — Method: in similar solids the ratio of the volumes is the cube of the ratio of corresponding lengths. Working: the heights are in the ratio 1 : 2, so the volumes are in the ratio 1³ : 2³ = 1 : 8. Answer: 1 : 8. The distractors: 1 : 2 leaves the height ratio unchanged, as though a volume scaled in the same way as a length; 1 : 4 comes from squaring, 1² : 2², which is the rule for surface areas and not for volumes; 1 : 6 comes from multiplying each part by 3 instead of raising each part to the power 3.
(d) Yes, by the AA condition — Method: similarity is decided by the angles, and because the three angles of a triangle add up to 180°, two matching pairs force the third pair to match as well. Working: the angles at A and D are both 40° and the angles at B and E are both 70°, so the third angles are both 180° − 40° − 70° = 70° and all three pairs are equal. Two pairs were enough, and that is the AA condition. Answer: yes, by the AA condition. The distractors: 'Yes, by the SSS condition' names a condition about three pairs of sides in proportion, and the question gives no side lengths at all; 'No, because no side lengths are given' treats side information as necessary, which it is for congruence but not for similarity; 'No, because the triangles may be different sizes' turns the definition of similarity into an objection, since similar figures are allowed to differ in size and only their shape must match.
(d) 8.75 cm — The scale factor of the enlargement is 11.2 ÷ 3.2 = 3.5. Applying this to the second line, 2.5 × 3.5 = 8.75 cm. The distractor 10.50 cm comes from adding the difference between the first line's two lengths (11.2 − 3.2 = 8) to the second line's original length, 2.5 + 8 = 10.5. The distractor 0.71 cm comes from using the scale factor the wrong way round, 2.5 × (3.2 ÷ 11.2) = 0.71 (to 2 d.p.). The distractor 8.70 cm comes from directly subtracting 11.2 − 2.5 = 8.7, muddling the two different lines instead of scaling the second one.
(b) 20 cm — Method: corresponding sides of similar triangles are in the same ratio, and the longest side of one triangle corresponds to the longest side of the other; a ratio of 2 : 5 means each length is multiplied by 5 ÷ 2 = 2.5 going from the smaller triangle to the larger one. Working: the longest side of the smaller triangle is 8 cm, so the matching side of the larger triangle is 8 × 2.5 = 20. Answer: 20 cm. The distractors: 10 cm comes from scaling the shortest side, 4 cm, instead of the longest; 40 cm comes from multiplying by 5 and forgetting to divide by 2; 3.2 cm comes from multiplying by 2 ÷ 5 instead of 5 ÷ 2, which scales from the larger triangle down to the smaller one.
(b) 12 cm — Method: in similar shapes every length is multiplied by the same scale factor, and a ratio of 1 : 3 means that factor is 3 going from the smaller shape to the larger one. Working: 4 × 3 = 12. Answer: 12 cm. The distractors: 7 cm comes from adding 3 to the side instead of multiplying by it, which is what happens when a ratio is read as a difference; 36 cm comes from multiplying by 3² = 9, the factor that scales areas, and applying it to a length; 4 cm comes from treating the two shapes as congruent, so that corresponding sides stay equal — similar shapes have equal angles, but their sides are in proportion.
(c) 15 cm — Method: going from the smaller tile to the larger one, every length is multiplied by the scale factor 5 ÷ 3. Working: 9 ÷ 3 = 3, and 3 × 5 = 15. Answer: 15 cm. The distractors: 11 cm comes from adding the difference between the parts of the ratio, 5 − 3 = 2, to the 9 cm side, treating a ratio as a gap rather than a multiplier; 45 cm comes from multiplying by 5 and forgetting to divide by 3; 27 cm comes from multiplying by 3, which is the part of the ratio belonging to the smaller tile.
(a) 10.4 cm — The scale factor from the smaller triangle to the larger triangle is 8 ÷ 5 = 1.6, so the larger side is 6.5 × 1.6 = 10.4 cm. The distractor 4.0625 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 6.5 × 5 ÷ 8 = 4.0625. The distractor 9.5 cm comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers (8 − 5 = 3) to the given length, 6.5 + 3 = 9.5. The distractor 13 cm comes from doubling the given length, treating the scale factor as 2 instead of 1.6.
(b) 8 : 27 — The heights are in the ratio 6 : 9, which simplifies to 2 : 3. For similar solids, volume scales with the cube of the length ratio, so the volume ratio is 2³ : 3³ = 8 : 27. 2 : 3 is only the simplified length ratio, without cubing. 4 : 9 comes from squaring instead of cubing — that's the rule for areas, not volumes. 27 : 8 has the correct cubed values but in the wrong order, giving the larger cone's volume first instead of the smaller.
(c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
(d) 6.4 cm — The scale factor from the larger sign to the smaller sign is 4 ÷ 9, so the smaller side is 14.4 × 4 ÷ 9 = 6.4 cm. The distractor 32.4 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 14.4 × 9 ÷ 4 = 32.4. The distractor 9.4 cm comes from subtracting the difference between the ratio numbers (9 − 4 = 5) from the given length, 14.4 − 5 = 9.4. The distractor 3.6 cm comes from dividing the given length by 4 only, 14.4 ÷ 4 = 3.6, without also using the other ratio number.
(d) No — the volume factor is 2³ = 8, not the area factor 4. — For similar solids, area scales with the square of the length scale factor and volume scales with its cube — different powers of the same number, so they are not usually equal. The length scale factor here is 2, so the area scale factor is 2² = 4 (Priya's figure) but the volume scale factor is 2³ = 8. Priya is wrong: the correct volume scale factor is 8, not 4. The option claiming area and volume always scale by the same factor treats the two as interchangeable, which is only true for the length factor itself. The option giving 6 comes from multiplying the length factor by the number of dimensions (2 × 3) rather than cubing it. The option repeating '4' for volume simply reuses Priya's own area calculation.

Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.