Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 1/4 — A full turn at the centre of a circle is 360°, so a sector's fraction of the circle is its angle divided by 360°: 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4. 1/2 would be the fraction for a sector with an angle of 180°, not 90°. 3/4 is the fraction of the rest of the circle, the major sector left over from the 270° that is not part of this sector. 1/8 would be the fraction for a sector with an angle of 45°, half of 90°.
- (b) 20 cm — Method: corresponding sides of similar triangles are in the same ratio, and the longest side of one triangle corresponds to the longest side of the other; a ratio of 2 : 5 means each length is multiplied by 5 ÷ 2 = 2.5 going from the smaller triangle to the larger one. Working: the longest side of the smaller triangle is 8 cm, so the matching side of the larger triangle is 8 × 2.5 = 20. Answer: 20 cm. The distractors: 10 cm comes from scaling the shortest side, 4 cm, instead of the longest; 40 cm comes from multiplying by 5 and forgetting to divide by 2; 3.2 cm comes from multiplying by 2 ÷ 5 instead of 5 ÷ 2, which scales from the larger triangle down to the smaller one.
- (a) the lens-shaped region where the two circles overlap — The region within 30 km of the ship is a circle of radius 30 km around the ship; the region within 20 km of the lighthouse is a circle of radius 20 km around the lighthouse. Since 30 + 20 = 50 km is more than the 40 km between them, and 30 − 20 = 10 km is less than 40 km, the two circles genuinely overlap, in a lens-shaped region where both conditions hold at once. "the whole smaller circle, since it fits inside the larger one" would only be true if the 40 km distance between the centres were small enough for one circle to swallow the other, which it is not here. "no overlap — 30 km and 20 km don't add to 40 km" wrongly assumes the two radii must add up to exactly the distance between the centres for an overlap to exist; any total greater than that distance is enough. "a straight strip, exactly halfway between the two" confuses this with an equidistant locus, which is a different problem from the one asked here.
- (d) 49° — Method: first combine the two given angles at the centre to find the whole central angle FOM, then apply the angle-at-the-centre theorem, which halves the central angle to give the angle at the circumference on the major arc. Working: angle FOM = angle FOP + angle POM = 55 + 43 = 98 degrees. Since S is on the major arc FM, angle FSM = 98 ÷ 2 = 49 degrees. Answer: 49°. Add BOTH given angles to find the whole angle FOM before you halve anything: halving only one of them, doubling the total instead of halving it, or subtracting from 180° all give the wrong angle for the programme.
- (c) 140° — Method: OAPB is a quadrilateral whose angles sum to 360°; the tangent-radius angles at A and B are each 90°, and angle APB is given, so angle AOB is whatever is left. Working: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°, so angle AOB = 360 − 90 − 90 − 40 = 140 degrees. Answer: 140°. Both tangent-radius angles are 90° each and must both be subtracted, not just one, and the quadrilateral's angles sum to 360°, not 180°: do not assume angle AOB simply matches angle APB, which is a different angle in a different part of the figure.
- (b) 80° — Method: opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°, so form and solve an equation for x, then substitute back to find angle DAB. Working: (2x + 10) + (3x − 5) = 180, so 5x + 5 = 180, x = 35, and angle DAB = 2(35) + 10 = 80°. Using 360° instead of 180° as the total (as if the two angles were the whole circle rather than a pair of opposite angles) gives x = 71 and angle DAB = 152°; solving correctly for x but reporting x itself instead of substituting it back into 2x + 10 gives 35°; and mishandling the signs when combining the two expressions, using (2x + 10) + (3x + 5) = 180 instead of (2x + 10) + (3x − 5) = 180, gives x = 33 and angle DAB = 76°. Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral — not adjacent ones — are the pair that sums to 180°.
- (a) 32 m — The scale factor from the larger pond to the smaller pond is 4 ÷ 11, so the smaller perimeter is 88 × 4 ÷ 11 = 32 m. The distractor 242 m comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 88 × 11 ÷ 4 = 242. The distractor 84 m comes from subtracting the smaller ratio number, 88 − 4 = 84, instead of scaling. The distractor 121 m comes from multiplying 11 × 11 = 121, ignoring the given perimeter altogether.
- (c) 5 m — The horizontal distance is the side adjacent to the 60° angle, and the sloping side is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = hypotenuse × cos 60°. The exact value of cos 60° is 1/2, so horizontal distance = 10 × 1/2 = 5 m. Using the sloping side itself as the horizontal distance, without using any trigonometry at all, gives 10 m. Using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of cos 60° finds the vertical height of the tent rather than the horizontal distance: 10 × √3/2 = 5√3 = 8.7 m (1 d.p.). Dividing the sloping side by cos 60° instead of multiplying by it, 10 ÷ 0.5 = 20 m, treats the sloping side as though it were the adjacent side rather than the hypotenuse.
- (d) Yes, since 3² + 4² = 5² — AB is horizontal with length 5 − 1 = 4, BC is vertical with length 4 − 1 = 3, and CA = √(4² + 3²) = √25 = 5. Since the two shorter sides satisfy 3² + 4² = 5², the triangle is right-angled, with the right angle at B. "No, since 3 + 4 ≠ 5" wrongly tests Pythagoras' theorem by adding the sides instead of squaring them first. "No, since AB, BC and CA are not all equal" confuses a right-angled triangle with an equilateral one — a triangle does not need equal sides to have a right angle. "Yes, since 4² + 5² = 3²" reaches the correct conclusion but puts the longest side, 5, on the wrong side of the equation, as if it were one of the two shorter sides instead of the hypotenuse.
- (a) No — the angle is not between the two sides — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides. Working: the 35° angle is marked away from the corner where the 40 cm and 65 cm edges meet, so it is not the included angle — this is SSA, which is not one of the four basic congruence conditions, so it does not guarantee congruence. Options: 'Yes — SAS' wrongly treats any two sides plus any angle as SAS, without checking the angle's position; 'Yes — SSS' wrongly counts the angle as if it were a third side; 'No — only two sides measured' is not the real reason, since SAS itself only needs two sides, so this reasoning is beside the point. Answer: no, the angle is not between the two sides.
- (a) opposite angles of a parallelogram are equal — P and R are opposite vertices of the parallelogram, and opposite angles of a parallelogram are always equal, which is why angle R equals angle P, 65°. Co-interior angles adding up to 180° is the correct fact for angle Q or angle S, the angles adjacent to P along a side, not for the opposite angle R. Alternate angles are equal is a fact about a transversal crossing two parallel lines, which explains other angle relationships in the parallelogram, not the one between opposite angles P and R directly. Angles on a straight line adding up to 180° applies to two angles that sit together on one straight line, which P and R do not.
- (d) £50 — Area = 1/2 × (3.5 + 6.5) × 4 = 1/2 × 10 × 4 = 20 m². Cost = 20 × £2.50 = £50. (£100 comes from forgetting to halve the trapezium area, giving 40 m² instead of 20 m²; £65 comes from using only the longer parallel side, 6.5 × 4 = 26 m², instead of the trapezium formula; £35 comes from adding all three given lengths, 3.5 + 6.5 + 4, and treating that total as the area in square metres.)
- (b) (−1, −1) — An enlargement by scale factor −1, centre (2, 1), sends a point P to the point on the opposite side of the centre, the same distance away: the image is 2 × centre − P. For the vertex (5, 3), this gives (2 × 2 − 5, 2 × 1 − 3) = (4 − 5, 2 − 3) = (−1, −1). Treating the centre as though it were the origin, and simply negating the point's coordinates, gives (−5, −3) — this ignores that the true centre is (2, 1), not (0, 0). Using scale factor +1 instead of −1 leaves the point exactly where it started, at (5, 3). Adding the point's displacement from the centre instead of subtracting it gives (2 × 2 + 5, 2 × 1 + 3) = (9, 5). Double the centre and subtract the point, and the image is (−1, −1).
- (c) 32 cm — Method: a perimeter is lengths added together, so it scales by the length scale factor itself, which is 4 ÷ 3 going from the smaller triangle to the larger one — not by its square. Working: 24 ÷ 3 = 8, and 8 × 4 = 32. Answer: 32 cm. The distractors: 18 cm comes from multiplying by 3 ÷ 4, scaling from the larger triangle down to the smaller one; 25 cm comes from adding the difference between the parts of the ratio, 4 − 3 = 1, to the perimeter; 8 cm comes from dividing by 3 and stopping there, before multiplying by 4.
- (a) 20 litres — Volume of water = length × width × depth of water = 40 × 25 × 20 = 20 000 cm³. Since 1000 cm³ = 1 litre, divide by 1000: 20 000 ÷ 1000 = 20 litres. A pupil who uses the full height of the tank, 30 cm, instead of the water depth, 20 cm, gets 40 × 25 × 30 = 30 000 cm³ = 30 litres. A pupil who forgets to convert cm³ to litres at all gives 20 000 litres. A pupil who divides by 1000 twice by mistake gets 20 000 ÷ 1000 ÷ 1000 = 0.02 litres. The correct volume of water is 20 litres.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.