Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
- (a) 62.8 cm — The ribbon goes once around the circular cross-section, so its length equals the circumference: 2πr = 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8 cm.
- (b) 10.5 — Method: multiply the drawing length by the scale factor to get the real length. Working: 7 cm × 1.5 = 10.5 m. A student who answers 8.5 has added the scale factor to the drawing length instead of multiplying (7 + 1.5). A student who answers 14 has rounded the scale factor up to 2 before multiplying. A student who answers 3.5 has divided the drawing length by 2 instead of multiplying it by 1.5. Answer: 10.5 m.
- (a) 17 cm — Convert the real distance to centimetres first: 3.4 km = 340 000 cm. Then divide by the scale factor, 20 000, since the map is 20 000 times smaller than real life: 340 000 ÷ 20 000 = 17, so the map distance is 17 cm. Choosing 1700 cm divides by 200 instead of 20 000, losing two zeros from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 200 = 1700). Choosing 170 cm divides by 2 000 instead of 20 000, losing one zero from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 = 170). Choosing 0.17 cm divides by 2 000 000 instead of 20 000, adding two extra zeros to the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 000 = 0.17).
- (a) £4.20 — 350 g is 3.5 lots of 100 g, since 350 ÷ 100 = 3.5, so the cost is 3.5 × £1.20 = £4.20. Multiplying the mass in grams directly by the price, without dividing by 100 first, gives £420.00. Working out 100 ÷ 350 instead of 350 ÷ 100 inverts the ratio and gives about £0.34. Rounding 350 g down to 300 g gives 3 × £1.20 = £3.60.
- (b) 10.5 m² — The area of a trapezium is half of the sum of the parallel sides, multiplied by the width. Add the parallel sides: 2.5 + 4.5 = 7. Multiply by the width: 7 × 3 = 21. Half of 21 is 10.5 m². 21 m² forgets to halve, using the full (2.5+4.5)×3. 3.5 m² averages the two parallel sides, (2.5+4.5)÷2 = 3.5, but forgets to multiply by the width. 6.75 m² treats the bed as a triangle, using only the longer parallel side: half of 4.5 × 3.
- (c) 1.5 — The area scale factor is the length scale factor squared, so if n is the length factor, n² = 2.25. Taking the positive square root gives n = 1.5 (check: 1.5² = 2.25). 2.25 is just the area factor restated, with no root taken. 1.125 comes from halving 2.25 instead of taking its square root. 5.0625 comes from squaring 2.25 instead of rooting it.
- (c) £7.85 — Arc length = (90 ÷ 360) × 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 0.25 × 62.8 = 15.7 cm. Cost = 15.7 × £0.50 = £7.85. (£31.40 comes from finding the full circumference and forgetting the angle fraction; £15.70 comes from using the diameter, 20 cm, in place of the radius; £157.00 comes from multiplying the arc length by the radius instead of by the cost per centimetre.)
- (a) 10 cm — Sector area is (angle ÷ 360) × π × radius². Here 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4, and 1/4 × 3.14 = 0.785, so radius² is 78.5 ÷ 0.785 = 100, and the radius is √100 = 10 cm. Stopping after finding radius² and not taking the square root gives 100 cm. Treating 78.5 as the area of the WHOLE circle, ignoring the 90° fraction, gives radius² = 78.5 ÷ 3.14 = 25, so a radius of 5 cm. Correctly finding a radius of 10 cm but then doubling it, mistaking the question for asking the diameter, gives 20 cm.
- (a) 69.3 m — Method: each observer gives a right-angled triangle with the mast as the opposite side, so tan θ = 60 ÷ distance and the distance from the foot of the mast is 60 ÷ tan θ; because both stand on the same side, the gap between them is the difference of those two distances. Working: from Amelia, 60 ÷ tan 30° = 103.92… m; from Noah, 60 ÷ tan 60° = 34.64… m; the gap is 103.92… − 34.64… = 69.28… m, which is 69.3 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 69.3 m. The distractors: 103.9 m is Amelia's own distance from the foot of the mast, written down before the second distance has been taken away; 34.6 m is Noah's distance from the foot of the mast; 138.6 m comes from adding the two distances, which would be right only if the two observers stood on opposite sides of the mast.
- (b) 340 — The real length of the path is 8.5 × 2000 = 17000 cm, which converts to 170 m by dividing by 100. The cyclist rides the path there and back, so the total distance is 170 × 2 = 340 m. A candidate who forgets the return journey gives only the one-way distance, 170 m. A candidate who halves the one-way distance instead of doubling it, reading “there and back” as splitting the journey, gets 85 m. A candidate who doubles the scale factor to 4000 by mistake, getting a one-way length of 340 m, and then doubles that for the return journey, gets 680 m. The total distance the cyclist travels is 340 m.
- (b) 3 — The real width is 0.6 × 500 = 300 cm, which converts to 3 m by dividing by 100. A candidate who uses the wrong side of the rectangle, 1.2 cm, instead of the 0.6 cm width, gets 1.2 × 500 = 600 cm = 6 m. A candidate who multiplies correctly but converts the 300 cm to metres by dividing by 1000 instead of 100 gets 0.3 m. A candidate who converts by dividing by 10 instead of 100 gets 30 m. The real width of the bay is 3 m.
- (c) AB, AC and angle BAC: Area = 1/2 × AB × AC × sin(BAC) — Method: Area = 1/2ab sin C only works when the angle used is the one included between the two sides being multiplied. Working: AB and AC meet at A, and angle BAC is the angle at A between them, so the statement pairing AB, AC and angle BAC is the correct one. The statement that three sides with no angle can still go into 1/2 AB × AC × sin(BAC) is wrong: with no angle known, sin(BAC) cannot be evaluated, so a different method must find an angle first. The statement pairing AB and BC with sin(BAC) is wrong: AB and BC meet at B, so the angle between them is angle ABC, not angle BAC — it names the wrong angle for the sides it uses. The statement pairing AB and AC with sin(ABC) is wrong for the same reason: AB and AC meet at A, so their included angle is angle BAC, and angle ABC is not between them at all.
- (d) 114.6° — Method: rearrange Area = (1/2)ab sin C to make sin C the subject, then use the obtuse branch since the question states the angle is obtuse. Working: sin C = 2 × 45 ÷ (11 × 9) = 0.909, so the acute angle is sin⁻¹(0.909) = 65.4°, and the obtuse angle is 180 − 65.4 = 114.6°. Answer: 114.6°. Giving the acute angle straight from the calculator, 65.4°, ignores that the question asks for the obtuse one; forgetting to double the area before dividing gives sin C = 45 ÷ (11 × 9) = 0.4545, whose obtuse angle is 180 − 27.0 = 153.0°; and that same forgotten-doubling error taken on the acute branch instead gives 27.0°. Always double the area first, and then take 180° minus the calculator's answer whenever the question specifically asks for the obtuse angle.
- (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.