Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 5√3 m — The cable, the pole and the ground form a right-angled triangle: the ground distance (5 m) is adjacent to the 60° angle, and the height of the pole is opposite it, so height = 5 × tan 60° = 5 × √3 = 5√3 m. 5√3/2 m comes from using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of tan 60°. 5/√3 m comes from using tan 30° = 1/√3, the reciprocal-angle value, instead of tan 60°. 10√3 m comes from doubling the correct height by mistake.
- (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
- (a) (−1, 1) — Translating by $\binom{−2}{3}$ subtracts 2 from every x-coordinate and adds 3 to every y-coordinate. This gives image vertices (−1, 4), (3, 4), (3, 7) and (−1, 7). The point (−1, 1) is not one of these: it has the correct new x-coordinate (1 − 2 = −1) but keeps the original y-coordinate (1) instead of adding 3, as if only the horizontal part of the vector had been applied.
- (a) 67° — PA and PB are tangents from the same point, so OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem. The kite's angles sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 46° = 134°. C is on the major arc AB, so by the angle at the centre theorem, angle ACB = 134° ÷ 2 = 67°. Doubling angle APB instead of first finding angle AOB from the kite gives 46° + 46° = 92°. Using angle APB directly as if it were the centre angle, then halving it, gives 46° ÷ 2 = 23°. Finding angle AOB = 134° correctly but forgetting to halve it for the angle at the circumference gives 134°. Halve angle AOB, once you've found it properly, and you get 67°.
- (d) A prism — A prism has two identical, parallel polygon faces (its cross-section) joined by flat rectangular side faces, so the same cross-sectional shape runs all the way along its length — this description matches a prism. A pyramid instead narrows from one polygon base up to a single point (the apex), so it does not have two identical parallel faces. A cone has one curved surface and a single circular base narrowing to a point — no flat rectangular sides at all. A cylinder has two identical circular faces, but they are joined by a curved surface, not by flat rectangles.
- (b) Neither, because both coordinates differ — A line segment is horizontal only when both points share the same y-coordinate, and vertical only when both points share the same x-coordinate. Here A has x-coordinate −4 and B has x-coordinate 2, which differ, and A has y-coordinate 3 and B has y-coordinate 6, which also differ, so the segment is neither horizontal nor vertical. Every point has a y-coordinate and an x-coordinate, so simply having one is not a reason for the line to be horizontal or vertical — both of those wrong reasons ignore that the coordinates must match, not just exist. The x-coordinates do increase from A to B, but an increasing x-coordinate on its own describes a slope, not a horizontal line.
- (a) isosceles trapezium — One pair of parallel sides, plus a separate pair of equal non-parallel sides, is exactly the definition of an isosceles trapezium — the shape the designer should draw. Parallelogram is wrong because a parallelogram needs BOTH pairs of opposite sides parallel, but only one pair is parallel here. Kite is wrong because a kite has two separate pairs of adjacent equal sides and no requirement for any sides to be parallel, a different combination of properties. Rhombus is wrong because a rhombus needs all four sides equal, but the description only makes two of the four sides equal to each other.
- (d) (2/5)a + (3/5)b — Method: OP = OA + AP, and since AP : PB = 3 : 2 splits AB into 5 equal parts, AP is 3/5 of the whole of AB, with AB = b − a. Working: OP = a + 3/5(b − a) = a − (3/5)a + (3/5)b = (2/5)a + (3/5)b. Answer: OP = (2/5)a + (3/5)b. Using the ratio the wrong way round, as though it read AP : PB = 2 : 3, gives (3/5)a + (2/5)b; adding (3/5)b onto the whole of a without subtracting a inside the bracket first gives a + (3/5)b; and treating the ratio as 1 : 1 gives the midpoint, (1/2)a + (1/2)b. Convert the ratio to a fraction of AB measured from A, matching the ORDER the ratio is stated in, and subtract before you scale.
- (c) $\binom{-4}{9}$ — The reverse of a translation negates both components, so the reverse of $\binom{4}{-9}$ is $\binom{-4}{9}$. $\binom{4}{9}$ is the student's mistake — only the bottom number has been negated, and the top number was left unchanged. $\binom{-4}{-9}$ makes the opposite error, negating only the top number. $\binom{4}{-9}$ is simply the original vector, unchanged.
- (d) £100.48 — Area of the rug = (angle ÷ 360) × π × r² = (180 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 16 = 0.5 × 50.24 = 25.12 m². Cost = 25.12 × £4 = £100.48. (£200.96 comes from finding the area of a full circle, 3.14 × 16 = 50.24 m², and forgetting the angle fraction before costing it; £25.12 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.5 × 3.14 × 4 = 6.28 m², and then costing that; £50.24 comes from using the arc length formula, 0.5 × 2 × 3.14 × 4 = 12.56, in place of the area, and costing that.)
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (d) 6 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 60° angle and the zip-wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 60° = 12 × 1/2 = 6 m. 6√3 m comes from using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of cos 60°, which would give the vertical drop, not the horizontal distance. 4√3 m comes from treating 12 as the side adjacent to a tangent ratio and dividing by tan 60° = √3. 24 m comes from dividing 12 by cos 60° instead of multiplying by it.
- (b) 28 — Method: total bricks = (number of squares in the footprint) × (the height of the wall in bricks). Working: the footprint has the row of 5 squares plus the 2 squares in the arm that stands out from the middle of that row, and they do not overlap, giving 5 + 2 = 7 squares; multiplying by the height of 4 bricks gives 7 × 4 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 20 comes from using only the row of 5 and ignoring the arm (5 × 4). 24 comes from treating the bottom square of the arm as if it were one of the row's own squares, so the arm is counted as adding only 1 new square instead of 2 (5 + 1 = 6, then 6 × 4). 32 comes from counting the square of the row directly below the arm a second time as part of the arm (5 + 3 = 8, then 8 × 4).
- (d) 4.44 m — The real van's length is 18.5 × 24 = 444 cm, which converts to 4.44 m. '0.77 m' comes from dividing by 24 instead of multiplying, using the ratio the wrong way round (18.5 ÷ 24 = 0.77 cm), and then writing that figure down as metres. '44.4 m' comes from converting 444 cm to metres with the decimal point in the wrong place. '444 m' comes from working out 444 cm correctly but forgetting to convert it into metres at all.
- (a) ∠QRS — Method: the middle letter in three-letter angle notation is always the vertex of the angle, and the outer two letters are the neighbouring vertices along the shape's sides. Working: at vertex R, the two adjacent vertices along the pentagon are Q and S, so the interior angle is written ∠QRS, with R in the middle. Options: ∠PQR names the angle at Q, not R, since Q is the middle letter there; ∠RST puts R first rather than in the middle, so it actually names the angle at S; ∠TRP does have R in the middle, but T and P are not the vertices adjacent to R along the pentagon's sides, so it does not describe R's interior angle. Answer: ∠QRS.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.