Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 5√3 m — The cable, the pole and the ground form a right-angled triangle: the ground distance (5 m) is adjacent to the 60° angle, and the height of the pole is opposite it, so height = 5 × tan 60° = 5 × √3 = 5√3 m. 5√3/2 m comes from using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of tan 60°. 5/√3 m comes from using tan 30° = 1/√3, the reciprocal-angle value, instead of tan 60°. 10√3 m comes from doubling the correct height by mistake.
- (b) 10.5 m² — The area of a trapezium is half of the sum of the parallel sides, multiplied by the width. Add the parallel sides: 2.5 + 4.5 = 7. Multiply by the width: 7 × 3 = 21. Half of 21 is 10.5 m². 21 m² forgets to halve, using the full (2.5+4.5)×3. 3.5 m² averages the two parallel sides, (2.5+4.5)÷2 = 3.5, but forgets to multiply by the width. 6.75 m² treats the bed as a triangle, using only the longer parallel side: half of 4.5 × 3.
- (b) 28 — The width of the rectangle is the difference in x-coordinates, 9 − 2 = 7, and the height is the difference in y-coordinates, 5 − 1 = 4. The area is width × height = 7 × 4 = 28. 22 comes from using the perimeter formula, 2 × (7 + 4), instead of the area formula. 35 comes from multiplying 7 by 5 instead of 4, misreading one of the y-coordinates. 63 comes from multiplying 9 by 7, using an x-coordinate instead of the height.
- (d) (3/4)a + (1/4)c — Method: OX = OA + AX, and since AX is a third of XC, AX is 1/4 of the whole of AC, with AC = c − a. Working: OX = a + 1/4(c − a) = a − (1/4)a + (1/4)c = (3/4)a + (1/4)c. Answer: OX = (3/4)a + (1/4)c. Measuring 1/4 of AC from C's end instead of A's swaps the fractions round, giving (1/4)a + (3/4)c; adding (1/4)c onto the whole of a without subtracting a inside the bracket first gives a + (1/4)c; and treating the ratio as though AX and XC were equal gives the midpoint, (1/2)a + (1/2)c. Convert the ratio to a fraction of AC measured from A, subtract before you scale, and then add the result to OA.
- (a) −2 — Let the centre be C = (c, 0). The vector from the centre to the image equals the scale factor k times the vector from the centre to the object: (7 − c, −4) = k(1 − c, 2). The y-coordinate gives −4 = 2k, so k = −2 — this doesn't depend on knowing c. (Checking: substituting k = −2 into the x-equation gives c = 3, consistent with a centre on the x-axis.) '2' comes from taking the magnitude of the ratio without noticing the image is on the opposite side of the centre from the object, so the sign should be negative. '−1/2' comes from inverting the scale factor, dividing the object's coordinate by the image's instead of the other way round. '3' is the x-coordinate of the centre, mistaken for the scale factor.
- (b) £5.00 — Perimeter of the kite = 25 + 25 + 40 + 40 = 130 cm = 1.3 m. The frame is sold only in whole metres, so 2 m must be bought. Cost = 2 × £2.50 = £5.00. A student who buys the exact 1.3 m instead of rounding up to whole metres gets 1.3 × £2.50 = £3.25. A student who never converts the perimeter from centimetres to metres and costs 130 × £2.50 gets £325.00.9 m, which rounds up to 3 whole metres, costing 3 × £2.50 = £7.50.
- (b) a rectangle — Lying on its side, the cylinder's curved surface touches the table along a straight line, and the two flat circular ends face sideways rather than up or down; viewed from directly above, the outline traced is a rectangle — as long as the cylinder and as wide as its diameter. "a circle" would be correct if the cylinder stood upright on one of its circular ends instead of lying on its side. "a triangle" belongs to a cone lying or standing so that it narrows to a point in that view, which a cylinder never does. "an oval" is a common guess from picturing the round ends, but from directly above those ends are edge-on and contribute to the rectangle's short sides, not a curved outline.
- (d) No transformation — every point stays exactly where it was — The two vectors (5, −3) and (−5, 3) are opposites, so adding them gives (0, 0): every point ends up exactly where it started, and there is no transformation at all. Misreading the second vector's signs and effectively adding (5, −3) to itself instead of to its opposite gives a translation by the vector (10, −6). Assuming two translations must combine into a reflection gives a reflection in the x-axis — but a reflection reverses orientation, and translations never do. Assuming that two opposite vectors must mean a half turn gives a rotation of 180° about the origin — but a 180° rotation moves every point except its own centre, whereas this pair of translations leaves every single point exactly where it was. Two translations by opposite vectors always cancel exactly, leaving every point unmoved.
- (d) 6 cm — Volume = πr²h, so height = volume ÷ (πr²) = 471 ÷ (3.14 × 25) = 471 ÷ 78.5 = 6 cm. (30 cm comes from dividing by πr instead of πr², missing one factor of the radius; 150 cm comes from dividing by π only, without using r² at all; 24 cm comes from treating the given 5 cm as a diameter and using a radius of 2.5 cm instead.)
- (a) Translation by the vector (0, 6) — Method: reflecting twice in two parallel horizontal lines is always equivalent to a single translation, at right angles to the lines, of twice the distance between them. Working: the two lines are 4 − 1 = 3 units apart, so the translation is 2 × 3 = 6 units in the positive y-direction. Answer: translation by the vector (0, 6). Using just the gap itself, without doubling it, gives (0, 3); translating in the negative y-direction, from the second line back towards the first, gives (0, −6); and describing the combination as a single reflection in the line halfway between them, y = 2.5, confuses this combination with the effect of a single reflection — two reflections in parallel lines are always equivalent to a translation, never to another reflection. Always double the gap between the lines, and translate in the direction from the first line towards the second.
- (c) 10 cm — The diagonals of a rhombus bisect each other at right angles, splitting it into four congruent right-angled triangles with legs 8 cm (half of 16 cm) and 6 cm (half of 12 cm). By Pythagoras' Theorem, side² = 8² + 6² = 64 + 36 = 100. Square root: √100 = 10 cm.
- (b) −2 — The gradient of the original line is (6 − 2) ÷ (3 − 1) = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Reflecting in the x-axis sends every y-coordinate to its negative, which flips the sign of the gradient: the image line has gradient −2. Translating by (2, 0) is a horizontal shift, which does not change the line's steepness or direction at all, so the gradient stays at −2. Assuming the gradient is unaffected by the reflection gives 2, the original gradient carried straight through. Thinking a reflection in the x-axis turns a gradient into its positive reciprocal gives 1/2. Combining that same wrong idea with the sign flip from the reflection gives −1/2. Only the sign flips, from the reflection, and translating never changes a gradient at all, so the answer is −2.
- (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
- (a) isosceles trapezium — One pair of parallel sides, plus a separate pair of equal non-parallel sides, is exactly the definition of an isosceles trapezium — the shape the designer should draw. Parallelogram is wrong because a parallelogram needs BOTH pairs of opposite sides parallel, but only one pair is parallel here. Kite is wrong because a kite has two separate pairs of adjacent equal sides and no requirement for any sides to be parallel, a different combination of properties. Rhombus is wrong because a rhombus needs all four sides equal, but the description only makes two of the four sides equal to each other.
- (b) Rhombus — A rhombus has exactly two lines of symmetry, formed by its two diagonals, and both pairs of opposite angles are equal, but its diagonals are unequal in length. A square also has opposite angles equal, but it has four lines of symmetry and its diagonals ARE equal, so it does not fit. A kite normally has only one line of symmetry and only one pair of opposite angles equal, so it does not fit. A general parallelogram has no lines of symmetry at all, so it does not fit. The correct answer is rhombus.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.