Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (a) 080° — The back bearing differs from the given bearing by 180°. Because 260° is greater than 180°, subtract 180°: 260 − 180 = 80°, so the bearing of A from B is 080°. Choosing 440° adds 180° instead of subtracting it, even though the result would be more than a full turn (260 + 180 = 440). Choosing 180° assumes the back bearing is always exactly 180°, ignoring the original bearing altogether. Choosing 100° comes from measuring the reflex angle the other way round the circle (360 − 260 = 100) instead of applying the 180° back-bearing rule.
- (c) 1.5 — The area scale factor is the length scale factor squared, so if n is the length factor, n² = 2.25. Taking the positive square root gives n = 1.5 (check: 1.5² = 2.25). 2.25 is just the area factor restated, with no root taken. 1.125 comes from halving 2.25 instead of taking its square root. 5.0625 comes from squaring 2.25 instead of rooting it.
- (a) 245 m² — Method: for similar figures the ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths, so multiply the smaller area by the square of the length scale factor. Working: the length scale factor is 7 ÷ 3, so the area scale factor is 49 ÷ 9, and the larger area is 45 × 49 ÷ 9 = 5 × 49 = 245. Answer: 245 m². The distractors: 105 m² comes from multiplying by the length scale factor 7 ÷ 3 instead of by its square, the commonest slip on this topic; 315 m² comes from multiplying by 7 and forgetting to divide by 3; 405 m² comes from multiplying by 3² = 9, squaring the wrong part of the ratio.
- (b) £33.60 — The area of the parallelogram flower bed is base × height = 3.5 × 2 = 7 m². The cost is 7 × £4.80 = £33.60. £16.80 comes from using the triangle formula instead of the parallelogram formula: 3.5 × 2 = 7, and half of 7 is 3.5 m², then 3.5 × £4.80 = £16.80. £26.40 comes from adding the base and height, 3.5+2 = 5.5, instead of multiplying them, then multiplying by £4.80. £7.00 correctly finds the area, 7 m², but forgets to multiply it by the cost per m².
- (d) 6 cm — Method: CH cuts the triangle into two smaller right-angled triangles, so Pythagoras' theorem can be written in each of the three right-angled triangles and the results combined. Working: HB = 12 − 3 = 9 cm. In triangle ACH, CH² = AC² − 3² = AC² − 9; in triangle CHB, CH² = CB² − 9² = CB² − 81. Setting those equal gives AC² − 9 = CB² − 81. In triangle ABC, AC² + CB² = 12² = 144, so CB² = 144 − AC². Substituting gives AC² − 9 = 144 − AC² − 81, so 2 × AC² = 72 and AC² = 36, giving AC = 6. Answer: 6 cm. The distractors: 36 cm comes from stopping at AC² = 36 and never taking the square root; 9 cm is HB, the other part of the hypotenuse, written down in place of AC; 4 cm comes from working out 12 ÷ 3, treating AH as a scale factor between the two triangles rather than as a length.
- (b) (6, 2) — The overall journey from house to park is the sum of the two vectors: top = 2 + 4 = 6, bottom = 5 + (−3) = 2, giving (6, 2). A candidate who subtracts the second vector from the first instead of adding gets (2 − 4, 5 − (−3)) = (−2, 8). A candidate who subtracts the other way round gets (4 − 2, −3 − 5) = (2, −8). A candidate who forgets the negative sign on the second vector's bottom number and adds 3 instead of −3 gets (6, 8). Because the journeys join end to end, the correct resultant vector is (6, 2).
- (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
- (b) 2x + 2y = 180° — Method: use the fact that OA, OB and OC are all radii, so triangles OAC and OBC are each isosceles, and set up the angle sum of triangle ABC as a whole. Working: since OA = OC, triangle OAC is isosceles, so angle OAC = angle OCA = x. Since OB = OC, triangle OBC is isosceles, so angle OBC = angle OCB = y. The angle at A in triangle ABC is x, the angle at B is y, and the angle at C is angle OCA plus angle OCB, which is x + y. The three angles of triangle ABC sum to 180°, giving x + y + (x + y) = 180°, which is 2x + 2y = 180°. Answer: 2x + 2y = 180°. Dividing this by 2 gives x + y = 90°, and since angle ACB = x + y, this proves angle ACB = 90°: the point C was never restricted to any particular position on the circle, so the proof holds for every choice of C. Include ALL THREE angles of the triangle in the sum, do not use a quadrilateral's 360° total, and remember angle ACB is the SUM x + y, not x alone.
- (c) 18 — Method: divide the real length by 5 to find how many 'units' of 5 m it contains, then multiply by 2 cm for each unit. Working: 45 ÷ 5 = 9, so the real bridge is 9 lots of 5 m; each lot is represented by 2 cm on the model, so the model length is 9 × 2 = 18 cm. Options: 9 comes from stopping after the division, without multiplying by the 2 cm per unit; 90 comes from multiplying the real length by 2 directly, without dividing by 5 first; 4.5 comes from dividing by 5 and then dividing by 2 again, instead of multiplying by 2. Answer: 18.
- (d) a rectangle — The shed is a prism, so its two triangular ends are identical and parallel, a fixed distance apart along the shed's length; the floor they stand on is therefore bounded by the base of one triangle, the base of the other, and the two straight edges joining them — a rectangle. Looking straight down, the sloping roof projects onto that same rectangle rather than outside it, so the plan view is a plain rectangle, as long as the shed and as wide as its gable end. "a triangle" is the shape of the END wall, seen from the front or back, not from above. "a triangle with a rectangle attached" wrongly combines a side-elevation feature with the plan — the plan does not show the triangular end wall at all, since looking down hides it completely. "two triangles joined at their bases" describes neither the plan nor any single elevation of this shed.
- (a) 110° — The angles in a quadrilateral add up to 360°. So 40° + 100° + W + W = 360°, giving 2W = 360° − 140° = 220°, so W = 110°. A pupil who works out 2W = 220° but forgets to divide by 2, since there are two equal angles W, gives 220°. A pupil who mistakenly uses the angle sum of a triangle, 180°, instead of 360°, gets 180° − 140° = 40°. A pupil who simply adds the two given angles together instead of subtracting from 360° gets 40° + 100° = 140°. The correct answer is 110°.
- (a) No — it's a 180° rotation, not a reflection. — A negative scale factor scales the shape by the size of the factor and turns it through 180° about the centre of enlargement — every point of the image lands on the opposite side of the centre from the object. A 180° turn is a rotation, and a rotation never reverses a shape's handedness (its sense), whereas a reflection always does, so the image is not a mirror image: Priti is wrong. The option claiming negative numbers always mean a reflection confuses the sign of a scale factor with the transformation of reflection — they are not the same thing. The option saying only the size changes ignores the sign altogether: the 180° turn does change the way the shape faces, even though it leaves the handedness unchanged. The option equating 'upside down' with 'mirrored' assumes the two always mean the same thing, but a 180° rotation and a reflection in a horizontal line can both look 'upside down' while being different transformations — only the reflection reverses the shape's handedness.
- (d) SAS — Method: a congruence condition is named by the parts that are given equal and the order in which they sit round the triangle, so count the sides and the angles first. Working: AB = DE and AC = DF are two pairs of equal sides, and the equal angle at A and D lies between AB and AC, so the given parts read side, included angle, side. Answer: SAS. The distractors: SSS needs three pairs of equal sides, and the third pair, BC and EF, is not given — it follows from the proof rather than being part of it; ASA reads the two equal sides as two equal angles, swapping which facts are which; RHS applies only when the triangles contain a right angle and the equal pair includes the hypotenuse, and nothing here says the angle at A is 90°.
- (d) SAS, vertically opposite angle included — AE equals CE and BE equals DE give two pairs of equal sides, and angle AEB equals angle CED because they are vertically opposite angles formed where AC and BD cross; vertically opposite angles are always equal without needing to be measured. This included angle sits between the two known sides in each triangle, giving SAS, so 'SAS, vertically opposite angle included' is correct. 'ASA, vertically opposite angle at E' is wrong because ASA needs two pairs of equal angles with the side between them, but only one angle is known in each triangle here, and the two other known facts are sides, not angles. 'SSS, three equal side pairs' is wrong because only two pairs of sides are given; there is no third pair of equal sides. 'Cannot prove — no angle measured' is wrong because vertically opposite angles are always equal automatically when two straight lines cross, so no separate measurement is needed.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.