Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 11.2 cm — Method: two angles and a side are given, so use the sine rule, a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C, taking care that each side is paired with the angle it faces. Working: BC faces angle BAC = 42°, and AC faces angle ABC = 63°, so AC/sin 63° = 8.4/sin 42°. Multiplying up, AC = 8.4 × sin 63° ÷ sin 42° = 7.4845 ÷ 0.6691 = 11.185. Answer: AC = 11.2 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 6.3 cm comes from writing the ratio upside down, 8.4 × sin 42° ÷ sin 63°, which pairs each side with the angle beside it rather than the angle opposite it; 12.1 cm comes from using the third angle, 180° − 42° − 63° = 75°, in the numerator, which gives the length of AB instead of AC; 12.6 cm comes from assuming the sides are in the same ratio as the angles and working out 8.4 × 63 ÷ 42, which is true for arcs of a circle but never for the sides of a triangle.
- (a) 2.40m — Method: a cost found from a rate is the rate multiplied by the amount bought. Working: the rate is £2.40 per kilogram and the amount is m kilograms, so the cost is 2.40 × m. Answer: 2.40m. A candidate who divides the amount by the rate instead of multiplying writes m/2.40. A candidate who adds the rate to the amount instead of multiplying writes 2.40 + m. A candidate who subtracts the rate from the amount instead of multiplying writes m − 2.40.
- (c) 14.7 cm — The scale factor from the smaller tile to the larger tile is 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75, so the larger side is 8.4 × 1.75 = 14.7 cm. '4.8 cm' comes from scaling by 4 ÷ 7 instead, using the ratio the wrong way round. '11.4 cm' comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 4 = 3, onto 8.4, instead of scaling. '58.8 cm' comes from multiplying by 7 on its own, using a ratio number as the scale factor instead of working out 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75 first.
- (d) 53.2 cm² — Method: diagonal AC splits the kite into two congruent triangles, ABC and ADC, each with area 1/2 × AB × CB × sin(ABC), so the whole kite has area 2 × 1/2 × AB × CB × sin(ABC) = AB × CB × sin(ABC). Working: kite area = 6 × 9 × sin 100° = 53.2 cm². Reporting just one triangle's area, 1/2 × 6 × 9 × sin 100°, and forgetting to double it for the whole kite gives 26.6 cm²; multiplying the two sides together without any sine term at all gives 54.0 cm²; and doubling the triangle area twice, as if the kite were made of four congruent triangles instead of two, gives 106.4 cm². A kite split by its axis of symmetry always gives exactly two congruent triangles.
- (a) 17 cm — Convert the real distance to centimetres first: 3.4 km = 340 000 cm. Then divide by the scale factor, 20 000, since the map is 20 000 times smaller than real life: 340 000 ÷ 20 000 = 17, so the map distance is 17 cm. Choosing 1700 cm divides by 200 instead of 20 000, losing two zeros from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 200 = 1700). Choosing 170 cm divides by 2 000 instead of 20 000, losing one zero from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 = 170). Choosing 0.17 cm divides by 2 000 000 instead of 20 000, adding two extra zeros to the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 000 = 0.17).
- (b) 8.5 m — First apply the scale to convert the plan length to a real length in centimetres: 3.4 × 250 = 850 cm. Then convert centimetres to metres by dividing by 100: 850 ÷ 100 = 8.5, so the wall is 8.5 m long. Choosing 850 m applies the scale correctly but forgets to convert the answer from centimetres into metres. Choosing 0.85 m divides by 1000 instead of 100, confusing the centimetre-to-metre conversion with a metre-to-kilometre one. Choosing 3.4 m ignores the scale factor completely and just restates the plan length as if it were already the real length.
- (a) 10.4 cm — The scale factor from the smaller triangle to the larger triangle is 8 ÷ 5 = 1.6, so the larger side is 6.5 × 1.6 = 10.4 cm. The distractor 4.0625 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 6.5 × 5 ÷ 8 = 4.0625. The distractor 9.5 cm comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers (8 − 5 = 3) to the given length, 6.5 + 3 = 9.5. The distractor 13 cm comes from doubling the given length, treating the scale factor as 2 instead of 1.6.
- (a) 28.1° — The angle a line makes with the horizontal plane lies in the right-angled triangle formed by the vertical rise, the horizontal distance travelled, and the line itself. The horizontal distance from A to B is √(9² + 12²) = √(81 + 144) = √225 = 15, using only the x- and y-coordinates. The vertical rise is the z-coordinate, 8, so tan(angle) = 8 ÷ 15, giving angle = 28.1° (1 d.p.). Inverting the ratio, tan(angle) = 15 ÷ 8, gives 61.9° instead — the complement of the angle, not the angle with the horizontal. Using only the x-coordinate as if it were the whole horizontal distance, tan(angle) = 8 ÷ 9, gives 41.6°. Using the y-coordinate alone in the same way, tan(angle) = 8 ÷ 12, gives 33.7°.
- (d) £982.20 — Method: find the missing side BC with the cosine rule, add it to AB and AC for the perimeter, then multiply by the cost per metre. Working: BC² = 45² + 38² − 2 × 45 × 38 × cos 110° = 4638.71, so BC = 68.108 m, perimeter = 45 + 38 + 68.108 = 151.108 m, and cost = 151.108 × £6.50 = £982.20 — keep the unrounded perimeter, because the rounded 151.1 m would give £982.15. Forgetting the negative sign in the cosine rule gives BC = 48.0 m and a cost of £851.18; costing only the missing side BC and forgetting to include AB and AC gives £442.70; and stopping after finding the perimeter, without multiplying by the cost per metre, gives £151.11. The perimeter is only the halfway point of this question — the cost still has to be worked out.
- (a) 10 cm — Sector area is (angle ÷ 360) × π × radius². Here 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4, and 1/4 × 3.14 = 0.785, so radius² is 78.5 ÷ 0.785 = 100, and the radius is √100 = 10 cm. Stopping after finding radius² and not taking the square root gives 100 cm. Treating 78.5 as the area of the WHOLE circle, ignoring the 90° fraction, gives radius² = 78.5 ÷ 3.14 = 25, so a radius of 5 cm. Correctly finding a radius of 10 cm but then doubling it, mistaking the question for asking the diameter, gives 20 cm.
- (c) 36.7 m — Method: use the cosine rule to find the missing side BC, then add all three sides for the perimeter. Working: BC² = 13² + 10² − 2 × 13 × 10 × cos 72°, so BC = 13.7 m, and perimeter = 13 + 10 + 13.7 = 36.7 m. Forgetting the negative sign in the cosine rule (using + instead of −) gives BC = 18.7 m and a perimeter of 41.7 m; leaving AC out of the total and only adding AB and BC gives 26.7 m; and adding AB twice instead of AB and AC gives 39.7 m. Always add all three named sides once the missing one has been found.
- (d) No transformation — every point stays exactly where it was — The two vectors (5, −3) and (−5, 3) are opposites, so adding them gives (0, 0): every point ends up exactly where it started, and there is no transformation at all. Misreading the second vector's signs and effectively adding (5, −3) to itself instead of to its opposite gives a translation by the vector (10, −6). Assuming two translations must combine into a reflection gives a reflection in the x-axis — but a reflection reverses orientation, and translations never do. Assuming that two opposite vectors must mean a half turn gives a rotation of 180° about the origin — but a 180° rotation moves every point except its own centre, whereas this pair of translations leaves every single point exactly where it was. Two translations by opposite vectors always cancel exactly, leaving every point unmoved.
- (b) (22, −13) — The vector from the ship to the lighthouse is (12, −4) − (2, 5) = (10, −9). Sailing along this vector twice from the start gives (2, 5) + 2 × (10, −9) = (2 + 20, 5 − 18) = (22, −13). '(12, −4)' stops after the ship reaches the lighthouse and ignores the second identical leg. '(−18, 23)' comes from finding the vector the wrong way round, as (2, 5) − (12, −4) = (−10, 9), and then doubling that. '(2, 5)' comes from adding the vector and then subtracting it again, wrongly cancelling the two legs instead of adding them.
- (a) 1023 m² — Method: split the quadrilateral along the diagonal AC into two triangles. Triangle ABC has two sides and the angle between them, so the cosine rule gives AC and the area formula gives its area; triangle ACD then has three known sides, so the cosine rule gives an angle and the area formula gives its area. Working: AC² = 40² + 32² − 2 × 40 × 32 × cos 95° = 1600 + 1024 + 223.12 = 2847.12, so AC = 53.358 m. The area of triangle ABC is 1/2 × 40 × 32 × sin 95° = 640 × 0.99619 = 637.56 m². In triangle ACD, cos ADC = (25² + 36² − 2847.12) ÷ (2 × 25 × 36) = (1921 − 2847.12) ÷ 1800 = −0.51451, so angle ADC = 120.965° and sin ADC = 0.85748, giving an area of 1/2 × 25 × 36 × 0.85748 = 385.87 m². The total is 637.56 + 385.87 = 1023.43. Answer: the field has an area of 1023 m² to the nearest square metre. The distractors: 1071 m² comes from taking cos 95° as positive, so the diagonal is found as 49.00 m instead of 53.358 m and the second triangle comes out too large; 2047 m² comes from leaving the factor 1/2 out of both area calculations; 638 m² is the area of triangle ABC alone, written down by a candidate who finds the diagonal and then forgets that the second triangle is part of the field.
- (a) £157.00 — Area covered = (angle ÷ 360) × π × r² = (90 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 400 = 0.25 × 1256 = 314 km². Charge = 314 × £0.50 = £157.00. (£7.85 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.25 × 3.14 × 20 = 15.7 km² and then charging that; £628.00 comes from finding the area of a full circle, 3.14 × 400 = 1256 km², and forgetting the angle fraction before charging; £15.70 comes from using the arc length formula, 0.25 × 2 × 3.14 × 20 = 31.4, in place of the area, and charging that.)
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.