Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 14.7 cm — The scale factor from the smaller tile to the larger tile is 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75, so the larger side is 8.4 × 1.75 = 14.7 cm. '4.8 cm' comes from scaling by 4 ÷ 7 instead, using the ratio the wrong way round. '11.4 cm' comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 4 = 3, onto 8.4, instead of scaling. '58.8 cm' comes from multiplying by 7 on its own, using a ratio number as the scale factor instead of working out 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75 first.
- (b) 6 m — Volume of a cuboid = length × width × height, so height = volume ÷ (length × width) = 360 ÷ (12 × 5) = 360 ÷ 60 = 6 m. A pupil who divides the volume by the length only gets 360 ÷ 12 = 30 m. A pupil who divides the volume by the width only gets 360 ÷ 5 = 72 m. A pupil who subtracts length × width from the volume instead of dividing gets 360 − 60 = 300 m. The correct height is 6 m.
- (a) 114.6° — Using the sine rule, sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) ÷ AC = 6 × sin(40°) ÷ 9. Since sin(40°) ≈ 0.64279, this gives sin(ACB) ≈ 3.8567 ÷ 9 ≈ 0.42852, so angle ACB ≈ 25.4° or its supplement, 154.6°. Testing the obtuse candidate: 40° + 154.6° = 194.6°, which already exceeds 180°, so angle BAC would have to be negative — impossible, so 154.6° is rejected. With angle ACB ≈ 25.4°, angle BAC = 180° − 40° − 25.4° = 114.6°. 25.4° is angle ACB, not angle BAC that the question asks for. 14.6° comes from using the invalid 154.6° candidate anyway and then wrongly turning the resulting negative angle sum (−14.6°) positive instead of rejecting it. 65.4° comes from inverting the sine rule ratio — dividing AC × sin(ABC) by AB instead of AB × sin(ABC) by AC — which gives a different, incorrect candidate for angle ACB entirely.
- (a) 8.1 m — Multiply the length on the plan by the scale factor: 4.5 × 1.8 = 8.1, so the real length is 8.1 m. Choosing 6.3 m adds the two numbers instead of multiplying them (4.5 + 1.8 = 6.3). Choosing 2.5 m divides the plan length by the scale factor the wrong way round (4.5 ÷ 1.8 = 2.5) instead of multiplying. Choosing 9.0 m rounds the scale factor up to 2 before multiplying (4.5 × 2 = 9.0), losing the accuracy the 1.8 was giving.
- (c) 8 cm — Area of a trapezium = (sum of parallel sides) ÷ 2 × height, so 45 = (a + 10) ÷ 2 × 5. Dividing 45 by 5 gives 9, so (a + 10) ÷ 2 = 9, meaning a + 10 = 18, so a = 18 − 10 = 8 cm. A pupil who correctly finds that the two parallel sides add up to 18 but forgets to subtract the known side of 10 cm gives the sum of both parallel sides, 18 cm, as the answer. A pupil who then adds 10 again by mistake instead of subtracting gets 18 + 10 = 28 cm. A pupil who halves the correct answer by mistake gets 8 ÷ 2 = 4 cm. The correct length of the other parallel side is 8 cm.
- (c) 0.5 — The real distance is 2 × 25000 = 50000 cm. Converting to metres, by dividing by 100, gives 500 m, and converting to kilometres, by dividing by 1000, gives 0.5 km. A candidate who divides the 50000 cm by 1000 in one go, applying the metres-to-kilometres factor straight to the centimetres, gets 50 km. A candidate who divides by 100 twice, treating 100 m as 1 km, gets 5 km. A candidate who slips one extra decimal place when converting 500 m to kilometres gets 0.05 km. The real distance is 0.5 km.
- (b) 320° — A bearing is always measured clockwise from north. An angle measured anticlockwise must be converted by subtracting it from 360°: 360 − 40 = 320°, so the bearing is 320°. Choosing 040° treats the anticlockwise angle as if it were already a clockwise bearing, without converting it. Choosing 220° adds 180° to the angle, mixing this up with a back-bearing calculation (40 + 180 = 220). Choosing 400° adds the angle to 360° instead of subtracting it (40 + 360 = 400), giving a bearing greater than a full turn.
- (b) −2 — The gradient of the original line is (6 − 2) ÷ (3 − 1) = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Reflecting in the x-axis sends every y-coordinate to its negative, which flips the sign of the gradient: the image line has gradient −2. Translating by (2, 0) is a horizontal shift, which does not change the line's steepness or direction at all, so the gradient stays at −2. Assuming the gradient is unaffected by the reflection gives 2, the original gradient carried straight through. Thinking a reflection in the x-axis turns a gradient into its positive reciprocal gives 1/2. Combining that same wrong idea with the sign flip from the reflection gives −1/2. Only the sign flips, from the reflection, and translating never changes a gradient at all, so the answer is −2.
- (b) 21.5 km — Method: find angle ABC from the two bearings, then use the cosine rule. Working: the bearing of A from B is 038° + 180° = 218°, so angle ABC = 218° − 142° = 76°. Then AC² = 14² + 20² − 2 × 14 × 20 × cos 76°, so AC = 21.5 km. Leaving out the factor of 2 in the cosine rule gives AC = 23.0 km; using 142° − 38° = 104° as the angle instead of the correct 76° gives AC = 27.0 km; and simply adding the two distances as if the path were a straight line gives 34.0 km. The angle between the two legs must come from the bearings, not from subtracting them directly.
- (c) 32.6° — Method: an angle is wanted from two sides and the angle facing one of them, so use the sine rule in the form sin A/a = sin B/b. Working: BC = 9.2 cm faces angle BAC and AC = 12.5 cm faces the 47° angle, so sin BAC = 9.2 × sin 47° ÷ 12.5 = 6.7285 ÷ 12.5 = 0.5383, and the inverse sine of 0.5383 is 32.566°. Because BC is shorter than AC, angle BAC must be smaller than 47°, so the acute value is the only one that fits. Answer: angle BAC = 32.6° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 147.4° comes from taking 180° − 32.566°, the obtuse angle with the same sine, without checking it — 147.4° and 47° already add to more than 180°, so no such triangle exists; 83.6° comes from putting the sides the wrong way up, 12.5 × sin 47° ÷ 9.2, which gives a sine of 0.9937; 57.4° comes from pressing the inverse cosine key on 0.5383 instead of the inverse sine key.
- (d) 53.2 cm² — Method: diagonal AC splits the kite into two congruent triangles, ABC and ADC, each with area 1/2 × AB × CB × sin(ABC), so the whole kite has area 2 × 1/2 × AB × CB × sin(ABC) = AB × CB × sin(ABC). Working: kite area = 6 × 9 × sin 100° = 53.2 cm². Reporting just one triangle's area, 1/2 × 6 × 9 × sin 100°, and forgetting to double it for the whole kite gives 26.6 cm²; multiplying the two sides together without any sine term at all gives 54.0 cm²; and doubling the triangle area twice, as if the kite were made of four congruent triangles instead of two, gives 106.4 cm². A kite split by its axis of symmetry always gives exactly two congruent triangles.
- (a) 5.9 — The real length is 9.8 × 60 = 588 cm. Converting to metres, by dividing by 100, gives 5.88 m, which rounds to 5.9 m to 1 decimal place. A candidate who rounds 5.88 down instead of up gets 5.8 m. A candidate who forgets to convert from centimetres to metres gets 58.8. A candidate who divides by 60 instead of multiplying gets 0.16, to 2 decimal places. The real length, to 1 decimal place, is 5.9 m.
- (d) No transformation — every point stays exactly where it was — The two vectors (5, −3) and (−5, 3) are opposites, so adding them gives (0, 0): every point ends up exactly where it started, and there is no transformation at all. Misreading the second vector's signs and effectively adding (5, −3) to itself instead of to its opposite gives a translation by the vector (10, −6). Assuming two translations must combine into a reflection gives a reflection in the x-axis — but a reflection reverses orientation, and translations never do. Assuming that two opposite vectors must mean a half turn gives a rotation of 180° about the origin — but a 180° rotation moves every point except its own centre, whereas this pair of translations leaves every single point exactly where it was. Two translations by opposite vectors always cancel exactly, leaving every point unmoved.
- (b) 8.64 m — The real length is 240 times the model length: 3.6 × 240 = 864 cm. Converting to metres, 864 cm ÷ 100 = 8.64 m. The distractor 864 m comes from finding the length correctly in centimetres but forgetting to convert to metres. The distractor 0.0864 m comes from dividing by 100 a second time, converting 864 cm to metres twice over (864 ÷ 10 000) instead of once. The distractor 86.4 m comes from converting centimetres to metres by dividing by 10 instead of 100.
- (c) 152.2 cm² — Method: find the area of one of the 5 isosceles triangles with 1/2ab sin C, then multiply by 5 for the whole pentagon. Working: one triangle has area 1/2 × 8 × 8 × sin 72° = 30.4338 cm², so the pentagon's area = 5 × 30.4338 = 152.2 cm² — keep the unrounded triangle area, since 5 × 30.4 would give 152.0. Reporting the area of a single triangle and forgetting to multiply by 5 gives 30.4 cm²; multiplying by 6 instead of 5, as for a hexagon, gives 182.6 cm²; and leaving out the 1/2 from each triangle before multiplying by 5 gives 304.3 cm². A regular pentagon splits into exactly 5 triangles at its centre, each with a 72° angle, since 360° ÷ 5 = 72°.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.