Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 43.8 km — Method: find the angle of the triangle at Q from the two bearings, then use the cosine rule on the two known sides and that included angle. Working: the bearing of P from Q is the back bearing of 040°, which is 040° + 180° = 220°, and the bearing of R from Q is 115°, so angle PQR = 220° − 115° = 105°. Then PR² = 24² + 31² − 2 × 24 × 31 × cos 105° = 576 + 961 − 1488 × (−0.25882) = 1537 + 385.12 = 1922.12, and the square root of 1922.12 is 43.842. Answer: PR = 43.8 km to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 33.9 km comes from subtracting the bearings, 115° − 040° = 75°, and using 75° as the angle at Q, which is the angle the ship turns through, not the angle inside the triangle; 19.9 km comes from using the first bearing itself, 040°, as the angle at Q; 55.0 km comes from adding the two legs, 24 + 31, which would be the distance only if the ship had sailed in a straight line.
- (a) 8,000,000 cm³ — Method: change the edge length into centimetres first and then cube it, because 1 m = 100 cm and a volume needs that conversion applied to all three dimensions. Working: 2 m = 2 × 100 = 200 cm, so the volume is 200 × 200 × 200. 200 × 200 = 40,000 and 40,000 × 200 = 8,000,000. Answer: 8,000,000 cm³. The distractors: 8,000 cm³ comes from converting 2 m to 20 cm and cubing that; 80,000 cm³ comes from cubing in metres to get 8 m³ and then multiplying by 10,000, the conversion factor for an area rather than the 1,000,000 a volume needs; 8 cm³ comes from cubing the 2 without converting at all and simply writing cm³ because the question asked for that unit.
- (a) 8.1 m — Multiply the length on the plan by the scale factor: 4.5 × 1.8 = 8.1, so the real length is 8.1 m. Choosing 6.3 m adds the two numbers instead of multiplying them (4.5 + 1.8 = 6.3). Choosing 2.5 m divides the plan length by the scale factor the wrong way round (4.5 ÷ 1.8 = 2.5) instead of multiplying. Choosing 9.0 m rounds the scale factor up to 2 before multiplying (4.5 × 2 = 9.0), losing the accuracy the 1.8 was giving.
- (d) 1 — An isosceles trapezium has one line of symmetry, running through the midpoints of the two parallel sides. 0 would be true for a scalene trapezium, whose non-parallel sides are unequal, but this trapezium's non-parallel sides are equal, so it is symmetrical. 2 is the number of lines of symmetry of a rectangle, not a trapezium. 4 comes from wrongly applying the 'number of sides equals number of lines of symmetry' rule, which only holds for REGULAR polygons — a trapezium is not regular.
- (a) Kite — Method: check each named quadrilateral's properties against the three facts given, one at a time. Working: a kite has two pairs of adjacent sides equal (not opposite pairs), one pair of opposite angles equal (the two angles where an unequal pair of sides meet), and exactly one line of symmetry — matching all three facts. Options: a rhombus does have equal adjacent sides, but all four of its sides are equal, both pairs of its opposite angles are equal, and it has two lines of symmetry rather than exactly one; a parallelogram has its opposite sides equal rather than adjacent pairs, both pairs of opposite angles equal, and no line of symmetry at all; a trapezium does not generally have any pair of equal adjacent sides or a line of symmetry. Answer: kite.
- (b) 4 : 9 — The heights are in the ratio 4 : 6, which simplifies to 2 : 3. For similar solids, area scales with the square of the length ratio, so the surface area ratio is 2² : 3² = 4 : 9. 2 : 3 is just the simplified length ratio, before squaring has been done. 8 : 27 comes from cubing the ratio (2³ : 3³) instead of squaring it — that's the rule for volumes, not areas. 9 : 4 has the correct squared values but in the wrong order, giving the larger tin's area first instead of the smaller.
- (a) (−2, 6) — Translating by the vector (−5, 4) means adding −5 to the x-coordinate and adding 4 to the y-coordinate: (3 + (−5), 2 + 4) = (−2, 6). (8, 6) comes from treating −5 as +5, adding instead of subtracting on the x-coordinate. (−2, −2) keeps the x-coordinate correct but subtracts 4 from the y-coordinate instead of adding it. (7, −3) comes from swapping the two components of the vector, applying 4 to the x-coordinate and −5 to the y-coordinate.
- (a) 90° clockwise about (0, 0) — Two reflections in lines through a common point compose to a single rotation about that point, through an angle equal to twice the angle between the two lines, in the direction from the first line to the second. The line y = x makes a 45° angle with the line y = 0, so the resulting rotation turns through 2 × 45° = 90°; testing the point (1, 0) — which reflects to (0, 1) in y = x, then to (0, −1) in y = 0 — shows the turn is clockwise, about the origin where the two lines cross. Taking the rotation anticlockwise instead reverses the direction the two reflections actually compose in. Using 45° directly, without doubling the angle between the lines, gives an angle equal to only half the true rotation. Treating any pair of reflecting lines as perpendicular, and so always giving a 180° rotation, ignores that these two lines actually meet at 45°, not 90°.
- (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
- (a) 245 m² — Method: for similar figures the ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths, so multiply the smaller area by the square of the length scale factor. Working: the length scale factor is 7 ÷ 3, so the area scale factor is 49 ÷ 9, and the larger area is 45 × 49 ÷ 9 = 5 × 49 = 245. Answer: 245 m². The distractors: 105 m² comes from multiplying by the length scale factor 7 ÷ 3 instead of by its square, the commonest slip on this topic; 315 m² comes from multiplying by 7 and forgetting to divide by 3; 405 m² comes from multiplying by 3² = 9, squaring the wrong part of the ratio.
- (c) 5 hours — The distance from the origin to (7, 24) is √(7² + 24²) = √(49 + 576) = √625 = 25 km. Travelling at 5 km per hour, the time taken is 25 ÷ 5 = 5 hours. 25 hours mistakes the distance itself for the time, forgetting to divide by the speed. 125 hours comes from multiplying the distance by the speed, 25 × 5, instead of dividing. 0.2 hours comes from dividing the speed by the distance, 5 ÷ 25, the wrong way round.
- (a) A rotation of 180° about the origin — Method: composing two reflections in lines that cross is always a single rotation about the point where the lines meet, through twice the angle between them. Working: the x-axis and y-axis meet at the origin at an angle of 90°, so the combined transformation is a rotation about the origin through 2 × 90 = 180 degrees. Answer: a rotation of 180° about the origin. The rotation angle is TWICE the angle between the mirror lines, not the angle itself, and the centre is always where the two lines cross, not some other point, and the result of two reflections in intersecting lines is a rotation, never another reflection.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (b) Parallel, since AB and DC are both horizontal lines — A and B both have y-coordinate 1, so AB is horizontal; D and C both have y-coordinate 4, so DC is horizontal too. Two horizontal lines are always parallel, so AB and DC are parallel. "Not parallel, since AB and DC have different lengths" is wrong twice over: AB runs from x = 1 to x = 5 and DC from x = 2 to x = 6, so both are in fact 4 units long, and in any case length has no bearing on whether two lines are parallel — only direction does. "Not parallel, since AB is horizontal and DC is vertical" misreads the coordinates of D and C, which share the y-coordinate 4 and so give a horizontal line, not a vertical one. "Parallel, since A and D have the same x-coordinate" rests on a false claim: A has x-coordinate 1 and D has x-coordinate 2, so they do not share an x-coordinate — and even if they did, it would say nothing about whether AB is parallel to DC.
- (a) 59.0° — Method: rearrange Area = (1/2)ab sin C to make sin C the subject: sin C = 2 × Area ÷ (a × b). Working: sin C = 2 × 24 ÷ (8 × 7) = 0.857, so C = sin⁻¹(0.857) = 59.0° (1 d.p.), which is acute as the question requires. Answer: 59.0°. Taking the obtuse angle instead of the acute one asked for, 180 − 59.0 = 121.0°; forgetting to double the area before dividing gives sin C = 24 ÷ (8 × 7) = 0.4286, whose acute angle is 25.4°; and combining that same forgotten-doubling error with the obtuse branch gives 180 − 25.4 = 154.6°. Always double the area first, and then pick the acute branch, since that is what this question asks for.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.