Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) tan 45° — Method: replace each ratio by its exact value, then compare. Working: a right-angled triangle with a 45° angle is isosceles, so its opposite and adjacent sides are equal and the tangent of 45° is exactly 1. The others are cos 30° = √3/2, about 0.87; sin 45° = √2/2, about 0.71; and cos 60° = 1/2. Answer: tan 45°, the only one of the four that reaches 1. Reading √3/2 as though it were √3, about 1.73, makes cos 30° look the largest, but the division by 2 is part of the value. Ranking by the size of the angle also fails here, because the cosine of an angle falls as the angle grows.
- (b) segment — The region enclosed between a chord and the arc it cuts off is called a segment. A sector is the different region already named in the question, enclosed by the two radii and the arc, not by the chord. A tangent is a straight line that touches the circle at one point, not an enclosed region at all. The circumference is the total distance around the whole circle, a length, not a region.
- (b) 28 — Method: total bricks = (number of squares in the footprint) × (the height of the wall in bricks). Working: the footprint has the row of 5 squares plus the 2 squares in the arm that stands out from the middle of that row, and they do not overlap, giving 5 + 2 = 7 squares; multiplying by the height of 4 bricks gives 7 × 4 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 20 comes from using only the row of 5 and ignoring the arm (5 × 4). 24 comes from treating the bottom square of the arm as if it were one of the row's own squares, so the arm is counted as adding only 1 new square instead of 2 (5 + 1 = 6, then 6 × 4). 32 comes from counting the square of the row directly below the arm a second time as part of the arm (5 + 3 = 8, then 8 × 4).
- (b) 4 m — The two triangles are similar, so height ÷ shadow is the same for both objects. For the post, height ÷ shadow = 1.2 ÷ 1.8. Flagpole height = 6 × (1.2 ÷ 1.8) = 4 m. A student who multiplies the flagpole's shadow by the post's height without applying the ratio gets 6 × 1.2 = 7.2 m. A student who assumes a constant DIFFERENCE between shadow and height instead of a constant ratio finds the post's shadow minus height, 1.8 − 1.2 = 0.6 m, then subtracts that from the flagpole's shadow to get 6 − 0.6 = 5.4 m.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (a) (5, 7) — Method: a midpoint is the mean of the two end points, so for each coordinate (start + end) ÷ 2 = midpoint; rearranging that gives end = 2 × midpoint less the start. Working: for x, (1 + x) ÷ 2 = 3, so 1 + x = 6 and x = 5. For y, (3 + y) ÷ 2 = 5, so 3 + y = 10 and y = 7. B is therefore (5, 7). Answer: (5, 7). The distractors: (2, 2) comes from subtracting A from the midpoint, (3 − 1, 5 − 3), which gives the step from A to the midpoint and stops there instead of taking that same step a second time; (4, 8) comes from adding A to the midpoint, (3 + 1, 5 + 3), without doubling the midpoint first; (6, 10) comes from doubling the midpoint, (2 × 3, 2 × 5), and then forgetting to take A off.
- (d) (4, −2) — Method: apply the rotation to the point first, then reflect the rotated image, in the order stated. Working: rotating (4, 2) by 90° anticlockwise about the origin sends (x, y) to (−y, x), so (4, 2) becomes (−2, 4). Reflecting (−2, 4) in the line y = x swaps its coordinates, giving (4, −2). Answer: (4, −2). Rotate before you reflect, exactly as the question orders them: these two maps do not commute, so reflecting first, only rotating without swapping the coordinates afterwards, or forgetting to negate the coordinate when rotating anticlockwise all send you to a different point.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (c) 5√3 cm — The space diagonal of a cube with edge a satisfies d² = a² + a² + a² = 3a², using Pythagoras' theorem in three dimensions. With a = 5, d² = 3 × 5² = 3 × 25 = 75, so d = √75 = √(25 × 3) = 5√3 cm. Finding the diagonal of one face instead, using only two of the three edges, gives d = √(5² + 5²) = √50 = 5√2 cm, which leaves out the third dimension. Adding the three edges directly, 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 cm, ignores that Pythagoras' theorem works with squares of lengths, not the lengths themselves. Squaring the edge and multiplying by 3 correctly, 3 × 5² = 75, but then forgetting to take the square root, leaves 75 cm — the squared length, not the diagonal itself.
- (c) $12\sqrt{3}$ cm² — Use Area = 1/2 × AB × AC × sin(angle BAC) = 1/2 × 6 × 8 × sin 60°. Since sin 60° = √3⁄2, this is 1/2 × 6 × 8 × √3⁄2 = 24 × √3⁄2 = 12√3 cm². Using AB × AB instead of AB × AC (taking 6 × 6 rather than 6 × 8) gives 1/2 × 6 × 6 × sin 60° = 18 × √3⁄2 = 9√3 cm². Using AC × AC instead of AB × AC (taking 8 × 8 rather than 6 × 8) gives 1/2 × 8 × 8 × sin 60° = 32 × √3⁄2 = 16√3 cm². Leaving out the 1/2 from the area formula gives 6 × 8 × sin 60° = 48 × √3⁄2 = 24√3 cm².
- (b) An enlargement, centre O, scale factor −1/2. — A single enlargement with a negative scale factor both changes the size (by the magnitude of the factor) and rotates the image 180° about the centre (giving the inverted orientation) in one transformation. Halving the size needs a magnitude of 1/2, and inverting needs a negative sign, so the scale factor is −1/2, centre O. 'Scale factor 1/2' gives the correct size but no inversion, since a positive scale factor keeps the same orientation. 'A 180° rotation with no change in size' gives the inversion but not the halving — K is described as smaller than J, so size must change too. 'Scale factor −2' inverts correctly but doubles the size instead of halving it.
- (a) 2 — Method: recall that the diagonals of a rhombus are always lines of symmetry, whatever its angles are. Working: a rhombus (all sides equal) always has its two diagonals as lines of symmetry, giving 2 lines of symmetry, whether or not the angles are 90°. Options: 0 wrongly assumes a non-square rhombus has no symmetry at all; 4 comes from the number of lines of symmetry a square has, mistaking this rhombus for a square; 1 comes from treating the rhombus like a kite, which has only one diagonal as a line of symmetry. Answer: 2.
- (a) No — the angle is not between the two sides — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides. Working: the 35° angle is marked away from the corner where the 40 cm and 65 cm edges meet, so it is not the included angle — this is SSA, which is not one of the four basic congruence conditions, so it does not guarantee congruence. Options: 'Yes — SAS' wrongly treats any two sides plus any angle as SAS, without checking the angle's position; 'Yes — SSS' wrongly counts the angle as if it were a third side; 'No — only two sides measured' is not the real reason, since SAS itself only needs two sides, so this reasoning is beside the point. Answer: no, the angle is not between the two sides.
- (c) (1/2)c − a — Method: in parallelogram OABC, AB is equal and parallel to OC, so AB = c; M is the midpoint of AB, so AM = (1/2)c and OM = OA + AM = a + (1/2)c. MC runs from M to C, so MC = OC − OM. Working: MC = c − (a + (1/2)c) = (1/2)c − a. Answer: MC = (1/2)c − a. Subtracting in the wrong order gives a − (1/2)c, the same vector pointing the opposite way, from C to M rather than M to C; forgetting to halve the c-term gives c − a, which is AC, not MC; and adding instead of subtracting gives (1/2)c + a, which is OM itself. Always subtract the vector for the START of the journey, OM, from the vector for its END point, OC — and keep the fraction from the halving step.
- (b) £2.94 — Method: the price is quoted for each kilogram, so the mass has to be written in kilograms before it is multiplied by the price. Working: 1 kg = 1000 g, so 350 ÷ 1000 = 0.35 and the piece weighs 0.35 kg. The cost is then 8.40 × 0.35 = 2.94. Answer: £2.94. Treating 350 g as 3.5 kg, a division by 100 rather than by 1000, gives 8.40 × 3.5 = 29.40. Multiplying the price by the number of grams gives 8.40 × 350 = 2940. Dividing the price by the mass instead of multiplying gives 8.40 ÷ 0.35 = 24.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.