Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16

The sine rule and the cosine rule worksheet — GCSE Higher

Fifteen questions on "the sine rule and the cosine rule" — DfE statement G22. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.

Higher onlyCalculator

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

CalculatorMixed Non-calculator (Paper 1)Calculator (Papers 2 and 3)

New sheet

Answer key: The sine rule and the cosine rule worksheet — GCSE Higher

Maths · GCSE Higher · G22 · The sine rule and the cosine rule · Calculator · 15 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(a) 9.3 cm — Method: the 40° angle is not between the two known sides, so call the unknown side x and put it into the cosine rule, which turns into a quadratic equation with two positive roots. Working: AC faces angle ABC, so 6² = 7² + x² − 2 × 7 × x × cos 40°, that is 36 = 49 + x² − 10.7246x, which rearranges to x² − 10.7246x + 13 = 0. The discriminant is 10.7246² − 4 × 13 = 115.02 − 52 = 63.02, whose square root is 7.9384, so x = (10.7246 + 7.9384) ÷ 2 = 9.3315 or x = (10.7246 − 7.9384) ÷ 2 = 1.3931. The longer of the two is wanted. Answer: BC = 9.3 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 1.4 cm is the shorter root, taken by a candidate who solves the quadratic correctly but does not read which of the two lengths is wanted; 4.5 cm comes from treating the 40° as the angle between the two given sides and working out 7² + 6² − 2 × 7 × 6 × cos 40° directly, when 40° lies at B and faces AC; 3.6 cm comes from assuming the triangle is right-angled with AB as the hypotenuse and using the square root of 7² − 6².
(d) 59.4° and 120.6° — Method: two sides and an angle that is not between them can describe two triangles, because an acute angle and its supplement have the same sine. Use the sine rule for the angle, then test whether the supplement also fits inside 180°. Working: AB = 9 cm faces angle ACB and BC = 6 cm faces the 35° angle, so sin ACB = 9 × sin 35° ÷ 6 = 5.1622 ÷ 6 = 0.86036. The inverse sine of 0.86036 is 59.358°, and its supplement is 180° − 59.358° = 120.642°. Both survive the angle-sum test, since 35° + 59.4° = 94.4° and 35° + 120.6° = 155.6°, each less than 180°. Answer: angle ACB is 59.4° or 120.6° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 22.5° and 157.5° come from putting the sides the wrong way up, 6 × sin 35° ÷ 9 = 0.38238; 30.6° and 149.4° come from pressing the inverse cosine key on 0.86036 instead of the inverse sine key; 59.4° and 85.6° are the two unknown angles of the first triangle, 59.358° and 180° − 35° − 59.358°, given by a candidate who has found one triangle and reported its angles rather than the two possible sizes of the same angle.
(a) 114.6° — Using the sine rule, sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) ÷ AC = 6 × sin(40°) ÷ 9. Since sin(40°) ≈ 0.64279, this gives sin(ACB) ≈ 3.8567 ÷ 9 ≈ 0.42852, so angle ACB ≈ 25.4° or its supplement, 154.6°. Testing the obtuse candidate: 40° + 154.6° = 194.6°, which already exceeds 180°, so angle BAC would have to be negative — impossible, so 154.6° is rejected. With angle ACB ≈ 25.4°, angle BAC = 180° − 40° − 25.4° = 114.6°. 25.4° is angle ACB, not angle BAC that the question asks for. 14.6° comes from using the invalid 154.6° candidate anyway and then wrongly turning the resulting negative angle sum (−14.6°) positive instead of rejecting it. 65.4° comes from inverting the sine rule ratio — dividing AC × sin(ABC) by AB instead of AB × sin(ABC) by AC — which gives a different, incorrect candidate for angle ACB entirely.
(b) 124.1° — Method: use the sine rule AB/sin(ACB) = AC/sin(ABC), since AB is opposite angle ACB and AC is opposite angle ABC. Working: sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) / AC = 13 × sin 35° / 9 = 0.8285, which gives angle ACB = 55.9° or its supplement 180 − 55.9 = 124.1°; both of these give a valid triangle, and since angle ACB is obtuse the answer is 124.1°. Reporting the acute solution instead, without checking the word 'obtuse' in the question, gives 55.9°; putting the sides the wrong way round in the ratio, sin(ACB) = 9 × sin 35° / 13, gives 23.4°; and subtracting the acute solution and the given 35° from 180° as if angle ACB were the remaining triangle angle gives 89.1°. A given SSA fact always has two possible angle solutions unless the stem states which one is meant.
(d) £982.20 — Method: find the missing side BC with the cosine rule, add it to AB and AC for the perimeter, then multiply by the cost per metre. Working: BC² = 45² + 38² − 2 × 45 × 38 × cos 110° = 4638.71, so BC = 68.108 m, perimeter = 45 + 38 + 68.108 = 151.108 m, and cost = 151.108 × £6.50 = £982.20 — keep the unrounded perimeter, because the rounded 151.1 m would give £982.15. Forgetting the negative sign in the cosine rule gives BC = 48.0 m and a cost of £851.18; costing only the missing side BC and forgetting to include AB and AC gives £442.70; and stopping after finding the perimeter, without multiplying by the cost per metre, gives £151.11. The perimeter is only the halfway point of this question — the cost still has to be worked out.
(c) 22.3 km — The bearing of E from D is 065°, so the bearing of D from E (the back bearing) is 065° + 180° = 245°. The bearing of F from E is 165°, so the angle at E between ED and EF is 245° − 165° = 80°. Using the cosine rule, DF² = DE² + EF² − 2 × DE × EF × cos(80°) = 14² + 20² − 2 × 14 × 20 × cos(80°) = 196 + 400 − 560 × cos(80°). Since cos(80°) ≈ 0.17365, 560 × cos(80°) ≈ 97.24, so DF² ≈ 596 − 97.24 = 498.76. Taking the square root, DF ≈ 22.333, which rounds to 22.3 km. 26.3 km comes from using 100° as the angle at E — the difference between the two given bearings taken directly (165° − 65°) without converting to the back bearing first. 498.8 km is DF² itself, rounded, with the square root never taken. 23.4 km comes from leaving out the factor of 2 in the cosine rule formula, computing DF² = 196 + 400 − 14 × 20 × cos(80°) ≈ 547.38 instead.
(c) 12.4 cm — Using the cosine rule, BC² = AB² + AC² − 2 × AB × AC × cos(A) = 9² + 6² − 2 × 9 × 6 × cos(110°) = 81 + 36 − 108 × cos(110°). Since cos(110°) ≈ −0.34202, 108 × cos(110°) ≈ −36.94, so BC² ≈ 117 + 36.94 = 153.94. Taking the square root, BC ≈ 12.4072, which rounds to 12.4 cm. 8.9 cm comes from treating cos(110°) as if it were positive (using +0.342 instead of −0.342), which wrongly subtracts instead of adds and gives BC² ≈ 80.06. 153.9 cm is BC² itself, rounded, with the square root never taken. 11.6 cm comes from leaving out the factor of 2 in the formula, computing BC² = 81 + 36 − 9 × 6 × cos(110°) ≈ 135.47 instead.
(b) 7.4 — Method: AB is opposite angle ACB and AC is opposite angle ABC, so the sine rule gives AB/sin(ACB) = AC/sin(ABC). Working: (2x + 1)/sin 48° = (3x − 2)/sin 72°; cross-multiplying and collecting the x terms gives x = 7.4. Using angle BAC = 180° − 72° − 48° = 60° in place of angle ABC in the ratio gives x = 4.7; ignoring the sine rule altogether and solving 2x + 1 = 3x − 2 as if the two sides were simply equal gives x = 3.0; and pairing each side with the wrong angle — AB with sin 72° and AC with sin 48° — gives x = 1.9. Each side in the sine rule must be paired with the sine of the angle directly opposite it.
(a) 53.5° — Method: use the sine rule BC/sin A = AC/sin B, since BC is opposite angle A and AC is opposite angle B. Working: sin(ABC) = AC × sin(BAC) / BC = 10 × sin 40° / 8, which gives angle ABC = 53.5° or its supplement 180 − 53.5 = 126.5°; since angle ABC is acute, the answer is 53.5°. Taking the obtuse supplement instead gives 126.5°; putting the sides the wrong way round in the ratio (sin B = BC × sin A / AC instead of AC × sin A / BC) gives 30.9°; and using sin 50° in place of sin 40° gives 73.2°. Every sine-rule ratio has two possible angle solutions that add to 180° — the word 'acute' tells you which one to keep.
(d) Two angles and a side: sine rule finds other sides. — Method: match the data you are given to the rule that needs it. Working: the sine rule a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C needs a complete angle-side pair to set up its ratio, so the statement that two angles and a side (AAS or ASA) let the sine rule find the other sides is the correct one — the third angle comes from the angle sum, and each unknown side is then opposite a known angle. The statement that two sides and the angle between them (SAS) call for the sine rule is wrong: no angle-side pair is complete, so the cosine rule is what works there. The statement that the sine rule finds any angle from three sides (SSS) is wrong for the same reason in reverse — no angle is known at all, so the cosine rule must find the first one. The statement that the cosine rule finds a missing angle directly from two sides and a non-included angle (SSA) is wrong: the cosine rule reports the angle enclosed by the two sides it uses, so with SSA it is the sine rule that reaches the missing angle, and the ambiguous case is then settled from the wording of the question.
(b) No — should divide by −2bc, not +2bc; sign is wrong. — Method: rearrange a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A step by step and compare with the student's version. Working: subtracting b² + c² from both sides gives a² − b² − c² = −2bc cos A, then dividing both sides by −2bc gives cos A = (a² − b² − c²) / (−2bc), which is the same as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) / (2bc). The student divided by +2bc instead of −2bc, so their expression is the negative of the correct one — the verdict is No. Saying the algebra is fine because 'either sign order gives a valid result' ignores that only one of the two signed expressions matches the original equation. Saying the denominator should be bc rather than 2bc is a different, unrelated error — the coefficient 2bc in the original formula is correct and must stay.
(c) Two angles and one side are known; x is another side — The sine rule needs a matching pair, a side and the angle opposite it, that you already know, so you can set up a ratio with the unknown. When two angles and one side are known, you can find the third angle from the angle sum, giving you an angle opposite the known side and an angle opposite x: the sine rule applies directly. When all three sides are known and x is an angle, there is no side-angle pair available at all, so the cosine rule, rearranged for an angle, is what's needed instead. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is the third side, again there is no matching side-angle pair yet, so the cosine rule finds the third side directly. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is one of the other angles, you still have no side-angle pair to start from — the cosine rule has to be used first, to find the third side, before any angle can be found. Only the two-angles-and-a-side case hands you a ready-made pair, which is exactly what the sine rule needs.
(a) 32.2° — Method: all three sides are known, so rearrange the cosine rule as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) ÷ 2bc, where a is the side facing the angle you want. Working: angle ABC sits between AB = 8 cm and BC = 11 cm and faces AC = 6 cm, so cos ABC = (8² + 11² − 6²) ÷ (2 × 8 × 11) = (64 + 121 − 36) ÷ 176 = 149 ÷ 176 = 0.84659, and the inverse cosine of 0.84659 is 32.157°. Answer: angle ABC = 32.2° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 102.6° comes from subtracting the square of the longest side, 11, rather than the square of the side the angle actually faces, giving (64 + 36 − 121) ÷ 96; 57.8° comes from taking the inverse sine of 0.84659 instead of the inverse cosine; 147.8° comes from rearranging with the subtraction the wrong way round, (36 − 64 − 121) ÷ 176 = −0.84659, which turns an acute angle into its supplement.
(a) 89.6° — Angle PQR is at vertex Q, so the side opposite it is PR = 13 cm. Using the cosine rule rearranged for an angle: cos(PQR) = (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 7) = 1 ÷ 154 = 0.0065. Taking the inverse cosine, angle PQR = 89.6° (1 d.p.). Using PR as one of the enclosing sides instead of as the opposite side, finding angle P instead of angle Q, gives (121 + 169 − 49) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 241 ÷ 286 = 0.8427, and angle = 32.6°. Swapping the sign inside the bracket, computing 169 − 121 − 49 instead, gives −1 ÷ 154 = −0.0065, and angle = 90.4°. Using PR in the denominator instead of QR gives (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 1 ÷ 286 = 0.0035, and angle = 89.8°. Keep PR as the opposite side, QR and PQ as the enclosing sides, and angle PQR comes to 89.6°.
(b) 43.8 km — Method: find the angle of the triangle at Q from the two bearings, then use the cosine rule on the two known sides and that included angle. Working: the bearing of P from Q is the back bearing of 040°, which is 040° + 180° = 220°, and the bearing of R from Q is 115°, so angle PQR = 220° − 115° = 105°. Then PR² = 24² + 31² − 2 × 24 × 31 × cos 105° = 576 + 961 − 1488 × (−0.25882) = 1537 + 385.12 = 1922.12, and the square root of 1922.12 is 43.842. Answer: PR = 43.8 km to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 33.9 km comes from subtracting the bearings, 115° − 040° = 75°, and using 75° as the angle at Q, which is the angle the ship turns through, not the angle inside the triangle; 19.9 km comes from using the first bearing itself, 040°, as the angle at Q; 55.0 km comes from adding the two legs, 24 + 31, which would be the distance only if the ship had sailed in a straight line.

Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.