Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 49.5 m² — Method: the area formula needs two sides and the angle between them, and only sides are given, so find one angle with the cosine rule first and then use the two sides that enclose it. Working: angle ABC lies between AB = 14 m and BC = 9 m, so cos ABC = (14² + 9² − 11²) ÷ (2 × 14 × 9) = (196 + 81 − 121) ÷ 252 = 156 ÷ 252 = 0.61905, giving angle ABC = 51.753° and sin ABC = 0.78535. The area is then 1/2 × 14 × 9 × 0.78535 = 63 × 0.78535 = 49.477. Answer: the area is 49.5 m² to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 60.5 m² comes from using the correct angle at B with the sides 14 m and 11 m, which do not both meet at B, so the angle is no longer the one they enclose; 63.0 m² comes from leaving the sine out and treating the two sides as a base and a perpendicular height; 40.5 m² comes from working out angle BAC = 39.98° instead and using its sine with the sides that meet at B, so that the angle used is not the angle between them.
- (b) 166.3 cm² — Method: split the regular hexagon into 6 identical triangles meeting at the centre, each with two sides of 8 cm and a 60° angle between them, and use Area = (1/2)ab sin C on just one of them. Working: one triangle's area = 1/2 × 8 × 8 × sin 60° = 27.7 cm² (1 d.p.); the hexagon is 6 of these, so its area is 6 × 27.7 = 166.3 cm² (1 d.p.). Answer: 166.3 cm². Reporting just one triangle's area, without multiplying by 6, gives 27.7 cm²; treating the angle at the centre as a right angle instead of 60°, using 1/2 × 8 × 8 with no sine factor at all, gives 6 × 32 = 192.0 cm²; and multiplying by 5 instead of 6, miscounting the triangles in the hexagon, gives 5 × 27.7 = 138.6 cm². A regular hexagon always splits into exactly 6 triangles at its centre — count them before you multiply.
- (a) 3 — Method: find the sail's area with Area = (1/2)ab sin C, then divide by how much one litre covers, and round up to a whole number of tins since paint can only be bought by the tin. Working: Area = 1/2 × 4.2 × 3.6 × sin 115° = 6.85 m² (2 d.p.); 6.85 ÷ 3 = 2.28 tins, which rounds up to 3 tins. Answer: 3. Rounding 2.28 to the nearest whole number instead of rounding up gives 2, which is not enough paint to finish the sail; forgetting the 1/2 in the area formula gives an area of 13.7 m², needing 5 tins; and assuming one litre covers exactly 1 m² of sail, ignoring the coverage rate given, rounds the area itself up to 7 tins. Whenever a quantity can only be bought in whole units, round up even when the decimal part is small — 2.28 tins means you need a third tin.
- (a) £4.20 — 350 g is 3.5 lots of 100 g, since 350 ÷ 100 = 3.5, so the cost is 3.5 × £1.20 = £4.20. Multiplying the mass in grams directly by the price, without dividing by 100 first, gives £420.00. Working out 100 ÷ 350 instead of 350 ÷ 100 inverts the ratio and gives about £0.34. Rounding 350 g down to 300 g gives 3 × £1.20 = £3.60.
- (c) 40.5 kg — Since the statues are made from the same material, mass is proportional to volume, which scales with the cube of the length scale factor. The length scale factor is 45 ÷ 30 = 1.5, so the volume (and mass) scale factor is 1.5³ = 3.375. The larger statue's mass is 12 × 3.375 = 40.5 kg. 18 kg comes from multiplying by the length factor 1.5 directly. 27 kg comes from using the area scale factor 1.5² = 2.25 instead of the volume scale factor. 54 kg comes from treating 'cubed' as 'multiplied by 3', giving 1.5 × 3 = 4.5 instead of 1.5³.
- (c) 1 : 300 — First convert both lengths to the same unit: 15 m = 1500 cm. The scale compares 5 cm on the drawing to 1500 cm in real life, so dividing both parts by 5 gives a scale of 1 : 300. A candidate who compares 5 to 15 without converting units gets 1 : 3. A candidate who converts 15 m to 150 cm, using the wrong conversion factor, gets 1 : 30. A candidate who converts 15 m to 15000 cm, again using the wrong conversion factor, gets 1 : 3000. The scale of the drawing is 1 : 300.
- (c) ASA — Method: check which condition matches two angles and the side between them, since that is all the sailmaker has measured. Working: the 10 m side lies between the 50° and 75° angles in both panels, so this is two Angles and the included Side, ASA. Options: SAS would need two sides and the angle between them, but only one side has been measured here; SSS would need three sides, but only one is known; RHS needs a right angle and a hypotenuse, and neither panel has a stated right angle. Answer: ASA.
- (b) 43.8 km — Method: find the angle of the triangle at Q from the two bearings, then use the cosine rule on the two known sides and that included angle. Working: the bearing of P from Q is the back bearing of 040°, which is 040° + 180° = 220°, and the bearing of R from Q is 115°, so angle PQR = 220° − 115° = 105°. Then PR² = 24² + 31² − 2 × 24 × 31 × cos 105° = 576 + 961 − 1488 × (−0.25882) = 1537 + 385.12 = 1922.12, and the square root of 1922.12 is 43.842. Answer: PR = 43.8 km to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 33.9 km comes from subtracting the bearings, 115° − 040° = 75°, and using 75° as the angle at Q, which is the angle the ship turns through, not the angle inside the triangle; 19.9 km comes from using the first bearing itself, 040°, as the angle at Q; 55.0 km comes from adding the two legs, 24 + 31, which would be the distance only if the ship had sailed in a straight line.
- (a) 44.7 m — Method: the line joining the two tops is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose horizontal side is the gap between the masts and whose vertical side is the difference in their heights, so Pythagoras' theorem applies. Working: the difference in heights is 50 − 30 = 20 m, so d² = 40² + 20² = 1600 + 400 = 2000 and d = √2000 = 44.721…, which is 44.7 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 44.7 m. The distractors: 34.6 m comes from subtracting the squares, √(40² − 20²), instead of adding them; 60.0 m comes from adding the two sides of the triangle, 40 + 20, rather than using Pythagoras' theorem; 50.0 m is the height of the taller mast, copied from the question in place of the distance asked for.
- (a) £94.58 — Method: find the area with 1/2ab sin C, then multiply by the cost per square metre. Working: area = 1/2 × 1.8 × 1.3 × sin 72° = 1.11274 m², so cost = 1.11274 × £85 = £94.58. Leaving out the 1/2 gives an area of 2.22547 m² and a cost of £189.17; using cos 72° instead of sin 72° gives a cost of £30.73; and rounding the area to 1 decimal place (1.1 m²) before multiplying by the cost per square metre gives £93.50, which loses accuracy that the final answer needs. Even rounding to 1.113 m² is enough to shift the cost to £94.61 — keep the unrounded area in your calculator until the very last step.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
- (c) 460 g — Each division is 20 g, so three divisions past the mark is 3 × 20 = 60 g. Adding this to the 400 g mark gives 400 + 60 = 460 g. Treating each division as worth 1 g instead of 20 g gives 400 + 3 = 403 g. Working out the extra amount correctly but forgetting to add the 400 g mark gives just 60 g. Treating each division as worth 10 g instead of 20 g gives 400 + 30 = 430 g.
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
- (a) 17 cm — Convert the real distance to centimetres first: 3.4 km = 340 000 cm. Then divide by the scale factor, 20 000, since the map is 20 000 times smaller than real life: 340 000 ÷ 20 000 = 17, so the map distance is 17 cm. Choosing 1700 cm divides by 200 instead of 20 000, losing two zeros from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 200 = 1700). Choosing 170 cm divides by 2 000 instead of 20 000, losing one zero from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 = 170). Choosing 0.17 cm divides by 2 000 000 instead of 20 000, adding two extra zeros to the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 000 = 0.17).
- (c) 5 m — The horizontal distance is the side adjacent to the 60° angle, and the sloping side is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = hypotenuse × cos 60°. The exact value of cos 60° is 1/2, so horizontal distance = 10 × 1/2 = 5 m. Using the sloping side itself as the horizontal distance, without using any trigonometry at all, gives 10 m. Using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of cos 60° finds the vertical height of the tent rather than the horizontal distance: 10 × √3/2 = 5√3 = 8.7 m (1 d.p.). Dividing the sloping side by cos 60° instead of multiplying by it, 10 ÷ 0.5 = 20 m, treats the sloping side as though it were the adjacent side rather than the hypotenuse.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.