Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) (10.5, −2) — Method: the vector from the first tile to the third tile is the pattern's vector doubled, since two translations happen between them. Working: doubling (4.5, −2.5) gives (9, −5); adding this to the starting corner (1.5, 3) gives x-coordinate 1.5 + 9 = 10.5 and y-coordinate 3 − 5 = −2. Answer: (10.5, −2). A candidate who only applies the vector once, translating to the second tile instead of the third, gets (6, 0.5). A candidate who adds 2.5 instead of subtracting it in the y-coordinate gets (10.5, 8). A candidate who doubles the x-part of the vector correctly but forgets to change the y-coordinate at all gets (10.5, 3).
- (d) 5 — Method: since the triangles are congruent by SAS, the corresponding sides AB and DE must be equal, because both are the side next to the given right angle that is not BC or EF. Working: AB = DE gives 2x + 3 = 13, so 2x = 10, so x = 5. Options: 10 comes from dropping the coefficient of x and solving x + 3 = 13 instead of 2x + 3 = 13; 4 comes from matching AB to the wrong side, EF, giving 2x + 3 = 11, so 2x = 8, so x = 4; 8 comes from a sign error, solving 2x − 3 = 13 instead of 2x + 3 = 13, giving 2x = 16, so x = 8. Answer: 5.
- (d) −2 — Method: the scale factor is the ratio of the image vector to the object vector, both measured FROM THE CENTRE of enlargement, keeping every sign. Working: the vector from the centre (2, 1) to P(2, 5) is (0, 4); the vector from the centre to P′(2, −7) is (0, −8). The scale factor is −8 ÷ 4 = −2. Answer: −2. Measure both vectors from the CENTRE, not from the origin, divide the IMAGE vector by the OBJECT vector and not the other way round, and keep the negative sign: a negative scale factor is not the same size as its positive counterpart with the sign dropped.
- (b) AB = DE — RHS needs a right angle, the hypotenuse, and one OTHER side to be equal; the right angles and hypotenuses are already equal, so a matching pair of the remaining sides, AB = DE, completes RHS. Angle A = angle D is an extra ANGLE fact, not the extra SIDE fact that RHS specifically requires. AC being parallel to DF says nothing about either triangle's side lengths, so it cannot complete a congruence condition. Being drawn the same way up is about orientation on the page, not about any measurement, so it proves nothing about congruence.
- (d) Similar, by SAS — Method: read off whether the given sides are equal or only in the same ratio, and where the given angle sits. Sides in proportion point to similarity; sides equal in length would be needed for congruence. Working: AB ÷ DE = AC ÷ DF gives two pairs of corresponding sides in the same ratio, and the equal angle at A and D lies between AB and AC in the first triangle and between DE and DF in the second, so it is the included angle. Two pairs of sides in proportion with the included angle equal is the SAS condition for similarity. Answer: similar, by SAS. The distractors: 'Similar, by AA' quotes a condition that needs two pairs of equal angles, while only one pair is given here; 'Congruent, by SAS' reads AB ÷ DE = AC ÷ DF as AB = DE and AC = DF, turning a statement about proportion into one about equal lengths; 'Congruent, by SSS' makes that same misreading and adds an assumption that the third pair of sides is equal too, which nothing in the question says.
- (a) Similar, but AAA alone does not prove congruence — Three equal corresponding angles (AAA) show that the two triangles are similar — the same shape — but says nothing about their size, so it does not prove congruence. They could be congruent, or one could simply be an enlargement of the other; without matching side lengths, congruence is not established, so 'congruent because AAA proves congruence' is wrong. Equal angles do not force equal sides — a triangle can be enlarged to any size while keeping the same angles, so that option is also wrong. Something CAN be said here — that the triangles are similar — so 'no relationship can be determined' is wrong too.
- (a) 56° — The angles of a triangle add up to 180°. Add the two known angles: 90° + 34° = 124°. Subtract from 180°: 180° − 124° = 56°.
- (c) 155° — Turning clockwise adds to the bearing. Starting on a bearing of 065° and turning clockwise through 90° gives 065° + 90° = 155°. A candidate who instead subtracts, working out 90° − 65° = 25°, has performed the wrong operation, giving 025°. A candidate who turns anticlockwise instead of clockwise works out 065° − 90°, which gives a negative number, and adding 360° to fix this gives 335° — the bearing for turning the other way. A candidate who thinks turning does not change the bearing at all keeps the answer as 065°. The new bearing, turning clockwise, is 155°.
- (b) 60 units² — Method: the area of a triangle is half the base times the perpendicular height, so choose a side to act as the base and measure the perpendicular distance from the opposite vertex to it. Working: A(0, 0) and B(10, 0) both lie on the x-axis, so AB is horizontal and AB = 10 − 0 = 10. The perpendicular height is the distance of C from the x-axis, which is its y-coordinate, 12. Area = (10 × 12) ÷ 2 = 120 ÷ 2 = 60. Answer: 60 units². The distractors: 120 units² comes from multiplying base by height and forgetting to halve; 65 units² comes from using the slanting side AC, which is 13 long, as the height in place of the perpendicular distance 12; 30 units² comes from halving the base to 5 before multiplying and then halving the product as well, so the halving is done twice.
- (b) £5.00 — Perimeter of the kite = 25 + 25 + 40 + 40 = 130 cm = 1.3 m. The frame is sold only in whole metres, so 2 m must be bought. Cost = 2 × £2.50 = £5.00. A student who buys the exact 1.3 m instead of rounding up to whole metres gets 1.3 × £2.50 = £3.25. A student who never converts the perimeter from centimetres to metres and costs 130 × £2.50 gets £325.00.9 m, which rounds up to 3 whole metres, costing 3 × £2.50 = £7.50.
- (a) SSS – all three corresponding sides are equal — All three pairs of corresponding sides are stated as equal — LM = XY, MN = YZ and LN = XZ — with no angle mentioned. This matches the SSS condition, so triangle LMN is congruent to triangle XYZ.
- (d) (2/5)a + (3/5)b — Method: OP = OA + AP, and since AP : PB = 3 : 2 splits AB into 5 equal parts, AP is 3/5 of the whole of AB, with AB = b − a. Working: OP = a + 3/5(b − a) = a − (3/5)a + (3/5)b = (2/5)a + (3/5)b. Answer: OP = (2/5)a + (3/5)b. Using the ratio the wrong way round, as though it read AP : PB = 2 : 3, gives (3/5)a + (2/5)b; adding (3/5)b onto the whole of a without subtracting a inside the bracket first gives a + (3/5)b; and treating the ratio as 1 : 1 gives the midpoint, (1/2)a + (1/2)b. Convert the ratio to a fraction of AB measured from A, matching the ORDER the ratio is stated in, and subtract before you scale.
- (b) £2.94 — Method: the price is quoted for each kilogram, so the mass has to be written in kilograms before it is multiplied by the price. Working: 1 kg = 1000 g, so 350 ÷ 1000 = 0.35 and the piece weighs 0.35 kg. The cost is then 8.40 × 0.35 = 2.94. Answer: £2.94. Treating 350 g as 3.5 kg, a division by 100 rather than by 1000, gives 8.40 × 3.5 = 29.40. Multiplying the price by the number of grams gives 8.40 × 350 = 2940. Dividing the price by the mass instead of multiplying gives 8.40 ÷ 0.35 = 24.
- (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
- (b) 2 cm — Method: the volume of a cube is edge × edge × edge, so finding the edge from the volume means undoing a cube, not a square or a halving. Working: edge × edge × edge = 8; testing whole numbers, 1 × 1 × 1 = 1 is too small and the next whole number gives 2 × 2 × 2 = 8, which matches. Answer: 2 cm. The distractors: 8 cm comes from writing the volume down as the edge length and changing only the unit; 4 cm comes from halving the volume, 8 ÷ 2, as though a cube were undone by dividing by 2; 2.83 cm is the square root of 8, from taking a square root where a cube root is needed.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.