Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 340 — The real length of the path is 8.5 × 2000 = 17000 cm, which converts to 170 m by dividing by 100. The cyclist rides the path there and back, so the total distance is 170 × 2 = 340 m. A candidate who forgets the return journey gives only the one-way distance, 170 m. A candidate who halves the one-way distance instead of doubling it, reading “there and back” as splitting the journey, gets 85 m. A candidate who doubles the scale factor to 4000 by mistake, getting a one-way length of 340 m, and then doubles that for the return journey, gets 680 m. The total distance the cyclist travels is 340 m.
- (a) 12 cm — Area of a parallelogram = base × perpendicular height, so height = area ÷ base = 96 ÷ 8 = 12 cm. A student who adds the area and base instead of dividing gets 96 + 8 = 104 cm. A student who multiplies the area and base instead of dividing gets 96 × 8 = 768 cm. A student who uses the triangle area formula, area = 1/2 × base × height, instead of the parallelogram formula solves 96 = 1/2 × 8 × h and gets h = 24 cm.
- (b) 3 — Method: the scale factor is a length of the second triangle divided by the corresponding length of the first, and corresponding means shortest paired with shortest. Working: the shortest side of the first triangle is 3 cm and the shortest side of the second is 9 cm, so the scale factor is 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: 3. The distractors: 1/3 comes from dividing 3 by 9, which is the scale factor from the second triangle back to the first; 6 comes from subtracting, 9 − 3, treating the scale factor as a difference rather than a multiplier; 1.8 comes from dividing 9 by 5, pairing the second triangle's shortest side with the first triangle's longest side.
- (c) $\binom{-4}{9}$ — The reverse of a translation negates both components, so the reverse of $\binom{4}{-9}$ is $\binom{-4}{9}$. $\binom{4}{9}$ is the student's mistake — only the bottom number has been negated, and the top number was left unchanged. $\binom{-4}{-9}$ makes the opposite error, negating only the top number. $\binom{4}{-9}$ is simply the original vector, unchanged.
- (d) Two angles and a side: sine rule finds other sides. — Method: match the data you are given to the rule that needs it. Working: the sine rule a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C needs a complete angle-side pair to set up its ratio, so the statement that two angles and a side (AAS or ASA) let the sine rule find the other sides is the correct one — the third angle comes from the angle sum, and each unknown side is then opposite a known angle. The statement that two sides and the angle between them (SAS) call for the sine rule is wrong: no angle-side pair is complete, so the cosine rule is what works there. The statement that the sine rule finds any angle from three sides (SSS) is wrong for the same reason in reverse — no angle is known at all, so the cosine rule must find the first one. The statement that the cosine rule finds a missing angle directly from two sides and a non-included angle (SSA) is wrong: the cosine rule reports the angle enclosed by the two sides it uses, so with SSA it is the sine rule that reaches the missing angle, and the ambiguous case is then settled from the wording of the question.
- (d) Similar, by SAS — Method: read off whether the given sides are equal or only in the same ratio, and where the given angle sits. Sides in proportion point to similarity; sides equal in length would be needed for congruence. Working: AB ÷ DE = AC ÷ DF gives two pairs of corresponding sides in the same ratio, and the equal angle at A and D lies between AB and AC in the first triangle and between DE and DF in the second, so it is the included angle. Two pairs of sides in proportion with the included angle equal is the SAS condition for similarity. Answer: similar, by SAS. The distractors: 'Similar, by AA' quotes a condition that needs two pairs of equal angles, while only one pair is given here; 'Congruent, by SAS' reads AB ÷ DE = AC ÷ DF as AB = DE and AC = DF, turning a statement about proportion into one about equal lengths; 'Congruent, by SSS' makes that same misreading and adds an assumption that the third pair of sides is equal too, which nothing in the question says.
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (c) Translation by the vector (8, 0) — Method: reflecting twice in two parallel vertical lines is always equivalent to a single translation, at right angles to the lines, of twice the distance between them. Working: the two lines are 5 − 1 = 4 units apart, so the translation is 2 × 4 = 8 units in the positive x-direction. Answer: translation by the vector (8, 0). Using just the gap itself, without doubling it, gives (4, 0); translating in the negative x-direction, from the second line back towards the first, gives (−8, 0); and describing the combination as a single reflection in the line halfway between them, x = 3, confuses this combination with the effect of a single reflection — two reflections in parallel lines are always equivalent to a translation, never to another reflection. Always double the gap between the lines, and translate in the direction from the first line towards the second.
- (d) sector — The region enclosed by two radii and the arc between them is called a sector. A segment is a different region, enclosed by a CHORD and an arc — it does not touch the centre at all. A chord is a straight line, not a region, so it cannot be the answer to a question asking for a region. A semicircle is only correct when the angle between the two radii is exactly 180°, which is not stated here, so it is too specific to be the general answer.
- (a) 9 — AB is a vertical segment, since A and B share the x-coordinate 1, and its length is the difference in y-coordinates: 5 − 1 = 4. BC is a horizontal segment, since B and C share the y-coordinate 5, and its length is the difference in x-coordinates: 6 − 1 = 5. The total path length is 4 + 5 = 9. 20 comes from multiplying the two lengths, 4 × 5, instead of adding them. 5 is only the length of BC, forgetting to include AB. 4 is only the length of AB, forgetting to include BC.
- (c) ABC ≅ XYZ — Method: match each vertex in ABC to its corresponding vertex in XYZ, using the equal sides and angles given, then write the letters in that matching order. Working: AB matches XY, BC matches YZ, and angle B matches angle Y, so A corresponds to X, B corresponds to Y, and C corresponds to Z, giving ABC ≅ XYZ. Options: 'ABC ≅ ZYX' puts Z in A's position, but A corresponds to X, not Z; 'ABC ≅ YXZ' puts Y in A's position, but A corresponds to X; 'ABC ≅ ZXY' puts Z in A's position and X in B's position, neither of which is correct. Answer: ABC ≅ XYZ.
- (c) 68° — Since PA and PB are both tangents from the external point P, PA = PB, so triangle PAB is isosceles with equal base angles at A and B. The angles of triangle PAB sum to 180°, so angle PAB + angle PBA = 180° − 44° = 136°, and since the two base angles are equal, angle PAB = 136° ÷ 2 = 68°. Angle PAB is the angle between the tangent at A and the chord AB, so by the alternate segment theorem it equals the angle in the alternate segment, angle ACB = 68°. Using angle APB directly as angle ACB, without using the isosceles triangle to find angle PAB first, gives 44°. Halving angle APB directly, rather than subtracting it from 180° before halving, gives 22°. Finding 180° − 44° = 136° correctly but forgetting to divide by 2 for one base angle leaves 136°.
- (b) P, since OP = 5 and OQ = 6 — Using the distance formula, OP = √(3² + 4²) = √(9 + 16) = √25 = 5, and OQ = √(6² + 0²) = √36 = 6. Since 5 is less than 6, P is closer to the origin. Naming Q as closer, with OQ = 5 and OP = 6, has the two distances swapped around the wrong point. Naming P as closer but with OP = 6 and OQ = 5 also has the two values swapped, even though it names the right point. The distances are not equal, since 5 is not the same as 6, so P and Q are not equally distant from the origin.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (d) Yes, by the AA condition — Method: similarity is decided by the angles, and because the three angles of a triangle add up to 180°, two matching pairs force the third pair to match as well. Working: the angles at A and D are both 40° and the angles at B and E are both 70°, so the third angles are both 180° − 40° − 70° = 70° and all three pairs are equal. Two pairs were enough, and that is the AA condition. Answer: yes, by the AA condition. The distractors: 'Yes, by the SSS condition' names a condition about three pairs of sides in proportion, and the question gives no side lengths at all; 'No, because no side lengths are given' treats side information as necessary, which it is for congruence but not for similarity; 'No, because the triangles may be different sizes' turns the definition of similarity into an objection, since similar figures are allowed to differ in size and only their shape must match.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.