Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 5√2 cm — Method: the angles of a triangle add to 180°, so the third angle is 45° as well and the two shorter sides are equal. Take one of them as the side opposite a 45° angle and use sin 45° = opposite ÷ hypotenuse. Working: the exact value of sin 45° is √2/2, so the shorter side = 10 × √2 ÷ 2, and half of 10 is 5. Answer: 5√2 cm, which is about 7.07 cm. Remembering sin 45° as √2 rather than as √2 halved gives 10√2 cm, which is longer than the hypotenuse. Halving the hypotenuse because 45° is half of 90° gives 5 cm. Taking the value from the other special triangle, sin 60° = √3/2, gives 5√3 cm.
- (b) 9.3 cm — Method: the area formula gives the second side that encloses the 38° angle, and once two sides and the angle between them are known the cosine rule gives the third side. Working: 61 = 1/2 × 15 × AC × sin 38°, so AC = 2 × 61 ÷ (15 × sin 38°) = 122 ÷ 9.2349 = 13.211 cm. Then BC² = 15² + 13.211² − 2 × 15 × 13.211 × cos 38° = 225 + 174.53 − 312.31 = 87.22, and the square root of 87.22 is 9.339. Answer: BC = 9.3 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 10.6 cm comes from forgetting to double the area when rearranging, so AC is taken as 6.606 cm before the cosine rule is applied; 26.7 cm comes from adding the last term of the cosine rule instead of subtracting it, 399.53 + 312.31; 13.2 cm is the length of AC, written down by a candidate who completes the first step and stops there.
- (a) 376.8 cm³ — Volume of a cone = (1/3)πr²h. Substitute r = 6 and h = 10: (1/3) × 3.14 × 6² × 10 = (1/3) × 3.14 × 36 × 10 = (1/3) × 1130.4 = 376.8 cm³.
- (a) 10.4 cm — The scale factor from the smaller triangle to the larger triangle is 8 ÷ 5 = 1.6, so the larger side is 6.5 × 1.6 = 10.4 cm. The distractor 4.0625 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 6.5 × 5 ÷ 8 = 4.0625. The distractor 9.5 cm comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers (8 − 5 = 3) to the given length, 6.5 + 3 = 9.5. The distractor 13 cm comes from doubling the given length, treating the scale factor as 2 instead of 1.6.
- (d) 21.2 m — Method: the cable is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose vertical side is the drop from the roof to the bracket and whose horizontal side is 15 m, so use Pythagoras' theorem. Working: the drop is 20 − 5 = 15 m, so c² = 15² + 15² = 225 + 225 = 450 and c = √450 = 21.213…, which is 21.2 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 21.2 m. The distractors: 25.0 m comes from using the whole 20 m height of the roof as the vertical side and forgetting that the bracket is already 5 m up; 30.0 m comes from adding the two sides of the triangle, 15 + 15, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem; 15.0 m is the horizontal distance on its own, which would be the length of the cable only if it ran level.
- (a) 62.8 cm — The ribbon goes once around the circular cross-section, so its length equals the circumference: 2πr = 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8 cm.
- (b) £2.94 — Method: the price is quoted for each kilogram, so the mass has to be written in kilograms before it is multiplied by the price. Working: 1 kg = 1000 g, so 350 ÷ 1000 = 0.35 and the piece weighs 0.35 kg. The cost is then 8.40 × 0.35 = 2.94. Answer: £2.94. Treating 350 g as 3.5 kg, a division by 100 rather than by 1000, gives 8.40 × 3.5 = 29.40. Multiplying the price by the number of grams gives 8.40 × 350 = 2940. Dividing the price by the mass instead of multiplying gives 8.40 ÷ 0.35 = 24.
- (d) 110.1° — Method: the largest angle in any triangle faces the longest side, so identify that angle first and then use the cosine rule rearranged as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) ÷ 2bc. Working: the longest side is AC = 12.8 cm, which is faced by angle ABC, and the two sides meeting at B are 6.4 cm and 9.1 cm, so cos ABC = (6.4² + 9.1² − 12.8²) ÷ (2 × 6.4 × 9.1) = (40.96 + 82.81 − 163.84) ÷ 116.48 = −40.07 ÷ 116.48 = −0.34401. A negative cosine means an obtuse angle, and the inverse cosine of −0.34401 is 110.12°. Answer: the largest angle is 110.1° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 28.0° is the angle facing the shortest side, chosen by a candidate who thinks the largest angle sits opposite the smallest side; 69.9° comes from dropping the minus sign and using cos = 0.34401, which turns the obtuse angle into its supplement; 81.4° comes from assuming the angles share out 180° in the same ratio as the sides, 180 × 12.8 ÷ 28.3, which is not how a triangle behaves.
- (b) −2 — The gradient of the original line is (6 − 2) ÷ (3 − 1) = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Reflecting in the x-axis sends every y-coordinate to its negative, which flips the sign of the gradient: the image line has gradient −2. Translating by (2, 0) is a horizontal shift, which does not change the line's steepness or direction at all, so the gradient stays at −2. Assuming the gradient is unaffected by the reflection gives 2, the original gradient carried straight through. Thinking a reflection in the x-axis turns a gradient into its positive reciprocal gives 1/2. Combining that same wrong idea with the sign flip from the reflection gives −1/2. Only the sign flips, from the reflection, and translating never changes a gradient at all, so the answer is −2.
- (c) £7.85 — Arc length = (90 ÷ 360) × 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 0.25 × 62.8 = 15.7 cm. Cost = 15.7 × £0.50 = £7.85. (£31.40 comes from finding the full circumference and forgetting the angle fraction; £15.70 comes from using the diameter, 20 cm, in place of the radius; £157.00 comes from multiplying the arc length by the radius instead of by the cost per centimetre.)
- (b) 8.5 m — First apply the scale to convert the plan length to a real length in centimetres: 3.4 × 250 = 850 cm. Then convert centimetres to metres by dividing by 100: 850 ÷ 100 = 8.5, so the wall is 8.5 m long. Choosing 850 m applies the scale correctly but forgets to convert the answer from centimetres into metres. Choosing 0.85 m divides by 1000 instead of 100, confusing the centimetre-to-metre conversion with a metre-to-kilometre one. Choosing 3.4 m ignores the scale factor completely and just restates the plan length as if it were already the real length.
- (c) 9.9 cm — Method: the 7 cm side is opposite the 45° angle and the hypotenuse is wanted, so use sin θ = opposite ÷ hypotenuse and rearrange it for the hypotenuse. Working: sin 45° = 7 ÷ h, so h = 7 ÷ sin 45° = 9.899…, which is 9.9 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 9.9 cm. The distractors: 5.0 cm comes from multiplying by sin 45° instead of dividing by it; 14.0 cm comes from doubling the 7 cm side, which is the rule for a side opposite 30° and not one opposite 45°; 7.0 cm comes from reading the two equal sides of a 45° right-angled triangle as including the hypotenuse, when the equal pair is the two shorter sides.
- (c) 17.71 m — The perimeter is the two long sides (5 m + 5 m = 10 m) plus the one remaining short side (3 m) plus the curved semicircular edge. The 3 m side is the diameter of the semicircle, so its radius is 3 ÷ 2 = 1.5 m and the curved length is half the circumference: (1/2) × 2 × 3.14 × 1.5 = 4.71 m. Total: 10 + 3 + 4.71 = 17.71 m.
- (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.