Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) £50 — Area = 1/2 × (3.5 + 6.5) × 4 = 1/2 × 10 × 4 = 20 m². Cost = 20 × £2.50 = £50. (£100 comes from forgetting to halve the trapezium area, giving 40 m² instead of 20 m²; £65 comes from using only the longer parallel side, 6.5 × 4 = 26 m², instead of the trapezium formula; £35 comes from adding all three given lengths, 3.5 + 6.5 + 4, and treating that total as the area in square metres.)
- (a) the lens-shaped region where the two circles overlap — The region within 30 km of the ship is a circle of radius 30 km around the ship; the region within 20 km of the lighthouse is a circle of radius 20 km around the lighthouse. Since 30 + 20 = 50 km is more than the 40 km between them, and 30 − 20 = 10 km is less than 40 km, the two circles genuinely overlap, in a lens-shaped region where both conditions hold at once. "the whole smaller circle, since it fits inside the larger one" would only be true if the 40 km distance between the centres were small enough for one circle to swallow the other, which it is not here. "no overlap — 30 km and 20 km don't add to 40 km" wrongly assumes the two radii must add up to exactly the distance between the centres for an overlap to exist; any total greater than that distance is enough. "a straight strip, exactly halfway between the two" confuses this with an equidistant locus, which is a different problem from the one asked here.
- (b) 2x + 2y = 180° — Method: use the fact that OA, OB and OC are all radii, so triangles OAC and OBC are each isosceles, and set up the angle sum of triangle ABC as a whole. Working: since OA = OC, triangle OAC is isosceles, so angle OAC = angle OCA = x. Since OB = OC, triangle OBC is isosceles, so angle OBC = angle OCB = y. The angle at A in triangle ABC is x, the angle at B is y, and the angle at C is angle OCA plus angle OCB, which is x + y. The three angles of triangle ABC sum to 180°, giving x + y + (x + y) = 180°, which is 2x + 2y = 180°. Answer: 2x + 2y = 180°. Dividing this by 2 gives x + y = 90°, and since angle ACB = x + y, this proves angle ACB = 90°: the point C was never restricted to any particular position on the circle, so the proof holds for every choice of C. Include ALL THREE angles of the triangle in the sum, do not use a quadrilateral's 360° total, and remember angle ACB is the SUM x + y, not x alone.
- (a) −2 — Let the centre be C = (c, 0). The vector from the centre to the image equals the scale factor k times the vector from the centre to the object: (7 − c, −4) = k(1 − c, 2). The y-coordinate gives −4 = 2k, so k = −2 — this doesn't depend on knowing c. (Checking: substituting k = −2 into the x-equation gives c = 3, consistent with a centre on the x-axis.) '2' comes from taking the magnitude of the ratio without noticing the image is on the opposite side of the centre from the object, so the sign should be negative. '−1/2' comes from inverting the scale factor, dividing the object's coordinate by the image's instead of the other way round. '3' is the x-coordinate of the centre, mistaken for the scale factor.
- (b) $\binom{-5}{5}$ — Method: add the two flights to get the single vector of the whole journey out, then reverse that vector to get the journey home. Working: across, 6 − 1 = 5; up, 4 − 9 = −5. So the drone finishes at (7, −8), which is 5 to the right of its start and 5 below it. The way home is therefore 5 to the left and 5 up. Answer: $\binom{-5}{5}$. Giving the combined journey itself, $\binom{5}{-5}$, describes the flight out rather than the flight home. Subtracting the second vector instead of adding it makes the journey out 7 across and 13 up, and reversing that gives $\binom{-7}{-13}$. Reversing the horizontal movement but leaving the vertical one alone gives $\binom{-5}{-5}$.
- (b) 160° — B is on the minor arc AC, so the angle at the centre theorem applies to the reflex angle AOC: reflex angle AOC = 2 × 100° = 200°. The non-reflex angle AOC is the rest of the full turn: 360° − 200° = 160°. Reporting the reflex angle itself, without subtracting it from 360°, gives 200°. Subtracting angle ABC from 180° instead, as if this were a cyclic quadrilateral, gives 80°. Halving angle ABC instead of doubling it gives 50°. Double first, then take the angle away from a full turn, and 160° is what's left.
- (a) 3 m — Height = sloping length × sin 45° = 3√2 × √2/2 = (3 × 2)/2 = 3 m, since √2 × √2 = 2. 3√2 m comes from forgetting to multiply by sin 45° at all. 3√2/2 m comes from using sin 30° = 1/2 instead of sin 45° = √2/2. 6 m comes from using √2 instead of √2/2 for sin 45°, dropping the denominator of the exact value: 3√2 × √2 = 6.
- (c) 5 cm — Volume of a cylinder = πr²h, so r² = V ÷ (πh) = 942 ÷ (3.14 × 12) = 942 ÷ 37.68 = 25, and r = √25 = 5 cm. A pupil who finds r² = 25 but forgets to take the square root gives 25 cm. A pupil who forgets to divide by π, using r² = 942 ÷ 12 = 78.5, gets r = √78.5 ≈ 8.9 cm. A pupil who forgets to divide by the height, using r² = 942 ÷ 3.14 = 300, gets r = √300 ≈ 17.3 cm. The correct radius is 5 cm.
- (c) 6 cm — For a parallelogram, area = base × height, so height = area ÷ base = 54 ÷ 9 = 6 cm. 12 cm comes from using the triangle's reverse formula, height = 2 × area ÷ base, which does not apply to a parallelogram. 45 cm comes from subtracting the base from the area, 54 − 9, instead of dividing. 486 cm comes from multiplying the area by the base, 54 × 9, instead of dividing.
- (b) No — should divide by −2bc, not +2bc; sign is wrong. — Method: rearrange a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A step by step and compare with the student's version. Working: subtracting b² + c² from both sides gives a² − b² − c² = −2bc cos A, then dividing both sides by −2bc gives cos A = (a² − b² − c²) / (−2bc), which is the same as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) / (2bc). The student divided by +2bc instead of −2bc, so their expression is the negative of the correct one — the verdict is No. Saying the algebra is fine because 'either sign order gives a valid result' ignores that only one of the two signed expressions matches the original equation. Saying the denominator should be bc rather than 2bc is a different, unrelated error — the coefficient 2bc in the original formula is correct and must stay.
- (c) I is the same distance from all three sides. — The angle bisector from A is the locus of points equidistant from sides AB and AC, and the angle bisector from B is the locus of points equidistant from sides AB and BC. Point I lies on both bisectors, so I is equidistant from AB and AC, and also equidistant from AB and BC — meaning I is the same distance from all three sides. (Being the same distance from all three vertices instead describes the circumcentre, found from the perpendicular bisectors of the sides, not the angle bisectors; I being the midpoint of AB confuses the angle bisector construction with the perpendicular bisector of a side; I lying on side AC is wrong because the angle bisectors meet inside the triangle, not on one of its sides.)
- (a) 6 cm — Method: a rectangle is made of two lengths and two widths, so the perimeter is 2 × (length + width). Half the perimeter is therefore one length plus one width, and the width is what is left of that half once the length is taken away. Working: 30 ÷ 2 = 15 cm is one length added to one width, and 15 − 9 = 6. Answer: 6 cm. The distractors: 21 cm comes from taking the length off the whole perimeter, 30 − 9, so three sides are still counted in the figure that is written down; 12 cm comes from removing both lengths correctly, 30 − 2 × 9 = 12, and then recording that remainder as the width instead of halving it, because it is in fact the two widths together; 7.5 cm comes from dividing the perimeter by four, 30 ÷ 4, which is the calculation for the side of a square and throws away the length that was given.
- (a) A rotation of 180° about the origin — Method: composing two reflections in lines that cross is always a single rotation about the point where the lines meet, through twice the angle between them. Working: the x-axis and y-axis meet at the origin at an angle of 90°, so the combined transformation is a rotation about the origin through 2 × 90 = 180 degrees. Answer: a rotation of 180° about the origin. The rotation angle is TWICE the angle between the mirror lines, not the angle itself, and the centre is always where the two lines cross, not some other point, and the result of two reflections in intersecting lines is a rotation, never another reflection.
- (a) SSA - not sufficient to prove congruence — The angle given, angle A, is not the angle between sides AB and BC — it is not the included angle — so this data is SSA (side, side, angle), which is not sufficient to prove congruence on its own; two triangles can share this SSA information without being congruent. SAS is wrong because the given angle is not the one included between the two given sides. ASA is wrong because only one angle (A) is given, not two. AAS is wrong for the same reason — only one angle is given, not two.
- (a) 67° — PA and PB are tangents from the same point, so OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem. The kite's angles sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 46° = 134°. C is on the major arc AB, so by the angle at the centre theorem, angle ACB = 134° ÷ 2 = 67°. Doubling angle APB instead of first finding angle AOB from the kite gives 46° + 46° = 92°. Using angle APB directly as if it were the centre angle, then halving it, gives 46° ÷ 2 = 23°. Finding angle AOB = 134° correctly but forgetting to halve it for the angle at the circumference gives 134°. Halve angle AOB, once you've found it properly, and you get 67°.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.