Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 36.7 m — Method: use the cosine rule to find the missing side BC, then add all three sides for the perimeter. Working: BC² = 13² + 10² − 2 × 13 × 10 × cos 72°, so BC = 13.7 m, and perimeter = 13 + 10 + 13.7 = 36.7 m. Forgetting the negative sign in the cosine rule (using + instead of −) gives BC = 18.7 m and a perimeter of 41.7 m; leaving AC out of the total and only adding AB and BC gives 26.7 m; and adding AB twice instead of AB and AC gives 39.7 m. Always add all three named sides once the missing one has been found.
- (c) 3028 cm² — Split the window into a rectangle and a semicircle. Rectangle area = 40 × 60 = 2400 cm². The semicircle has radius 40 ÷ 2 = 20 cm, so its area = 0.5 × 3.14 × 20² = 628 cm². Total area = 2400 + 628 = 3028 cm². A student who uses a full circle instead of a semicircle on top of the rectangle gets 3.14 × 20² = 1256 cm² for the circle, plus 2400 cm² for the rectangle, totalling 3656 cm². A student who uses the rectangle's full width (40 cm) as the radius instead of halving it gets 0.5 × 3.14 × 40² = 2512 cm² for the semicircle, plus 2400 cm² for the rectangle, totalling 4912 cm².
- (d) 38 m² — The two fences meet at a right angle, so the rope sweeps a quarter of a circle: 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4. Grazing area = (90 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 7² = 0.25 × 153.86 = 38.465 m², which rounds to 38 m². (5 m² comes from forgetting to square the rope length; 154 m² comes from finding the area of a full circle and forgetting the angle fraction; 11 m² comes from using the arc length formula instead of the sector area formula.)
- (b) No — should divide by −2bc, not +2bc; sign is wrong. — Method: rearrange a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A step by step and compare with the student's version. Working: subtracting b² + c² from both sides gives a² − b² − c² = −2bc cos A, then dividing both sides by −2bc gives cos A = (a² − b² − c²) / (−2bc), which is the same as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) / (2bc). The student divided by +2bc instead of −2bc, so their expression is the negative of the correct one — the verdict is No. Saying the algebra is fine because 'either sign order gives a valid result' ignores that only one of the two signed expressions matches the original equation. Saying the denominator should be bc rather than 2bc is a different, unrelated error — the coefficient 2bc in the original formula is correct and must stay.
- (d) £48 — Scale factor = new width ÷ original width = 40 ÷ 10 = 4. Poster height = 15 × 4 = 60 cm. Cost = 60 × £0.80 = £48. (£12 comes from forgetting to scale the height at all, and pricing the original 15 cm height; £15.20 comes from adding the scale factor 4 to the height instead of multiplying by it; £3 comes from dividing the height by the scale factor instead of multiplying by it.)
- (d) No transformation — every point stays exactly where it was — The two vectors (5, −3) and (−5, 3) are opposites, so adding them gives (0, 0): every point ends up exactly where it started, and there is no transformation at all. Misreading the second vector's signs and effectively adding (5, −3) to itself instead of to its opposite gives a translation by the vector (10, −6). Assuming two translations must combine into a reflection gives a reflection in the x-axis — but a reflection reverses orientation, and translations never do. Assuming that two opposite vectors must mean a half turn gives a rotation of 180° about the origin — but a 180° rotation moves every point except its own centre, whereas this pair of translations leaves every single point exactly where it was. Two translations by opposite vectors always cancel exactly, leaving every point unmoved.
- (b) trapezium — A quadrilateral with exactly one pair of parallel sides is a trapezium; field ABCD has AB parallel to DC and no other pair of parallel sides, so trapezium is correct. Parallelogram requires BOTH pairs of opposite sides to be parallel, but the plan says only AB and DC are parallel. Rhombus requires all four sides to be equal in length, which is not stated here. A kite is defined by two pairs of adjacent equal sides, not by having a pair of parallel sides, so it does not match this description either.
- (b) 10.5 — Method: multiply the drawing length by the scale factor to get the real length. Working: 7 cm × 1.5 = 10.5 m. A student who answers 8.5 has added the scale factor to the drawing length instead of multiplying (7 + 1.5). A student who answers 14 has rounded the scale factor up to 2 before multiplying. A student who answers 3.5 has divided the drawing length by 2 instead of multiplying it by 1.5. Answer: 10.5 m.
- (b) 8.64 m — The real length is 240 times the model length: 3.6 × 240 = 864 cm. Converting to metres, 864 cm ÷ 100 = 8.64 m. The distractor 864 m comes from finding the length correctly in centimetres but forgetting to convert to metres. The distractor 0.0864 m comes from dividing by 100 a second time, converting 864 cm to metres twice over (864 ÷ 10 000) instead of once. The distractor 86.4 m comes from converting centimetres to metres by dividing by 10 instead of 100.
- (a) 8,000,000 cm³ — Method: change the edge length into centimetres first and then cube it, because 1 m = 100 cm and a volume needs that conversion applied to all three dimensions. Working: 2 m = 2 × 100 = 200 cm, so the volume is 200 × 200 × 200. 200 × 200 = 40,000 and 40,000 × 200 = 8,000,000. Answer: 8,000,000 cm³. The distractors: 8,000 cm³ comes from converting 2 m to 20 cm and cubing that; 80,000 cm³ comes from cubing in metres to get 8 m³ and then multiplying by 10,000, the conversion factor for an area rather than the 1,000,000 a volume needs; 8 cm³ comes from cubing the 2 without converting at all and simply writing cm³ because the question asked for that unit.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
- (a) 89.6° — Angle PQR is at vertex Q, so the side opposite it is PR = 13 cm. Using the cosine rule rearranged for an angle: cos(PQR) = (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 7) = 1 ÷ 154 = 0.0065. Taking the inverse cosine, angle PQR = 89.6° (1 d.p.). Using PR as one of the enclosing sides instead of as the opposite side, finding angle P instead of angle Q, gives (121 + 169 − 49) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 241 ÷ 286 = 0.8427, and angle = 32.6°. Swapping the sign inside the bracket, computing 169 − 121 − 49 instead, gives −1 ÷ 154 = −0.0065, and angle = 90.4°. Using PR in the denominator instead of QR gives (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 1 ÷ 286 = 0.0035, and angle = 89.8°. Keep PR as the opposite side, QR and PQ as the enclosing sides, and angle PQR comes to 89.6°.
- (c) 0.5 — The real distance is 2 × 25000 = 50000 cm. Converting to metres, by dividing by 100, gives 500 m, and converting to kilometres, by dividing by 1000, gives 0.5 km. A candidate who divides the 50000 cm by 1000 in one go, applying the metres-to-kilometres factor straight to the centimetres, gets 50 km. A candidate who divides by 100 twice, treating 100 m as 1 km, gets 5 km. A candidate who slips one extra decimal place when converting 500 m to kilometres gets 0.05 km. The real distance is 0.5 km.
- (b) 21 — Both legs of the journey are on the same bearing, 070°, so the ship travels in one straight line the whole way and the distances simply add: 12 + 9 = 21 km. A candidate who subtracts instead of adding gets 12 − 9 = 3 km. A candidate who multiplies the two distances gets 12 × 9 = 108. A candidate who assumes the ship changed direction and treats the two legs as the sides of a right-angled triangle works out √(12² + 9²) = √225 = 15 km — but the bearing does not change, so there is no triangle and no hypotenuse to find. Because the ship stays on one straight line, the total distance is 21 km.
- (c) 32.6° — Method: an angle is wanted from two sides and the angle facing one of them, so use the sine rule in the form sin A/a = sin B/b. Working: BC = 9.2 cm faces angle BAC and AC = 12.5 cm faces the 47° angle, so sin BAC = 9.2 × sin 47° ÷ 12.5 = 6.7285 ÷ 12.5 = 0.5383, and the inverse sine of 0.5383 is 32.566°. Because BC is shorter than AC, angle BAC must be smaller than 47°, so the acute value is the only one that fits. Answer: angle BAC = 32.6° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 147.4° comes from taking 180° − 32.566°, the obtuse angle with the same sine, without checking it — 147.4° and 47° already add to more than 180°, so no such triangle exists; 83.6° comes from putting the sides the wrong way up, 12.5 × sin 47° ÷ 9.2, which gives a sine of 0.9937; 57.4° comes from pressing the inverse cosine key on 0.5383 instead of the inverse sine key.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.