Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 5√3 m — The cable, the pole and the ground form a right-angled triangle: the ground distance (5 m) is adjacent to the 60° angle, and the height of the pole is opposite it, so height = 5 × tan 60° = 5 × √3 = 5√3 m. 5√3/2 m comes from using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of tan 60°. 5/√3 m comes from using tan 30° = 1/√3, the reciprocal-angle value, instead of tan 60°. 10√3 m comes from doubling the correct height by mistake.
- (b) −2 — The gradient of the original line is (6 − 2) ÷ (3 − 1) = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Reflecting in the x-axis sends every y-coordinate to its negative, which flips the sign of the gradient: the image line has gradient −2. Translating by (2, 0) is a horizontal shift, which does not change the line's steepness or direction at all, so the gradient stays at −2. Assuming the gradient is unaffected by the reflection gives 2, the original gradient carried straight through. Thinking a reflection in the x-axis turns a gradient into its positive reciprocal gives 1/2. Combining that same wrong idea with the sign flip from the reflection gives −1/2. Only the sign flips, from the reflection, and translating never changes a gradient at all, so the answer is −2.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
- (b) 32 cm² — The area of a trapezium is half of the sum of the parallel sides, multiplied by the height. Add the parallel sides: 6 + 10 = 16. Multiply by the height: 16 × 4 = 64. Half of 64 is 32 cm². 64 cm² forgets to halve and just gives (6+10)×4. 8 cm² averages the two parallel sides, (6+10)÷2 = 8, but forgets to multiply by the height. 20 cm² treats it as a triangle using only the longer parallel side as the base: half of 10 × 4.
- (b) 60 units² — Method: the area of a triangle is half the base times the perpendicular height, so choose a side to act as the base and measure the perpendicular distance from the opposite vertex to it. Working: A(0, 0) and B(10, 0) both lie on the x-axis, so AB is horizontal and AB = 10 − 0 = 10. The perpendicular height is the distance of C from the x-axis, which is its y-coordinate, 12. Area = (10 × 12) ÷ 2 = 120 ÷ 2 = 60. Answer: 60 units². The distractors: 120 units² comes from multiplying base by height and forgetting to halve; 65 units² comes from using the slanting side AC, which is 13 long, as the height in place of the perpendicular distance 12; 30 units² comes from halving the base to 5 before multiplying and then halving the product as well, so the halving is done twice.
- (c) 13 — Area of the trapezium = 1/2 × (8 + 12) × 5 = 1/2 × 100 = 50 m². Number of bags = 50 ÷ 4 = 12.5, which rounds up to 13 bags since seed is sold only in whole bags. A student who mistakenly uses 2 m² of coverage per bag instead of 4 m² finds 50 ÷ 2 = 25 bags.
- (a) 31.4 — Method: first find the circumference of one turn using π × diameter, then multiply by the number of turns. Working: circumference = 3.14 × 0.5 = 1.57 m; total distance = 1.57 × 20 = 31.4 m. A student who answers 15.7 has mistakenly halved the diameter again before multiplying, using 0.25 m instead of 0.5 m. A student who answers 3.14 has simply written down π itself, without completing the circumference or multiplying by the number of turns. A student who answers 62.8 has mistakenly doubled the diameter to 1 m before multiplying, treating the given length as a radius. Answer: 31.4 m.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (b) An enlargement, centre O, scale factor −1/2. — A single enlargement with a negative scale factor both changes the size (by the magnitude of the factor) and rotates the image 180° about the centre (giving the inverted orientation) in one transformation. Halving the size needs a magnitude of 1/2, and inverting needs a negative sign, so the scale factor is −1/2, centre O. 'Scale factor 1/2' gives the correct size but no inversion, since a positive scale factor keeps the same orientation. 'A 180° rotation with no change in size' gives the inversion but not the halving — K is described as smaller than J, so size must change too. 'Scale factor −2' inverts correctly but doubles the size instead of halving it.
- (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
- (c) ∠XYZ — The angle at a named vertex is written with that vertex's letter in the middle, flanked by its two neighbouring vertices. The angle at Y sits between X and Z, its neighbours in quadrilateral WXYZ, so it is written ∠XYZ. ∠WXY names the angle at X, since X is the middle letter, not Y. ∠YZW names the angle at Z, since Z is the middle letter. ∠ZWX names the angle at W, since W is the middle letter.
- (d) (6, 2) — Applying the first vector: (2, 1) + (5, −3) = (7, −2), which is the warehouse. Applying the second vector: (7, −2) + (−1, 4) = (6, 2), the delivery address. '(7, −2)' stops at the warehouse and forgets the second flight. '(8, −6)' comes from adding (1, −4) instead of (−1, 4) for the second vector, getting both signs wrong. '(11, −3)' comes from swapping the components of the second vector to (4, −1) before adding.
- (c) 38° — The interior angles of a hexagon sum to (6 − 2) × 180° = 720°. 130° + 142° + 125° + 150° + 135° = 682°. x = 720° − 682° = 38°. A student who uses 6 × 180° instead of (6 − 2) × 180°, forgetting to subtract the 2, gets 1080° − 682° = 398°. A student who mis-adds the five given angles as 680° instead of 682° gets x = 720° − 680° = 40°. A student who answers with one of the given angles instead of solving for x might write 142°.
- (b) (5, 1) — First scale a by 2: 2a = (2×3, 2×(−2)) = (6, −4). Then add b component by component: (6+(−1), −4+5) = (5, 1). (2, 3) is a + b without doubling a first. (4, 6) doubles both a and b instead of only a. (7, −9) subtracts b from 2a instead of adding it.
- (d) 13 — Method: OP and PQ meet at a right angle because of the tangent–radius fact, so triangle OPQ is right-angled at P; use Pythagoras' theorem. Working: OQ² = OP² + PQ² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169; OQ = √169 = 13. A student who answers 17 has simply added the two given lengths (5 + 12) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 7 has subtracted the two given lengths (12 − 5) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 144 has correctly squared 12 but stopped there, forgetting to add 5² and take the square root. Answer: 13 cm.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.