Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 110° — The truss is isosceles, so its two base angles are equal; since the three angles of the triangle add up to 180° and the apex is 40°, each base angle is (180 − 40) ÷ 2 = 70°. The angle between the sloping edge and the joist, extended beyond the base of the truss, sits on a straight line with that 70° base angle, and angles on a straight line add up to 180°, so the required angle is 180 − 70 = 110°. "70°" comes from stopping after finding the base angle and giving it directly, without also using the straight-line fact to find the angle on the OUTSIDE of the truss. "140°" comes from doubling the base angle instead of using the straight-line fact. "20°" comes from taking half of the apex angle (40° ÷ 2), mistaking it for the required angle instead of properly using the triangle's angle sum.
- (d) (−4, −3) — The combined translation is the sum of the two column vectors, added component by component: top numbers 3 + (−7) = −4, bottom numbers −5 + 2 = −3, giving (−4, −3). (10, −7) subtracts the second vector from the first instead of adding them. (−4, 3) gets the top number right but makes a sign error on the bottom, treating −5 + 2 as +3. (4, −3) gets the bottom number right but makes a sign error on the top, treating 3 + (−7) as +4.
- (d) 1 — An isosceles trapezium has one line of symmetry, running through the midpoints of the two parallel sides. 0 would be true for a scalene trapezium, whose non-parallel sides are unequal, but this trapezium's non-parallel sides are equal, so it is symmetrical. 2 is the number of lines of symmetry of a rectangle, not a trapezium. 4 comes from wrongly applying the 'number of sides equals number of lines of symmetry' rule, which only holds for REGULAR polygons — a trapezium is not regular.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (b) (12, −9) — Two enlargements one after the other combine into a single scale factor: 1.5 × 2 = 3. Multiplying a vector by a scalar means multiplying both the top number and the bottom number by it: top = 4 × 3 = 12, bottom = −3 × 3 = −9, giving (12, −9). A candidate who adds the scale factor to each number instead of multiplying gets (4 + 3, −3 + 3) = (7, 0). A candidate who multiplies the top number but leaves the bottom number unchanged gets (12, −3). A candidate who multiplies the bottom number but leaves the top number unchanged gets (4, −9). The correct column vector for the poster is (12, −9).
- (b) 10.5 — Method: multiply the drawing length by the scale factor to get the real length. Working: 7 cm × 1.5 = 10.5 m. A student who answers 8.5 has added the scale factor to the drawing length instead of multiplying (7 + 1.5). A student who answers 14 has rounded the scale factor up to 2 before multiplying. A student who answers 3.5 has divided the drawing length by 2 instead of multiplying it by 1.5. Answer: 10.5 m.
- (b) 2 cm — Method: the volume of a cube is edge × edge × edge, so finding the edge from the volume means undoing a cube, not a square or a halving. Working: edge × edge × edge = 8; testing whole numbers, 1 × 1 × 1 = 1 is too small and the next whole number gives 2 × 2 × 2 = 8, which matches. Answer: 2 cm. The distractors: 8 cm comes from writing the volume down as the edge length and changing only the unit; 4 cm comes from halving the volume, 8 ÷ 2, as though a cube were undone by dividing by 2; 2.83 cm is the square root of 8, from taking a square root where a cube root is needed.
- (c) x — By convention, the side opposite a vertex is labelled with the lowercase version of that vertex's letter, so the side opposite X is labelled x. y is the label for the side opposite Y, not X. z is the label for the side opposite Z, not X. X is the vertex's own uppercase letter — the convention specifically switches to lowercase for the side, so the uppercase letter on its own is not correct.
- (c) base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal — Because AB = AC, triangle ABC is isosceles, and the base angles of an isosceles triangle — the two angles opposite the equal sides — are always equal, which is why angle C equals angle B, 70°. Angles in a triangle adding up to 180° is a true fact about the triangle as a whole, but it is not the reason two specific angles are equal to each other. Corresponding angles are equal is a fact about parallel lines cut by a transversal, which does not apply inside a single triangle like this. Vertically opposite angles are equal is a fact about two lines crossing, not about a triangle's base angles.
- (d) 6 cm — Volume = πr²h, so height = volume ÷ (πr²) = 471 ÷ (3.14 × 25) = 471 ÷ 78.5 = 6 cm. (30 cm comes from dividing by πr instead of πr², missing one factor of the radius; 150 cm comes from dividing by π only, without using r² at all; 24 cm comes from treating the given 5 cm as a diameter and using a radius of 2.5 cm instead.)
- (d) 2/3 — Method: since A is the midpoint of OE, OE = 2a, so E = 2a. Since FB is twice AF, F is 1/3 of the way along AB from A, so F = a + 1/3(b − a) = (2/3)a + (1/3)b. G is the midpoint of OB, so G = (1/2)b. Working: EF = F − E = (2/3)a + (1/3)b − 2a = −(4/3)a + (1/3)b, and EG = G − E = −2a + (1/2)b. Comparing term by term, 2/3 × (−2a + (1/2)b) = −(4/3)a + (1/3)b, which matches EF exactly — the same scalar works on both the a-term and the b-term, so the two vectors are parallel, and since they share the point E the three points are collinear. Answer: k = 2/3, so E, F and G lie on a straight line. Giving 1/3 instead is the scalar linking F to G (FG = (1/3)EG), not E to F; giving 3/2 is the reciprocal — it is EG that equals 3/2 × EF, not the other way round, since EF = k × EG was what was asked for; and giving 4/3 is EF's a-coefficient read off raw, without ever dividing it by EG's a-coefficient to form the comparison. Always match the direction of the scalar to the vectors exactly as the question states them.
- (a) A smaller circle — Since the cutting plane is parallel to the circular base, the cross-section is also a circle, but smaller than the base because the cone narrows as it rises towards the apex, so 'a smaller circle' is correct. 'A triangle' wrongly describes the outline seen from the side of the cone, not a horizontal cross-section. 'An ellipse' would only result from a cut made at an angle to the base, not one parallel to it. 'The same size circle as the base' wrongly ignores that the cone tapers, so any parallel cross-section above the base must be smaller.
- (d) £100.48 — Area of the rug = (angle ÷ 360) × π × r² = (180 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 16 = 0.5 × 50.24 = 25.12 m². Cost = 25.12 × £4 = £100.48. (£200.96 comes from finding the area of a full circle, 3.14 × 16 = 50.24 m², and forgetting the angle fraction before costing it; £25.12 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.5 × 3.14 × 4 = 6.28 m², and then costing that; £50.24 comes from using the arc length formula, 0.5 × 2 × 3.14 × 4 = 12.56, in place of the area, and costing that.)
- (b) 20 cm — Method: corresponding sides of similar triangles are in the same ratio, and the longest side of one triangle corresponds to the longest side of the other; a ratio of 2 : 5 means each length is multiplied by 5 ÷ 2 = 2.5 going from the smaller triangle to the larger one. Working: the longest side of the smaller triangle is 8 cm, so the matching side of the larger triangle is 8 × 2.5 = 20. Answer: 20 cm. The distractors: 10 cm comes from scaling the shortest side, 4 cm, instead of the longest; 40 cm comes from multiplying by 5 and forgetting to divide by 2; 3.2 cm comes from multiplying by 2 ÷ 5 instead of 5 ÷ 2, which scales from the larger triangle down to the smaller one.
- (d) Wrong - the given angle is not the included angle — Sides AB and BC meet at vertex B, so the included angle needed for SAS is angle B, not angle A — the information given is SSA. SSA does not prove congruence: with AB = 10 cm, BC = 7 cm and angle A = 40° there are two different triangles that fit, one with angle C ≈ 74.6° and one with angle C ≈ 105.4°, so Sam's triangles need not be the same shape and size at all. Sam is not correct just because two sides and an angle are equal, since the angle must be the one INCLUDED between those two sides. The condition is not ASA either, because ASA needs two angles, and only one angle is given here. It is also not true that nothing matches — the stated lengths and angle DO match between the two triangles; the problem is which angle was given, not whether the values agree.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.