Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16

The sine rule and the cosine rule worksheet — GCSE Higher

Fifteen questions on "the sine rule and the cosine rule" — DfE statement G22. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.

Higher only

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

CalculatorMixed Non-calculator (Paper 1)Calculator (Papers 2 and 3)

New sheet

Answer key: The sine rule and the cosine rule worksheet — GCSE Higher

Maths · GCSE Higher · G22 · The sine rule and the cosine rule · 15 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(d) £982.20 — Method: find the missing side BC with the cosine rule, add it to AB and AC for the perimeter, then multiply by the cost per metre. Working: BC² = 45² + 38² − 2 × 45 × 38 × cos 110° = 4638.71, so BC = 68.108 m, perimeter = 45 + 38 + 68.108 = 151.108 m, and cost = 151.108 × £6.50 = £982.20 — keep the unrounded perimeter, because the rounded 151.1 m would give £982.15. Forgetting the negative sign in the cosine rule gives BC = 48.0 m and a cost of £851.18; costing only the missing side BC and forgetting to include AB and AC gives £442.70; and stopping after finding the perimeter, without multiplying by the cost per metre, gives £151.11. The perimeter is only the halfway point of this question — the cost still has to be worked out.
(b) 21.5 km — Method: find angle ABC from the two bearings, then use the cosine rule. Working: the bearing of A from B is 038° + 180° = 218°, so angle ABC = 218° − 142° = 76°. Then AC² = 14² + 20² − 2 × 14 × 20 × cos 76°, so AC = 21.5 km. Leaving out the factor of 2 in the cosine rule gives AC = 23.0 km; using 142° − 38° = 104° as the angle instead of the correct 76° gives AC = 27.0 km; and simply adding the two distances as if the path were a straight line gives 34.0 km. The angle between the two legs must come from the bearings, not from subtracting them directly.
(d) 8.8 km — Method: turn each bearing into an angle of triangle ABC, find the third angle from the angle sum, then use the sine rule. Working: B is due east of A, so AB itself lies on a bearing of 090°, and the angle at A between AB and AC is 090° − 062° = 28°. From B, station A lies due west on a bearing of 270°, and C lies on 315°, so the angle at B is 315° − 270° = 45°. The third angle is 180° − 28° − 45° = 107°. The side BC faces the 28° angle and AB = 18 km faces the 107° angle, so BC = 18 × sin 28° ÷ sin 107° = 8.4505 ÷ 0.95630 = 8.8366. Answer: the boat is 8.8 km from B, to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 13.3 km comes from pairing BC with the 45° angle at B instead of the 28° angle it faces, which gives the distance AC; 12.0 km comes from never working out the third angle and dividing by sin 45° instead of sin 107°; 16.6 km comes from using the bearing 062° itself as the angle at A, instead of the 28° between AC and AB.
(a) 5 — Method: BC faces the 60° angle, so put the two algebraic sides into the cosine rule and solve the equation that results. By hand, cos 60° = 0.5. Working: 7² = x² + (x + 3)² − 2 × x × (x + 3) × 0.5, so 49 = x² + x² + 6x + 9 − x² − 3x = x² + 3x + 9. That rearranges to x² + 3x − 40 = 0, which factorises as (x + 8)(x − 5) = 0, giving x = −8 or x = 5. A length cannot be negative, so the negative root is rejected. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: 8 comes from expanding (x + 3)² as x² + 9, the error of assuming that squaring a bracket squares each term, which turns the equation into x² − 3x − 40 = 0; −8 is the negative root, kept by a candidate who solves the quadratic but never checks that x has to be a length; 37 comes from applying the cosine rule as though the 60° angle were at C facing AB, which gives x² = (x + 3)² + 49 − 7(x + 3) and a single linear solution.
(b) 124.1° — Method: use the sine rule AB/sin(ACB) = AC/sin(ABC), since AB is opposite angle ACB and AC is opposite angle ABC. Working: sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) / AC = 13 × sin 35° / 9 = 0.8285, which gives angle ACB = 55.9° or its supplement 180 − 55.9 = 124.1°; both of these give a valid triangle, and since angle ACB is obtuse the answer is 124.1°. Reporting the acute solution instead, without checking the word 'obtuse' in the question, gives 55.9°; putting the sides the wrong way round in the ratio, sin(ACB) = 9 × sin 35° / 13, gives 23.4°; and subtracting the acute solution and the given 35° from 180° as if angle ACB were the remaining triangle angle gives 89.1°. A given SSA fact always has two possible angle solutions unless the stem states which one is meant.
(d) 82.8° — Method: angle ABC is opposite the given side AC, so rearrange the cosine rule to cos B = (AB² + BC² − AC²) / (2 × AB × BC). Working: cos B = (3.5² + 2.8² − 4.2²) / (2 × 3.5 × 2.8), so angle ABC = 82.8°. Forgetting the negative sign in the rearrangement gives the supplementary angle 97.2°; leaving out the factor of 2 in the denominator gives 75.5°; and using AB and AC (the pair either side of angle A, not angle B) gives 41.4°, which is angle BAC, not angle ABC. Always check which angle sits opposite the side you left out of the pair you are dividing by.
(c) 36.7 m — Method: use the cosine rule to find the missing side BC, then add all three sides for the perimeter. Working: BC² = 13² + 10² − 2 × 13 × 10 × cos 72°, so BC = 13.7 m, and perimeter = 13 + 10 + 13.7 = 36.7 m. Forgetting the negative sign in the cosine rule (using + instead of −) gives BC = 18.7 m and a perimeter of 41.7 m; leaving AC out of the total and only adding AB and BC gives 26.7 m; and adding AB twice instead of AB and AC gives 39.7 m. Always add all three named sides once the missing one has been found.
(a) 120° — Method: three sides are known, so use the cosine rule rearranged as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) ÷ 2bc, with a the side facing the angle wanted. Working: angle ABC lies between AB = 5 cm and BC = 3 cm and faces AC = 7 cm, so cos ABC = (5² + 3² − 7²) ÷ (2 × 5 × 3) = (25 + 9 − 49) ÷ 30 = −15 ÷ 30 = −0.5. The angle between 0° and 180° whose cosine is −0.5 is 180° − 60°. Answer: angle ABC = 120°. The distractors: 60° comes from taking the subtraction the other way round, (49 − 25 − 9) ÷ 30 = 0.5, which loses the minus sign that makes the angle obtuse; 90° comes from the instinct that three known sides always mean Pythagoras, and 5² + 3² = 34 is not 49, so the triangle is not right-angled; 150° comes from knowing the cosine is −0.5 but subtracting 30° from 180°, using the angle whose sine is 0.5 rather than the angle whose cosine is 0.5.
(b) 43.8 km — Method: find the angle of the triangle at Q from the two bearings, then use the cosine rule on the two known sides and that included angle. Working: the bearing of P from Q is the back bearing of 040°, which is 040° + 180° = 220°, and the bearing of R from Q is 115°, so angle PQR = 220° − 115° = 105°. Then PR² = 24² + 31² − 2 × 24 × 31 × cos 105° = 576 + 961 − 1488 × (−0.25882) = 1537 + 385.12 = 1922.12, and the square root of 1922.12 is 43.842. Answer: PR = 43.8 km to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 33.9 km comes from subtracting the bearings, 115° − 040° = 75°, and using 75° as the angle at Q, which is the angle the ship turns through, not the angle inside the triangle; 19.9 km comes from using the first bearing itself, 040°, as the angle at Q; 55.0 km comes from adding the two legs, 24 + 31, which would be the distance only if the ship had sailed in a straight line.
(d) Two angles and a side: sine rule finds other sides. — Method: match the data you are given to the rule that needs it. Working: the sine rule a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C needs a complete angle-side pair to set up its ratio, so the statement that two angles and a side (AAS or ASA) let the sine rule find the other sides is the correct one — the third angle comes from the angle sum, and each unknown side is then opposite a known angle. The statement that two sides and the angle between them (SAS) call for the sine rule is wrong: no angle-side pair is complete, so the cosine rule is what works there. The statement that the sine rule finds any angle from three sides (SSS) is wrong for the same reason in reverse — no angle is known at all, so the cosine rule must find the first one. The statement that the cosine rule finds a missing angle directly from two sides and a non-included angle (SSA) is wrong: the cosine rule reports the angle enclosed by the two sides it uses, so with SSA it is the sine rule that reaches the missing angle, and the ambiguous case is then settled from the wording of the question.
(b) No — should divide by −2bc, not +2bc; sign is wrong. — Method: rearrange a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A step by step and compare with the student's version. Working: subtracting b² + c² from both sides gives a² − b² − c² = −2bc cos A, then dividing both sides by −2bc gives cos A = (a² − b² − c²) / (−2bc), which is the same as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) / (2bc). The student divided by +2bc instead of −2bc, so their expression is the negative of the correct one — the verdict is No. Saying the algebra is fine because 'either sign order gives a valid result' ignores that only one of the two signed expressions matches the original equation. Saying the denominator should be bc rather than 2bc is a different, unrelated error — the coefficient 2bc in the original formula is correct and must stay.
(d) 14.9 cm — By the sine rule, sin(BAC) ÷ BC = sin(ACB) ÷ AB, so sin(BAC) = 7 × sin35° ÷ 10 = 0.4015. This gives angle BAC = 23.7° or angle BAC = 156.3°; since angle BAC is acute, angle BAC = 23.7°. Angle ABC = 180° − 35° − 23.7° = 121.3°. By the sine rule again, AC ÷ sin(ABC) = AB ÷ sin(ACB), so AC = 10 × sin121.3° ÷ sin35° = 14.9 cm. Using angle BAC in the final step instead of angle ABC gives AC = 10 × sin23.7° ÷ sin35° = 7.0 cm — this just recomputes the given side BC. Using angle ACB again in the final step, instead of the newly found angle ABC, gives AC = 10 × sin35° ÷ sin35° = 10.0 cm — this just returns AB unchanged. Making a sign slip when finding angle ABC, computing 180° − 35° + 23.7° = 168.7° instead of subtracting it, and carrying that through gives AC = 10 × sin168.7° ÷ sin35° = 3.4 cm. Find angle BAC, then angle ABC, then apply the sine rule once more, and AC comes to 14.9 cm.
(c) 32.6° — Method: an angle is wanted from two sides and the angle facing one of them, so use the sine rule in the form sin A/a = sin B/b. Working: BC = 9.2 cm faces angle BAC and AC = 12.5 cm faces the 47° angle, so sin BAC = 9.2 × sin 47° ÷ 12.5 = 6.7285 ÷ 12.5 = 0.5383, and the inverse sine of 0.5383 is 32.566°. Because BC is shorter than AC, angle BAC must be smaller than 47°, so the acute value is the only one that fits. Answer: angle BAC = 32.6° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 147.4° comes from taking 180° − 32.566°, the obtuse angle with the same sine, without checking it — 147.4° and 47° already add to more than 180°, so no such triangle exists; 83.6° comes from putting the sides the wrong way up, 12.5 × sin 47° ÷ 9.2, which gives a sine of 0.9937; 57.4° comes from pressing the inverse cosine key on 0.5383 instead of the inverse sine key.
(c) 12.4 cm — Using the cosine rule, BC² = AB² + AC² − 2 × AB × AC × cos(A) = 9² + 6² − 2 × 9 × 6 × cos(110°) = 81 + 36 − 108 × cos(110°). Since cos(110°) ≈ −0.34202, 108 × cos(110°) ≈ −36.94, so BC² ≈ 117 + 36.94 = 153.94. Taking the square root, BC ≈ 12.4072, which rounds to 12.4 cm. 8.9 cm comes from treating cos(110°) as if it were positive (using +0.342 instead of −0.342), which wrongly subtracts instead of adds and gives BC² ≈ 80.06. 153.9 cm is BC² itself, rounded, with the square root never taken. 11.6 cm comes from leaving out the factor of 2 in the formula, computing BC² = 81 + 36 − 9 × 6 × cos(110°) ≈ 135.47 instead.
(a) 114.6° — Using the sine rule, sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) ÷ AC = 6 × sin(40°) ÷ 9. Since sin(40°) ≈ 0.64279, this gives sin(ACB) ≈ 3.8567 ÷ 9 ≈ 0.42852, so angle ACB ≈ 25.4° or its supplement, 154.6°. Testing the obtuse candidate: 40° + 154.6° = 194.6°, which already exceeds 180°, so angle BAC would have to be negative — impossible, so 154.6° is rejected. With angle ACB ≈ 25.4°, angle BAC = 180° − 40° − 25.4° = 114.6°. 25.4° is angle ACB, not angle BAC that the question asks for. 14.6° comes from using the invalid 154.6° candidate anyway and then wrongly turning the resulting negative angle sum (−14.6°) positive instead of rejecting it. 65.4° comes from inverting the sine rule ratio — dividing AC × sin(ABC) by AB instead of AB × sin(ABC) by AC — which gives a different, incorrect candidate for angle ACB entirely.

Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.