Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) minor segment — A chord splits a circle into two segments; the smaller of the two is called the minor segment and the larger one the major segment. "major segment" names the larger region, the opposite of what is asked for. "sector" is a different region altogether, enclosed by two radii and an arc, not by a chord. "arc" is a curved length along the circumference, not an enclosed region at all.
- (d) No — the volume factor is 2³ = 8, not the area factor 4. — For similar solids, area scales with the square of the length scale factor and volume scales with its cube — different powers of the same number, so they are not usually equal. The length scale factor here is 2, so the area scale factor is 2² = 4 (Priya's figure) but the volume scale factor is 2³ = 8. Priya is wrong: the correct volume scale factor is 8, not 4. The option claiming area and volume always scale by the same factor treats the two as interchangeable, which is only true for the length factor itself. The option giving 6 comes from multiplying the length factor by the number of dimensions (2 × 3) rather than cubing it. The option repeating '4' for volume simply reuses Priya's own area calculation.
- (d) (−4, −3) — The combined translation is the sum of the two column vectors, added component by component: top numbers 3 + (−7) = −4, bottom numbers −5 + 2 = −3, giving (−4, −3). (10, −7) subtracts the second vector from the first instead of adding them. (−4, 3) gets the top number right but makes a sign error on the bottom, treating −5 + 2 as +3. (4, −3) gets the bottom number right but makes a sign error on the top, treating 3 + (−7) as +4.
- (a) 3 m — Height = sloping length × sin 45° = 3√2 × √2/2 = (3 × 2)/2 = 3 m, since √2 × √2 = 2. 3√2 m comes from forgetting to multiply by sin 45° at all. 3√2/2 m comes from using sin 30° = 1/2 instead of sin 45° = √2/2. 6 m comes from using √2 instead of √2/2 for sin 45°, dropping the denominator of the exact value: 3√2 × √2 = 6.
- (b) 320° — A bearing is always measured clockwise from north. An angle measured anticlockwise must be converted by subtracting it from 360°: 360 − 40 = 320°, so the bearing is 320°. Choosing 040° treats the anticlockwise angle as if it were already a clockwise bearing, without converting it. Choosing 220° adds 180° to the angle, mixing this up with a back-bearing calculation (40 + 180 = 220). Choosing 400° adds the angle to 360° instead of subtracting it (40 + 360 = 400), giving a bearing greater than a full turn.
- (a) No — it's a 180° rotation, not a reflection. — A negative scale factor scales the shape by the size of the factor and turns it through 180° about the centre of enlargement — every point of the image lands on the opposite side of the centre from the object. A 180° turn is a rotation, and a rotation never reverses a shape's handedness (its sense), whereas a reflection always does, so the image is not a mirror image: Priti is wrong. The option claiming negative numbers always mean a reflection confuses the sign of a scale factor with the transformation of reflection — they are not the same thing. The option saying only the size changes ignores the sign altogether: the 180° turn does change the way the shape faces, even though it leaves the handedness unchanged. The option equating 'upside down' with 'mirrored' assumes the two always mean the same thing, but a 180° rotation and a reflection in a horizontal line can both look 'upside down' while being different transformations — only the reflection reverses the shape's handedness.
- (b) £157 — Method: round the hours worked up to the next whole hour, multiply by the hourly rate, then add the call-out fee. Working: 3 hours 30 minutes rounds up to 4 hours; 28 × 4 = 112; 112 + 45 = 157. Answer: £157. A candidate who uses the unrounded time of 3.5 hours, working out 28 × 3.5 = 98 and adding 45, gets £143. A candidate who forgets the call-out fee, giving only 28 × 4, gets £112. A candidate who rounds down to 3 hours instead of up, working out 28 × 3 = 84 and adding 45, gets £129.
- (a) 310° — Method: give the two rotations opposite signs since they turn in opposite senses — clockwise positive, anticlockwise negative — combine them into a single signed turn, then convert that turn into an angle measured clockwise between 0° and 360°. Working: the first rotation is 200° clockwise, so +200. The second is 250° anticlockwise, so −250. Combined: 200 − 250 = −50, meaning the net effect is a 50° turn anticlockwise. Measured clockwise instead, that same turn is 360 − 50 = 310°. Answer: 310°. Give the two rotations opposite signs before combining them, and convert a negative (anticlockwise) result into a clockwise angle by subtracting it from 360°, not from 180°: taking 50° away from a half turn gives 130°, which is a different rotation altogether; adding the two sizes as if both were clockwise gives 450°, which reduces to 90°; and reporting the anticlockwise size without converting it gives 50°.
- (a) 3/4 — 1 litre = 1000 ml, so 750 ml is 750/1000 of a litre. Dividing both the numerator and denominator by 250 simplifies this to 3/4. Writing the fraction upside down, as the litre out of the 750 ml, gives 4/3. Finding the fraction of the litre that is NOT filled, 250/1000, gives 1/4. Dividing the numerator by 250 but the denominator by only 100, an inconsistent simplification, gives 3/10.
- (a) the lens-shaped region where the two circles overlap — The region within 30 km of the ship is a circle of radius 30 km around the ship; the region within 20 km of the lighthouse is a circle of radius 20 km around the lighthouse. Since 30 + 20 = 50 km is more than the 40 km between them, and 30 − 20 = 10 km is less than 40 km, the two circles genuinely overlap, in a lens-shaped region where both conditions hold at once. "the whole smaller circle, since it fits inside the larger one" would only be true if the 40 km distance between the centres were small enough for one circle to swallow the other, which it is not here. "no overlap — 30 km and 20 km don't add to 40 km" wrongly assumes the two radii must add up to exactly the distance between the centres for an overlap to exist; any total greater than that distance is enough. "a straight strip, exactly halfway between the two" confuses this with an equidistant locus, which is a different problem from the one asked here.
- (b) (7, 3) — Reflecting in the line y = x swaps the x- and y-coordinates: (3, 7) → (7, 3). A pupil who reflects in the x-axis instead gets (3, −7). A pupil who reflects in the y-axis instead gets (−3, 7). A pupil who confuses y = x with y = −x, swapping the coordinates and changing both signs, gets (−7, −3). The correct image is (7, 3).
- (b) Neither, because both coordinates differ — A line segment is horizontal only when both points share the same y-coordinate, and vertical only when both points share the same x-coordinate. Here A has x-coordinate −4 and B has x-coordinate 2, which differ, and A has y-coordinate 3 and B has y-coordinate 6, which also differ, so the segment is neither horizontal nor vertical. Every point has a y-coordinate and an x-coordinate, so simply having one is not a reason for the line to be horizontal or vertical — both of those wrong reasons ignore that the coordinates must match, not just exist. The x-coordinates do increase from A to B, but an increasing x-coordinate on its own describes a slope, not a horizontal line.
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
- (b) (3, −1) — Method: find the distance from the point to the mirror line, then place the image the same distance on the other side of the line. Working: B is 5 − 2 = 3 units above the line y = 2, so its image is 3 units below the line, at y = 2 − 3 = −1, giving (3, −1); the x-coordinate does not change, since the mirror line is horizontal. Options: (3, −5) comes from reflecting in the x-axis (y = 0) instead of the line y = 2; (−3, 5) comes from reflecting in the y-axis instead of a horizontal line; (3, −4) comes from doubling the distance from the line instead of reflecting it, giving 2 − 2×3 = −4. Answer: (3, −1).
- (a) 56° — The angles of a triangle add up to 180°. Add the two known angles: 90° + 34° = 124°. Subtract from 180°: 180° − 124° = 56°.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.