Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 118° — In an isosceles trapezium, the two angles next to the same parallel side are equal, because the sloping sides are equal in length. So the angle at the other end of the shorter parallel side also equals 118°.
- (a) Draw equal arcs from X and Y, meeting below line l. — After the first arc marks two points X and Y on line l, compasses are opened to a new radius and arcs of equal radius are drawn centred at X and at Y, so that they meet on the opposite side of l from P; joining P to that meeting point gives the perpendicular. (Joining X and Y with a straight line only retraces part of line l itself, since X and Y both already lie on it; drawing an arc centred at P through only one of X or Y repeats part of the first step instead of moving on; drawing a circle through X, Y and P does not locate the new point needed to complete the perpendicular.)
- (a) 2 — Gradient = (change in y) ÷ (change in x) = (11 − 3) ÷ (6 − 2) = 8 ÷ 4 = 2. "0.5" comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y the wrong way round: 4 ÷ 8. "8" is only the change in y, forgetting to divide by the change in x at all. "−2" comes from a sign error, as if the y-coordinate had decreased rather than increased.
- (b) 28 — Method: total bricks = (number of squares in the footprint) × (the height of the wall in bricks). Working: the footprint has the row of 5 squares plus the 2 squares in the arm that stands out from the middle of that row, and they do not overlap, giving 5 + 2 = 7 squares; multiplying by the height of 4 bricks gives 7 × 4 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 20 comes from using only the row of 5 and ignoring the arm (5 × 4). 24 comes from treating the bottom square of the arm as if it were one of the row's own squares, so the arm is counted as adding only 1 new square instead of 2 (5 + 1 = 6, then 6 × 4). 32 comes from counting the square of the row directly below the arm a second time as part of the arm (5 + 3 = 8, then 8 × 4).
- (a) 100° — In a kite, the pair of angles between the unequal sides are equal to each other. Angle X and angle Z are both between one side from the WX/WZ pair and one side from the XY/ZY pair, so angle Z = angle X = 100°.
- (b) No — the angle given is not the included angle — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides, since SAS requires the included angle. Working: sides AB and BC meet at vertex B, so the angle between them is angle B — but the angle given is angle A, which is not between the two given sides, and the same mismatch happens in triangle DEF. Options: 'two sides and one angle match' restates SAS's ingredients without checking their positions, which is exactly Meera's mistake; 'SSS needs three equal sides' is a true fact about a different condition, but it is not the reason Meera is wrong here; 'SAS allows any equal angle' states a rule that is not how SAS works, since the angle must be the included one. Answer: no, the angle given is not the included angle.
- (d) 10 — Method: the distance between two points is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose shorter sides are the horizontal and vertical gaps, so work out both gaps first, handling the negative coordinates carefully, and then apply Pythagoras' theorem. Working: the horizontal gap is 5 − (−3) = 5 + 3 = 8 and the vertical gap is 4 − (−2) = 4 + 2 = 6. Then d² = 8² + 6² = 64 + 36 = 100, so d = √100 = 10. Answer: 10. The distractors: 14 comes from adding the two gaps, 8 + 6, instead of adding their squares and taking the root; 100 comes from stopping at the sum of the squares and never taking the square root; 50 comes from reaching 100 correctly and then halving it instead of taking its square root, a candidate who has read the last step as “halve” rather than “root”.
- (b) 61° — Triangle OAT is isosceles because OA = OT, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OTA = angle OAT = (180° − 122°) ÷ 2 = 29°. The tangent PT meets the radius OT at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem, so angle OTP = 90°. Since TA lies between TO and TP, angle OTP splits into angle OTA and angle ATP: angle ATP = 90° − 29° = 61°. Stopping after the isosceles step and reporting the base angle itself gives 29°. Finding the base angles as 180° − 122° without halving, then subtracting from 90°, gives 90° − 58° = 32°. Adding the base angle to 90° instead of subtracting it gives 90° + 29° = 119°. Subtract the base angle from the right angle, and 61° is what's left.
- (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
- (c) 80 cm² — Method: a composite shape made of two rectangles that do not overlap has an area equal to the sum of the two rectangle areas, so work out each area and add them. Working: the first rectangle has area 12 × 4 = 48 cm² and the second has area 4 × 8 = 32 cm², so the total is 48 + 32 = 80. Answer: 80 cm². The distractors: 48 cm² comes from working out the larger rectangle only and treating it as the whole shape; 32 cm² comes from working out the smaller rectangle only; 28 cm comes from adding the four given lengths, 12 + 4 + 4 + 8, which is a distance rather than an area and so carries a plain centimetre unit.
- (b) 5 cm by 3 cm — The plan view looks straight down on the cuboid's footprint, so it shows the length (5 cm, left to right) and the depth (3 cm, front to back) — the two dimensions that do not involve height. "5 cm by 2 cm" repeats the front elevation's dimensions, pairing the length with the height instead of the depth. "3 cm by 2 cm" repeats the side elevation's dimensions, again pairing the depth with the height rather than with the length. "5 cm by 5 cm" comes from mistakenly assuming the plan must be a square, pairing the length with itself instead of with the depth.
- (a) 67° — PA and PB are tangents from the same point, so OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem. The kite's angles sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 46° = 134°. C is on the major arc AB, so by the angle at the centre theorem, angle ACB = 134° ÷ 2 = 67°. Doubling angle APB instead of first finding angle AOB from the kite gives 46° + 46° = 92°. Using angle APB directly as if it were the centre angle, then halving it, gives 46° ÷ 2 = 23°. Finding angle AOB = 134° correctly but forgetting to halve it for the angle at the circumference gives 134°. Halve angle AOB, once you've found it properly, and you get 67°.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
- (d) No — angles must be equal too — A regular polygon must have both all sides equal and all angles equal. This tile has all six sides equal, but its interior angles are not all equal, so it fails the angle condition and is not regular — 'No — angles must be equal too' is correct. 'Yes — all sides are equal' is wrong because equal sides alone are not enough; a shape can have equal sides but unequal angles, as here. 'Yes — six equal sides means regular' is wrong for the same reason: equal sides do not automatically guarantee equal angles. 'No — hexagons can't be regular' is wrong because regular hexagons certainly exist (six equal sides and six equal 120° angles); it is this particular tile that fails to be regular, not hexagons in general.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.