Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 31.4 cm — Circumference = π × diameter, so 3.14 × 10 = 31.4 cm. 15.7 cm comes from using the radius, 5 cm, in place of the diameter: 3.14 × 5 = 15.7, which is only half the circumference. 78.5 cm comes from using the area formula π × radius² instead of the circumference formula: 3.14 × 5² = 3.14 × 25 = 78.5. 62.8 cm comes from keeping the 2 from the radius form of the formula, C = 2 × π × radius, but putting the full diameter into it: 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8.
- (d) 240 cm² — Method: the area of a parallelogram is base × perpendicular height, and the perpendicular height is not the sloping side, so it must be found first from the right-angled triangle. Working: the sloping side is the hypotenuse, so the height squared is 13² − 5² = 169 − 25 = 144, giving a height of √144 = 12 cm; then 20 × 12 = 240. Answer: 240 cm². The distractors: 260 cm² comes from using the 13 cm sloping side as the height, 20 × 13, without going through the right-angled triangle at all; 120 cm² comes from finding the height of 12 cm correctly and then halving the product, (20 × 12) ÷ 2, which is the rule for a triangle and not for a parallelogram; 100 cm² comes from using the 5 cm along the base as the height, 20 × 5.
- (d) 30.2 cm² — Method: with two sides and the angle between them, use Area = (1/2)ab sin C. Working: Area = 1/2 × 9.4 × 7.2 × sin 63° = 30.2 cm² (1 d.p.). Answer: 30.2 cm². Leaving out the 1/2 altogether gives 60.3 cm²; using cos 63° instead of sin 63° gives 15.4 cm²; and squaring one side instead of multiplying the two different given sides together gives 39.4 cm². Always check you are using sin, not cos, and that the 1/2 is there before you multiply the two given sides together.
- (a) 3 cm² — Area scale factor = (linear scale factor)² = (1/4)² = 1/16. Area of T = 48 × 1/16 = 3 cm². (12 cm² comes from multiplying by the linear scale factor 1/4 directly, without squaring it; 24 cm² comes from taking the square root of the scale factor instead of squaring it; 768 cm² comes from squaring the reciprocal of the scale factor, 4, instead of the scale factor itself.)
- (b) 75.1 cm² — Method: a segment is a sector with its triangle cut away, so find the sector area and the triangle area (using Area = (1/2)r² sin C on the two radii) and subtract. Working: sector area = (130 ÷ 360) × π × 10² = 113.4 cm² (1 d.p.); triangle area = 1/2 × 10 × 10 × sin 130° = 38.3 cm² (1 d.p.); segment area = 113.4 − 38.3 = 75.1 cm². Answer: 75.1 cm². Reporting the sector area on its own, without subtracting the triangle, gives 113.4 cm²; reporting the triangle area on its own gives 38.3 cm²; and using the reflex angle, 360° − 130° = 230°, in the sector but still subtracting the triangle gives 162.4 cm², which is neither segment — the major segment would be the 230° sector PLUS the triangle, 239.0 cm². The minor segment is the smaller piece, cut off by the shorter arc, so use the angle actually given, 130°, and subtract the triangle from that sector.
- (a) 3 : 5 — Method: for similar figures the ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths, so the length ratio is found by taking the square root of each part of the area ratio. Working: the areas are in the ratio 36 : 100, and taking square roots gives √36 : √100 = 6 : 10, which cancels to 3 : 5. Answer: 3 : 5. The distractors: 9 : 25 is 36 : 100 in its simplest form, so it is still the ratio of the areas and the square roots were never taken; 5 : 3 takes the roots correctly but writes the parts the wrong way round, giving DEF to ABC when ABC to DEF was asked for; 25 : 9 makes both mistakes at once, leaving the area ratio and reversing it.
- (c) $12\sqrt{3}$ cm² — Use Area = 1/2 × AB × AC × sin(angle BAC) = 1/2 × 6 × 8 × sin 60°. Since sin 60° = √3⁄2, this is 1/2 × 6 × 8 × √3⁄2 = 24 × √3⁄2 = 12√3 cm². Using AB × AB instead of AB × AC (taking 6 × 6 rather than 6 × 8) gives 1/2 × 6 × 6 × sin 60° = 18 × √3⁄2 = 9√3 cm². Using AC × AC instead of AB × AC (taking 8 × 8 rather than 6 × 8) gives 1/2 × 8 × 8 × sin 60° = 32 × √3⁄2 = 16√3 cm². Leaving out the 1/2 from the area formula gives 6 × 8 × sin 60° = 48 × √3⁄2 = 24√3 cm².
- (a) Square-based pyramid — A solid with one square base and four triangular faces meeting at a single apex above the base is a square-based pyramid. A triangular prism has two triangular faces and three rectangular faces, not a square base with four triangles, so that is a different solid. A cube has six square faces, and a cuboid has six rectangular faces — neither has any triangular faces at all. The solid described is a square-based pyramid.
- (a) £157.00 — Area covered = (angle ÷ 360) × π × r² = (90 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 400 = 0.25 × 1256 = 314 km². Charge = 314 × £0.50 = £157.00. (£7.85 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.25 × 3.14 × 20 = 15.7 km² and then charging that; £628.00 comes from finding the area of a full circle, 3.14 × 400 = 1256 km², and forgetting the angle fraction before charging; £15.70 comes from using the arc length formula, 0.25 × 2 × 3.14 × 20 = 31.4, in place of the area, and charging that.)
- (b) 4 m — The two triangles are similar, so height ÷ shadow is the same for both objects. For the post, height ÷ shadow = 1.2 ÷ 1.8. Flagpole height = 6 × (1.2 ÷ 1.8) = 4 m. A student who multiplies the flagpole's shadow by the post's height without applying the ratio gets 6 × 1.2 = 7.2 m. A student who assumes a constant DIFFERENCE between shadow and height instead of a constant ratio finds the post's shadow minus height, 1.8 − 1.2 = 0.6 m, then subtracts that from the flagpole's shadow to get 6 − 0.6 = 5.4 m.
- (d) 16 — Method: use the scale to find the real length and width separately, then use the perimeter formula. Working: real length = 4 cm × 125 = 500 cm = 5 m; real width = 2.4 cm × 125 = 300 cm = 3 m; perimeter = 2 × (5 + 3) = 16 m. A student who answers 8 has added the real length and width but forgotten to double the total for the perimeter. A student who answers 1600 has correctly worked out the perimeter in centimetres but forgotten to convert it to metres. A student who answers 500 has only converted the length to real centimetres and stopped there, ignoring the width and the perimeter step. Answer: 16 m.
- (d) £48 — Scale factor = new width ÷ original width = 40 ÷ 10 = 4. Poster height = 15 × 4 = 60 cm. Cost = 60 × £0.80 = £48. (£12 comes from forgetting to scale the height at all, and pricing the original 15 cm height; £15.20 comes from adding the scale factor 4 to the height instead of multiplying by it; £3 comes from dividing the height by the scale factor instead of multiplying by it.)
- (b) 7.4 — Method: AB is opposite angle ACB and AC is opposite angle ABC, so the sine rule gives AB/sin(ACB) = AC/sin(ABC). Working: (2x + 1)/sin 48° = (3x − 2)/sin 72°; cross-multiplying and collecting the x terms gives x = 7.4. Using angle BAC = 180° − 72° − 48° = 60° in place of angle ABC in the ratio gives x = 4.7; ignoring the sine rule altogether and solving 2x + 1 = 3x − 2 as if the two sides were simply equal gives x = 3.0; and pairing each side with the wrong angle — AB with sin 72° and AC with sin 48° — gives x = 1.9. Each side in the sine rule must be paired with the sine of the angle directly opposite it.
- (c) They must also be equal — Once two triangles are proved congruent by any condition, including ASA, they are identical in every respect: every pair of corresponding sides and every pair of corresponding angles must be equal, not just the ones originally used to prove the congruence. So the two remaining pairs of corresponding sides must also be equal, making 'they must also be equal' correct. 'They might be equal or not' and 'not enough information to say' both wrongly suggest that congruence only guarantees the specific facts used to prove it, when congruence actually guarantees the triangles are identical overall. 'They must be different' is backwards: the triangles being identical is the entire point of proving congruence, not a reason for a side to differ.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.