Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 15 cm — Method: any two sides of a triangle must together be longer than the third, so the third side must be longer than the difference of the two given sides and shorter than their sum. Working: the difference is 20 − 8 = 12 cm and the sum is 20 + 8 = 28 cm, so the third side must be between 12 cm and 28 cm, and 15 cm lies inside that range. Answer: 15 cm. The distractors: 12 cm is exactly the difference, so the three lengths would lie flat along a straight line and never close into a triangle; 5 cm is shorter than the difference — 5 + 8 = 13 cm cannot reach across the 20 cm side — and is chosen by candidates who check no lower limit at all; 30 cm is longer than the sum of the other two, so those two sides could never meet, and it is chosen by candidates who check no upper limit.
- (b) 6√3 m — The horizontal distance covered by one support is adjacent to the 30° angle, so it equals 6 × cos 30° = 6 × √3/2 = 3√3 m. The total base width is made up of both supports, so it is 2 × 3√3 = 6√3 m. '3√3 m' gives only one support's horizontal distance and forgets to double it for the total width. '6 m' comes from using sin 30° instead of cos 30° for the horizontal distance (6 × sin 30° = 3, doubled to 6). '12 m' comes from doubling the full sloping length of 6 m without using any trigonometry at all.
- (d) Concentric circles — Method: focus on what the two circles have in common — their centre, not their size. Working: both circles share exactly the same centre point but have different radii, which is the defining feature of this pair of circles. A student who answers congruent circles has confused 'same centre' with 'same size', but congruent circles simply have equal radii and need not share a centre. A student who answers tangential circles has confused circles that touch each other at one point with ones that share a centre. A student who answers similar circles has used the general term for the same shape at different sizes, missing the specific 'same centre' fact. Answer: concentric circles.
- (b) No — should divide by −2bc, not +2bc; sign is wrong. — Method: rearrange a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A step by step and compare with the student's version. Working: subtracting b² + c² from both sides gives a² − b² − c² = −2bc cos A, then dividing both sides by −2bc gives cos A = (a² − b² − c²) / (−2bc), which is the same as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) / (2bc). The student divided by +2bc instead of −2bc, so their expression is the negative of the correct one — the verdict is No. Saying the algebra is fine because 'either sign order gives a valid result' ignores that only one of the two signed expressions matches the original equation. Saying the denominator should be bc rather than 2bc is a different, unrelated error — the coefficient 2bc in the original formula is correct and must stay.
- (a) 7.2 cm — The distance around the mat is the circumference, π × diameter = 3.14 × 20 = 62.8 cm. Yasmin started with 70 cm, so the ribbon left over is 70 − 62.8 = 7.2 cm. 62.8 cm is the circumference itself, the amount of ribbon used, not what is left over. 50 cm comes from subtracting the diameter instead of the circumference: 70 − 20 = 50. 20 cm is simply the diameter of the mat and involves no calculation with the ribbon length at all.
- (c) 2 — A point 4 cm from A lies on a circle of radius 4 cm centred at A; a point 3 cm from B lies on a circle of radius 3 cm centred at B. Since AB = 5 cm, and 4 + 3 = 7 is greater than 5 while 4 − 3 = 1 is less than 5, the two circles genuinely cross each other, at two separate points, one on each side of line AB. "1" comes from wrongly assuming the circles only touch rather than cross, which would need 4 + 3 to equal exactly 5. "0" comes from wrongly assuming the circles miss each other completely. "4" comes from counting where each circle crosses the line AB itself (two points each) instead of counting where the two circles cross each other.
- (a) (−1, 1) — Translating by $\binom{−2}{3}$ subtracts 2 from every x-coordinate and adds 3 to every y-coordinate. This gives image vertices (−1, 4), (3, 4), (3, 7) and (−1, 7). The point (−1, 1) is not one of these: it has the correct new x-coordinate (1 − 2 = −1) but keeps the original y-coordinate (1) instead of adding 3, as if only the horizontal part of the vector had been applied.
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (a) 314 cm² — Method: the area of a circle is πr², and the radius is half the diameter, so halve the 20 cm before squaring. Working: r = 20 ÷ 2 = 10 cm, so the area is 3.14 × 10² = 3.14 × 100 = 314. Answer: 314 cm². The distractors: 1256 cm² comes from putting the diameter straight into πr² without halving it, 3.14 × 20²; 628 cm² comes from halving correctly but then using 2πr², a mixture of the circumference and area formulae; 62.8 cm² comes from working out πd = 3.14 × 20, which is the circumference of the plate rather than its area.
- (b) $\binom{-6}{10}$ — Translating twice by the same vector doubles both components: 2 × $\binom{-3}{5}$ = $\binom{-6}{10}$. $\binom{-3}{5}$ forgets to double the vector at all, giving only one translation's worth. $\binom{-9}{15}$ trebles the vector instead of doubling it. $\binom{-6}{5}$ doubles only the top number and forgets to double the bottom number.
- (a) Isosceles trapezium: base angles are equal — WX is parallel to ZY and the two non-parallel sides WZ and XY are equal in length, so WXYZ is an isosceles trapezium. In an isosceles trapezium the two angles at each of the parallel sides are equal, so angle W = angle X (and angle Z = angle Y). A student who answers with the parallelogram property has quoted a fact that is true of a parallelogram, but WZ and XY are given as non-parallel so WXYZ is not a parallelogram — and in a parallelogram "opposite angles" pairs W with Y, not W with X. A student who answers with the kite property has again taken a true fact about the wrong shape: a kite's equal sides are two pairs of adjacent sides, not the two non-parallel sides of a trapezium. A student who answers with the rhombus property has used something no rhombus has — a rhombus has two pairs of parallel sides and only two pairs of equal angles; all four angles are equal only in a square.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (c) 6 squares — Method: the plan view shows the footprint of the solid; a second layer stacked on top of floor positions that are already covered does not create any new squares in the plan. Working: the row of 4 cubes and the row of 2 cubes attached at the end do not overlap, so the footprint has 4 + 2 = 6 distinct squares. Answer: 6 squares. The distractors: 12 squares comes from counting the total number of cubes used, including the second layer (6 floor positions × 2 layers = 12), instead of the footprint. 4 squares comes from counting only the row of four and forgetting the attached row of two. 5 squares comes from wrongly treating the corner square as shared between the two rows (4 + 1 instead of 4 + 2).
- (a) 2√3/3 — tan 30° = √3/3, so tan 30° + tan 30° = 2 × √3/3 = 2√3/3. √3 comes from wrongly treating tan 30° + tan 30° as tan(30° + 30°) = tan 60° = √3 — adding angles is not the same as adding ratios. √3/3 comes from forgetting to double the value and just writing down tan 30° on its own. 2√3 comes from doubling the numerator of √3/3 but forgetting to keep the denominator of 3.
- (a) 3/4 — 1 litre = 1000 ml, so 750 ml is 750/1000 of a litre. Dividing both the numerator and denominator by 250 simplifies this to 3/4. Writing the fraction upside down, as the litre out of the 750 ml, gives 4/3. Finding the fraction of the litre that is NOT filled, 250/1000, gives 1/4. Dividing the numerator by 250 but the denominator by only 100, an inconsistent simplification, gives 3/10.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.