Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) It is a parallelogram but not a rectangle — Method: match the given properties to the definition of each named quadrilateral. Working: having both pairs of opposite sides parallel and equal in length is exactly the definition of a parallelogram; since none of the angles are right angles, it cannot also be a rectangle, which needs four right angles. Options: 'must be a rectangle' wrongly assumes every parallelogram has right angles; 'must be a rhombus' wrongly assumes equal opposite sides means all four sides are equal, but only the opposite pairs are stated as equal here; 'trapezium' is wrong because a trapezium has exactly one pair of parallel sides, while this shape has two pairs, so it is a parallelogram and not a trapezium. Answer: it is a parallelogram but not a rectangle.
- (d) 30.2 cm² — Method: with two sides and the angle between them, use Area = (1/2)ab sin C. Working: Area = 1/2 × 9.4 × 7.2 × sin 63° = 30.2 cm² (1 d.p.). Answer: 30.2 cm². Leaving out the 1/2 altogether gives 60.3 cm²; using cos 63° instead of sin 63° gives 15.4 cm²; and squaring one side instead of multiplying the two different given sides together gives 39.4 cm². Always check you are using sin, not cos, and that the 1/2 is there before you multiply the two given sides together.
- (b) £26.25 — First multiply the base and height: 2.4 × 1.75 = 4.2. The area of the triangular sail is half of that: half of 4.2 is 2.1 m². Then multiply by the cost per m²: 2.1 × £12.50 = £26.25. £52.50 forgets to halve in the area formula, giving an area of 4.2 m² and doubling the true cost. £30.00 multiplies the base length by the cost per m² (2.4 × £12.50) without ever finding the area. £25.00 rounds the area to 2 m² before multiplying by the cost, losing accuracy.
- (b) (22, −13) — The vector from the ship to the lighthouse is (12, −4) − (2, 5) = (10, −9). Sailing along this vector twice from the start gives (2, 5) + 2 × (10, −9) = (2 + 20, 5 − 18) = (22, −13). '(12, −4)' stops after the ship reaches the lighthouse and ignores the second identical leg. '(−18, 23)' comes from finding the vector the wrong way round, as (2, 5) − (12, −4) = (−10, 9), and then doubling that. '(2, 5)' comes from adding the vector and then subtracting it again, wrongly cancelling the two legs instead of adding them.
- (a) £94.58 — Method: find the area with 1/2ab sin C, then multiply by the cost per square metre. Working: area = 1/2 × 1.8 × 1.3 × sin 72° = 1.11274 m², so cost = 1.11274 × £85 = £94.58. Leaving out the 1/2 gives an area of 2.22547 m² and a cost of £189.17; using cos 72° instead of sin 72° gives a cost of £30.73; and rounding the area to 1 decimal place (1.1 m²) before multiplying by the cost per square metre gives £93.50, which loses accuracy that the final answer needs. Even rounding to 1.113 m² is enough to shift the cost to £94.61 — keep the unrounded area in your calculator until the very last step.
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (c) AB, AC and angle BAC: Area = 1/2 × AB × AC × sin(BAC) — Method: Area = 1/2ab sin C only works when the angle used is the one included between the two sides being multiplied. Working: AB and AC meet at A, and angle BAC is the angle at A between them, so the statement pairing AB, AC and angle BAC is the correct one. The statement that three sides with no angle can still go into 1/2 AB × AC × sin(BAC) is wrong: with no angle known, sin(BAC) cannot be evaluated, so a different method must find an angle first. The statement pairing AB and BC with sin(BAC) is wrong: AB and BC meet at B, so the angle between them is angle ABC, not angle BAC — it names the wrong angle for the sides it uses. The statement pairing AB and AC with sin(ABC) is wrong for the same reason: AB and AC meet at A, so their included angle is angle BAC, and angle ABC is not between them at all.
- (a) 28.1° — The angle a line makes with the horizontal plane lies in the right-angled triangle formed by the vertical rise, the horizontal distance travelled, and the line itself. The horizontal distance from A to B is √(9² + 12²) = √(81 + 144) = √225 = 15, using only the x- and y-coordinates. The vertical rise is the z-coordinate, 8, so tan(angle) = 8 ÷ 15, giving angle = 28.1° (1 d.p.). Inverting the ratio, tan(angle) = 15 ÷ 8, gives 61.9° instead — the complement of the angle, not the angle with the horizontal. Using only the x-coordinate as if it were the whole horizontal distance, tan(angle) = 8 ÷ 9, gives 41.6°. Using the y-coordinate alone in the same way, tan(angle) = 8 ÷ 12, gives 33.7°.
- (a) 4700 cm² — Method: split the T-shaped outline into the two rectangles it is made from, find the area of each, then add them together. Working: the wide base gives a rectangle 90 cm × 30 cm = 2700 cm²; the narrower block on top gives a rectangle 40 cm × 50 cm = 2000 cm²; adding these, 2700 + 2000 = 4700 cm². Answer: 4700 cm². The distractors: 2700 cm² comes from finding only the area of the base rectangle and forgetting to add the block on top. 2000 cm² comes from finding only the area of the top block and forgetting the base. 7200 cm² comes from treating the whole outline as one large rectangle, 90 cm wide by (30 + 50) = 80 cm tall, instead of splitting it into the two separate rectangles that actually make up the shape.
- (a) 53.5° — Method: use the sine rule BC/sin A = AC/sin B, since BC is opposite angle A and AC is opposite angle B. Working: sin(ABC) = AC × sin(BAC) / BC = 10 × sin 40° / 8, which gives angle ABC = 53.5° or its supplement 180 − 53.5 = 126.5°; since angle ABC is acute, the answer is 53.5°. Taking the obtuse supplement instead gives 126.5°; putting the sides the wrong way round in the ratio (sin B = BC × sin A / AC instead of AC × sin A / BC) gives 30.9°; and using sin 50° in place of sin 40° gives 73.2°. Every sine-rule ratio has two possible angle solutions that add to 180° — the word 'acute' tells you which one to keep.
- (a) 114.6° — Using the sine rule, sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) ÷ AC = 6 × sin(40°) ÷ 9. Since sin(40°) ≈ 0.64279, this gives sin(ACB) ≈ 3.8567 ÷ 9 ≈ 0.42852, so angle ACB ≈ 25.4° or its supplement, 154.6°. Testing the obtuse candidate: 40° + 154.6° = 194.6°, which already exceeds 180°, so angle BAC would have to be negative — impossible, so 154.6° is rejected. With angle ACB ≈ 25.4°, angle BAC = 180° − 40° − 25.4° = 114.6°. 25.4° is angle ACB, not angle BAC that the question asks for. 14.6° comes from using the invalid 154.6° candidate anyway and then wrongly turning the resulting negative angle sum (−14.6°) positive instead of rejecting it. 65.4° comes from inverting the sine rule ratio — dividing AC × sin(ABC) by AB instead of AB × sin(ABC) by AC — which gives a different, incorrect candidate for angle ACB entirely.
- (a) 376.8 cm³ — Volume of a cone = (1/3)πr²h. Substitute r = 6 and h = 10: (1/3) × 3.14 × 6² × 10 = (1/3) × 3.14 × 36 × 10 = (1/3) × 1130.4 = 376.8 cm³.
- (c) 27.7 cm — Arc length = (150 ÷ 360) × 2 × 3.14 × 6 = (5 ÷ 12) × 37.68 = 15.7 cm. The perimeter of a sector also includes the two straight radii, so perimeter = 15.7 + 6 + 6 = 27.7 cm. (15.7 cm comes from stopping after the arc length and forgetting the two straight edges; 21.7 cm comes from adding only one radius instead of two; 31.4 cm comes from doubling the arc length instead of adding the two straight edges.)
- (b) 166.3 cm² — Method: split the regular hexagon into 6 identical triangles meeting at the centre, each with two sides of 8 cm and a 60° angle between them, and use Area = (1/2)ab sin C on just one of them. Working: one triangle's area = 1/2 × 8 × 8 × sin 60° = 27.7 cm² (1 d.p.); the hexagon is 6 of these, so its area is 6 × 27.7 = 166.3 cm² (1 d.p.). Answer: 166.3 cm². Reporting just one triangle's area, without multiplying by 6, gives 27.7 cm²; treating the angle at the centre as a right angle instead of 60°, using 1/2 × 8 × 8 with no sine factor at all, gives 6 × 32 = 192.0 cm²; and multiplying by 5 instead of 6, miscounting the triangles in the hexagon, gives 5 × 27.7 = 138.6 cm². A regular hexagon always splits into exactly 6 triangles at its centre — count them before you multiply.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.