Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) Pentagonal pyramid — Method: a pyramid has one base and triangular faces that all meet at a single apex; the base shape gives the pyramid its name. Working: the base is a pentagon and the other five faces are triangles meeting at one point, so this is a pyramid with a pentagon base. A student who answers pentagonal prism has confused a pyramid, whose sloping faces meet at an apex, with a prism, which has two identical parallel faces. A student who answers hexagonal pyramid has miscounted the base as having 6 sides instead of 5. A student who answers triangular pyramid has misread the five triangular side faces as meaning the base itself is a triangle. Answer: pentagonal pyramid.
- (c) Tangent-chord angle = angle in the alternate segment. — This diagram has a diameter AC, a centre O, and a cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, but no tangent anywhere in it. 'Angle in a semicircle = 90°' applies directly, because AC is a diameter. 'Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°' applies directly, because ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral. 'Angle at the centre = twice angle at circumference' applies directly, because O is given as the centre of the circle. The tangent-chord fact relates the angle between a tangent and a chord to an angle elsewhere in the circle, and since this diagram has no tangent, there is nothing in it for that fact to describe — so it is the one theorem that does not apply here.
- (a) Square-based pyramid — A solid with one square base and four triangular faces meeting at a single apex above the base is a square-based pyramid. A triangular prism has two triangular faces and three rectangular faces, not a square base with four triangles, so that is a different solid. A cube has six square faces, and a cuboid has six rectangular faces — neither has any triangular faces at all. The solid described is a square-based pyramid.
- (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
- (b) 1 point — A rotation about a point P always leaves P itself unchanged, and — unless the shape has rotational symmetry about that exact point — no other point of the shape maps onto itself. The centre of rotation here is the vertex (2, 1), so exactly one point of the trapezium, that vertex, is invariant. Thinking that a rotation always has no invariant points ignores the centre of rotation itself, which is always fixed, and gives 0 points. Assuming every vertex of the shape is invariant confuses a rotation with the identity transformation and gives 4 points, the total number of vertices. Believing that the point diametrically opposite the centre is also fixed applies point symmetry of the whole coordinate grid rather than checking whether that point actually lies on this particular trapezium, and gives 2 points.
- (c) (1/3)a + (2/3)b — Method: OP = OA + AP, and since AP is twice PB, AP is 2/3 of the whole of AB, with AB = b − a. Working: OP = a + 2/3(b − a) = a − (2/3)a + (2/3)b = (1/3)a + (2/3)b. Answer: OP = (1/3)a + (2/3)b. Measuring 2/3 of AB from B's end instead of A's swaps the fractions round, giving (2/3)a + (1/3)b; adding (2/3)b onto the whole of a without first subtracting a inside the bracket gives a + (2/3)b; and treating the ratio as though AP and PB were equal gives the midpoint, (1/2)a + (1/2)b. Convert the ratio to a fraction of AB measured from the point named first in the ratio, subtract before you scale, and then add the result to OA.
- (c) 3200 — Method: to change cubic metres to litres, multiply by 1000. Working: 3.2 × 1000 = 3200. Answer: 3200 litres. A candidate who multiplies by 100 instead of 1000 gets 320. A candidate who multiplies by 10000 instead of 1000 gets 32000. A candidate who does not convert at all gives 3.2.
- (c) 1 — cos 45° = √2/2 and sin 45° = √2/2. Squaring each gives (√2/2)² = 2/4 = 1/2, so (cos 45°)² + (sin 45°)² = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. The distractor √2 comes from adding cos 45° + sin 45° directly without squaring first (√2/2 + √2/2 = √2). The distractor 2 comes from squaring the top of the fraction, (√2)² = 2, but then dividing by 2 instead of 4 for each term, giving 1 + 1 = 2. The distractor 1/2 comes from squaring only cos 45° and forgetting to add the sin 45° term.
- (c) They must also be equal — Once two triangles are proved congruent by any condition, including ASA, they are identical in every respect: every pair of corresponding sides and every pair of corresponding angles must be equal, not just the ones originally used to prove the congruence. So the two remaining pairs of corresponding sides must also be equal, making 'they must also be equal' correct. 'They might be equal or not' and 'not enough information to say' both wrongly suggest that congruence only guarantees the specific facts used to prove it, when congruence actually guarantees the triangles are identical overall. 'They must be different' is backwards: the triangles being identical is the entire point of proving congruence, not a reason for a side to differ.
- (a) 1 : 8 — Method: in similar solids the ratio of the volumes is the cube of the ratio of corresponding lengths. Working: the heights are in the ratio 1 : 2, so the volumes are in the ratio 1³ : 2³ = 1 : 8. Answer: 1 : 8. The distractors: 1 : 2 leaves the height ratio unchanged, as though a volume scaled in the same way as a length; 1 : 4 comes from squaring, 1² : 2², which is the rule for surface areas and not for volumes; 1 : 6 comes from multiplying each part by 3 instead of raising each part to the power 3.
- (a) 24 — The display is 4 tins wide, 3 tins high and 2 tins deep, and every position in that block is filled, so the total number of tins is the product of all three measurements: 4 × 3 × 2 = 24. "12" comes from multiplying only the width and height shown in the front elevation (4 × 3), forgetting the depth entirely. "9" comes from adding the three measurements (4 + 3 + 2) instead of multiplying them. "6" comes from multiplying only the height and depth (3 × 2), forgetting the width shown by the front elevation.
- (b) (−2, −1) — Method: apply the reflection to the point first, then rotate the image about the given centre, in the order the question states them. Working: reflecting (3, 4) in the line y = 1 keeps x = 3 and puts the image as far below the line as the point is above it: 4 is 3 units above y = 1, so the image is 3 units below, at 1 − 3 = −2 (the same as 2 × 1 − 4 = −2). The reflected point is (3, −2). Rotating (3, −2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1): subtracting the centre gives 3 − 1 = 2 and −2 − 1 = −3, the clockwise rule swaps and negates these to give −3 and −2, and adding the centre back gives 1 + (−3) = −2 and 1 + (−2) = −1. The final image is (−2, −1). Answer: (−2, −1). Reflect before you rotate, exactly as the design process is described, and rotate about the CENTRE (1, 1) given in the question rather than the origin: either mistake, or reversing the two steps, sends the tile to a different point.
- (a) No — the angle is not between the two sides — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides. Working: the 35° angle is marked away from the corner where the 40 cm and 65 cm edges meet, so it is not the included angle — this is SSA, which is not one of the four basic congruence conditions, so it does not guarantee congruence. Options: 'Yes — SAS' wrongly treats any two sides plus any angle as SAS, without checking the angle's position; 'Yes — SSS' wrongly counts the angle as if it were a third side; 'No — only two sides measured' is not the real reason, since SAS itself only needs two sides, so this reasoning is beside the point. Answer: no, the angle is not between the two sides.
- (a) 71° — Method: first use the straight line through T to find the tangent-chord angle RTC, then apply the alternate segment theorem, which states that this angle equals the angle subtended by the chord in the alternate segment. Working: the two rails form a straight line through T, so angle RTC = 180 − 109 = 71 degrees. D lies in the alternate segment of the chord TC, so angle TDC = angle RTC = 71°. Answer: 71°. Find angle RTC FIRST from the straight line before applying the theorem: using the given 109° directly, doubling the tangent-chord angle, or taking its complement from 90° all give the wrong angle at D.
- (b) 104 — Method: angles on a straight line add up to 180°. Working: 180° − 76° = 104°. A student who answers 76 has mistaken this for the vertically opposite angle, which is equal, rather than the adjacent angle on a straight line. A student who answers 90 has wrongly assumed the two paths must be perpendicular. A student who answers 14 has subtracted 76° from 90° instead of from 180°. Answer: 104°.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.