Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) No — third angle is also fixed — Since both braces have angles of 55° and 65°, their third angles must both be 60°, because angles in a triangle sum to 180°. All three angles now match, so the braces have the same shape. Both 8 cm sides lie in the same position relative to those angles — opposite the 55° angle in each brace — so one matching pair of corresponding sides fixes the size as well, exactly as ASA or AAS would. The braces are therefore guaranteed to be congruent and the carpenter is incorrect: 'No — third angle is also fixed' is correct. 'Yes — side must be included' is wrong because the side does not have to lie physically between the two named angles; once the third angle is fixed, a corresponding equal side anywhere is enough. 'No — any two angles enough alone' is wrong because two equal angles with no side length at all would only show the triangles are similar, not congruent. 'Yes — third angle may differ' is wrong because the third angle is fixed at 60° by the angle sum and cannot vary.
- (a) No — it's a 180° rotation, not a reflection. — A negative scale factor scales the shape by the size of the factor and turns it through 180° about the centre of enlargement — every point of the image lands on the opposite side of the centre from the object. A 180° turn is a rotation, and a rotation never reverses a shape's handedness (its sense), whereas a reflection always does, so the image is not a mirror image: Priti is wrong. The option claiming negative numbers always mean a reflection confuses the sign of a scale factor with the transformation of reflection — they are not the same thing. The option saying only the size changes ignores the sign altogether: the 180° turn does change the way the shape faces, even though it leaves the handedness unchanged. The option equating 'upside down' with 'mirrored' assumes the two always mean the same thing, but a 180° rotation and a reflection in a horizontal line can both look 'upside down' while being different transformations — only the reflection reverses the shape's handedness.
- (a) (5, 4) — Method: find the vector from the centre to the point, multiply it by the scale factor, then add the result back to the centre. Working: the vector from (2, 4) to (8, 4) is (6, 0); multiplying by 1/2 gives (3, 0); adding this to the centre (2, 4) gives (5, 4). Options: (4, 2) comes from multiplying the original coordinates by 1/2 directly, ignoring the centre of enlargement; (14, 4) comes from using a scale factor of 2 instead of 1/2, giving (2, 4) + 2×(6, 0) = (14, 4); (8, 2) comes from halving only the y-coordinate and leaving the x-coordinate unchanged. Answer: (5, 4).
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (c) (10.5, −2) — Method: the vector from the first tile to the third tile is the pattern's vector doubled, since two translations happen between them. Working: doubling (4.5, −2.5) gives (9, −5); adding this to the starting corner (1.5, 3) gives x-coordinate 1.5 + 9 = 10.5 and y-coordinate 3 − 5 = −2. Answer: (10.5, −2). A candidate who only applies the vector once, translating to the second tile instead of the third, gets (6, 0.5). A candidate who adds 2.5 instead of subtracting it in the y-coordinate gets (10.5, 8). A candidate who doubles the x-part of the vector correctly but forgets to change the y-coordinate at all gets (10.5, 3).
- (a) 104° — Method: find each inscribed angle separately using the angle-at-the-centre theorem: for a point on the arc NOT cut off by the given central angle, halve that central angle; for a point on the OTHER arc, halve the REFLEX central angle instead; then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: for C on the major arc, angle ACB = 76 ÷ 2 = 38 degrees. For D on the minor arc, D sees the reflex angle at the centre, 360 − 76 = 284 degrees, so angle ADB = 284 ÷ 2 = 142 degrees. The difference is 142 − 38 = 104 degrees. Answer: 104°. Both inscribed angles need the theorem applied separately, using the correct arc's central angle each time (the reflex angle for D), and the question asks for the DIFFERENCE between the two, not either angle on its own and not their sum, 180°, which is simply the opposite-angle total for the cyclic quadrilateral ACBD.
- (a) 25° — PA and PB are tangents from the same external point, so PA = PB and OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°. The four angles of the kite sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 50° = 130°. Triangle OAB is isosceles because OA = OB, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OAB = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. Using angle APB itself as the apex angle of triangle OAB instead of angle AOB gives (180° − 50°) ÷ 2 = 65°. Using a triangle's angle sum on the four-sided kite, and so counting only one of its two right angles, treats angle AOB as 180° − 90° − 50° = 40°, and halving what is then left of triangle OAB gives (180° − 40°) ÷ 2 = 70°. Finding angle AOB = 130° correctly but forgetting to halve for the isosceles base angle gives 180° − 130° = 50°. Halve that remaining angle, and 25° is what's left for angle OAB.
- (a) 24 cm — The line from the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to the chord, so triangle OMA has a right angle at M. By Pythagoras' theorem, AM² = OA² − OM² = 169 − 25 = 144, so AM = 12 cm. AB is twice AM, since M is the midpoint: AB = 2 × 12 = 24 cm. Finding AM = 12 cm correctly but forgetting to double it for the full chord gives 12 cm. Working out 169 − 25 = 144 and forgetting to take the square root gives 144 cm. Subtracting first and then doubling the wrong way, (13 − 5) × 2, gives 16 cm. Doubling AM after finding it correctly is the step that's missing from all three — do it, and you get 24 cm.
- (a) 118° — When two straight lines cross, the angles that are vertically opposite each other are always equal. So the angle vertically opposite 118° is also 118°. A candidate who instead finds the angle next to it on the straight line, using 180° − 118° = 62°, has found the adjacent angle, not the vertically opposite one. A candidate who answers 180° has confused the rule with angles on a straight line. A candidate who doubles the angle, giving 236°, has applied no valid angle rule at all. The vertically opposite angle is 118°.
- (d) sector — The region enclosed by two radii and the arc between them is called a sector. A segment is a different region, enclosed by a CHORD and an arc — it does not touch the centre at all. A chord is a straight line, not a region, so it cannot be the answer to a question asking for a region. A semicircle is only correct when the angle between the two radii is exactly 180°, which is not stated here, so it is too specific to be the general answer.
- (a) 245 m² — Method: for similar figures the ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths, so multiply the smaller area by the square of the length scale factor. Working: the length scale factor is 7 ÷ 3, so the area scale factor is 49 ÷ 9, and the larger area is 45 × 49 ÷ 9 = 5 × 49 = 245. Answer: 245 m². The distractors: 105 m² comes from multiplying by the length scale factor 7 ÷ 3 instead of by its square, the commonest slip on this topic; 315 m² comes from multiplying by 7 and forgetting to divide by 3; 405 m² comes from multiplying by 3² = 9, squaring the wrong part of the ratio.
- (b) 68° — Method: two properties are needed. Angle A and angle D are co-interior angles between the parallel sides AB and DC, so they add up to 180°; and because the trapezium is isosceles, the two angles on the side AB are equal, so angle B = angle A. Working: angle A = 180° − 112° = 68°, and angle B = angle A = 68°. Answer: 68°. The distractors: 112° comes from assuming that angles B and D are equal, which is the property of a parallelogram, not of a trapezium; 90° comes from assuming that the angles on the other parallel side must be right angles; 248° comes from using the 360° angle sum of a quadrilateral and taking away only the one angle that is given.
- (d) 1.5 m — By Pythagoras' theorem, diagonal² = 1.2² + 0.9² = 1.44 + 0.81 = 2.25, so diagonal = √2.25 = 1.5 m. 2.1 m comes from simply adding the two sides (1.2 + 0.9) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. 0.3 m comes from subtracting the two sides (1.2 − 0.9) instead. 2.25 m comes from correctly finding 1.2² + 0.9² = 2.25 but forgetting to take the square root at the end.
- (c) AB ∥ CD only; EF not confirmed — By convention, lines marked with the same number of arrows are parallel to each other, but lines marked with a different number of arrows belong to a different, unrelated family of parallel lines. AB and CD both have a single arrow, so AB is parallel to CD. EF has a double arrow, showing it is not part of the same family as AB and CD; it may be parallel to some other line marked with a double arrow, but nothing here confirms it is parallel to AB or CD, so 'AB ∥ CD only; EF not confirmed' is correct. 'AB, CD and EF are all parallel' and 'EF is parallel to AB' both wrongly treat every arrow mark as showing the same relationship. 'None of the lines are parallel' wrongly assumes a different arrow count rules out any parallel relationship at all, when it actually just signals a different pairing.
- (c) Two angles and one side are known; x is another side — The sine rule needs a matching pair, a side and the angle opposite it, that you already know, so you can set up a ratio with the unknown. When two angles and one side are known, you can find the third angle from the angle sum, giving you an angle opposite the known side and an angle opposite x: the sine rule applies directly. When all three sides are known and x is an angle, there is no side-angle pair available at all, so the cosine rule, rearranged for an angle, is what's needed instead. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is the third side, again there is no matching side-angle pair yet, so the cosine rule finds the third side directly. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is one of the other angles, you still have no side-angle pair to start from — the cosine rule has to be used first, to find the third side, before any angle can be found. Only the two-angles-and-a-side case hands you a ready-made pair, which is exactly what the sine rule needs.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.