Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 21 — Both legs of the journey are on the same bearing, 070°, so the ship travels in one straight line the whole way and the distances simply add: 12 + 9 = 21 km. A candidate who subtracts instead of adding gets 12 − 9 = 3 km. A candidate who multiplies the two distances gets 12 × 9 = 108. A candidate who assumes the ship changed direction and treats the two legs as the sides of a right-angled triangle works out √(12² + 9²) = √225 = 15 km — but the bearing does not change, so there is no triangle and no hypotenuse to find. Because the ship stays on one straight line, the total distance is 21 km.
- (a) 104° — Method: find each inscribed angle separately using the angle-at-the-centre theorem: for a point on the arc NOT cut off by the given central angle, halve that central angle; for a point on the OTHER arc, halve the REFLEX central angle instead; then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: for C on the major arc, angle ACB = 76 ÷ 2 = 38 degrees. For D on the minor arc, D sees the reflex angle at the centre, 360 − 76 = 284 degrees, so angle ADB = 284 ÷ 2 = 142 degrees. The difference is 142 − 38 = 104 degrees. Answer: 104°. Both inscribed angles need the theorem applied separately, using the correct arc's central angle each time (the reflex angle for D), and the question asks for the DIFFERENCE between the two, not either angle on its own and not their sum, 180°, which is simply the opposite-angle total for the cyclic quadrilateral ACBD.
- (a) 5 — Method: BC faces the 60° angle, so put the two algebraic sides into the cosine rule and solve the equation that results. By hand, cos 60° = 0.5. Working: 7² = x² + (x + 3)² − 2 × x × (x + 3) × 0.5, so 49 = x² + x² + 6x + 9 − x² − 3x = x² + 3x + 9. That rearranges to x² + 3x − 40 = 0, which factorises as (x + 8)(x − 5) = 0, giving x = −8 or x = 5. A length cannot be negative, so the negative root is rejected. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: 8 comes from expanding (x + 3)² as x² + 9, the error of assuming that squaring a bracket squares each term, which turns the equation into x² − 3x − 40 = 0; −8 is the negative root, kept by a candidate who solves the quadratic but never checks that x has to be a length; 37 comes from applying the cosine rule as though the 60° angle were at C facing AB, which gives x² = (x + 3)² + 49 − 7(x + 3) and a single linear solution.
- (d) y = 2 — Two reflections in perpendicular lines that cross at a point combine to a 180° rotation about that point. The line x = 3 is vertical, so the second line must be horizontal, and it must pass through the centre of rotation (3, 2) — that line is y = 2. Taking the y-coordinate of the centre but writing it against the wrong letter gives y = 3. Assuming the second line must also be vertical, like the first one, and just swapping in the other coordinate gives x = 2. Reaching for the standard mirror line y = x without checking that it actually passes through (3, 2) gives y = x — it does not pass through that point at all. The line that is both perpendicular to x = 3 and through (3, 2) is y = 2.
- (b) 25 minutes — Method: a rate in litres per minute can only be used on a volume measured in litres, so convert the tank first and then divide. Working: 1 m³ = 1000 litres, so the tank holds 0.45 × 1000 = 450 litres, and the time is 450 ÷ 18 = 25. Answer: 25 minutes. Using 1 m³ = 100 litres gives 45 ÷ 18 = 2.5 minutes. Using 1 m³ = 1 000 000 litres, which is the factor that turns cubic metres into cubic centimetres, gives 450 000 ÷ 18 = 25 000 minutes. Multiplying by the rate instead of dividing by it gives 450 × 18 = 8100.
- (d) XP is the shortest distance from X to the line — The perpendicular from a point to a line always gives the shortest possible distance to that line — joining X to any other point on the line forms the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle with XP as one of the shorter sides, and a hypotenuse is always longer than either of the other two sides. So XP is shorter than the distance to every other point on the line. "XP is the longest distance from X to the line" reverses this relationship. "XP equals every other distance from X to the line" would only be true if X were equidistant from every point on the line, which is impossible for a point and a straight line. "XP cannot be compared without knowing the line's length" is false — the shortest-distance fact holds whatever the line's length, since only the local right angle matters.
- (a) 3 times the size, opposite side, rotated 180° — Method: for any enlargement, the MAGNITUDE of the scale factor gives the size ratio between image and object, while the SIGN decides which side of the centre the image falls on; a negative scale factor puts the image on the opposite side, which is equivalent to a 180° rotation about the centre. Working: the scale factor is −3, so the size ratio is the magnitude, which is 3, and the negative sign puts the image on the opposite side of the centre, rotated 180° relative to the original. Answer: 3 times the size, opposite side, rotated 180°. The magnitude of the scale factor controls the SIZE only: do not let the sign leak into it and turn 3 into 1/3. The sign controls the SIDE and orientation, which a positive-only view of enlargement, just 'further away' with the same orientation, misses entirely.
- (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
- (d) 12 cm — Since DE is parallel to BC, triangle ADE is similar to triangle ABC (the two triangles share angle A, and the parallel lines make the angles at D and E equal to the angles at B and C). The whole side AB = AD + DB = 3 + 6 = 9 cm. The scale factor from the small triangle to the large triangle is AB ÷ AD = 9 ÷ 3 = 3, so BC = DE × 3 = 4 × 3 = 12 cm. Scaling by DB ÷ AD instead of AB ÷ AD gives 4 × (6 ÷ 3) = 8 cm. Adding DB directly onto DE, instead of scaling, gives 4 + 6 = 10 cm. Treating the triangles as congruent rather than similar, so assuming corresponding sides are simply equal, gives BC = DE = 4 cm.
- (b) 62° — Because AT is a diameter, the radius OT lies along AT, and the tangent PT meets every radius at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem. So PT meets AT at T at a right angle: angle ATP = 90°. The angles of triangle APT sum to 180°, so angle APT = 180° − 90° − 28° = 62°. Copying the given angle PAT straight across, as though the triangle were isosceles, gives 28°. Adding the two known angles instead of subtracting them from 180° gives 90° + 28° = 118°. Naming the right angle itself, angle ATP, instead of the angle that was actually asked for gives 90°. Subtract both known angles from 180°, and 62° is angle APT.
- (a) 24 cm — The line from the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to the chord, so triangle OMA has a right angle at M. By Pythagoras' theorem, AM² = OA² − OM² = 169 − 25 = 144, so AM = 12 cm. AB is twice AM, since M is the midpoint: AB = 2 × 12 = 24 cm. Finding AM = 12 cm correctly but forgetting to double it for the full chord gives 12 cm. Working out 169 − 25 = 144 and forgetting to take the square root gives 144 cm. Subtracting first and then doubling the wrong way, (13 − 5) × 2, gives 16 cm. Doubling AM after finding it correctly is the step that's missing from all three — do it, and you get 24 cm.
- (c) 13 cm — Method: the two given sides meet at the right angle, so they are the shorter pair and the hypotenuse comes from Pythagoras' theorem, a² + b² = c². Working: c² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169, so c = √169 = 13. Answer: 13 cm. The distractors: 17 cm comes from adding the two sides, 5 + 12, rather than adding their squares; 60 cm comes from multiplying them, 5 × 12, which is twice the area of the triangle and not a length; 7 cm comes from subtracting, 12 − 5, as though the hypotenuse were the difference of the two shorter sides.
- (c) I is the same distance from all three sides. — The angle bisector from A is the locus of points equidistant from sides AB and AC, and the angle bisector from B is the locus of points equidistant from sides AB and BC. Point I lies on both bisectors, so I is equidistant from AB and AC, and also equidistant from AB and BC — meaning I is the same distance from all three sides. (Being the same distance from all three vertices instead describes the circumcentre, found from the perpendicular bisectors of the sides, not the angle bisectors; I being the midpoint of AB confuses the angle bisector construction with the perpendicular bisector of a side; I lying on side AC is wrong because the angle bisectors meet inside the triangle, not on one of its sides.)
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (b) 3 — Method: the scale factor is a length of the second triangle divided by the corresponding length of the first, and corresponding means shortest paired with shortest. Working: the shortest side of the first triangle is 3 cm and the shortest side of the second is 9 cm, so the scale factor is 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: 3. The distractors: 1/3 comes from dividing 3 by 9, which is the scale factor from the second triangle back to the first; 6 comes from subtracting, 9 − 3, treating the scale factor as a difference rather than a multiplier; 1.8 comes from dividing 9 by 5, pairing the second triangle's shortest side with the first triangle's longest side.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.