Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) £817 — Method: find the area of the plot with 1/2 × a × b × sin C, then multiply the area by the cost of a square metre. Working: the 108° angle is between AB and AC, so the area is 1/2 × 23.5 × 17.2 × sin 108° = 202.1 × 0.95106 = 192.21 m². The cost is 192.21 × 4.25 = 816.89. Answer: the turf costs £817 to the nearest pound. The distractors: £1634 comes from leaving out the factor 1/2, so the area is taken as 384.42 m²; £859 comes from leaving the sine out and using 202.1 m² as the area, which treats the two sides as a base and a perpendicular height; £192 is the area of the plot written down as though it were the cost, stopping one step short of the question.
- (b) £157 — Method: round the hours worked up to the next whole hour, multiply by the hourly rate, then add the call-out fee. Working: 3 hours 30 minutes rounds up to 4 hours; 28 × 4 = 112; 112 + 45 = 157. Answer: £157. A candidate who uses the unrounded time of 3.5 hours, working out 28 × 3.5 = 98 and adding 45, gets £143. A candidate who forgets the call-out fee, giving only 28 × 4, gets £112. A candidate who rounds down to 3 hours instead of up, working out 28 × 3 = 84 and adding 45, gets £129.
- (c) Two angles and one side are known; x is another side — The sine rule needs a matching pair, a side and the angle opposite it, that you already know, so you can set up a ratio with the unknown. When two angles and one side are known, you can find the third angle from the angle sum, giving you an angle opposite the known side and an angle opposite x: the sine rule applies directly. When all three sides are known and x is an angle, there is no side-angle pair available at all, so the cosine rule, rearranged for an angle, is what's needed instead. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is the third side, again there is no matching side-angle pair yet, so the cosine rule finds the third side directly. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is one of the other angles, you still have no side-angle pair to start from — the cosine rule has to be used first, to find the third side, before any angle can be found. Only the two-angles-and-a-side case hands you a ready-made pair, which is exactly what the sine rule needs.
- (b) (22, −13) — The vector from the ship to the lighthouse is (12, −4) − (2, 5) = (10, −9). Sailing along this vector twice from the start gives (2, 5) + 2 × (10, −9) = (2 + 20, 5 − 18) = (22, −13). '(12, −4)' stops after the ship reaches the lighthouse and ignores the second identical leg. '(−18, 23)' comes from finding the vector the wrong way round, as (2, 5) − (12, −4) = (−10, 9), and then doubling that. '(2, 5)' comes from adding the vector and then subtracting it again, wrongly cancelling the two legs instead of adding them.
- (a) 53.5° — Method: use the sine rule BC/sin A = AC/sin B, since BC is opposite angle A and AC is opposite angle B. Working: sin(ABC) = AC × sin(BAC) / BC = 10 × sin 40° / 8, which gives angle ABC = 53.5° or its supplement 180 − 53.5 = 126.5°; since angle ABC is acute, the answer is 53.5°. Taking the obtuse supplement instead gives 126.5°; putting the sides the wrong way round in the ratio (sin B = BC × sin A / AC instead of AC × sin A / BC) gives 30.9°; and using sin 50° in place of sin 40° gives 73.2°. Every sine-rule ratio has two possible angle solutions that add to 180° — the word 'acute' tells you which one to keep.
- (a) 89.6° — Angle PQR is at vertex Q, so the side opposite it is PR = 13 cm. Using the cosine rule rearranged for an angle: cos(PQR) = (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 7) = 1 ÷ 154 = 0.0065. Taking the inverse cosine, angle PQR = 89.6° (1 d.p.). Using PR as one of the enclosing sides instead of as the opposite side, finding angle P instead of angle Q, gives (121 + 169 − 49) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 241 ÷ 286 = 0.8427, and angle = 32.6°. Swapping the sign inside the bracket, computing 169 − 121 − 49 instead, gives −1 ÷ 154 = −0.0065, and angle = 90.4°. Using PR in the denominator instead of QR gives (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 1 ÷ 286 = 0.0035, and angle = 89.8°. Keep PR as the opposite side, QR and PQ as the enclosing sides, and angle PQR comes to 89.6°.
- (a) £157.00 — Area covered = (angle ÷ 360) × π × r² = (90 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 400 = 0.25 × 1256 = 314 km². Charge = 314 × £0.50 = £157.00. (£7.85 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.25 × 3.14 × 20 = 15.7 km² and then charging that; £628.00 comes from finding the area of a full circle, 3.14 × 400 = 1256 km², and forgetting the angle fraction before charging; £15.70 comes from using the arc length formula, 0.25 × 2 × 3.14 × 20 = 31.4, in place of the area, and charging that.)
- (c) 14.7 cm — The scale factor from the smaller tile to the larger tile is 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75, so the larger side is 8.4 × 1.75 = 14.7 cm. '4.8 cm' comes from scaling by 4 ÷ 7 instead, using the ratio the wrong way round. '11.4 cm' comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 4 = 3, onto 8.4, instead of scaling. '58.8 cm' comes from multiplying by 7 on its own, using a ratio number as the scale factor instead of working out 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75 first.
- (a) 9.3 cm — Method: the 40° angle is not between the two known sides, so call the unknown side x and put it into the cosine rule, which turns into a quadratic equation with two positive roots. Working: AC faces angle ABC, so 6² = 7² + x² − 2 × 7 × x × cos 40°, that is 36 = 49 + x² − 10.7246x, which rearranges to x² − 10.7246x + 13 = 0. The discriminant is 10.7246² − 4 × 13 = 115.02 − 52 = 63.02, whose square root is 7.9384, so x = (10.7246 + 7.9384) ÷ 2 = 9.3315 or x = (10.7246 − 7.9384) ÷ 2 = 1.3931. The longer of the two is wanted. Answer: BC = 9.3 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 1.4 cm is the shorter root, taken by a candidate who solves the quadratic correctly but does not read which of the two lengths is wanted; 4.5 cm comes from treating the 40° as the angle between the two given sides and working out 7² + 6² − 2 × 7 × 6 × cos 40° directly, when 40° lies at B and faces AC; 3.6 cm comes from assuming the triangle is right-angled with AB as the hypotenuse and using the square root of 7² − 6².
- (d) Two angles and a side: sine rule finds other sides. — Method: match the data you are given to the rule that needs it. Working: the sine rule a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C needs a complete angle-side pair to set up its ratio, so the statement that two angles and a side (AAS or ASA) let the sine rule find the other sides is the correct one — the third angle comes from the angle sum, and each unknown side is then opposite a known angle. The statement that two sides and the angle between them (SAS) call for the sine rule is wrong: no angle-side pair is complete, so the cosine rule is what works there. The statement that the sine rule finds any angle from three sides (SSS) is wrong for the same reason in reverse — no angle is known at all, so the cosine rule must find the first one. The statement that the cosine rule finds a missing angle directly from two sides and a non-included angle (SSA) is wrong: the cosine rule reports the angle enclosed by the two sides it uses, so with SSA it is the sine rule that reaches the missing angle, and the ambiguous case is then settled from the wording of the question.
- (a) 69.3 m — Method: each observer gives a right-angled triangle with the mast as the opposite side, so tan θ = 60 ÷ distance and the distance from the foot of the mast is 60 ÷ tan θ; because both stand on the same side, the gap between them is the difference of those two distances. Working: from Amelia, 60 ÷ tan 30° = 103.92… m; from Noah, 60 ÷ tan 60° = 34.64… m; the gap is 103.92… − 34.64… = 69.28… m, which is 69.3 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 69.3 m. The distractors: 103.9 m is Amelia's own distance from the foot of the mast, written down before the second distance has been taken away; 34.6 m is Noah's distance from the foot of the mast; 138.6 m comes from adding the two distances, which would be right only if the two observers stood on opposite sides of the mast.
- (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
- (a) 2.40m — Method: a cost found from a rate is the rate multiplied by the amount bought. Working: the rate is £2.40 per kilogram and the amount is m kilograms, so the cost is 2.40 × m. Answer: 2.40m. A candidate who divides the amount by the rate instead of multiplying writes m/2.40. A candidate who adds the rate to the amount instead of multiplying writes 2.40 + m. A candidate who subtracts the rate from the amount instead of multiplying writes m − 2.40.
- (d) No transformation — every point stays exactly where it was — The two vectors (5, −3) and (−5, 3) are opposites, so adding them gives (0, 0): every point ends up exactly where it started, and there is no transformation at all. Misreading the second vector's signs and effectively adding (5, −3) to itself instead of to its opposite gives a translation by the vector (10, −6). Assuming two translations must combine into a reflection gives a reflection in the x-axis — but a reflection reverses orientation, and translations never do. Assuming that two opposite vectors must mean a half turn gives a rotation of 180° about the origin — but a 180° rotation moves every point except its own centre, whereas this pair of translations leaves every single point exactly where it was. Two translations by opposite vectors always cancel exactly, leaving every point unmoved.
- (a) £4.20 — 350 g is 3.5 lots of 100 g, since 350 ÷ 100 = 3.5, so the cost is 3.5 × £1.20 = £4.20. Multiplying the mass in grams directly by the price, without dividing by 100 first, gives £420.00. Working out 100 ÷ 350 instead of 350 ÷ 100 inverts the ratio and gives about £0.34. Rounding 350 g down to 300 g gives 3 × £1.20 = £3.60.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.