Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16

The sine rule and the cosine rule worksheet — GCSE Higher

Fifteen questions on "the sine rule and the cosine rule" — DfE statement G22. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.

Higher only

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

CalculatorMixed Non-calculator (Paper 1)Calculator (Papers 2 and 3)

New sheet

Answer key: The sine rule and the cosine rule worksheet — GCSE Higher

Maths · GCSE Higher · G22 · The sine rule and the cosine rule · 15 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(b) 8.4 cm — Two sides and the angle between them are known, so use the cosine rule: BC² = AB² + AC² − 2 × AB × AC × cos(BAC). Substituting, BC² = 81 + 36 − 45.64 = 71.36. Taking the square root: BC = √71.36 = 8.4 cm (1 d.p.). Leaving out the factor of 2 in the formula gives BC² = 81 + 36 − 22.82 = 94.18, so BC = 9.7 cm. Adding the cosine term instead of subtracting it gives BC² = 81 + 36 + 45.64 = 162.64, so BC = 12.8 cm. Using sin65° in place of cos65° gives BC² = 81 + 36 − 97.88 = 19.12, so BC = 4.4 cm. Keep the factor of 2, subtract the cosine term, and the correct length is 8.4 cm.
(a) 32.2° — Method: all three sides are known, so rearrange the cosine rule as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) ÷ 2bc, where a is the side facing the angle you want. Working: angle ABC sits between AB = 8 cm and BC = 11 cm and faces AC = 6 cm, so cos ABC = (8² + 11² − 6²) ÷ (2 × 8 × 11) = (64 + 121 − 36) ÷ 176 = 149 ÷ 176 = 0.84659, and the inverse cosine of 0.84659 is 32.157°. Answer: angle ABC = 32.2° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 102.6° comes from subtracting the square of the longest side, 11, rather than the square of the side the angle actually faces, giving (64 + 36 − 121) ÷ 96; 57.8° comes from taking the inverse sine of 0.84659 instead of the inverse cosine; 147.8° comes from rearranging with the subtraction the wrong way round, (36 − 64 − 121) ÷ 176 = −0.84659, which turns an acute angle into its supplement.
(a) 49 cm² — Method: two sides and the angle between them are given, so use the cosine rule a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A with BC facing the 60° angle. By hand, cos 60° = 0.5. Working: BC² = 8² + 5² − 2 × 8 × 5 × cos 60° = 64 + 25 − 80 × 0.5 = 89 − 40 = 49. Answer: BC² = 49 cm². The distractors: 129 cm² comes from adding the final term instead of subtracting it, 89 + 40; 89 cm² comes from leaving the cosine term out altogether and treating the 60° as though it were a right angle, so that Pythagoras applies; 69 cm² comes from forgetting the factor 2 in 2bc cos A and subtracting only 8 × 5 × 0.5 = 20.
(a) 53.5° — Method: use the sine rule BC/sin A = AC/sin B, since BC is opposite angle A and AC is opposite angle B. Working: sin(ABC) = AC × sin(BAC) / BC = 10 × sin 40° / 8, which gives angle ABC = 53.5° or its supplement 180 − 53.5 = 126.5°; since angle ABC is acute, the answer is 53.5°. Taking the obtuse supplement instead gives 126.5°; putting the sides the wrong way round in the ratio (sin B = BC × sin A / AC instead of AC × sin A / BC) gives 30.9°; and using sin 50° in place of sin 40° gives 73.2°. Every sine-rule ratio has two possible angle solutions that add to 180° — the word 'acute' tells you which one to keep.
(c) 11.2 cm — Method: two angles and a side are given, so use the sine rule, a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C, taking care that each side is paired with the angle it faces. Working: BC faces angle BAC = 42°, and AC faces angle ABC = 63°, so AC/sin 63° = 8.4/sin 42°. Multiplying up, AC = 8.4 × sin 63° ÷ sin 42° = 7.4845 ÷ 0.6691 = 11.185. Answer: AC = 11.2 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 6.3 cm comes from writing the ratio upside down, 8.4 × sin 42° ÷ sin 63°, which pairs each side with the angle beside it rather than the angle opposite it; 12.1 cm comes from using the third angle, 180° − 42° − 63° = 75°, in the numerator, which gives the length of AB instead of AC; 12.6 cm comes from assuming the sides are in the same ratio as the angles and working out 8.4 × 63 ÷ 42, which is true for arcs of a circle but never for the sides of a triangle.
(d) 14.9 cm — By the sine rule, sin(BAC) ÷ BC = sin(ACB) ÷ AB, so sin(BAC) = 7 × sin35° ÷ 10 = 0.4015. This gives angle BAC = 23.7° or angle BAC = 156.3°; since angle BAC is acute, angle BAC = 23.7°. Angle ABC = 180° − 35° − 23.7° = 121.3°. By the sine rule again, AC ÷ sin(ABC) = AB ÷ sin(ACB), so AC = 10 × sin121.3° ÷ sin35° = 14.9 cm. Using angle BAC in the final step instead of angle ABC gives AC = 10 × sin23.7° ÷ sin35° = 7.0 cm — this just recomputes the given side BC. Using angle ACB again in the final step, instead of the newly found angle ABC, gives AC = 10 × sin35° ÷ sin35° = 10.0 cm — this just returns AB unchanged. Making a sign slip when finding angle ABC, computing 180° − 35° + 23.7° = 168.7° instead of subtracting it, and carrying that through gives AC = 10 × sin168.7° ÷ sin35° = 3.4 cm. Find angle BAC, then angle ABC, then apply the sine rule once more, and AC comes to 14.9 cm.
(d) Two angles and a side: sine rule finds other sides. — Method: match the data you are given to the rule that needs it. Working: the sine rule a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C needs a complete angle-side pair to set up its ratio, so the statement that two angles and a side (AAS or ASA) let the sine rule find the other sides is the correct one — the third angle comes from the angle sum, and each unknown side is then opposite a known angle. The statement that two sides and the angle between them (SAS) call for the sine rule is wrong: no angle-side pair is complete, so the cosine rule is what works there. The statement that the sine rule finds any angle from three sides (SSS) is wrong for the same reason in reverse — no angle is known at all, so the cosine rule must find the first one. The statement that the cosine rule finds a missing angle directly from two sides and a non-included angle (SSA) is wrong: the cosine rule reports the angle enclosed by the two sides it uses, so with SSA it is the sine rule that reaches the missing angle, and the ambiguous case is then settled from the wording of the question.
(b) 124.1° — Method: use the sine rule AB/sin(ACB) = AC/sin(ABC), since AB is opposite angle ACB and AC is opposite angle ABC. Working: sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) / AC = 13 × sin 35° / 9 = 0.8285, which gives angle ACB = 55.9° or its supplement 180 − 55.9 = 124.1°; both of these give a valid triangle, and since angle ACB is obtuse the answer is 124.1°. Reporting the acute solution instead, without checking the word 'obtuse' in the question, gives 55.9°; putting the sides the wrong way round in the ratio, sin(ACB) = 9 × sin 35° / 13, gives 23.4°; and subtracting the acute solution and the given 35° from 180° as if angle ACB were the remaining triangle angle gives 89.1°. A given SSA fact always has two possible angle solutions unless the stem states which one is meant.
(a) 120° — Method: three sides are known, so use the cosine rule rearranged as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) ÷ 2bc, with a the side facing the angle wanted. Working: angle ABC lies between AB = 5 cm and BC = 3 cm and faces AC = 7 cm, so cos ABC = (5² + 3² − 7²) ÷ (2 × 5 × 3) = (25 + 9 − 49) ÷ 30 = −15 ÷ 30 = −0.5. The angle between 0° and 180° whose cosine is −0.5 is 180° − 60°. Answer: angle ABC = 120°. The distractors: 60° comes from taking the subtraction the other way round, (49 − 25 − 9) ÷ 30 = 0.5, which loses the minus sign that makes the angle obtuse; 90° comes from the instinct that three known sides always mean Pythagoras, and 5² + 3² = 34 is not 49, so the triangle is not right-angled; 150° comes from knowing the cosine is −0.5 but subtracting 30° from 180°, using the angle whose sine is 0.5 rather than the angle whose cosine is 0.5.
(b) 47.2° — Method: two sides and the angle between them are given, so find the third side with the cosine rule and then use the sine rule for the angle. Working: BC² = 12² + 9² − 2 × 12 × 9 × cos 55° = 144 + 81 − 216 × 0.57358 = 225 − 123.89 = 101.11, so BC = 10.0552 cm. Angle ABC faces AC = 9 cm and the 55° angle faces BC = 10.0552 cm, so sin ABC = 9 × sin 55° ÷ 10.0552 = 7.3724 ÷ 10.0552 = 0.73318, and the inverse sine of 0.73318 is 47.154°. Since AC is not the longest side, angle ABC is not the largest angle and the acute value is the one that fits. Answer: angle ABC = 47.2° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 77.8° comes from pairing the angle at B with AB = 12 cm, the side beside it, instead of AC = 9 cm, the side it faces, which actually produces angle ACB; 23.2° comes from a sign slip in the cosine rule step, 225 + 123.89 = 348.89, giving BC = 18.68 cm before the sine rule is applied; 37.9° comes from dividing by AB = 12 cm rather than by the side facing the 55° angle.
(a) 114.6° — Using the sine rule, sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) ÷ AC = 6 × sin(40°) ÷ 9. Since sin(40°) ≈ 0.64279, this gives sin(ACB) ≈ 3.8567 ÷ 9 ≈ 0.42852, so angle ACB ≈ 25.4° or its supplement, 154.6°. Testing the obtuse candidate: 40° + 154.6° = 194.6°, which already exceeds 180°, so angle BAC would have to be negative — impossible, so 154.6° is rejected. With angle ACB ≈ 25.4°, angle BAC = 180° − 40° − 25.4° = 114.6°. 25.4° is angle ACB, not angle BAC that the question asks for. 14.6° comes from using the invalid 154.6° candidate anyway and then wrongly turning the resulting negative angle sum (−14.6°) positive instead of rejecting it. 65.4° comes from inverting the sine rule ratio — dividing AC × sin(ABC) by AB instead of AB × sin(ABC) by AC — which gives a different, incorrect candidate for angle ACB entirely.
(b) 21.5 km — Method: find angle ABC from the two bearings, then use the cosine rule. Working: the bearing of A from B is 038° + 180° = 218°, so angle ABC = 218° − 142° = 76°. Then AC² = 14² + 20² − 2 × 14 × 20 × cos 76°, so AC = 21.5 km. Leaving out the factor of 2 in the cosine rule gives AC = 23.0 km; using 142° − 38° = 104° as the angle instead of the correct 76° gives AC = 27.0 km; and simply adding the two distances as if the path were a straight line gives 34.0 km. The angle between the two legs must come from the bearings, not from subtracting them directly.
(b) No — should divide by −2bc, not +2bc; sign is wrong. — Method: rearrange a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A step by step and compare with the student's version. Working: subtracting b² + c² from both sides gives a² − b² − c² = −2bc cos A, then dividing both sides by −2bc gives cos A = (a² − b² − c²) / (−2bc), which is the same as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) / (2bc). The student divided by +2bc instead of −2bc, so their expression is the negative of the correct one — the verdict is No. Saying the algebra is fine because 'either sign order gives a valid result' ignores that only one of the two signed expressions matches the original equation. Saying the denominator should be bc rather than 2bc is a different, unrelated error — the coefficient 2bc in the original formula is correct and must stay.
(a) 5 — Method: BC faces the 60° angle, so put the two algebraic sides into the cosine rule and solve the equation that results. By hand, cos 60° = 0.5. Working: 7² = x² + (x + 3)² − 2 × x × (x + 3) × 0.5, so 49 = x² + x² + 6x + 9 − x² − 3x = x² + 3x + 9. That rearranges to x² + 3x − 40 = 0, which factorises as (x + 8)(x − 5) = 0, giving x = −8 or x = 5. A length cannot be negative, so the negative root is rejected. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: 8 comes from expanding (x + 3)² as x² + 9, the error of assuming that squaring a bracket squares each term, which turns the equation into x² − 3x − 40 = 0; −8 is the negative root, kept by a candidate who solves the quadratic but never checks that x has to be a length; 37 comes from applying the cosine rule as though the 60° angle were at C facing AB, which gives x² = (x + 3)² + 49 − 7(x + 3) and a single linear solution.
(c) Two angles and one side are known; x is another side — The sine rule needs a matching pair, a side and the angle opposite it, that you already know, so you can set up a ratio with the unknown. When two angles and one side are known, you can find the third angle from the angle sum, giving you an angle opposite the known side and an angle opposite x: the sine rule applies directly. When all three sides are known and x is an angle, there is no side-angle pair available at all, so the cosine rule, rearranged for an angle, is what's needed instead. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is the third side, again there is no matching side-angle pair yet, so the cosine rule finds the third side directly. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is one of the other angles, you still have no side-angle pair to start from — the cosine rule has to be used first, to find the third side, before any angle can be found. Only the two-angles-and-a-side case hands you a ready-made pair, which is exactly what the sine rule needs.

Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.