Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) Translation by the vector (0, 6) — Method: reflecting twice in two parallel horizontal lines is always equivalent to a single translation, at right angles to the lines, of twice the distance between them. Working: the two lines are 4 − 1 = 3 units apart, so the translation is 2 × 3 = 6 units in the positive y-direction. Answer: translation by the vector (0, 6). Using just the gap itself, without doubling it, gives (0, 3); translating in the negative y-direction, from the second line back towards the first, gives (0, −6); and describing the combination as a single reflection in the line halfway between them, y = 2.5, confuses this combination with the effect of a single reflection — two reflections in parallel lines are always equivalent to a translation, never to another reflection. Always double the gap between the lines, and translate in the direction from the first line towards the second.
- (b) 18.84 m² — The pond has radius 2.5 m (half of the 5 m diameter), so the outer edge of the path has radius 2.5 + 1 = 3.5 m. Path area = area of outer circle − area of pond = 3.14 × 3.5² − 3.14 × 2.5² = 38.465 − 19.625 = 18.84 m².
- (a) Kite — Method: check each named quadrilateral's properties against the three facts given, one at a time. Working: a kite has two pairs of adjacent sides equal (not opposite pairs), one pair of opposite angles equal (the two angles where an unequal pair of sides meet), and exactly one line of symmetry — matching all three facts. Options: a rhombus does have equal adjacent sides, but all four of its sides are equal, both pairs of its opposite angles are equal, and it has two lines of symmetry rather than exactly one; a parallelogram has its opposite sides equal rather than adjacent pairs, both pairs of opposite angles equal, and no line of symmetry at all; a trapezium does not generally have any pair of equal adjacent sides or a line of symmetry. Answer: kite.
- (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
- (c) Tangent-chord angle = angle in the alternate segment. — This diagram has a diameter AC, a centre O, and a cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, but no tangent anywhere in it. 'Angle in a semicircle = 90°' applies directly, because AC is a diameter. 'Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°' applies directly, because ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral. 'Angle at the centre = twice angle at circumference' applies directly, because O is given as the centre of the circle. The tangent-chord fact relates the angle between a tangent and a chord to an angle elsewhere in the circle, and since this diagram has no tangent, there is nothing in it for that fact to describe — so it is the one theorem that does not apply here.
- (c) Two angles and one side are known; x is another side — The sine rule needs a matching pair, a side and the angle opposite it, that you already know, so you can set up a ratio with the unknown. When two angles and one side are known, you can find the third angle from the angle sum, giving you an angle opposite the known side and an angle opposite x: the sine rule applies directly. When all three sides are known and x is an angle, there is no side-angle pair available at all, so the cosine rule, rearranged for an angle, is what's needed instead. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is the third side, again there is no matching side-angle pair yet, so the cosine rule finds the third side directly. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is one of the other angles, you still have no side-angle pair to start from — the cosine rule has to be used first, to find the third side, before any angle can be found. Only the two-angles-and-a-side case hands you a ready-made pair, which is exactly what the sine rule needs.
- (b) P, since OP = 5 and OQ = 6 — Using the distance formula, OP = √(3² + 4²) = √(9 + 16) = √25 = 5, and OQ = √(6² + 0²) = √36 = 6. Since 5 is less than 6, P is closer to the origin. Naming Q as closer, with OQ = 5 and OP = 6, has the two distances swapped around the wrong point. Naming P as closer but with OP = 6 and OQ = 5 also has the two values swapped, even though it names the right point. The distances are not equal, since 5 is not the same as 6, so P and Q are not equally distant from the origin.
- (b) 5 cm by 3 cm — The plan view looks straight down on the cuboid's footprint, so it shows the length (5 cm, left to right) and the depth (3 cm, front to back) — the two dimensions that do not involve height. "5 cm by 2 cm" repeats the front elevation's dimensions, pairing the length with the height instead of the depth. "3 cm by 2 cm" repeats the side elevation's dimensions, again pairing the depth with the height rather than with the length. "5 cm by 5 cm" comes from mistakenly assuming the plan must be a square, pairing the length with itself instead of with the depth.
- (d) (6, 2) — Applying the first vector: (2, 1) + (5, −3) = (7, −2), which is the warehouse. Applying the second vector: (7, −2) + (−1, 4) = (6, 2), the delivery address. '(7, −2)' stops at the warehouse and forgets the second flight. '(8, −6)' comes from adding (1, −4) instead of (−1, 4) for the second vector, getting both signs wrong. '(11, −3)' comes from swapping the components of the second vector to (4, −1) before adding.
- (c) 1/4 — A full turn at the centre of a circle is 360°, so a sector's fraction of the circle is its angle divided by 360°: 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4. 1/2 would be the fraction for a sector with an angle of 180°, not 90°. 3/4 is the fraction of the rest of the circle, the major sector left over from the 270° that is not part of this sector. 1/8 would be the fraction for a sector with an angle of 45°, half of 90°.
- (d) 6 — The plan view shows every square of the base footprint, whether or not there is a taller stack above it — the base layer alone already covers a 3 by 2 rectangle of cubes, which is 6 squares. The extra cube on top of a corner cube sits directly above a square that is already counted, so it adds no NEW square to the plan — height does not show up in a plan view, only footprint does. "7" comes from wrongly counting the extra cube as an additional square. "5" comes from missing one square of the base rectangle, perhaps forgetting a corner. "3" comes from counting only one row of the base rectangle and forgetting that the base is two rows deep.
- (b) Square — A square has all four sides equal, all four angles equal to 90°, and diagonals that are equal in length and bisect each other at right angles — every part of the description matches, so Square is correct. A rhombus has all four sides equal and diagonals bisecting at right angles, but its interior angles are not generally 90° (only a square, a special rhombus, has that), so it does not fully match. A rectangle has four 90° angles and equal diagonals, but its sides are not all equal in general, so it fails the equal-sides condition. A kite has two pairs of adjacent equal sides rather than all four sides equal, and its diagonals are not generally equal in length, so it fails both conditions.
- (b) 4 : 9 — The heights are in the ratio 4 : 6, which simplifies to 2 : 3. For similar solids, area scales with the square of the length ratio, so the surface area ratio is 2² : 3² = 4 : 9. 2 : 3 is just the simplified length ratio, before squaring has been done. 8 : 27 comes from cubing the ratio (2³ : 3³) instead of squaring it — that's the rule for volumes, not areas. 9 : 4 has the correct squared values but in the wrong order, giving the larger tin's area first instead of the smaller.
- (b) 360 cm² — Method: the total surface area is the square base plus the four triangular faces, and the height used for a triangular face is the slant height of 13 cm, not the vertical height of 12 cm. Working: the base is 10 × 10 = 100 cm²; one triangular face is (10 × 13) ÷ 2 = 65 cm², so four faces give 4 × 65 = 260 cm²; the total is 100 + 260 = 360. Answer: 360 cm². The distractors: 260 cm² comes from adding the four triangular faces and leaving out the base; 340 cm² comes from using the vertical height of 12 cm as the height of each triangle, 100 + 4 × 60; 620 cm² comes from working out each face as 10 × 13 without halving, 100 + 4 × 130.
- (d) £100.48 — Area of the rug = (angle ÷ 360) × π × r² = (180 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 16 = 0.5 × 50.24 = 25.12 m². Cost = 25.12 × £4 = £100.48. (£200.96 comes from finding the area of a full circle, 3.14 × 16 = 50.24 m², and forgetting the angle fraction before costing it; £25.12 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.5 × 3.14 × 4 = 6.28 m², and then costing that; £50.24 comes from using the arc length formula, 0.5 × 2 × 3.14 × 4 = 12.56, in place of the area, and costing that.)
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.