Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 31.4 cm — Circumference = π × diameter, so 3.14 × 10 = 31.4 cm. 15.7 cm comes from using the radius, 5 cm, in place of the diameter: 3.14 × 5 = 15.7, which is only half the circumference. 78.5 cm comes from using the area formula π × radius² instead of the circumference formula: 3.14 × 5² = 3.14 × 25 = 78.5. 62.8 cm comes from keeping the 2 from the radius form of the formula, C = 2 × π × radius, but putting the full diameter into it: 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8.
- (c) No — 50° is angle P, not between PQ and QR. — Method: 1/2ab sin C only gives the area when C is the angle between the two named sides. Working: PQ and QR meet at vertex Q, so the angle between them is angle PQR, not angle QPR (which is the angle at vertex P, between sides PQ and PR). Since angle QPR is not included between PQ and QR, the student's calculation 1/2 × 8 × 11 × sin 50° does not give the area of the triangle — the verdict is No. Claiming that any angle works with any two sides ignores that the formula is only true for the INCLUDED angle. Claiming the formula needs all three sides is a different, incorrect statement about the formula itself — Area = 1/2ab sin C is valid with exactly two sides and their included angle, when that angle is actually known.
- (a) ∠QRS — Method: the middle letter in three-letter angle notation is always the vertex of the angle, and the outer two letters are the neighbouring vertices along the shape's sides. Working: at vertex R, the two adjacent vertices along the pentagon are Q and S, so the interior angle is written ∠QRS, with R in the middle. Options: ∠PQR names the angle at Q, not R, since Q is the middle letter there; ∠RST puts R first rather than in the middle, so it actually names the angle at S; ∠TRP does have R in the middle, but T and P are not the vertices adjacent to R along the pentagon's sides, so it does not describe R's interior angle. Answer: ∠QRS.
- (c) 14 units — Method: the perimeter of a rectangle is the distance all the way round its outside, 2 × (length + width), so the two side lengths must be found first; on a coordinate grid a side's length is the difference between the coordinates that change along it. Working: along AB, from (1, 1) to (4, 1), only x changes, so AB = 4 − 1 = 3. Along BC, from (4, 1) to (4, 5), only y changes, so BC = 5 − 1 = 4. Perimeter = 2 × (3 + 4) = 2 × 7 = 14. Answer: 14 units. The distractors: 18 units comes from reading the vertex numbers 4 and 5 as the side lengths instead of subtracting, giving 2 × (4 + 5); 12 units comes from working out the area, 3 × 4, in place of the perimeter; 7 units comes from adding one length to one width and stopping there, without doubling for the opposite pair of sides.
- (d) 24 cm²; same way round as T — An enlargement scales area by the square of the scale factor, whatever its sign: area factor = (−2)² = 4, so the image's area is 6 × 4 = 24 cm². A negative scale factor is equivalent to an enlargement by the positive scale factor together with a rotation of 180°, so it does not create a mirror image — it is still a direct transformation, and combining it with a further rotation cannot create one either, since rotations never change a shape's orientation. Using the scale factor itself rather than its square gives area 6 × 2 = 12 cm², which is too small. Believing that a negative scale factor reflects the shape gives 'a mirror image of T' alongside the correct area of 24 cm², and combining both mistakes gives 12 cm² together with 'a mirror image of T'.
- (d) 2 — Method: a point is invariant under a reflection exactly when it lies on the mirror line, so check each vertex's coordinate against the line's equation. Working: the line of reflection is x = 3, so a vertex is invariant only if its x-coordinate equals 3. (3, 1) has x = 3, so it is invariant. (3, 5) has x = 3, so it is also invariant. (6, 1) has x = 6, so it is not invariant, since 6 is not equal to 3. Two of the three vertices are invariant. Answer: 2. Check EVERY vertex against the mirror line's equation rather than assuming a shape either keeps all its vertices fixed or none of them: a vertex is invariant only when it sits exactly on the line, and here two do and one does not.
- (a) 310° — Method: give the two rotations opposite signs since they turn in opposite senses — clockwise positive, anticlockwise negative — combine them into a single signed turn, then convert that turn into an angle measured clockwise between 0° and 360°. Working: the first rotation is 200° clockwise, so +200. The second is 250° anticlockwise, so −250. Combined: 200 − 250 = −50, meaning the net effect is a 50° turn anticlockwise. Measured clockwise instead, that same turn is 360 − 50 = 310°. Answer: 310°. Give the two rotations opposite signs before combining them, and convert a negative (anticlockwise) result into a clockwise angle by subtracting it from 360°, not from 180°: taking 50° away from a half turn gives 130°, which is a different rotation altogether; adding the two sizes as if both were clockwise gives 450°, which reduces to 90°; and reporting the anticlockwise size without converting it gives 50°.
- (d) Yes, since 3² + 4² = 5² — AB is horizontal with length 5 − 1 = 4, BC is vertical with length 4 − 1 = 3, and CA = √(4² + 3²) = √25 = 5. Since the two shorter sides satisfy 3² + 4² = 5², the triangle is right-angled, with the right angle at B. "No, since 3 + 4 ≠ 5" wrongly tests Pythagoras' theorem by adding the sides instead of squaring them first. "No, since AB, BC and CA are not all equal" confuses a right-angled triangle with an equilateral one — a triangle does not need equal sides to have a right angle. "Yes, since 4² + 5² = 3²" reaches the correct conclusion but puts the longest side, 5, on the wrong side of the equation, as if it were one of the two shorter sides instead of the hypotenuse.
- (b) (6, 3) — For an enlargement centred on the origin, multiply both coordinates by the scale factor: (2 × 3, 1 × 3) = (6, 3). A pupil who adds the scale factor to each coordinate instead of multiplying gets (2 + 3, 1 + 3) = (5, 4). A pupil who multiplies only the x-coordinate gets (6, 1). A pupil who multiplies only the y-coordinate gets (2, 3). The correct image is (6, 3).
- (b) 4 : 9 — The heights are in the ratio 4 : 6, which simplifies to 2 : 3. For similar solids, area scales with the square of the length ratio, so the surface area ratio is 2² : 3² = 4 : 9. 2 : 3 is just the simplified length ratio, before squaring has been done. 8 : 27 comes from cubing the ratio (2³ : 3³) instead of squaring it — that's the rule for volumes, not areas. 9 : 4 has the correct squared values but in the wrong order, giving the larger tin's area first instead of the smaller.
- (d) A translation by the vector (8, 0) — Method: two reflections in PARALLEL lines combine into a single translation, perpendicular to the lines, of size twice the distance between them; two reflections in lines that CROSS combine into a rotation instead, never a translation. Working: the lines x = 2 and x = 6 are parallel, a distance of 6 − 2 = 4 apart. Doubling this distance gives 2 × 4 = 8, and the translation runs in the direction from the first line towards the second, so the vector is (8, 0). Answer: a translation by the vector (8, 0). Double the distance between the lines rather than using it directly, keep the direction running from the FIRST line reflected to the SECOND, and remember that two reflections in lines that never meet can only give a translation, never a rotation.
- (c) (4, 3) — Method: the midpoint of a segment is the mean of its two end points, so its x-coordinate is the mean of the two x-coordinates and its y-coordinate is the mean of the two y-coordinates. Working: for x, (1 + 7) ÷ 2 = 8 ÷ 2 = 4. For y, (3 + 3) ÷ 2 = 6 ÷ 2 = 3. The midpoint is therefore (4, 3). Answer: (4, 3). The distractors: (3, 3) comes from halving the difference of the x-coordinates, (7 − 1) ÷ 2 = 3, which measures half the distance instead of locating the point; (3.5, 3) comes from halving only the larger x-coordinate and leaving the smaller one out of the working; (4, 0) comes from averaging the x-coordinates correctly but then subtracting the y-coordinates, 3 − 3, rather than averaging them.
- (b) Neither, because both coordinates differ — A line segment is horizontal only when both points share the same y-coordinate, and vertical only when both points share the same x-coordinate. Here A has x-coordinate −4 and B has x-coordinate 2, which differ, and A has y-coordinate 3 and B has y-coordinate 6, which also differ, so the segment is neither horizontal nor vertical. Every point has a y-coordinate and an x-coordinate, so simply having one is not a reason for the line to be horizontal or vertical — both of those wrong reasons ignore that the coordinates must match, not just exist. The x-coordinates do increase from A to B, but an increasing x-coordinate on its own describes a slope, not a horizontal line.
- (c) 6 squares — Method: the plan view shows the footprint of the solid; a second layer stacked on top of floor positions that are already covered does not create any new squares in the plan. Working: the row of 4 cubes and the row of 2 cubes attached at the end do not overlap, so the footprint has 4 + 2 = 6 distinct squares. Answer: 6 squares. The distractors: 12 squares comes from counting the total number of cubes used, including the second layer (6 floor positions × 2 layers = 12), instead of the footprint. 4 squares comes from counting only the row of four and forgetting the attached row of two. 5 squares comes from wrongly treating the corner square as shared between the two rows (4 + 1 instead of 4 + 2).
- (d) 4.44 m — The real van's length is 18.5 × 24 = 444 cm, which converts to 4.44 m. '0.77 m' comes from dividing by 24 instead of multiplying, using the ratio the wrong way round (18.5 ÷ 24 = 0.77 cm), and then writing that figure down as metres. '44.4 m' comes from converting 444 cm to metres with the decimal point in the wrong place. '444 m' comes from working out 444 cm correctly but forgetting to convert it into metres at all.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.