Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 9π cm² — Sector area is the fraction θ/360 of the full circle's area, πr². Substitute θ = 40 and r = 9: 40 out of 360 is one ninth, and the full circle's area is π × 9² = 81π. One ninth of 81π is 9π, so the sector area is 9π cm². Choosing 2π cm² is this sector's ARC LENGTH, not its area — a different formula and a different quantity. Choosing 81π cm² is the area of the WHOLE circle, forgetting to scale down by the sector's angle. Choosing 18π cm² is the CIRCUMFERENCE of the whole circle, 2π × 9, mixed up with an area.
- (b) 113.04 cm² — Sector area is (angle ÷ 360) × π × radius², and radius means the RADIUS, not the diameter: here the diameter is 24 cm, so the radius is 12 cm. The fraction is 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4, and 12² = 144, so the area is 0.25 × 3.14 × 144 = 113.04 cm². Using the diameter itself as if it were the radius gives 0.25 × 3.14 × 576 = 452.16 cm². Using the arc-length formula, 2 × π × radius, instead of the area formula gives 0.25 × 2 × 3.14 × 12 = 18.84 cm². Using the radius instead of its square gives 0.25 × 3.14 × 12 = 9.42 cm².
- (d) 36.9° — sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = 6/10 = 0.6, so θ = sin⁻¹(0.6) = 36.86...° ≈ 36.9°. "53.1°" finds the OTHER acute angle in the triangle, 90° − 36.9°, instead of θ itself, as if the two acute angles had been swapped. "31.0°" comes from using the tangent ratio instead of sine, working out tan⁻¹(6/10) = 31.0° with the wrong ratio for the two sides given. "36.8°" rounds sin⁻¹(0.6) = 36.86...° down to 36.8° instead of correctly rounding it up to 36.9°.
- (a) 69.3 m — Method: each observer gives a right-angled triangle with the mast as the opposite side, so tan θ = 60 ÷ distance and the distance from the foot of the mast is 60 ÷ tan θ; because both stand on the same side, the gap between them is the difference of those two distances. Working: from Amelia, 60 ÷ tan 30° = 103.92… m; from Noah, 60 ÷ tan 60° = 34.64… m; the gap is 103.92… − 34.64… = 69.28… m, which is 69.3 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 69.3 m. The distractors: 103.9 m is Amelia's own distance from the foot of the mast, written down before the second distance has been taken away; 34.6 m is Noah's distance from the foot of the mast; 138.6 m comes from adding the two distances, which would be right only if the two observers stood on opposite sides of the mast.
- (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
- (d) 14.9 cm — By the sine rule, sin(BAC) ÷ BC = sin(ACB) ÷ AB, so sin(BAC) = 7 × sin35° ÷ 10 = 0.4015. This gives angle BAC = 23.7° or angle BAC = 156.3°; since angle BAC is acute, angle BAC = 23.7°. Angle ABC = 180° − 35° − 23.7° = 121.3°. By the sine rule again, AC ÷ sin(ABC) = AB ÷ sin(ACB), so AC = 10 × sin121.3° ÷ sin35° = 14.9 cm. Using angle BAC in the final step instead of angle ABC gives AC = 10 × sin23.7° ÷ sin35° = 7.0 cm — this just recomputes the given side BC. Using angle ACB again in the final step, instead of the newly found angle ABC, gives AC = 10 × sin35° ÷ sin35° = 10.0 cm — this just returns AB unchanged. Making a sign slip when finding angle ABC, computing 180° − 35° + 23.7° = 168.7° instead of subtracting it, and carrying that through gives AC = 10 × sin168.7° ÷ sin35° = 3.4 cm. Find angle BAC, then angle ABC, then apply the sine rule once more, and AC comes to 14.9 cm.
- (d) 2546 cm² — Each of the 8 triangles formed by joining O to the vertices is isosceles, with two sides of 30 cm and an angle at O of 360° ÷ 8 = 45°. The area of one triangle is 1/2 × 30 × 30 × sin 45° = 450 × 0.7071 = 318.2 cm². Multiplying by 8 gives the area of the octagon: 318.2 × 8 = 2545.6 cm², which rounds to 2546 cm². Taking the area of a single triangle as the final answer, without multiplying by 8, gives 318 cm². Multiplying by 6 instead of 8, as for a hexagon, gives 318.2 × 6 = 1909 cm². Leaving out the 1/2 from the triangle area formula gives 30 × 30 × sin 45° × 8 = 5091 cm².
- (c) 36.7 m — Method: use the cosine rule to find the missing side BC, then add all three sides for the perimeter. Working: BC² = 13² + 10² − 2 × 13 × 10 × cos 72°, so BC = 13.7 m, and perimeter = 13 + 10 + 13.7 = 36.7 m. Forgetting the negative sign in the cosine rule (using + instead of −) gives BC = 18.7 m and a perimeter of 41.7 m; leaving AC out of the total and only adding AB and BC gives 26.7 m; and adding AB twice instead of AB and AC gives 39.7 m. Always add all three named sides once the missing one has been found.
- (c) No — 50° is angle P, not between PQ and QR. — Method: 1/2ab sin C only gives the area when C is the angle between the two named sides. Working: PQ and QR meet at vertex Q, so the angle between them is angle PQR, not angle QPR (which is the angle at vertex P, between sides PQ and PR). Since angle QPR is not included between PQ and QR, the student's calculation 1/2 × 8 × 11 × sin 50° does not give the area of the triangle — the verdict is No. Claiming that any angle works with any two sides ignores that the formula is only true for the INCLUDED angle. Claiming the formula needs all three sides is a different, incorrect statement about the formula itself — Area = 1/2ab sin C is valid with exactly two sides and their included angle, when that angle is actually known.
- (d) 15 cm — Arc length = (angle ÷ 360) × 2 × π × r. Here 120 ÷ 360 = 1/3, and 2 × 3.14 = 6.28, so 31.4 = (1/3) × 6.28 × r. Multiplying both sides by 3 gives 6.28 × r = 94.2, so r = 94.2 ÷ 6.28 = 15 cm. (5 cm comes from forgetting the angle fraction altogether and dividing the arc length by 2 × π alone: 31.4 ÷ 6.28 = 5; 30 cm comes from leaving out the factor of 2, dividing by (1/3) × 3.14 = 1.0467 instead of (1/3) × 6.28: 31.4 ÷ 1.0467 = 30; 7.5 cm comes from correctly finding a radius of 15 cm but then treating that 15 cm as a diameter and halving it.)
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (d) 6 cm — Volume = πr²h, so height = volume ÷ (πr²) = 471 ÷ (3.14 × 25) = 471 ÷ 78.5 = 6 cm. (30 cm comes from dividing by πr instead of πr², missing one factor of the radius; 150 cm comes from dividing by π only, without using r² at all; 24 cm comes from treating the given 5 cm as a diameter and using a radius of 2.5 cm instead.)
- (d) £100.48 — Area of the rug = (angle ÷ 360) × π × r² = (180 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 16 = 0.5 × 50.24 = 25.12 m². Cost = 25.12 × £4 = £100.48. (£200.96 comes from finding the area of a full circle, 3.14 × 16 = 50.24 m², and forgetting the angle fraction before costing it; £25.12 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.5 × 3.14 × 4 = 6.28 m², and then costing that; £50.24 comes from using the arc length formula, 0.5 × 2 × 3.14 × 4 = 12.56, in place of the area, and costing that.)
- (c) 155° — Turning clockwise adds to the bearing. Starting on a bearing of 065° and turning clockwise through 90° gives 065° + 90° = 155°. A candidate who instead subtracts, working out 90° − 65° = 25°, has performed the wrong operation, giving 025°. A candidate who turns anticlockwise instead of clockwise works out 065° − 90°, which gives a negative number, and adding 360° to fix this gives 335° — the bearing for turning the other way. A candidate who thinks turning does not change the bearing at all keeps the answer as 065°. The new bearing, turning clockwise, is 155°.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.